NATION

PASSWORD

Men need to be trained to not rape.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:19 pm

Free Council Communes wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:And? How the fuck does declaring something a Women's Rights issue prevent men from rallying against it as well? Unless women are legislating that men cannot defend themselves from rape, you're making the shittiest argument ever.

But women can defend themselves from rape! It would be sexist to think that women are weak and defenseless.

Women can prevent rape by not raping people.
Men can prevent rape by not raping people.
Third gender people can prevent rape by not raping people.
Agender people can prevent rape by not raping people.

OK, we've established our roles to play in this drama. Now get to it.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:19 pm

Free Council Communes wrote:But women can defend themselves from rape! It would be sexist to think that women are weak and defenseless.

Are you even attempting to read my post? Quote me saying women cannot defend themselves.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:20 pm

Free Council Communes wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:And? How the fuck does declaring something a Women's Rights issue prevent men from rallying against it as well? Unless women are legislating that men cannot defend themselves from rape, you're making the shittiest argument ever.

But women can defend themselves from rape! It would be sexist to think that women are weak and defenseless.

And it would be victim-blaming to suggest that women who do not defend themselves (whether they are unable to or whatever) are consenting to the rape.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Nailed to the Perch
Minister
 
Posts: 2137
Founded: Dec 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nailed to the Perch » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:20 pm

Free Council Communes wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Yes. Why is this hard to grasp?

Then why don't I see feminists whining about muggery?
An issue should matter of it effects people, regardless of sex.


Um...because robbers don't disproportionately target women?

I mean, are you kidding us here?

Robbery matters. It is not particularly a "women's rights issue" because it is not a particularly gendered crime (to the best of my knowledge).

Rape also matters. It is also a women's rights issue, because it is a particularly gendered crime.

Similarly, both burglary and lynching matter, but only one of them was specifically a civil rights issue. This isn't freaking rocket science.
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:20 pm

Free Council Communes wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Yes. Why is this hard to grasp?

Then why don't I see feminists whining about muggery?
An issue should matter of it effects people, regardless of sex.


Because (and please, do us the favor to TRY to get this through your thick skull) feminism is a movement that concerns itself with the causes and effects of prejudice and oppression against women. To such a movement, crimes such a stealing are irrelevant to the core goal and ideals of feminism, unless there is a factor related to social and cultural preconceptions that promote the victimhood of women.
Much in the same way that LGBT rights has no ideological responsibility towards the issues terrorism or pollution, feminism has no ideological responsibility towards mugging or rape in general, only in the cases where prejudice against women is a major factor.

¿Entendió, mi querido?
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:20 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Which one?

'Most rape victims are women'. In light of both the overwhelmingly male prison system, similar social stigma against men coming out as having been raped (Although with separate justifications), and the aforementioned only recently changed definition of rape (Originally it was "the carnal knowledge of a female, forcibly and against her will."), it would seem to me that asserting that one sex is raped more than the other is not necessarily helpful and possibly untrue.


Except that prison rape is a completely distinct issue, and has a very different set of solutions than combating rape in the rest of society, a completely separate environment. It seems dishonest, to me, to conflate prison reform and societal reform in regards to rape..

User avatar
Nailed to the Perch
Minister
 
Posts: 2137
Founded: Dec 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nailed to the Perch » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:23 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
Nadkor wrote:I'm pretty sure my photo is floating around here somewhere. Best to just be sure he knows where I stand, just in case.

In that case, might as well say that I hereby revoke consent to having sex with Free Council Communes. I have higher standards.


I'm going to third this. Consent officially revoked, as of now. And since he doesn't know what I look like, he'd probably better play it safe and just assume anyone he meets COULD be me and not have sex with them until he has confirmed that they never explicitly revoked their consent.
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

User avatar
Zweite Alaje
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9551
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zweite Alaje » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:23 pm

Free Council Communes wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:And? How the fuck does declaring something a Women's Rights issue prevent men from rallying against it as well? Unless women are legislating that men cannot defend themselves from rape, you're making the shittiest argument ever.

But women can defend themselves from rape! It would be sexist to think that women are weak and defenseless.

