Choronzon wrote:I think TJ has "discussing the implications of his ideas" confused with "strawman."
Yes means no, black means white, up means down....
We're hitting Rod Serling territory here.
Advertisement

by The Emerald Dawn » Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:25 am
Choronzon wrote:I think TJ has "discussing the implications of his ideas" confused with "strawman."

by Terruana » Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:28 am

by Northern Dominus » Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:30 am
Really? Cause I could have sworn I saw the exit sign for Rod Serling City awhile ago and the exit for Calvinball Central coming up.

by The Truth and Light » Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:39 am

by The Emerald Dawn » Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:41 am
The Truth and Light wrote:Choronzon wrote:Considering some of TJ's other positions on rape I would be not at all surprised if he thought yes meant no.
Considering his posts the last week or so, it seems pretty clear that his positions on almost anything can be predicted to be whatever goes against "Sacred Feminist Dogma", as he puts it.

by Choronzon » Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:42 am
The Truth and Light wrote:Choronzon wrote:Considering some of TJ's other positions on rape I would be not at all surprised if he thought yes meant no.
Considering his posts the last week or so, it seems pretty clear that his positions on almost anything can be predicted to be whatever goes against "Sacred Feminist Dogma", as he puts it.

by The Truth and Light » Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:45 am
Choronzon wrote:The Truth and Light wrote:Considering his posts the last week or so, it seems pretty clear that his positions on almost anything can be predicted to be whatever goes against "Sacred Feminist Dogma", as he puts it.
Sacred Feminist Dogma exists. I am an Archdaecon within the church. There is even a whole subsect of dogma named after me.

by Choronzon » Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:46 am
The Truth and Light wrote:Choronzon wrote:Sacred Feminist Dogma exists. I am an Archdaecon within the church. There is even a whole subsect of dogma named after me.
Are you also aware that Dom a vehement proponent of rape culture and that Bottle is in charge of the man-killing sect? I'm also a chronic amnesiac, according to him. He seems to know us all so well, it's uncanny.

by Northern Dominus » Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:49 am
And they can never know of the headquarters in the City of London, y'know the one that uses the cover of being a Guild of...Choronzon wrote:The Truth and Light wrote:Are you also aware that Dom a vehement proponent of rape culture and that Bottle is in charge of the man-killing sect? I'm also a chronic amnesiac, according to him. He seems to know us all so well, it's uncanny.
Membership is secret. The plebs cannot know our names or our true purpose. It makes manipulation and forming shadow governments easier. Stop naming names.

by Choronzon » Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:50 am
Northern Dominus wrote:And they can never know of the headquarters in the City of London, y'know the one that uses the cover of being a Guild of...Choronzon wrote:Membership is secret. The plebs cannot know our names or our true purpose. It makes manipulation and forming shadow governments easier. Stop naming names.
...goddammit, I gate it away didn't I?

by Northern Dominus » Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:59 am
Hey, you're the one that was whining on and on about how membership is down and how new blood is needed, but when I start to get walk-ins for the curious all of a sudden its all hands on deck, end of the society and the ways of mutually consenting BSDM and whatnot...Choronzon wrote:Northern Dominus wrote:And they can never know of the headquarters in the City of London, y'know the one that uses the cover of being a Guild of...
...goddammit, I gate it away didn't I?
Fuck, now we have to pack up and move again. Nice going, dude.
Does nobody get the core concept behind a secret society?!

by Choronzon » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:02 am
Northern Dominus wrote:Hey, you're the one that was whining on and on about how membership is down and how new blood is needed, but when I start to get walk-ins for the curious all of a sudden its all hands on deck, end of the society and the ways of mutually consenting BSDM and whatnot...Choronzon wrote:Fuck, now we have to pack up and move again. Nice going, dude.
Does nobody get the core concept behind a secret society?!
...at the very least can we avoid moving everything back to the Vatican? I mean yeah, the porn collection was astounding but it'l be hell coming up with a new disguise, I mean the Pope Benedict one can't really be used now can it?

by Special Containment Procedures » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:02 am
Oooghka wrote:What is rape? Baby don't hurt me. Don't hurt me, no more.
That actually got pretty dark.

