NATION

PASSWORD

What is Rape?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Pradja
Diplomat
 
Posts: 723
Founded: Mar 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Pradja » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:11 pm

The New World Oceania wrote:The real question is, where is the line drawn between rape, sexual harassment, and sexual assault? From what I've been taught in various government-funded health classes and lectures, sexual harassment classifies as unwanted sexual behavior (after the victim has asked the harasser to cease), whereas rape is any sex which is forced or given without consent.

I knew a friend once whom had been verbally raped, in which sexual acts were described in detail as they were pinned down. Assault and additional harassment, I take it, were also involved, though I don't think any of this could ultimately classify as "rape," since no intercourse was ever forced.

Aye no sex without consent = not rape, but eg sexual assault.
Sex without consent(the default position is no unless told otherwise)= rape.

Its really not that hard.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:11 pm

Des-Bal wrote:It's incredibly relevant I'm saying that unless they have expressed their desire not to be a participant they were not raped.


Samuraikoku wrote:Lack of consent. That it's directly "no" or unable to say "yes" or "no" is still lack of consent.

User avatar
Tiltjuice
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33978
Founded: Jan 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Tiltjuice » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:11 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Tiltjuice wrote:
Irrelevant. Either way, they can't express desire.

It's incredibly relevant I'm saying that unless they have expressed their desire not to be a participant they were not raped.


And since that's not possible, I conclude you have no interest in an intellectually honest discussion. Here's your smoke and mirrors.
Beauty is not in the face; beauty is a light in the heart. -Khalil Gibran
Cut red tape with the Red Book / Bureaucracy is a system - #ApplyTNI / Think globally, act locally
At fifteen, I set my heart on learning. At thirty, I was firmly established. At forty, I had no more doubts. At fifty, I knew the will of heaven. At sixty, I was ready to listen to it. At seventy, I could follow my heart's desire without transgressing what was right. ~Analects, 2:4
I wear teal, blue, pink, and red for Swith.
mumblemumblemumble

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:11 pm

Des-Bal wrote:Sure it does. There is a difference between "I didn't tell you to do this" and "I told you not to do this."


No, there really isn't.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:12 pm

Tiltjuice wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:It's incredibly relevant I'm saying that unless they have expressed their desire not to be a participant they were not raped.


And since that's not possible, I conclude you have no interest in an intellectually honest discussion. Here's your smoke and mirrors.


There is nothing intellectual about his dishonesty.

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:12 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Arglorand wrote:That's because anti-consent doesn't exist.


Sure it does. There is a difference between "I didn't tell you to do this" and "I told you not to do this."


That's really where you want to plant your flag? This is the argument you think is a winner?

Wow.
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:12 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Tiltjuice wrote:
Irrelevant. Either way, they can't express desire.

It's incredibly relevant I'm saying that unless they have expressed their desire not to be a participant they were not raped.

You know, in normal human civilization we've accepted that, informally, people who haven't consented to sex are automatically considered unwilling participants.

Otherwise we'd have to accept that unless you told me you didn't want me to hit you with my car, that I can use you as a hood ornament.

You know, because you haven't expressed your desire to not be a hood ornament.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:12 pm

Nadkor wrote:
So...what you're saying is that people have to actively opt out of having sex with every individual on the planet or they're fair game and it's not rape?

Sure if you divide the world into "rape " and "legal."


Rape apologist.


Still nope.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
The Truth and Light
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29396
Founded: Jan 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Truth and Light » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:12 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:Sure it does. There is a difference between "I didn't tell you to do this" and "I told you not to do this."


No, there really isn't.

"I mean, he put his penis inside me, but I wasn't awake to tell him not to, so I guess it wasn't rape...."


WHAT????

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:12 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Arglorand wrote:That's because anti-consent doesn't exist.


Sure it does. There is a difference between "I didn't tell you to do this" and "I told you not to do this."

...

I give up. I fucking give up.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Nadkor
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12114
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Nadkor » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:12 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Arglorand wrote:That's because anti-consent doesn't exist.


Sure it does. There is a difference between "I didn't tell you to do this" and "I told you not to do this."


That's all you've got?

Christ.
economic left/right: -7.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: -7.59
thekidswhopoptodaywillrocktomorrow

I think we need more post-coital and less post-rock
Feels like the build-up takes forever but you never get me off

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:13 pm

Des-Bal wrote:Still nope.


Sadly for you, yes.

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65244
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:13 pm

Guys what's going on this...

Des-Bal wrote:
Arglorand wrote:That's because anti-consent doesn't exist.


Sure it does. There is a difference between "I didn't tell you to do this" and "I told you not to do this."


*headdesk*
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:13 pm

Norstal wrote:...

I give up. I fucking give up.