Sometimes the feminists can have double standards, I at least agree with you on that. To some of them men are the evil monsters just waiting for an opportunity to rape, but women are strong!!!
Geist über Körper, durch Aktionen Ehrung
Likes: Corporatism, Market Socialism, Syndicalism, Progressivism, Pantheism, Gaia Hypothesis, Centrism, Dirigisme

Dislikes: Capitalism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Abortion, Modern Feminism
I've been: Communist , Fascist
Economic Left/Right: -7.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.18

NIFP
Please don't call me Zweite, Al or Ally is fine. Add 2548 posts, founded Oct 06, 2011

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:24 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:Except that prison rape is a completely distinct issue, and has a very different set of solutions than combating rape in the rest of society, a completely separate environment. It seems dishonest, to me, to conflate prison reform and societal reform in regards to rape..

The conversation stemmed from a post about the number of male and female victims of rape rather than the OP.

However, I would say that prison rape stems from the same lax attitudes about rape found in some parts of society as in non-prison environments, and that fighting such attitudes here would very likely reduce the incidence of rape in prisons as well.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:24 pm

Free Council Communes wrote:
Liriena wrote:If women were being robbed due to ignorant preconceptions from the culprits regarding the worth of women and their supposed social and cultural role?

YES

But women aren't being raped due to ignorant perceptions from rapists.

Actually, they are. Educate yourself for us.

That is a bourgeois lie used to demonize working men and cause infighting against the proletariat!

Don't use socialist concepts as arguments for your own misogynistic bullshit. Socialism and feminism have gone hand in hand for countless years, and I'm not going to let an ignorant, pedantic, misogynistic brat to pervert the meaning of the works of Marx and his successors.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159066
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:25 pm

Free Council Communes wrote:
Liriena wrote:If women were being robbed due to ignorant preconceptions from the culprits regarding the worth of women and their supposed social and cultural role?

YES

But women aren't being raped due to ignorant perceptions from rapists. That is a bourgeois lie used to demonize working men and cause infighting against the proletariat!

You're saying that when you hear "rapists" you assume that it's working men who are being talked about? You're the one doing the demonising here, boss.


Nadkor wrote:
Free Council Communes wrote:But women aren't being raped due to ignorant perceptions from rapists. That is a bourgeois lie used to demonize working men and cause infighting against the proletariat!


Was...was that a shark you just jumped?

A bourgeois shark that's fed on the blood of the working man!


Nadkor wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Since this Free Council Communes chap got it into his head that he can assume that every man and woman on Earth wants to fuck him until proven otherwise.


You know, on the off chance that I ever met Free Council Communes without realising it and in the interests of avoiding being raped by him let me make something clear:

Free Council Communes, I do not give you consent to have sex with me.

Good thinking.

I, too, do not give you consent to have sex with me, Free Council Communes.


Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Free Council Communes wrote:But women aren't being raped due to ignorant perceptions from rapists. That is a bourgeois lie used to demonize working men and cause infighting against the proletariat!


Er, yes they are. Women are being raped because some rapists are ignorant of what rape is or constitutes.

Where's that Neo Art post. damn it?

Here's me quoting him quoting it. But don't quote that one, quotes only nest three deep.

User avatar
Free Council Communes
Diplomat
 
Posts: 955
Founded: Feb 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Council Communes » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:25 pm

Saint Jade IV wrote:The very idea that a woman can "lead a man on" through her behaviour, dress, or actions. If she consents to a blowjob, she's not consenting to anything else.

