NATION

PASSWORD

What is Rape?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Gravlen
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16625
Founded: Jul 01, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Gravlen » Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:50 am

Immoren wrote:
Gravlen wrote:Is the maximum possible penalty different between the two categories?


aggravated rape:2-10 years in prison
rape:1-6 years in prison
coercive sexual contact: up to 3 years in prison
coercive sexual act: Fines or up to 3 years in prison

Hmm... I understand your apprehension.
EnragedMaldivians wrote:That's preposterous. Gravlens's not a white nationalist; Gravlen's a penguin.

Unio de Sovetaj Socialismaj Respublikoj wrote:There is no use arguing the definition of murder with someone who has a picture of a penguin with a chainsaw as their nations flag.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:51 am

Gravlen wrote:Deal with it on its merits.

But I find it unlikely you'd ever see the situation arise. I don't believe there is such a thing as "mutual rape" outside of the realm of theory. You simply won't get two people who are not sufficiently intoxicated to be unable to carry out sexual acts while being sufficiently intoxicated to be unable to consent and, at the same time, is not sufficiently intoxicated to be able to understand that the other party is sufficiently intoxicated to be unable to consent.


This is where you I and the law are in agreement. I'm of the opinion that if a person is incapable of consent they are also incapable of fulfilling the mens rea requirement of the crime. That's apparently both very controversial and "clearly" being a rapist apologist.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:52 am

Gravlen wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
Bother were drunk enough to be incapable of giving consent and neither can understand what could have possibly motivated them to do such a thing.

So neither are actually claiming to be raped, nor are they accusing the other of rape?


The question wasn't necessarily about whether or not the case should go to court it was about whether or not one of them had been raped. Rapes happen even if they aren't appointed.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Oceania-Eurasia-Eastasia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 411
Founded: Feb 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Oceania-Eurasia-Eastasia » Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:57 am

"One common theme in history is that there was a pop quiz on Wednesdays."

OOC: American-Human married male, enjoys the separation of state and religion and seeks the separation of state and religion from everything else. MT / PMT RPer, but willing to try FT. I want a government small enough to overthrow with a vote.

IC: The Iron Heel + 1984 + Brave New World = 700 years worth of global dystopia to play with, er, as...

"Treat every question as if it were loaded. Never point a question at anyone or anything you don't intend to put a hole in."

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:01 am

Des-Bal wrote:
Condunum wrote:Nevermind if one has actually happened.

What do you DO in that case?


Pray to god that neither of them presses charges. Unless you're a lawyer in which case you pray to god that both of them press charges.

Oh god no. I'm pretty sure if I were a lawyer I would never want a case like that.

"Your rapist raped my rapist!"
"No, your rapist raped my rapist!"
password scrambled

User avatar
Blamuesia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Nov 14, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Blamuesia » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:01 am

What the actuall fuck?

User avatar
ThirdPrizeYoureFired
Envoy
 
Posts: 231
Founded: Mar 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby ThirdPrizeYoureFired » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:04 am

Kromar wrote:If a woman has enjoys forceful men, men who kiss her without her consent and don't let her go even if she is trying to forcefully push them off and get away, is it rape to force oneself upon her? and if it is rape is it wrong? I know one such girl, she told me about one time when she was put in that situation and she ultimately gave in and began kissing back and she really really enjoyed the whole affair, in hindsight.

I was in a very similar situation, and nearly a year later I'm still dealing with the trauma of my rape. There are days where I can't leave my flat, I still have panic attacks. It's cost me a lot of money in therapy (I've been forced to go private since I'm still waiting for a therapist). That person changed my life forever, and I've been in the fight of my life to get healthy again. I didn't just wake up, decide I regretted the sex, then decide the best way to deal with those feelings would be to have panic attacks and social anxiety.

So, the consequences of backing off when someone says "no" is some people might not get a chance to discover a kink of theirs and someone else doesn't get an orgasm. OR you really screw up someone's life. I'm sorry, but I don't understand why my feelings and my well being should be given less consideration in this case.

