NATION

PASSWORD

What is Rape?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:55 am

Individuality-ness wrote:So drug-assisted rape isn't rape then? What happened to the girl in the Steubenville case wasn't really raped?


No. That case was actually what prompted me to come back here after my change of heart. You see I had a discussion in class and witnessed several people voice complaints about the media coverage only to back off when their opinions proved to be unpopular. All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing or words to that effect so I decided that I'm not going to fight every battle rather then let people be wrong.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:55 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:So drug-assisted rape isn't rape then? What happened to the girl in the Steubenville case wasn't really raped?


But we're not marginalising people by denying that they've been raped, okay? :roll:

Of course not. The people who marginalize rape are those who recognize the intersections between rape culture and bullying culture, and work to combat both.

Really, we all should be thanking Des-Bal for ensuring that rape won't be marginalized by the insufficiently-horrible experiences of certain rape victims.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159055
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:56 am

Des-Bal wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Really? So the fear and pain that someone experiences with non-consensual sexual conduct suddenly not being "actual rape" because they were asleep, isn't marginalizing?

Now you're being dishonest.


I'm saying the fear and pain they've experienced is not comparable to the fear and pain experienced in actual rape. I'm saying it's a lesser crime.

You're saying you want it to be a lesser crime, actually. You'll recall that you don't actually run any real countries.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:56 am

Bottle wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
But we're not marginalising people by denying that they've been raped, okay? :roll:

Of course not. The people who marginalize rape are those who recognize the intersections between rape culture and bullying culture, and work to combat both.

Really, we all should be thanking Des-Bal for ensuring that rape won't be marginalized by the insufficiently-horrible experiences of certain rape victims.

Remember kids, not all lynches are crimes.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:57 am

Bottle wrote:Of course not. The people who marginalize rape are those who recognize the intersections between rape culture and bullying culture, and work to combat both.

Really, we all should be thanking Des-Bal for ensuring that rape won't be marginalized by the insufficiently-horrible experiences of certain rape victims.


A man gets stabbed in a parking lot, has he been raped? No. There's nothing marginalizing about calling things what they are.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:57 am

Bottle wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
But we're not marginalising people by denying that they've been raped, okay? :roll:

Of course not. The people who marginalize rape are those who recognize the intersections between rape culture and bullying culture, and work to combat both.

Really, we all should be thanking Des-Bal for ensuring that rape won't be marginalized by the insufficiently-horrible experiences of certain rape victims.


I mean, clearly, if you weren't screaming, you weren't rape. Obviously.

And what kind of careless whore lets herself sleep? Back when I were a lad, people had more self-respect and stayed awake 24/7 to ensure that they were definitely being raped when they were attacked rather than not-raped-because-they-didn't-say-no-because-they-were-asleep-and-consequently-couldn't-say-no.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:58 am

Des-Bal wrote:
Bottle wrote:Of course not. The people who marginalize rape are those who recognize the intersections between rape culture and bullying culture, and work to combat both.

Really, we all should be thanking Des-Bal for ensuring that rape won't be marginalized by the insufficiently-horrible experiences of certain rape victims.


A man gets stabbed in a parking lot, has he been raped? No. There's nothing marginalizing about calling things what they are.

An apple walks into a bar and asks for orange juice. He receives apple juice. IS THIS RAPE!?!?!?!111111one!!?!?!
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:58 am

Des-Bal wrote:
Bottle wrote:Of course not. The people who marginalize rape are those who recognize the intersections between rape culture and bullying culture, and work to combat both.

Really, we all should be thanking Des-Bal for ensuring that rape won't be marginalized by the insufficiently-horrible experiences of certain rape victims.

A man gets stabbed in a parking lot, has he been raped? No. There's nothing marginalizing about calling things what they are.

Total non sequitur.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:58 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:I mean, clearly, if you weren't screaming, you weren't rape. Obviously.

And what kind of careless whore lets herself sleep? Back when I were a lad, people had more self-respect and stayed awake 24/7 to ensure that they were definitely being raped when they were attacked rather than not-raped-because-they-didn't-say-no-because-they-were-asleep-and-consequently-couldn't-say-no.


There you go arguing with people that aren't me again.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:59 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Bottle wrote:Of course not. The people who marginalize rape are those who recognize the intersections between rape culture and bullying culture, and work to combat both.

Really, we all should be thanking Des-Bal for ensuring that rape won't be marginalized by the insufficiently-horrible experiences of certain rape victims.

I mean, clearly, if you weren't screaming, you weren't rape. Obviously.

And what kind of careless whore lets herself sleep? Back when I were a lad, people had more self-respect and stayed awake 24/7 to ensure that they were definitely being raped when they were attacked rather than not-raped-because-they-didn't-say-no-because-they-were-asleep-and-consequently-couldn't-say-no.