Actually a women can lead a man on, it has happened to me. I thought she loved me but she was just using me; I has led to me attempting to commit suicide twice and I have developed depression. So yes, that does happen, a lot. I'm not suggesting that those women deserve to be raped, but it isn't rape unless consent was clearly withdrawn.
Last edited by Free Council Communes on Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
DEATH TO FASCISM, FREEDOM TO THE PEOPLE!
Left Communist, Anti-Establishmentarian Populist, New Atheist, Ethical Egotist & Satanic Hedonist
Supporter of the PKK & the DHKP/C
Economic Left/Right:Economic Left/Right: -10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: Economic Left/Right: -7.44
For: LGBTQ/Kink Rights, Anarchism, Libertinism, Internet Privacy & Piracy, Guns, Socialist Feminism, Republicanism, Beppe Grillo, Men's Rights
Against: Conformism, Conservatism, Morality, Copyrights, Capitalism, Radical Feminism, USA, China, Russia, DPRK, EU, Turkey, NATO, UN

User avatar
Freelanderness
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10526
Founded: Feb 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Freelanderness » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:26 pm

Saint Jade IV wrote:
Free Council Communes wrote:I dare you to give an example of one cultural phenomena promoting rape.


There's plenty.

For one, Ms Maxwell was threatened with rape over her comments. The irony in that is that she was making those comments as a victim of the very crime she was now being threatened with again.

The constant background hum every time a rape case is reported on, like the comments of Spida Everitt - "If he's asking you upstairs at 3 am, it's not for a cup of milo." implying that if women do go upstairs, they've consented to sex.

The very idea that a woman can "lead a man on" through her behaviour, dress, or actions. If she consents to a blowjob, she's not consenting to anything else.

Judges who make statements in sentencing like the ones in these cases:
[url]
http://www.smh.com.au/national/judge-ra ... -dvyp.html[/url]

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/judge-questions-if-drunken-sex-was-a-technical-rape/story-e6freo8c-1225753064957

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/rape-laws-fury/story-e6frf7jo-1226075258315

ALSO: Facebook and Rape Comments
. ♕ I am your LORD and saviour, for I am Jesus Christina Confess your sins, and ye shall be forgiven. ❤ .
One of Le Sexiest NSers 2013. Call me ¡¥. Now a fascist because rape is bad, mmkay.
Meet the TET Pantheon
"What I hope most of all is that you understand what I mean when I tell you that, even though I do not know you, and even though I may never meet you, laugh with you cry with you or kiss you, I love you." - Evey (V for Vendetta)
Alleniana wrote:
New Manvir wrote:Well, it's obvious the Native Americans didn't really have a history. They were just loafing about, waiting for some white people to show up so the real fun could start.

The party don't start till I walk in
-Tik Tok, by Christopher Columbus

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:26 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Except that prison rape is a completely distinct issue, and has a very different set of solutions than combating rape in the rest of society, a completely separate environment. It seems dishonest, to me, to conflate prison reform and societal reform in regards to rape..

The conversation stemmed from a post about the number of male and female victims of rape rather than the OP.

However, I would say that prison rape stems from the same lax attitudes about rape found in some parts of society as in non-prison environments, and that fighting such attitudes here would very likely reduce the incidence of rape in prisons as well.


I don't think I would contest that.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:27 pm

Free Council Communes wrote:
Saint Jade IV wrote:The very idea that a woman can "lead a man on" through her behaviour, dress, or actions. If she consents to a blowjob, she's not consenting to anything else.

Actually a women can lead a man on, it has happened to me. I thought she loved me but she was just using me; I has led to me attempting to commit suicide twice and I have developed depression. So yes, that does happen, a lot. I'm not suggesting that those women deserve to be raped, but it isn't rape unless consent was clearly withdrawn.


Why the fuck are you still here.


Also you get anywhere near me with the intention for sex I will call the fucking police.
Last edited by The Steel Magnolia on Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Saint Jade IV
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6441
Founded: Jul 02, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saint Jade IV » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:27 pm

Free Council Communes wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Ok, am I the only one who is seeing just how fucking convoluted some people are making this or what?

It's fucking easy. Really.

Before you're to engage in sexual behavior with someone, ask them if they want to have sex with you. If they say 'yes', then you have sex. If they say no, then you fucking abstain.

Is that so hard to follow? Jesus H. Christ.

Sorry but it's sort of awkward to ask someone "Wanna have sex" as your getting into bed with them. It is your responsibly to ensure that your partner is aware that you so not want to have sex with them. It is not rape simply because they didn't ask first.