Another thing, all rapists aren't monsters. Mine wasn't. This was someone I was attracted to, danced with and kissed. I think it's possible my rapist wouldn't consider what they did to me to be rape. They might even tell you that I enjoyed it. What they think doesn't negate the damage they did to me.
Conscentia wrote:Those were no hobbits. They were goblins in disguise. You just sold NZ to Mordor.

User avatar
ThirdPrizeYoureFired
Envoy
 
Posts: 231
Founded: Mar 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby ThirdPrizeYoureFired » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:06 am

Des-Bal wrote:
Gravlen wrote:So neither are actually claiming to be raped, nor are they accusing the other of rape?


The question wasn't necessarily about whether or not the case should go to court it was about whether or not one of them had been raped. Rapes happen even if they aren't appointed.

But did both of them feel raped? That's the critical thing here.
Conscentia wrote:Those were no hobbits. They were goblins in disguise. You just sold NZ to Mordor.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:09 am

ThirdPrizeYoureFired wrote:But did both of them feel raped? That's the critical thing here.


Sure.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
ThirdPrizeYoureFired
Envoy
 
Posts: 231
Founded: Mar 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby ThirdPrizeYoureFired » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:20 am

Des-Bal wrote:
ThirdPrizeYoureFired wrote:But did both of them feel raped? That's the critical thing here.


Sure.

There you have it then. The emotional impact of rape is the deciding factor here. That's what people who survive rape have to live with and get past, and regardless of how the situation looks to those on the outside, how those people feel is what matters.

I do find it highly unlikely two people would walk away from a sexual encounter both feeling raped, based on my own experiences, but I won't go so far to say it's completely impossible. Sorry, I don't feel like explaining why I feel the way I do more than that.

To be clear, I am speaking on the non-legal level. I'll leave the legalities of such a scenario to someone with an actual law degree.
Conscentia wrote:Those were no hobbits. They were goblins in disguise. You just sold NZ to Mordor.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:25 am

ThirdPrizeYoureFired wrote:There you have it then. The emotional impact of rape is the deciding factor here. That's what people who survive rape have to live with and get past, and regardless of how the situation looks to those on the outside, how those people feel is what matters.

I do find it highly unlikely two people would walk away from a sexual encounter both feeling raped, based on my own experiences, but I won't go so far to say it's completely impossible. Sorry, I don't feel like explaining why I feel the way I do more than that.

To be clear, I am speaking on the non-legal level. I'll leave the legalities of such a scenario to someone with an actual law degree.


But that doesn't make sense. If someone can't consent how can they assess someone elses' ability to consent?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
ThirdPrizeYoureFired
Envoy
 
Posts: 231
Founded: Mar 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby ThirdPrizeYoureFired » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:37 am

Des-Bal wrote:
ThirdPrizeYoureFired wrote:There you have it then. The emotional impact of rape is the deciding factor here. That's what people who survive rape have to live with and get past, and regardless of how the situation looks to those on the outside, how those people feel is what matters.

I do find it highly unlikely two people would walk away from a sexual encounter both feeling raped, based on my own experiences, but I won't go so far to say it's completely impossible. Sorry, I don't feel like explaining why I feel the way I do more than that.

To be clear, I am speaking on the non-legal level. I'll leave the legalities of such a scenario to someone with an actual law degree.


But that doesn't make sense. If someone can't consent how can they assess someone elses' ability to consent?

I'm not talking about the legal definitions here, and I didn't think you were either. If you want to discuss legalities, I do have to politely bow out.

Let me do my best to explain my point of view, and fair warning, I might decide this is too much for me at any time and stop the dialogue (and I have to leave in 10 mins, so you might have to wait until tomorrow for an answer).

From the perspective of the victim, the problem isn't "I didn't give consent" the problem is, "this person keeps doing things to me that I'm not okay with." This goes beyond the general misread signals we've all had from time to time. It's... more. I've had sex I wasn't enthusiastic about. I've let a partner do things I'd rather they not have done. Those did not feel like the time I was raped. At all.