by Northern Dominus » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:13 am
... I CLAIM THESE INTERNETS FOR ROGER'S PARK!....goddammit where did I put that flag on a pole...Choronzon wrote:Northern Dominus wrote:Hey, you're the one that was whining on and on about how membership is down and how new blood is needed, but when I start to get walk-ins for the curious all of a sudden its all hands on deck, end of the society and the ways of mutually consenting BSDM and whatnot...
...at the very least can we avoid moving everything back to the Vatican? I mean yeah, the porn collection was astounding but it'l be hell coming up with a new disguise, I mean the Pope Benedict one can't really be used now can it?
There is nothing I can say that will top this response.
Bravo.

by The Emerald Dawn » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:13 am

by Individuality-ness » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:17 am
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I'm looking around, and I'm noticing something that may be a trend.
Increased anti-bullying messaging, but still nothing about sexual assault, even though sexual assault could easily be seen as bullying when happening between members of a young peer group.

by Neo Art » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:18 am

by Des-Bal » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:20 am
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Individuality-ness » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:20 am
Neo Art wrote:Choronzon wrote:Considering some of TJ's other positions on rape I would be not at all surprised if he thought yes meant no.
Nah, TJ's positions on rape are pretty unambiguous. Yes means yes. "maybe" means yes. Not saying anything at all means yes. Not actively resisting means yes.
Actively resisting while screaming "no" does, in fact, mean no.
And should you say no, then you should feel guilty for being such a filthy filthy whore who lead a man on by doing things like "talking to him" and "looking at him" and "being around him" without being willing to reward him for tolerating your horrid, boring existence with the only thing about your entire existence that matters. I hope you're happy, you filthy filthy whore.

by The Emerald Dawn » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:21 am
Individuality-ness wrote:The Emerald Dawn wrote:I'm looking around, and I'm noticing something that may be a trend.
Increased anti-bullying messaging, but still nothing about sexual assault, even though sexual assault could easily be seen as bullying when happening between members of a young peer group.
Where are you seeing this?

by Northern Dominus » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:22 am
On top of that, because data exists that some rapists were incited to rape because of the way their victims were dressed therefore the correlation is universal IE "they were asking for it".... even though the abboration isn't the woman but the rapist. Oh no, she dared to go out and expose a little cleavage or wear a skirt that has a hem further than 2 inches above the knee, therefore it's her fault.Neo Art wrote:Choronzon wrote:Considering some of TJ's other positions on rape I would be not at all surprised if he thought yes meant no.
Nah, TJ's positions on rape are pretty unambiguous. Yes means yes. "maybe" means yes. Not saying anything at all means yes. Not actively resisting means yes.
Actively resisting while screaming "no" does, in fact, mean no.
And should you say no, then you should feel guilty for being such a filthy filthy whore who lead a man on by doing things like "talking to him" and "looking at him" and "being around him" without being willing to reward him for tolerating your horrid, boring existence with the only thing about your entire existence that matters. I hope you're happy, you filthy filthy whore.

by Individuality-ness » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:22 am

by The Emerald Dawn » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:23 am
Northern Dominus wrote:On top of that, because data exists that some rapists were incited to rape because of the way their victims were dressed therefore the correlation is universal IE "they were asking for it".... even though the abboration isn't the woman but the rapist. Oh no, she dared to go out and expose a little cleavage or wear a skirt that has a hem further than 2 inches above the knee, therefore it's her fault.Neo Art wrote:
Nah, TJ's positions on rape are pretty unambiguous. Yes means yes. "maybe" means yes. Not saying anything at all means yes. Not actively resisting means yes.
Actively resisting while screaming "no" does, in fact, mean no.
And should you say no, then you should feel guilty for being such a filthy filthy whore who lead a man on by doing things like "talking to him" and "looking at him" and "being around him" without being willing to reward him for tolerating your horrid, boring existence with the only thing about your entire existence that matters. I hope you're happy, you filthy filthy whore.

by The Emerald Dawn » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:25 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Bienenhalde, Cannot think of a name, Des-Bal, Dimetrodon Empire, Eahland, Grinning Dragon, Kanaia, Notanam, Port Caverton, Stellar Colonies, The Pirateariat, Umeria, Washington Resistance Army, Washington-Columbia
Advertisement