If you feel awkward ensuring that the person you are getting into bed with actually wants to...you probably should not be getting into bed with people.
When you grow up, your heart dies.
It's my estimation that every man ever got a statue made of him was one kind of son of a b*tch or another.
RIP Dyakovo...we are all poorer for your loss.

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:27 pm

Free Council Communes wrote:
Saint Jade IV wrote:The very idea that a woman can "lead a man on" through her behaviour, dress, or actions. If she consents to a blowjob, she's not consenting to anything else.

Actually a women can lead a man on, it has happened to me. I thought she loved me but she was just using me; I has led to me attempting to commit suicide twice and I have developed depression. So yes, that does happen, a lot. I'm not suggesting that those women deserve to be raped, but it isn't rape unless consent was clearly withdrawn.

Wrong. We already corrected you at least 20 times. You're still wrong.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:28 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Free Council Communes wrote:Actually a women can lead a man on, it has happened to me. I thought she loved me but she was just using me; I has led to me attempting to commit suicide twice and I have developed depression. So yes, that does happen, a lot. I'm not suggesting that those women deserve to be raped, but it isn't rape unless consent was clearly withdrawn.


Why the fuck are you still here.


Also you get anywhere near me with the intention for sex I will call the fucking police.


Don't you see. He's still here to teach us how not to be. Or to get assed whooped some more. Not sure.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Eliasonia
Minister
 
Posts: 2144
Founded: Oct 15, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Eliasonia » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:28 pm

Free Council Communes wrote:
Saint Jade IV wrote:

Actually a women can lead a man on, it has happened to me. I thought she loved me but she was just using me; I has led to me attempting to commit suicide twice and I have developed depression. So yes, that does happen, a lot. I'm not suggesting that those women deserve to be raped, but it isn't rape unless consent was clearly withdrawn.

I bring up my past example of how this is just plain stupid.
Scumbag roofies a girl at a party, girl is unconscious, can't talk and therefore can't withdraw consent. Scumbag fucks her brains out, she's powerless to stop him.
By your definition this would not be rape. Do you see the problem with your theory yet?
╬ The Iron Party ╬
Liberals: Promoting Freedom, unless it's guns, hunting, tobacco, food, what you can drive, how much money you can make, what you can say, and where you can pray
Maineiacs wrote:There once was a man from Belfast
Whose balls were constructed of brass.
In stormy weather
They'd clang together
And lightening shot out of his ass. :D

New East Ireland wrote:
East germanias wrote:no"
*continues to cry*

*Gives a stuffed Hath doll*
Here you go.. When you squeeze its weenier, it talks and shoots fire from it's eyes..

Mushet wrote:
Necro-Paroom wrote:*Leaks pus*

*leaks cum*
:blush: I'm just very excited to be here
Economic Left/Right: 3.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.31
Political Test

User avatar
Free Council Communes
Diplomat
 
Posts: 955
Founded: Feb 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Council Communes » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:28 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Free Council Communes wrote:Actually a women can lead a man on, it has happened to me. I thought she loved me but she was just using me; I has led to me attempting to commit suicide twice and I have developed depression. So yes, that does happen, a lot. I'm not suggesting that those women deserve to be raped, but it isn't rape unless consent was clearly withdrawn.


Why the fuck are you still here.

Because I'm not going to back down simply because a bunch of fascists decide I lost simply because they think they can pull facts out of their asses.
DEATH TO FASCISM, FREEDOM TO THE PEOPLE!
Left Communist, Anti-Establishmentarian Populist, New Atheist, Ethical Egotist & Satanic Hedonist
Supporter of the PKK & the DHKP/C
Economic Left/Right:Economic Left/Right: -10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: Economic Left/Right: -7.44
For: LGBTQ/Kink Rights, Anarchism, Libertinism, Internet Privacy & Piracy, Guns, Socialist Feminism, Republicanism, Beppe Grillo, Men's Rights
Against: Conformism, Conservatism, Morality, Copyrights, Capitalism, Radical Feminism, USA, China, Russia, DPRK, EU, Turkey, NATO, UN

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:28 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Why the fuck are you still here.


Also you get anywhere near me with the intention for sex I will call the fucking police.