I have a hard time believing that two people are going to be feeling like, "oh god, oh god, when will this end" while at the same time continuing the assault on their partner who's thinking the same thing. IF such a scenario occurred, they are both going to be profoundly affected by that sex act and they need all the support and care any other rape victim deserves. I realize this seems like an absurd scenario, but if it were to occur, I'd hate to see these people denied all the resources necessary to recover.

I'll do my best to clarify, I know I'm being vague. This isn't the easiest thing to put into words. I also am not speaking for all rape victims. Others might have different feelings than me.
Last edited by ThirdPrizeYoureFired on Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Conscentia wrote:Those were no hobbits. They were goblins in disguise. You just sold NZ to Mordor.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:41 am

ThirdPrizeYoureFired wrote:I'm not talking about the legal definitions here, and I didn't think you were either. If you want to discuss legalities, I do have to politely bow out.

Let me do my best to explain my point of view, and fair warning, I might decide this is too much for me at any time and stop the dialogue (and I have to leave in 10 mins, so you might have to wait until tomorrow for an answer).

From the perspective of the victim, the problem isn't "I didn't give consent" the problem is, "this person keeps doing things to me that I'm not okay with." This goes beyond the general misread signals we've all had from time to time. It's... more. I've had sex I wasn't enthusiastic about. I've let a partner do things I'd rather they not have done. Those did not feel like the time I was raped. At all.

I have a hard time believing that two people are going to be feeling like, "oh god, oh god, when will this end" while at the same time continuing the assault on their partner who's thinking the same thing. IF such a scenario occurred, they are both going to be profoundly affected by that sex act and they need all the support and care any other rape victim deserves.

I'll do my best to clarify, I know I'm being vague. This isn't the easiest thing to put into words. I also am not speaking for all rape victims. Others might have different feelings than me.


So you're saying consent isn't the actual issue, it's the emotional state of the victim?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Northern Dominus
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14337
Founded: Aug 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Dominus » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:41 am

ThirdPrizeYoureFired wrote:
Kromar wrote:If a woman has enjoys forceful men, men who kiss her without her consent and don't let her go even if she is trying to forcefully push them off and get away, is it rape to force oneself upon her? and if it is rape is it wrong? I know one such girl, she told me about one time when she was put in that situation and she ultimately gave in and began kissing back and she really really enjoyed the whole affair, in hindsight.

I was in a very similar situation, and nearly a year later I'm still dealing with the trauma of my rape. There are days where I can't leave my flat, I still have panic attacks. It's cost me a lot of money in therapy (I've been forced to go private since I'm still waiting for a therapist). That person changed my life forever, and I've been in the fight of my life to get healthy again. I didn't just wake up, decide I regretted the sex, then decide the best way to deal with those feelings would be to have panic attacks and social anxiety.

So, the consequences of backing off when someone says "no" is some people might not get a chance to discover a kink of theirs and someone else doesn't get an orgasm. OR you really screw up someone's life. I'm sorry, but I don't understand why my feelings and my well being should be given less consideration in this case.

Another thing, all rapists aren't monsters. Mine wasn't. This was someone I was attracted to, danced with and kissed. I think it's possible my rapist wouldn't consider what they did to me to be rape. They might even tell you that I enjoyed it. What they think doesn't negate the damage they did to me.
Not to pry too much, but even after the therapy and the determination to get back to as normal as you can, does the memory still remain? Does the trauma of the event still have an affect on how you perceive men that are interested in a relationship with you beyond platonic frienship? Not in a PTSD break sort of deal, but just in the back of your mind, the whole "what if" scenario?

More importantly, did your rapist ever face justice or accountability for his crimes?
Battletech RP: Giant walking war machines, space to surface fighters, and other implements blowing things up= lots of fun! Sign up here
We even have a soundtrack!

RIP Caroll Shelby 1923-2012
Aurora, Oak Creek, Happy Valley, Sandy Hook. Just how high a price are we willing to pay?

