Northern Dominus wrote:There's "lesser" and then there's negligently under-punished. Again, given what we know about psychological trauma, surely the sexual assault crimes should receive a revamp of some sort to reflect that, should they not?
No.
Advertisement

by Des-Bal » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:13 pm
Northern Dominus wrote:There's "lesser" and then there's negligently under-punished. Again, given what we know about psychological trauma, surely the sexual assault crimes should receive a revamp of some sort to reflect that, should they not?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by The Steel Magnolia » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:13 pm
Northern Skatchbrod wrote:Northern Dominus wrote:And what side did you get? His? Ever think he might have a bit of bias? Were you a prosecutor? Police officer? Medical professional? Linked at all to the case besides "at a party with this guy"?
And what if he did in fact rape that woman, what if "no" was uttered and he pressed on against her wishes? How do you know ANY of it beyond what this alleged victim of false reporting said?
I was next to him when he went in, and I've known him for his whole life. He's a law-abiding citizen. A weak and stuttering young guy. The woman was a local girl who's had sex with almost everyone in town.

by Northern Skatchbrod » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:14 pm

by Northern Dominus » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:15 pm
And just because you know him that does not automatically mean he's innocent and she's guilty. That's for a court of law and the justice system to prove, not your own judgement which does come with a hefty bias given your description.Northern Skatchbrod wrote:Northern Dominus wrote:And what side did you get? His? Ever think he might have a bit of bias? Were you a prosecutor? Police officer? Medical professional? Linked at all to the case besides "at a party with this guy"?
And what if he did in fact rape that woman, what if "no" was uttered and he pressed on against her wishes? How do you know ANY of it beyond what this alleged victim of false reporting said?
I was next to him when he went in, and I've known him for his whole life. He's a law-abiding citizen. A weak and stuttering young guy. The woman was a local girl who's had sex with almost everyone in town.

by Individuality-ness » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:15 pm

by Northern Skatchbrod » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:15 pm
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Northern Skatchbrod wrote:I was next to him when he went in, and I've known him for his whole life. He's a law-abiding citizen. A weak and stuttering young guy. The woman was a local girl who's had sex with almost everyone in town.
Ah, slut shaming. Because she`s had sex before, she couldn`t possibly have been raped!

by Northern Skatchbrod » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:15 pm

by Northern Skatchbrod » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:16 pm
Northern Dominus wrote:And just because you know him that does not automatically mean he's innocent and she's guilty. That's for a court of law and the justice system to prove, not your own judgement which does come with a hefty bias given your description.Northern Skatchbrod wrote:I was next to him when he went in, and I've known him for his whole life. He's a law-abiding citizen. A weak and stuttering young guy. The woman was a local girl who's had sex with almost everyone in town.
And again, as I keep saying, if what you said is true then it's still not the norm for reporting rape, and to allege that false reporting is the norm makes a person a spiritual accomplice to any rape thereafter.


by Individuality-ness » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:16 pm

by The Steel Magnolia » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:16 pm
Northern Skatchbrod wrote:The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Ah, slut shaming. Because she`s had sex before, she couldn`t possibly have been raped!
As I said, a law-abiding stuttering weak young boy, and a local slut who's had sex with everything with a cock in town. I can even bet the slut has more muscle than my buddy.

by Des-Bal » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:17 pm
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Northern Skatchbrod » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:17 pm

by Northern Skatchbrod » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:18 pm
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Northern Skatchbrod wrote:As I said, a law-abiding stuttering weak young boy, and a local slut who's had sex with everything with a cock in town. I can even bet the slut has more muscle than my buddy.
Funnily enough, you'll find that muscle mass is often irrelevant when it comes to rape.

by Stormdawn » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:18 pm

by Individuality-ness » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:18 pm

by Des-Bal » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:18 pm
Northern Dominus wrote:And just because you know him that does not automatically mean he's innocent and she's guilty. That's for a court of law and the justice system to prove, not your own judgement which does come with a hefty bias given your description.
And again, as I keep saying, if what you said is true then it's still not the norm for reporting rape, and to allege that false reporting is the norm makes a person a spiritual accomplice to any rape thereafter.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Ifreann » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:18 pm
Northern Skatchbrod wrote:Northern Dominus wrote:And what side did you get? His? Ever think he might have a bit of bias? Were you a prosecutor? Police officer? Medical professional? Linked at all to the case besides "at a party with this guy"?
And what if he did in fact rape that woman, what if "no" was uttered and he pressed on against her wishes? How do you know ANY of it beyond what this alleged victim of false reporting said?
I was next to him when he went in, and I've known him for his whole life. He's a law-abiding citizen. A weak and stuttering young guy. The woman was a local girl who's had sex with almost everyone in town.

by Des-Bal » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:19 pm
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Northern Skatchbrod » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:19 pm
Individuality-ness wrote:Northern Skatchbrod wrote:Along with an actual justice system than investigates if a rape had actually happen, the justice system should also be a lot stricter.
It does. That's why we have police who check out claims. If there was enough evidence to go to trial and land your friend in jail, then he probably did actually rape her; whether you think so or not is irrelevant.

by Northern Skatchbrod » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:20 pm
Ifreann wrote:Northern Skatchbrod wrote:I was next to him when he went in, and I've known him for his whole life. He's a law-abiding citizen. A weak and stuttering young guy. The woman was a local girl who's had sex with almost everyone in town.
Was this before or after you invented the lightbulb?
Come on, if you're going to bullshit us, at least make it amusing bullshit.

by Stormdawn » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:20 pm

by Northern Skatchbrod » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:21 pm

by Evraim » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:21 pm
Kromar wrote:When a woman says no, should a man instantly stop and back off? I think no, because doing so is unsexy and women like to be chased -- you aren't going to get laid very often if you stop at the first lick of resistance.
Kromar wrote:If a woman has enjoys forceful men, men who kiss her without her consent and don't let her go even if she is trying to forcefully push them off and get away, is it rape to force oneself upon her? And if it is rape, is it wrong? I know one such girl, she told me about one time when she was put in that situation and she ultimately gave in and began kissing back and she really really enjoyed the whole affair, in hindsight.
Kromar wrote:Why is it rape to have sex with a girl who is drunk?
Kromar wrote:Does it matter if you are also drunk?
Kromar wrote:While I understand it is kind-of rapey to get a girl drunk with this intention, its not as if alcohol mind controls women into becoming sex slaves, it only lowers their inhibitions. If one encounters an inebriated woman and seduces her, why is it fair for her to cry rape when she sobers up?

Kromar wrote:If a woman never actually says no, and merely implies lack of consent by not cooperating with the sex, covering herself up with blankets, and complaining that it hurts, but she previously DID consent verbally to having sex with you, and you disregard her obvious discomfort and continue using her for your own pleasure, are you a rapist?

by The Steel Magnolia » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:21 pm
Northern Skatchbrod wrote:Individuality-ness wrote:It does. That's why we have police who check out claims. If there was enough evidence to go to trial and land your friend in jail, then he probably did actually rape her; whether you think so or not is irrelevant.
How the fuck can they check whether or not she was raped in a noisy club?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bagiyagaram, Dazchan, Luziyca, Ostroeuropa, Ryemarch, Stellar Colonies, The republic of halizin, Umeria, Washington Resistance Army, Yokron pro-government partisans
Advertisement