Don't you see. He's still here to teach us how not to be. Or to get assed whooped some more. Not sure.

He must really like getting whooped then.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:29 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Don't you see. He's still here to teach us how not to be. Or to get assed whooped some more. Not sure.

He must really like getting whooped then.


Maybe he likes pain.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Free Council Communes
Diplomat
 
Posts: 955
Founded: Feb 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Council Communes » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:29 pm

Eliasonia wrote:
Free Council Communes wrote:Actually a women can lead a man on, it has happened to me. I thought she loved me but she was just using me; I has led to me attempting to commit suicide twice and I have developed depression. So yes, that does happen, a lot. I'm not suggesting that those women deserve to be raped, but it isn't rape unless consent was clearly withdrawn.

I bring up my past example of how this is just plain stupid.
Scumbag roofies a girl at a party, girl is unconscious, can't talk and therefore can't withdraw consent. Scumbag fucks her brains out, she's powerless to stop him.
By your definition this would not be rape. Do you see the problem with your theory yet?

No and that shouldn't be rape. That should be classified as unlawful coercion.
DEATH TO FASCISM, FREEDOM TO THE PEOPLE!
Left Communist, Anti-Establishmentarian Populist, New Atheist, Ethical Egotist & Satanic Hedonist
Supporter of the PKK & the DHKP/C
Economic Left/Right:Economic Left/Right: -10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: Economic Left/Right: -7.44
For: LGBTQ/Kink Rights, Anarchism, Libertinism, Internet Privacy & Piracy, Guns, Socialist Feminism, Republicanism, Beppe Grillo, Men's Rights
Against: Conformism, Conservatism, Morality, Copyrights, Capitalism, Radical Feminism, USA, China, Russia, DPRK, EU, Turkey, NATO, UN

User avatar
Saint Jade IV
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6441
Founded: Jul 02, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saint Jade IV » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:29 pm

Free Council Communes wrote:
Saint Jade IV wrote:The very idea that a woman can "lead a man on" through her behaviour, dress, or actions. If she consents to a blowjob, she's not consenting to anything else.

Actually a women can lead a man on, it has happened to me. I thought she loved me but she was just using me; I has led to me attempting to commit suicide twice and I have developed depression. So yes, that does happen, a lot. I'm not suggesting that those women deserve to be raped, but it isn't rape unless consent was clearly withdrawn.


I have no idea how your story is relevant. Are you suggesting that you raped your ex, and now feel depressed about it?
When you grow up, your heart dies.
It's my estimation that every man ever got a statue made of him was one kind of son of a b*tch or another.
RIP Dyakovo...we are all poorer for your loss.

User avatar
Eliasonia
Minister
 
Posts: 2144
Founded: Oct 15, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Eliasonia » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:29 pm

Saint Jade IV wrote:
Free Council Communes wrote:Sorry but it's sort of awkward to ask someone "Wanna have sex" as your getting into bed with them. It is your responsibly to ensure that your partner is aware that you so not want to have sex with them. It is not rape simply because they didn't ask first.


If you feel awkward ensuring that the person you are getting into bed with actually wants to...you probably should not be getting into bed with people.

^This.
X1000
╬ The Iron Party ╬
Liberals: Promoting Freedom, unless it's guns, hunting, tobacco, food, what you can drive, how much money you can make, what you can say, and where you can pray
Maineiacs wrote:There once was a man from Belfast
Whose balls were constructed of brass.
In stormy weather
They'd clang together
And lightening shot out of his ass. :D

New East Ireland wrote:
East germanias wrote:no"
*continues to cry*

*Gives a stuffed Hath doll*
Here you go.. When you squeeze its weenier, it talks and shoots fire from it's eyes..

Mushet wrote:
Necro-Paroom wrote:*Leaks pus*

*leaks cum*
:blush: I'm just very excited to be here
Economic Left/Right: 3.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.31
Political Test

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alvecia, Canarsia, Dogmeat, Elejamie, Google [Bot], Ifreann, North Korea Choson, San Lumen, The Archregimancy, Xinisti

Advertisement

Remove ads