User avatar
ThirdPrizeYoureFired
Envoy
 
Posts: 231
Founded: Mar 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby ThirdPrizeYoureFired » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:45 am

Des-Bal wrote:
ThirdPrizeYoureFired wrote:I'm not talking about the legal definitions here, and I didn't think you were either. If you want to discuss legalities, I do have to politely bow out.

Let me do my best to explain my point of view, and fair warning, I might decide this is too much for me at any time and stop the dialogue (and I have to leave in 10 mins, so you might have to wait until tomorrow for an answer).

From the perspective of the victim, the problem isn't "I didn't give consent" the problem is, "this person keeps doing things to me that I'm not okay with." This goes beyond the general misread signals we've all had from time to time. It's... more. I've had sex I wasn't enthusiastic about. I've let a partner do things I'd rather they not have done. Those did not feel like the time I was raped. At all.

I have a hard time believing that two people are going to be feeling like, "oh god, oh god, when will this end" while at the same time continuing the assault on their partner who's thinking the same thing. IF such a scenario occurred, they are both going to be profoundly affected by that sex act and they need all the support and care any other rape victim deserves.

I'll do my best to clarify, I know I'm being vague. This isn't the easiest thing to put into words. I also am not speaking for all rape victims. Others might have different feelings than me.


So you're saying consent isn't the actual issue, it's the emotional state of the victim?

From the perspective I'm coming from and if I understand what you're saying, then yes. Again, this has nothing to do with legal definitions, but how we react to victims. I think that's the far more important part.
Conscentia wrote:Those were no hobbits. They were goblins in disguise. You just sold NZ to Mordor.

User avatar
Cocsoah
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 499
Founded: Jun 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Cocsoah » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:50 am

Do you need to ask that question?
Oh, and you belong in jail... >:(
The United Republic of Cocsoah
    1) [ ] Nuclear War- WMD's introduced, civillians evacuated, all soldiers on standby.
    2) [ ] War- At war with another nation, or civil war.
    3) [ ] Highly Alert- Possibility of war, or war is imminent.
    4) [x] Peace- No ongoing conflicts.


Caracoran Civil-War: Draw
Greater Beggnigian Civil-War: Victory
Angulian Civil-War: Victory


The Republic of The New Anglain State of Derlyyyk

User avatar
ThirdPrizeYoureFired
Envoy
 
Posts: 231
Founded: Mar 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby ThirdPrizeYoureFired » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:52 am

Northern Dominus wrote:
ThirdPrizeYoureFired wrote:I was in a very similar situation, and nearly a year later I'm still dealing with the trauma of my rape. There are days where I can't leave my flat, I still have panic attacks. It's cost me a lot of money in therapy (I've been forced to go private since I'm still waiting for a therapist). That person changed my life forever, and I've been in the fight of my life to get healthy again. I didn't just wake up, decide I regretted the sex, then decide the best way to deal with those feelings would be to have panic attacks and social anxiety.

So, the consequences of backing off when someone says "no" is some people might not get a chance to discover a kink of theirs and someone else doesn't get an orgasm. OR you really screw up someone's life. I'm sorry, but I don't understand why my feelings and my well being should be given less consideration in this case.

Another thing, all rapists aren't monsters. Mine wasn't. This was someone I was attracted to, danced with and kissed. I think it's possible my rapist wouldn't consider what they did to me to be rape. They might even tell you that I enjoyed it. What they think doesn't negate the damage they did to me.
Not to pry too much, but even after the therapy and the determination to get back to as normal as you can, does the memory still remain? Does the trauma of the event still have an affect on how you perceive men that are interested in a relationship with you beyond platonic frienship? Not in a PTSD break sort of deal, but just in the back of your mind, the whole "what if" scenario?

More importantly, did your rapist ever face justice or accountability for his crimes?