Does that mean that the new anti-whore agent is meth? WHOOT!
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:59 am

Individuality-ness wrote:
Bottle wrote:Ah, but Semantic Dude to the rescue!

He merely said that "absence of consent" isn't enough, you have to "express desire" that you...anti-consent? One assumes?

I'm guessing this falls under the same precedent as the idea that one can safely assume that another person wants to be murdered unless they actively assert that they DO NOT want to be murdered. Which is not to say you are assuming that another person consented to be murdered, you just naturally concluded that they didn't not consent.

Damn it, do I have to go get a new sign up now? >:(

I'd recommend some sort of portable LED marquee, just to be safe, since you'll need to have a scrolling list of every one of your specific desires.

You'll also want it to be easily updated since, for example, there may be times when you consent to being hugged, or certain persons who you consent to hug, but you will have to quickly enable the "I do not consent to be hugged" element once a person you'd prefer not to hug comes within visual range.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:59 am

Individuality-ness wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:A man gets stabbed in a parking lot, has he been raped? No. There's nothing marginalizing about calling things what they are.

Total non sequitur.


I'm saying that no rape happened in either case. The fact that the crime does not follow the offense was the point of my statement.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:59 am

Des-Bal wrote:
Bottle wrote:Of course not. The people who marginalize rape are those who recognize the intersections between rape culture and bullying culture, and work to combat both.

Really, we all should be thanking Des-Bal for ensuring that rape won't be marginalized by the insufficiently-horrible experiences of certain rape victims.


A man gets stabbed in a parking lot, has he been raped? No. There's nothing marginalizing about calling things what they are.


Which is why we call things that are rape rape.

Inserting an object into someone's vagina or anus without their consent is rape.

Marginalisation is when you say that people who have been raped haven't been raped because of your ridiculous notion that not not giving consent is actually giving consent.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:00 pm

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:Which is why we call things that are rape rape.

Inserting an object into someone's vagina or anus without their consent is rape.

Marginalisation is when you say that people who have been raped haven't been raped because of your ridiculous notion that not not giving consent is actually giving consent.

I did not say that. I said the opposite. I have specified that I never said that. I cannot make it any clearer that I am not saying that. You're being willfully ignorant and you're trying to use me as a surrogate for someone else you disagree with.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:01 pm

Bottle wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Damn it, do I have to go get a new sign up now? >:(

I'd recommend some sort of portable LED marquee, just to be safe, since you'll need to have a scrolling list of every one of your specific desires.

You'll also want it to be easily updated since, for example, there may be times when you consent to being hugged, or certain persons who you consent to hug, but you will have to quickly enable the "I do not consent to be hugged" element once a person you'd prefer not to hug comes within visual range.

But that means that they have to stand there waiting for the whole the "I do not consent to <x>" list to completely scroll up to figure out whether I'm okay with it or not!!! *flails*
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:02 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
Bottle wrote:I'd recommend some sort of portable LED marquee, just to be safe, since you'll need to have a scrolling list of every one of your specific desires.

You'll also want it to be easily updated since, for example, there may be times when you consent to being hugged, or certain persons who you consent to hug, but you will have to quickly enable the "I do not consent to be hugged" element once a person you'd prefer not to hug comes within visual range.

But that means that they have to stand there waiting for the whole the "I do not consent to <x>" list to completely scroll up to figure out whether I'm okay with it or not!!! *flails*

I want one of those little people who carry around the large horns to carry around a scroll and announce to the individual who wants to have intercourse to me if I consent or not.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:02 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Total non sequitur.

I'm saying that no rape happened in either case. The fact that the crime does not follow the offense was the point of my statement.

A person is drugged and someone forces sexual intercourse while she was unconscious. Is this rape?
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:03 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:Which is why we call things that are rape rape.

Inserting an object into someone's vagina or anus without their consent is rape.

Marginalisation is when you say that people who have been raped haven't been raped because of your ridiculous notion that not not giving consent is actually giving consent.

I did not say that. I said the opposite. I have specified that I never said that. I cannot make it any clearer that I am not saying that. You're being willfully ignorant and you're trying to use me as a surrogate for someone else you disagree with.

Des-Bal wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:So you're saying that having penetrative sex with someone while they're asleep and therefore by definition cannot consent is not rape.

I weep for humanity.

Yes. I'm saying that the absence of consent is not sufficient, there must be an expressed desire.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:03 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:A person is drugged and someone forces sexual intercourse while she was unconscious. Is this rape?


No.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Tiltjuice
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33978
Founded: Jan 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Tiltjuice » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:04 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
Bottle wrote:I'd recommend some sort of portable LED marquee, just to be safe, since you'll need to have a scrolling list of every one of your specific desires.

