NATION

PASSWORD

What is Rape?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:04 pm

Tiltjuice wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:But that means that they have to stand there waiting for the whole the "I do not consent to <x>" list to completely scroll up to figure out whether I'm okay with it or not!!! *flails*

I took one look at this and thought 'O(n)...but it could be improved by using a dynamic array and contains()'...further proof that algorithms and data structures have eaten my brain. >.>

:lol2:
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:05 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:I did not say that. I said the opposite. I have specified that I never said that. I cannot make it any clearer that I am not saying that. You're being willfully ignorant and you're trying to use me as a surrogate for someone else you disagree with.

Des-Bal wrote:Yes. I'm saying that the absence of consent is not sufficient, there must be an expressed desire.

That isn't saying or implying that they default to yes. I'm saying that the absence of consent isn't what makes it rape.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:05 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:Dude, you're arguing that you didn't say things that we have quotes for you saying. They've been provided.


No.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:05 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:A person is drugged and someone forces sexual intercourse while she was unconscious. Is this rape?


No.


You mentioned when you first posted this idea that "the evidence" had changed your mind.

Can we please see the evidence that it's not rape if you don't say no because you can't?
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:05 pm

Bottle wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
I mean, clearly, if you weren't screaming, you weren't rape. Obviously.

And what kind of careless whore lets herself sleep? Back when I were a lad, people had more self-respect and stayed awake 24/7 to ensure that they were definitely being raped when they were attacked rather than not-raped-because-they-didn't-say-no-because-they-were-asleep-and-consequently-couldn't-say-no.

I wonder if my assault will qualify? I mean, I was conscious, but I was not physically fighting off the ROTC-trained fellow assaulting me. I protested, but I didn't scream, or even raise my voice much. I was mostly shocked and frozen, as a person I thought was my friend (who I had invited into my place) pinned me down and overpowered me.

Maybe mine qualifies as a sorta-rape? Well, regardless, I'm sure Des-Bal will tell me how traumatized I was, thank heavens! I certainly wouldn't know, and would have no way of communicating my thoughts on the subject, without someone like him around to tell it like it is!

Bottle, as a member of the member-having portion of humanity, and as recognition to your decades of glorious service to the member-having portion of humanity, I am willing to upgrade it to a Demi-Rape.

Sign here please.

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:06 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Dude, you're arguing that you didn't say things that we have quotes for you saying. They've been provided.


No.

Wow. What a great argument. It's almost as if you realize that you're wrong and just won't admit it.

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:06 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:

That isn't saying or implying that they default to yes. I'm saying that the absence of consent isn't what makes it rape.

Yes it does imply that you think the default is yes. Be intellectually honest for once.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:07 pm

Ifreann wrote:Calling certain rapes something other than rape does not mean that they aren't rapes. There's some 60+ pages of argument that any sex without consent is rape. Do you have anything to counter that beyond what amounts to "Nuh-uh"?


I don't really need one given that those 60+ pages are
1. Filled with people who have similar or more radical ideas of what constitutes rape than I do.
2. Substantiated by no more than the assertion "Yuh-huh"
3. Really not relevant.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:08 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:That isn't saying or implying that they default to yes. I'm saying that the absence of consent isn't what makes it rape.

Yes it does imply that you think the default is yes. Be intellectually honest for once.


No it doesn't. Intercourse in the absence of consent is clearly a crime it is not however rape.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:08 pm

Des-Bal wrote:2. Substantiated by no more than the assertion "Yuh-huh"


Dear God, the irony.

Des-Bal wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Yes it does imply that you think the default is yes. Be intellectually honest for once.


No it doesn't. Intercourse in the absence of consent is clearly a crime it is not however rape.


[citation needed]

Can we see the sources that you said convinced you, please?
Last edited by Of the Free Socialist Territories on Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:09 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Bottle wrote:I wonder if my assault will qualify? I mean, I was conscious, but I was not physically fighting off the ROTC-trained fellow assaulting me. I protested, but I didn't scream, or even raise my voice much. I was mostly shocked and frozen, as a person I thought was my friend (who I had invited into my place) pinned me down and overpowered me.

Maybe mine qualifies as a sorta-rape? Well, regardless, I'm sure Des-Bal will tell me how traumatized I was, thank heavens! I certainly wouldn't know, and would have no way of communicating my thoughts on the subject, without someone like him around to tell it like it is!

Bottle, as a member of the member-having portion of humanity, and as recognition to your decades of glorious service to the member-having portion of humanity, I am willing to upgrade it to a Demi-Rape.

Sign here please.

Hmm, does this mean I'm entitled to only half the amount of criticism of my personal choices and sex life to which most rape victims are subjected? Because I wouldn't want to miss out on any of that. I mean, that's most of the reason we womenfolks get ourselves raped, after all...the great attention that one enjoys as a rape victim!
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:10 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Yes it does imply that you think the default is yes. Be intellectually honest for once.


No it doesn't. Intercourse in the absence of consent is clearly a crime it is not however rape.


Except...it is.

I mean, for the most part, that's pretty definitionally exactly what it is.

Really, pretty damned spot on actually.
Last edited by Neo Art on Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:10 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:Wow. What a great argument. It's almost as if you realize that you're wrong and just won't admit it.


I don't need to argue about what I said or meant as I was there when I said them and intimately familiar with what I was communicating. You've taken one quote out of context and made a series of wild assed assumptions to get to a place that I was never going. Further you've ignored the fact that I've clarified what I was saying repeatedly.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:11 pm

Bottle wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Bottle, as a member of the member-having portion of humanity, and as recognition to your decades of glorious service to the member-having portion of humanity, I am willing to upgrade it to a Demi-Rape.

