NATION

PASSWORD

What is Rape?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Truth and Light
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29396
Founded: Jan 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Truth and Light » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:49 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Nadkor wrote:I wonder did Des-Bal once have sex with an unconscious girl (or guy, let's be open-minded about this) and is now desperately trying to convince himself that he's a rapist?

Would certainly explain a great many things.


And since you've run out of things to say you've actually started accusing me of being a rapist.

Potential rapist, probably will become one.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:49 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Nadkor wrote:I wonder did Des-Bal once have sex with an unconscious girl (or guy, let's be open-minded about this) and is now desperately trying to convince himself that he's a rapist?

Would certainly explain a great many things.


And since you've run out of things to say you've actually started accusing me of being a rapist.


When the only argument presented so far is "I say it's not rape", and when confronted with what rape is the only answer is "says you"...

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:49 pm

The Truth and Light wrote:I feel like my soul is dying. Help.

Begins CPR on your soul.

Applies Soul Glow.

Puts on Soul Survivor.

Keeps CPR going.

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:50 pm

The Truth and Light wrote:I feel like my soul is dying. Help.


It's not dying, really, unless it clearly expresses to you that it's dying.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Nadkor
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12114
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Nadkor » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:50 pm

Neo Art wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
So says you.


Really? This is what you're going for here? When your mind read this, and plumbed the depths of your intellectual capacity, scanned all that you know and believe, filtered through your vocabulary, and came up with an argument, the best, the very best it came up with was "says you"?

And this is something you admit to willingly? In public?


It's astonishing, isn't it?

I mean, if that's really the limits of Des-Bal's intellect then, perhaps, we should feel sorry for him? It must be difficult to navigate the world with such limited capacity.
economic left/right: -7.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: -7.59
thekidswhopoptodaywillrocktomorrow

I think we need more post-coital and less post-rock
Feels like the build-up takes forever but you never get me off

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:50 pm

Bottle wrote:
Neo Art wrote:
This might be a vaguely worth while point if we were, like, the first people to ever realize rape was "a thing" and were sitting down trying to describe it. But where we've gone completely off the rails is, that his argument LITERALLY IS that being "stabbed" is not "being raped" because the actions that constitute "being stabbed" do not meet the existant legal elements of "rape".

Therefore he was not raped as a matter of law, because rape has an explicitly defined legal definition and "stabbed" doesn't meet it.

OK, fine so far.

Except we've then gone one further. What he's trying to argue here is that rape when the victim is unconcious isn't actually rape because it doesn't meet the definition of rape, except for the fact that it does.

That's what rape is actually legally defined as. Don't believe me? Go ask the two guys who just got convicted of raping a girl for doing exactly that.

Well, in fairness, he's arguing that something is only rape if HE, personally, decides it is rape. I see no evidence that he thinks the law has much to do with it, beyond the notion that the law should be the means through which his personal opinion gets imposed on everyone.

I haven't yet seen him present any reason why any of us should agree to his system, or why anybody (other than rapists) would benefit from his system, but I'm sure he'll get right on that.


Because he's a guy on the internet, don't you understand how important that makes him?

He has a computer, and opinions about things! Clearly he and he alone shall lead us all
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:50 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Nadkor wrote:I wonder did Des-Bal once have sex with an unconscious girl (or guy, let's be open-minded about this) and is now desperately trying to convince himself that he's a rapist?

Would certainly explain a great many things.

Wait.
Wait wait wait.

You say Rape Apologists may often PROJECT?

....

Gif's gonna need to help clean up the cranial goo from my mind being blown.


^^^ :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: you sir are going on my sig as the best quote I have seen on NS BY FAR!
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32057
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:50 pm

Bottle wrote:Well, in fairness, he's arguing that something is only rape if HE, personally, decides it is rape. I see no evidence that he thinks the law has much to do with it, beyond the notion that the law should be the means through which his personal opinion gets imposed on everyone.