You'll also want it to be easily updated since, for example, there may be times when you consent to being hugged, or certain persons who you consent to hug, but you will have to quickly enable the "I do not consent to be hugged" element once a person you'd prefer not to hug comes within visual range.

But that means that they have to stand there waiting for the whole the "I do not consent to <x>" list to completely scroll up to figure out whether I'm okay with it or not!!! *flails*


I took one look at this and thought 'O(n)...but it could be improved by using a dynamic array and contains()'...further proof that algorithms and data structures have eaten my brain. >.>
Beauty is not in the face; beauty is a light in the heart. -Khalil Gibran
Cut red tape with the Red Book / Bureaucracy is a system - #ApplyTNI / Think globally, act locally
At fifteen, I set my heart on learning. At thirty, I was firmly established. At forty, I had no more doubts. At fifty, I knew the will of heaven. At sixty, I was ready to listen to it. At seventy, I could follow my heart's desire without transgressing what was right. ~Analects, 2:4
I wear teal, blue, pink, and red for Swith.
mumblemumblemumble

User avatar
Tiltjuice
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33978
Founded: Jan 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Tiltjuice » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:04 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:A person is drugged and someone forces sexual intercourse while she was unconscious. Is this rape?


No.


What.
Beauty is not in the face; beauty is a light in the heart. -Khalil Gibran
Cut red tape with the Red Book / Bureaucracy is a system - #ApplyTNI / Think globally, act locally
At fifteen, I set my heart on learning. At thirty, I was firmly established. At forty, I had no more doubts. At fifty, I knew the will of heaven. At sixty, I was ready to listen to it. At seventy, I could follow my heart's desire without transgressing what was right. ~Analects, 2:4
I wear teal, blue, pink, and red for Swith.
mumblemumblemumble

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:04 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:A person is drugged and someone forces sexual intercourse while she was unconscious. Is this rape?

No.

Why not?
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:04 pm

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Bottle wrote:Of course not. The people who marginalize rape are those who recognize the intersections between rape culture and bullying culture, and work to combat both.

Really, we all should be thanking Des-Bal for ensuring that rape won't be marginalized by the insufficiently-horrible experiences of certain rape victims.


I mean, clearly, if you weren't screaming, you weren't rape. Obviously.

And what kind of careless whore lets herself sleep? Back when I were a lad, people had more self-respect and stayed awake 24/7 to ensure that they were definitely being raped when they were attacked rather than not-raped-because-they-didn't-say-no-because-they-were-asleep-and-consequently-couldn't-say-no.

I wonder if my assault will qualify? I mean, I was conscious, but I was not physically fighting off the ROTC-trained fellow assaulting me. I protested, but I didn't scream, or even raise my voice much. I was mostly shocked and frozen, as a person I thought was my friend (who I had invited into my place) pinned me down and overpowered me.

Maybe mine qualifies as a sorta-rape? Well, regardless, I'm sure Des-Bal will tell me how traumatized I was, thank heavens! I certainly wouldn't know, and would have no way of communicating my thoughts on the subject, without someone like him around to tell it like it is!

EDIT: Just to be clear, Des-Bal, the above is sarcasm. I realized that someone who struggles with the notion of "consent" probably also has trouble with other normal forms of human communication, so I will make my desires explicit for you. I'm actually not remotely interested in your opinions on the subject of my assault, and I would strongly suggest that you shove any such insights up an orifice that you do not expressly desire to have things shoved in.
Last edited by Bottle on Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:07 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159055
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:04 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Bottle wrote:Of course not. The people who marginalize rape are those who recognize the intersections between rape culture and bullying culture, and work to combat both.

Really, we all should be thanking Des-Bal for ensuring that rape won't be marginalized by the insufficiently-horrible experiences of certain rape victims.


A man gets stabbed in a parking lot, has he been raped? No. There's nothing marginalizing about calling things what they are.

Calling certain rapes something other than rape does not mean that they aren't rapes. There's some 60+ pages of argument that any sex without consent is rape. Do you have anything to counter that beyond what amounts to "Nuh-uh"?

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:04 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:Which is why we call things that are rape rape.

Inserting an object into someone's vagina or anus without their consent is rape.

Marginalisation is when you say that people who have been raped haven't been raped because of your ridiculous notion that not not giving consent is actually giving consent.

I did not say that. I said the opposite. I have specified that I never said that. I cannot make it any clearer that I am not saying that. You're being willfully ignorant and you're trying to use me as a surrogate for someone else you disagree with.

Dude, you're arguing that you didn't say things that we have quotes for you saying. They've been provided.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: The peoples commune

Advertisement

Remove ads