Sign here please.

Hmm, does this mean I'm entitled to only half the amount of criticism of my personal choices and sex life to which most rape victims are subjected? Because I wouldn't want to miss out on any of that. I mean, that's most of the reason we womenfolks get ourselves raped, after all...the great attention that one enjoys as a rape victim!


I mean, normally you'd be entitled to a discount, but we'll give you the full treatment, given that you're such a good customer.
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
EnragedMaldivians
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8450
Founded: Feb 01, 2010
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby EnragedMaldivians » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:12 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Really? So the fear and pain that someone experiences with non-consensual sexual conduct suddenly not being "actual rape" because they were asleep, isn't marginalizing?

Now you're being dishonest.


I'm saying the fear and pain they've experienced is not comparable to the fear and pain experienced in actual rape. I'm saying it's a lesser crime.


Even if the underlined were true (ignoring the term "actual rape") it would be irrelevant.

As Neo Art frequently points out, being punched on the nose may not be as bad as having your leg broken by someone else, but both fall under assault.

Sex with another person without their consent is rape, regardless of the degree of trauma experienced by the victim. There is no reason to not call that rape. And having someone betray your trust or violate you like that in your sleep is not something that should be trivialised or treated as a lesser offence than what it actually is. What it actually is...is, again, rape.

Edit..

Oh speak of the devil and...it's Batman.
Last edited by EnragedMaldivians on Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Taking a break.

User avatar
Yugoslavia-
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 20
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Yugoslavia- » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:12 pm

A thread on rape?
What is this? :palm:
Press Bureau of the Executive Council
Federal Assembly of The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia-
Притисните Биро Извршног већа
Савезна скупштина Савезне Републике Југославије

Member-State and Minister of Foreign Affairs of Slavya
Looking for a region in which your voice will be heard? Join us Today!

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:13 pm

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:2. Substantiated by no more than the assertion "Yuh-huh"


Dear God, the irony.

Des-Bal wrote:
No it doesn't. Intercourse in the absence of consent is clearly a crime it is not however rape.


[citation needed]

Can we see the sources that you said convinced you, please?


No because I can't find them. They were made by a rape victim explaining her position on intoxication by saying that the absence of consent wasn't the issue it was the assault and it's continuation against the victims wishes that made rape heinous. I wrote that off at first but I eventually came to agree.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:13 pm

Neo Art wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:No it doesn't. Intercourse in the absence of consent is clearly a crime it is not however rape.

Except...it is.

I mean, for the most part, that's pretty definitionally exactly what it is.

Really, pretty damned spot on actually.

You're a lawyer, right Neo? For Des's sake:

If you're drugged or asleep or mentally disabled or unconscious or whatever, can that person legally give consent? And if someone initiates sexual activity on said person, is that legally rape?

Edited for grammar (what is wrong with grammar and me today?).
Last edited by Individuality-ness on Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:13 pm

Neo Art wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
No it doesn't. Intercourse in the absence of consent is clearly a crime it is not however rape.


Except...it is.

I mean, for the most part, that's pretty definitionally exactly what it is.

Really, pretty damned spot on actually.


Couldn't have said it better :lol2:
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:14 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:You're a lawyer, right Neo? For Des's sake:

If you're drugged or asleep or mentally disabled or unconscious or whatever, can that person legally give consent? And if someone initiates sexual activity said person, is that legally rape?


Given that I'm arguing the law needs to changed it stands to reason I'm aware of what it currently says.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159055
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:14 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:

That isn't saying or implying that they default to yes. I'm saying that the absence of consent isn't what makes it rape.

Indeed you are saying that. And you saying it makes it so since...when, exactly?


Des-Bal wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Calling certain rapes something other than rape does not mean that they aren't rapes. There's some 60+ pages of argument that any sex without consent is rape. Do you have anything to counter that beyond what amounts to "Nuh-uh"?


I don't really need one given that those 60+ pages are
1. Filled with people who have similar or more radical ideas of what constitutes rape than I do.
2. Substantiated by no more than the assertion "Yuh-huh"
3. Really not relevant.

So do you have any argument at all for why sex without consent isn't rape sometimes?

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:15 pm

Des-Bal wrote:...it was the assault and it's continuation against the victims wishes that made rape heinous.


And this makes having sex with an unconscious person not rape because...
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159055
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:16 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:You're a lawyer, right Neo? For Des's sake:

If you're drugged or asleep or mentally disabled or unconscious or whatever, can that person legally give consent? And if someone initiates sexual activity said person, is that legally rape?


Given that I'm arguing the law needs to changed it stands to reason I'm aware of what it currently says.

That does not stand to reason at all, and that you think it does only makes it more likely that you do not know what the law currently says.


Yugoslavia- wrote:A thread on rape?
What is this? :palm:

A thread on rape.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:16 pm

EnragedMaldivians wrote:
Even if the underlined were true (ignoring the term "actual rape") it would be irrelevant.

As Neo Art frequently points out, being punched on the nose may not be as bad as having your leg broken by someone else, but both fall under assault.

Sex with another person without their consent is rape, regardless of the degree of trauma experienced by the victim. There is no reason to not call that rape. And having someone betray your trust or violate you like that in your sleep is not something that should be trivialised or treated as a lesser offence than what it actually is. What it actually is...is, again, rape.

Edit..

Oh speak of the devil and...it's Batman.


Assault, aggravated assault, attempted murder- all different crimes differentiated by the elements of the case.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:17 pm

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:And this makes having sex with an unconscious person not rape because...


Because the absence of consent isn't what matters, it is again the assault occurring and continuing in direct opposition to the victims expressed wishes.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: The peoples commune

Advertisement

Remove ads