Yeah, it still does and I still am affected. Just a few hours ago, someone groped me and instead of being annoyed I just felt the bottom fall out of my stomach. It definitely has altered my perception of others who violate my personal space. A lot of things that I wouldn't have even noticed before, really bother me now. Relationships are an interesting question, and I don't have an answer for that. I haven't dated since that happened, and in some ways, I feel like it's all new again. I don't know how I'll react. I know I'm a lot quicker to shut down potential romantic possibilities. I feel like I'm not ready, but if the right person came along I would be. If that makes sense? I'm probably rambling a bit. :blush:

Where my rape happened, it wouldn't have been considered rape. I also had too many other, much more important, things going on in my life. So even if it had, I wouldn't have reported it. I just couldn't face going through the hell of an investigation and trial at that point in my life.

And ask anything you want. I'm out of the safe space of the rape thread, I know what that means. I will tell you if I don't want to discuss something. Thanks for the discretion in asking though. It's appreciated. Anything else, I'll answer tomorrow, I promise.
Conscentia wrote:Those were no hobbits. They were goblins in disguise. You just sold NZ to Mordor.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:52 am

ThirdPrizeYoureFired wrote:From the perspective I'm coming from and if I understand what you're saying, then yes. Again, this has nothing to do with legal definitions, but how we react to victims. I think that's the far more important part.


Laws are fleeting, transitory things I'm more interested in what you consider to be right and wrong. Complications arise with the fact that if we have decoupled the ideas of consent and emotional state then it's possible for someone to commit rape without being aware of it and for an offender to forcibly have sex with another person fully intent on committing rape but for the victim to feel that they were not raped.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Greater soviet america
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Jan 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater soviet america » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:52 am

unwanted forced sexual intercourse

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:53 am

Greater soviet america wrote:unwanted forced sexual intercourse

It... Doesn't really even need to be forced.
password scrambled

User avatar
Asasia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1338
Founded: Aug 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Asasia » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:54 am

There is a very fine line between seduction and rape.
Asasia Homepage
Nationstates Tracker
Benomia wrote:
The Cosmos wrote:That's nice. You country will be nothing left but a deserted wasteland inhabited by a homosexual walrus.

You say that like it's a bad thing

I support thermonuclear warfare. Do you?
Economic Left/Right: -5.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.56

I am a Marxist-Leninist Communist

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:55 am

Condunum wrote:It... Doesn't really even need to be forced.


Or intercourse according to some people.
Asasia wrote:There is a very fine line between seduction and rape.

There really shouldn't be.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Oceania-Eurasia-Eastasia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 411
Founded: Feb 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Oceania-Eurasia-Eastasia » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:55 am

rape

1) n. the crime of sexual intercourse (with actual penetration of a woman's vagina with the man's penis) without consent and accomplished through force, threat of violence or intimidation (such as a threat to harm a woman's child, husband or boyfriend). What constitutes lack of consent usually includes saying "no" or being too drunk or drug-influenced for the woman to be able to either resist or consent, but a recent Pennsylvania case ruled that a woman must do more than say "no" on the bizarre theory that "no" does not always mean "don't," but a flirtatious come-on. "Date rape" involves rape by an acquaintance who refuses to stop when told to. Defense attorneys often argue that there had to be physical resistance, but the modern view is that fear of harm and the relative strengths of the man and the woman are obvious deterrents to a woman fighting back. Any sexual intercourse with a child is rape and in most states sexual relations even with consent involving a girl 14 to 18 (with some variation on ages in a few states) is "statutory rape," on the basis that the female is unable to give consent. 2) v. to have sexual intercourse with a female without her consent through force, violence, threat or intimidation, or with a girl under age. Technically, a woman can be charged with rape by assisting a man in the rape of another woman. Dissatisfied with the typical prosecution of rape cases (in which the defense humiliates the accuser, and prosecutors are unable or unwilling to protect the woman from such tactics), women have been suing for civil damages for the physical and emotional damage caused by the rape, although too often the perpetrator has no funds. Protection services for rape victims have been developed by both public and private agencies. On the other side of the coin, there is the concern of law enforcement and prosecutors that women whose advances have been rejected by a man, or who have been caught in the act of consensual sexual intercourse may falsely cry "rape."