Tag someone else! :p

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:14 pm

Neo Art wrote:
That's really where you want to plant your flag? This is the argument you think is a winner?

Wow.


Absolutely.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:14 pm

Nadkor wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:

In this case "expressed desire" refers to the expressed desire not to be a participant. There's not a good word for Anti-Consent.


So...what you're saying is that people have to actively opt out of having sex with every individual on the planet or they're fair game and it's not rape?

Rape apologist.


I think, like TED, you're assuming more than there is. I don't really blame you. I mean, we expect there to be at least a little nuance to his argument. His whole whine however seems entirely to consist of that he just doesn't like CALLING it rape.

No, really, I know that seems obscenely sophoric, completely juvenile, nonsensically petty, and generally too simplistic to ACTUALLY be his point, but I swear to god, it is.

It really is just that petty and insignificant.
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:14 pm

Des-Bal wrote:Absolutely.


It's not, and you should feel bad for arguing it.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:14 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:Sure it does. There is a difference between "I didn't tell you to do this" and "I told you not to do this."


No, there really isn't.

Killing someone illegally who didn't consent isn't murder. If they actively expressed they didn't consent however, it's murder.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Tiltjuice
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33978
Founded: Jan 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Tiltjuice » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:14 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:
Tiltjuice wrote:
And since that's not possible, I conclude you have no interest in an intellectually honest discussion. Here's your smoke and mirrors.


There is nothing intellectual about his dishonesty.


Yeah, I'm getting that...
Beauty is not in the face; beauty is a light in the heart. -Khalil Gibran
Cut red tape with the Red Book / Bureaucracy is a system - #ApplyTNI / Think globally, act locally
At fifteen, I set my heart on learning. At thirty, I was firmly established. At forty, I had no more doubts. At fifty, I knew the will of heaven. At sixty, I was ready to listen to it. At seventy, I could follow my heart's desire without transgressing what was right. ~Analects, 2:4
I wear teal, blue, pink, and red for Swith.
mumblemumblemumble

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:15 pm

Des-Bal wrote:It's incredibly relevant I'm saying that unless they have expressed their desire not to be a participant they were not raped.


Oh so silence is an admittance to sex now?!

Please, don't be so dense.

A woman has to tell you "Fuck me!" or get naked, open her legs, and invite you with a seductive gesture for you to do SHIT to her! Is that crystal clear or do I have to draw a picture with full pornographic detail about it?!
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Nadkor
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12114
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Nadkor » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:15 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Nadkor wrote:
So...what you're saying is that people have to actively opt out of having sex with every individual on the planet or they're fair game and it's not rape?

Sure if you divide the world into "rape " and "legal."


What does this even mean.

Do you think I consider all acts to either be rape or legal? That any illegal act is rape? What?

You're literally making no sense.
economic left/right: -7.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: -7.59
thekidswhopoptodaywillrocktomorrow

I think we need more post-coital and less post-rock
Feels like the build-up takes forever but you never get me off

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:15 pm

Mavorpen wrote:Killing someone illegally who didn't consent isn't murder. If they actively expressed they didn't consent however, it's murder.


You can kill me. I'll just respawn.

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:15 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Neo Art wrote:
That's really where you want to plant your flag? This is the argument you think is a winner?

Wow.


Absolutely.


I'm so sorry. Somewhere along the way, someone, most likely a teacher, or someone else responsible for explaing how to form complex arguments, failed you horribly.

I am so, so sorry for that.
Last edited by Neo Art on Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Nadkor
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12114
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Nadkor » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:16 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:A woman has to tell you "Fuck me!" or get naked, open her legs, and invite you with a seductive gesture for you to do SHIT to her! Is that crystal clear or do I have to draw a picture with full pornographic detail about it?!


Not to derail the thread, but have you ever had sex with a woman?
economic left/right: -7.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: -7.59
thekidswhopoptodaywillrocktomorrow

I think we need more post-coital and less post-rock
Feels like the build-up takes forever but you never get me off

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72165
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:16 pm

Nadkor wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:

In this case "expressed desire" refers to the expressed desire not to be a participant. There's not a good word for Anti-Consent.


So...what you're saying is that people have to actively opt out of having sex with every individual on the planet or they're fair game and it's not rape?

Rape apologist.

I believe the technical term would be some-heinous-crime-not-called-rape-but-really-like-it apologist.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Aguaria Major, Amenson, Armeattla, Bienenhalde, Champlania, El Lazaro, Elwher, Ermland-Prussia, Floofybit, Greater Miami Shores 3, Jabberwocky, Kashimura, Khardsland, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Necroghastia, Of Memers, Pizza Friday Forever91, Port Caverton, Rary, Raskana, Ryemarch, Upper Nulis Ales

Advertisement

Remove ads