I haven't yet seen him present any reason why any of us should agree to his system, or why anybody (other than rapists) would benefit from his system, but I'm sure he'll get right on that.


I'm saying the legal definitions need to be changed. I'm not sure how exactly rapists benefit given that I just stated I wanted rape to be a capital crime.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:50 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Nadkor wrote:I wonder did Des-Bal once have sex with an unconscious girl (or guy, let's be open-minded about this) and is now desperately trying to convince himself that he's a rapist?

Would certainly explain a great many things.


And since you've run out of things to say you've actually started accusing me of being a rapist.

It's not rape, you said so yourself.

She/he was unconscious.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:51 pm

The Truth and Light wrote:I feel like my soul is dying. Help.


Get me a Dreadnought, we got a Battle-Brother wounded.

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:51 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:"Victims don't always want their attackers to face justice."[/size]


And? Don't come to me with this crap, please.

Rape is rape, non consentual sex is rape, no matter how you slice it is sick and wrong to have sex with someone without the consent of said person. Only cavemen used to do that and we're past that.

Victims don't always want their attackers to face justice, you may be right about that, but the matter is, being such a close person in many instances (people you know are more prone to commit rape rather than strangers) of course the victim may not want to report, and therefore it goes unreported, but it still doesn't make it right.

I know you aren't intentionally doing this, but please don't buy into the frame that victims who opt not to report are typically doing so because they "don't want their attackers to face justice."

A lot of us choose not to report because we 1) know that the odds of getting justice via reporting our assault are vanishingly small, and 2) know that the odds of us being subjected to shitty treatment are almost assured.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32057
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:51 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:It's not rape, you said so yourself.

She/he was unconscious.

I was talking from his perspective.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:52 pm

Des-Bal wrote:I'm saying the legal definitions need to be changed.


So you are downplaying rape.

And this in turn makes you a rape apologist.

Des-Bal wrote:I'm not sure how exactly rapists benefit given that I just stated I wanted rape to be a capital crime.


Do victims benefit in any way?

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:52 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Bottle wrote:Well, in fairness, he's arguing that something is only rape if HE, personally, decides it is rape. I see no evidence that he thinks the law has much to do with it, beyond the notion that the law should be the means through which his personal opinion gets imposed on everyone.

I haven't yet seen him present any reason why any of us should agree to his system, or why anybody (other than rapists) would benefit from his system, but I'm sure he'll get right on that.


I'm saying the legal definitions need to be changed. I'm not sure how exactly rapists benefit given that I just stated I wanted rape to be a capital crime.

Because by your definitions, unwanted sex would not be rape anymore. It would be just something that can go unpunished.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Lindenholt
Minister
 
Posts: 2071
Founded: Oct 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lindenholt » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:52 pm

Without listening to what y´all saying i will answer this question:

Rape is having sexual intercourse where at least one person does not want to have... sex. Thats rape.
For information: http://iiwiki.us/wiki/Lindenholt
Come to Sunalaya, you'll enjoy it! Sunalaya
This user supports a single state solution for Ventismar.

New Paris 2014, never forget
This user supports a seven state solution for Bograel-Joguestine.

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:52 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Bottle wrote:Well, in fairness, he's arguing that something is only rape if HE, personally, decides it is rape. I see no evidence that he thinks the law has much to do with it, beyond the notion that the law should be the means through which his personal opinion gets imposed on everyone.

I haven't yet seen him present any reason why any of us should agree to his system, or why anybody (other than rapists) would benefit from his system, but I'm sure he'll get right on that.


I'm saying the legal definitions need to be changed. I'm not sure how exactly rapists benefit given that I just stated I wanted rape to be a capital crime.


The people who benefit are those who attack and rape people who are asleep, people who are in comas and people who have been drugged, because their rape is reclassified, in your system, to a less severe crime.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:52 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:It's not rape, you said so yourself.

She/he was unconscious.

I was talking from his perspective.

Perspective doesn't matter, unless you actually don't think what you say you think.