See also: date rape statutory rape

http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=1718
"One common theme in history is that there was a pop quiz on Wednesdays."

OOC: American-Human married male, enjoys the separation of state and religion and seeks the separation of state and religion from everything else. MT / PMT RPer, but willing to try FT. I want a government small enough to overthrow with a vote.

IC: The Iron Heel + 1984 + Brave New World = 700 years worth of global dystopia to play with, er, as...

"Treat every question as if it were loaded. Never point a question at anyone or anything you don't intend to put a hole in."

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:56 am

Condunum wrote:
Greater soviet america wrote:unwanted forced sexual intercourse

It... Doesn't really even need to be forced.

It could be coerced, it could be extorted, it could be anything.

Also, you will still be raped if the rapist jams a dildo into your ass or if you were forced to give a girl oral or if a guy sticks his fingers into a girl's vagina, under the current FBI legal definition if I remember correctly.
Last edited by Individuality-ness on Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Northern Dominus
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14337
Founded: Aug 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Dominus » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:59 am

ThirdPrizeYoureFired wrote:
Northern Dominus wrote:Not to pry too much, but even after the therapy and the determination to get back to as normal as you can, does the memory still remain? Does the trauma of the event still have an affect on how you perceive men that are interested in a relationship with you beyond platonic frienship? Not in a PTSD break sort of deal, but just in the back of your mind, the whole "what if" scenario?

More importantly, did your rapist ever face justice or accountability for his crimes?

Yeah, it still does and I still am affected. Just a few hours ago, someone groped me and instead of being annoyed I just felt the bottom fall out of my stomach. It definitely has altered my perception of others who violate my personal space. A lot of things that I wouldn't have even noticed before, really bother me now. Relationships are an interesting question, and I don't have an answer for that. I haven't dated since that happened, and in some ways, I feel like it's all new again. I don't know how I'll react. I know I'm a lot quicker to shut down potential romantic possibilities. I feel like I'm not ready, but if the right person came along I would be. If that makes sense? I'm probably rambling a bit. :blush:

Where my rape happened, it wouldn't have been considered rape. I also had too many other, much more important, things going on in my life. So even if it had, I wouldn't have reported it. I just couldn't face going through the hell of an investigation and trial at that point in my life.

And ask anything you want. I'm out of the safe space of the rape thread, I know what that means. I will tell you if I don't want to discuss something. Thanks for the discretion in asking though. It's appreciated. Anything else, I'll answer tomorrow, I promise.
And that's the failing of our legal system and our society at large by trying to break things down into semantics. If somebody mentions that an act which is unwanted sexual contact is not rape because "it's not the legal definition", then by extension that's societal molestation of the victim after the fact.
In your cause, unfortunately the trauma is continuing because the asshole never answered for what he did. He might not be a "monster" in the Lifetime Movie sense, but something about him is most definitely malformed and unfit for modern society if he didn't feel guilty as hell about it afterwords at the very least.

You've hit it on the head: the law is lacking because it fails to recognize the trauma to the victim in all cases of sexual assault, and splitting hairs on the part of society only perpetuates it.

Asasia wrote:There is a very fine line between seduction and rape.
Not really. In fact there's a very big bold line punctuated by one big word:
No.
Battletech RP: Giant walking war machines, space to surface fighters, and other implements blowing things up= lots of fun! Sign up here
We even have a soundtrack!

RIP Caroll Shelby 1923-2012
Aurora, Oak Creek, Happy Valley, Sandy Hook. Just how high a price are we willing to pay?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Aguaria Major, Amenson, Armeattla, Bienenhalde, Champlania, El Lazaro, Elwher, Ermland-Prussia, Floofybit, Greater Miami Shores 3, Jabberwocky, Kashimura, Khardsland, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Necroghastia, Of Memers, Pizza Friday Forever91, Port Caverton, Rary, Raskana, Ryemarch, The Jamesian Republic, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Upper Nulis Ales

Advertisement

Remove ads