You can't claim it isn't rape if they're unconscious, then accuse people of accusing you of rape WHEN THEY USE YOUR DEFINITION.

User avatar
Nadkor
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12114
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Nadkor » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:52 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Nadkor wrote:I wonder did Des-Bal once have sex with an unconscious girl (or guy, let's be open-minded about this) and is now desperately trying to convince himself that he's a rapist?

Would certainly explain a great many things.


And since you've run out of things to say you've actually started accusing me of being a rapist.


Wondering about the possibility is, with the arguments you've presented, the only reasonable thing to do.

And, no. I wouldn't accuse you of being a rapist. I wondered whether or not you had sex with an unconscious person. That, after all, isn't rape.

Right?
economic left/right: -7.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: -7.59
thekidswhopoptodaywillrocktomorrow

I think we need more post-coital and less post-rock
Feels like the build-up takes forever but you never get me off

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32057
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:53 pm

Norstal wrote:Because by your definitions, unwanted sex would not be rape anymore. It would be just something that can go unpunished.


That's only if you divide the world into "things that are rape" and "things that are legal."
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:53 pm

Lindenholt wrote:Without listening to what y´all saying i will answer this question:

Rape is having sexual intercourse where at least one person does not want to have... sex. Thats rape.

IF SHE DOESN'T SAY NO IT MEANS YES! LOLOLOLOL.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:53 pm

Des-Bal wrote:It is absolutely sick and wrong it shouldn't however be conflated with rape.

Who said right? You accused me of not understanding what stockholm syndrome was in a post where I paid general reference to it.


I know, but you still don't understand that Stockholm Syndrome affects people who doesn't want to report in many instances. It doesn't necessarily mean it is right as the victim is going to defend the attacker being in such a close bond, but nevertheless he must face the consequences of his actions.

And it should absolutely be conflated with rape, both ARE rape. There is no way you can separate the two without being a hypocrite.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
The Truth and Light
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29396
Founded: Jan 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Truth and Light » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:53 pm

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
The Truth and Light wrote:I feel like my soul is dying. Help.


It's not dying, really, unless it clearly expresses to you that it's dying.
Samuraikoku wrote:
The Truth and Light wrote:I feel like my soul is dying. Help.


Get me a Dreadnought, we got a Battle-Brother wounded.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:
The Truth and Light wrote:I feel like my soul is dying. Help.

Begins CPR on your soul.

Applies Soul Glow.

Puts on Soul Survivor.

Keeps CPR going.

Guys, there's still hope, right? I don't know if I can deal with such idiocy for the rest my life. I'm very aggressive and I might kill someone. :(

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:53 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Norstal wrote:Because by your definitions, unwanted sex would not be rape anymore. It would be just something that can go unpunished.


That's only if you divide the world into "things that are rape" and "things that are legal."

...What the hell do you call it then?
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:54 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Bottle wrote:Well, in fairness, he's arguing that something is only rape if HE, personally, decides it is rape. I see no evidence that he thinks the law has much to do with it, beyond the notion that the law should be the means through which his personal opinion gets imposed on everyone.

I haven't yet seen him present any reason why any of us should agree to his system, or why anybody (other than rapists) would benefit from his system, but I'm sure he'll get right on that.


I'm saying the legal definitions need to be changed. I'm not sure how exactly rapists benefit given that I just stated I wanted rape to be a capital crime.

Oh, right, sorry...it would only benefit the totally-not-rapists who fuck unconscious victims.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32057
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:54 pm

Nadkor wrote:
Wondering about the possibility is, with the arguments you've presented, the only reasonable thing to do.

And, no. I wouldn't accuse you of being a rapist. I wondered whether or not you had sex with an unconscious person. That, after all, isn't rape.

Right?

It shouldn't be, it's definitely a crime but it's not rape.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alcala-Cordel, Bovad, Corrian, Greater Eireann, Ivartixi, Restructured Russia, The Great Nevada Overlord, Theyra

Advertisement

Remove ads