NATION

PASSWORD

No apologies needed

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What to do with the screaming brat?

Poll ended at Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:45 pm

Don't let kids under five fly, period.
8
9%
Sedate them before they get on the plane and keep them sedated.
16
19%
They paid for the ticket, they should fly - other passengers suck it up, it's only for couple of hours.
26
30%
If they disrupt things before the plane takes off, it's only fair to kick them off - with a refund or a voucher for the next available flight.
20
23%
Other solution - explain.
6
7%
LG would know what to do.
10
12%
 
Total votes : 86

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:32 pm

Anti-Social Darwinism wrote:But the question is - does NSG think that the rights of the parent and child to travel supercede the rights of the other passengers to have a quiet flight? Especially considering how uncomfortable flying has become - unless you go first class.


There is no right for passengers to have a quiet flight. People with screaming brats might need to fly, too.
Last edited by Grave_n_idle on Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41256
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:32 pm

[quote="Grave_n_idle";p="866549"There is no right for passengers to have a quiet flight. People with screaming brats might need to fly, too.[/quote]

There is a right to fly without being assaulted though. How many pissed of kids kick the backs of chairs?

That's my personal bug bear, noisy kids don't bother me but kids having a tantrum behind my seat really do.

User avatar
The Movie of the Book
Attaché
 
Posts: 69
Founded: Oct 29, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Movie of the Book » Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:42 pm

If there was an airline that had a policy of only allowing adults on board, I would fly with them 100% of the time.

Similarily, if there were non-porn theatres that had showings of movies where kids weren't allowed, I'd go out to the cinema roughly 500% more often than I do.
of the Collectable Card Game of the Anime of the Dating Sim.

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:49 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:[quote="Grave_n_idle";p="866549"There is no right for passengers to have a quiet flight. People with screaming brats might need to fly, too.


There is a right to fly without being assaulted though. How many pissed of kids kick the backs of chairs?

That's my personal bug bear, noisy kids don't bother me but kids having a tantrum behind my seat really do.[/quote]

And what would you advocate, instead?

That kid could be kicking your chair because his temperature is 104, and he's just this side of seizure. He's flying because he's on his way to receive treatment.

You being grumpy about it doesn't fix the kid.


I'm not a big fan of bratty kids. I'm not a big fan of other people being judgemental about bratty kids, either, though.

In my experience of flying - which isn't prodigious, numbering maybe a dozen flights - I've encountered precisely one child bumping seats. He was bumping my wife's seat, and I asked him to stop, and he did. Getting angry at the kid, or at the parents, doesn't fix anything. In some cases, it just gets you a quite ride, and leaves a mom and an infant looking for somewhere they can stay overnight.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:50 pm

The Movie of the Book wrote:If there was an airline that had a policy of only allowing adults on board, I would fly with them 100% of the time.

Similarily, if there were non-porn theatres that had showings of movies where kids weren't allowed, I'd go out to the cinema roughly 500% more often than I do.


Meh. Kids at the theatre don't bother me. It's other adults chatting through the feature, or laughing-too-loud-to-show-how-unscared-they-are, or talking on their cellphones - those are the things that bug me.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Vault 10
Minister
 
Posts: 2471
Founded: Sep 15, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Vault 10 » Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:54 pm

Anti-Social Darwinism wrote:I've flown with crying, screaming brats. Even on a short flight, it's enough to turn a calm, nurturing grandmotherly type into a fire-eyed, raving maniac. My feeling is if the kid can't keep quiet, he/she shouldn't be on the plane. [...]
But the question is - does NSG think that the rights of the parent and child to travel supercede the rights of the other passengers to have a quiet flight?

Distribute free ball gags.

Problem solved.

[/thread]
There is a line most people say they will never cross. It is usually something they have done long ago when they thought no one was watching.




User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Sat Oct 31, 2009 11:04 pm

Vault 10 wrote:
Anti-Social Darwinism wrote:I've flown with crying, screaming brats. Even on a short flight, it's enough to turn a calm, nurturing grandmotherly type into a fire-eyed, raving maniac. My feeling is if the kid can't keep quiet, he/she shouldn't be on the plane. [...]
But the question is - does NSG think that the rights of the parent and child to travel supercede the rights of the other passengers to have a quiet flight?

Distribute free ball gags.

Problem solved.

[/thread]


It's a pity we don't have a similar technology for keyboards.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41256
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sat Oct 31, 2009 11:30 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:And what would you advocate, instead?

That kid could be kicking your chair because his temperature is 104, and he's just this side of seizure. He's flying because he's on his way to receive treatment.

You being grumpy about it doesn't fix the kid.


I'm not a big fan of bratty kids. I'm not a big fan of other people being judgemental about bratty kids, either, though.

In my experience of flying - which isn't prodigious, numbering maybe a dozen flights - I've encountered precisely one child bumping seats. He was bumping my wife's seat, and I asked him to stop, and he did. Getting angry at the kid, or at the parents, doesn't fix anything. In some cases, it just gets you a quite ride, and leaves a mom and an infant looking for somewhere they can stay overnight.


I would advocate the parent and child are removed from the flight, regardless of altitude.

My experience of kids kicking chairs is 4 off the top of my head. One involved me telling the kid to stop and the parent apoligising and then stopping the child to the best of their ability, this I have no problem with, the other 3 involved me telling the kid to stop and my recieving a mouthful from the parent.

User avatar
NERVUN
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 29451
Founded: Mar 24, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby NERVUN » Sun Nov 01, 2009 12:16 am

Sarzonia wrote:Kids under 5 should not be allowed on a plane, period.

If a parent can not or WILL not control a child, that child has no business being outside the house.

When a little kid seemingly can't or won't keep from touching you or he throws a set of keys that hits you, any penchant you may have for patience goes out the window.

Oh yeah, that'll work. It's not like I might not have any reason whatsoever to return to the US with my son for the next three years. No sudden tragedy, no death in the family, no need or want to see family or friends, no chance that something might happen that requires my presence back in the States. Nothing at all could POSSIBLY happen before my son turns five that would require me and my family to fly home from Japan to the US. No, nothing at all. :roll:
To those who feel, life is a tragedy. To those who think, it's a comedy.
"Men, today you'll be issued small trees. Do what you can for the emperor's glory." -Daistallia 2104 on bonsai charges in WWII
Science may provide the means while religion provides the motivation but humanity and humanity alone provides the vehicle -DaWoad

One-Stop Rules Shop, read it, love it, live by it. Getting Help Mod email: nervun@nationstates.net NSG Glossary
Add 10,145 to post count from Jolt: I have it from an unimpeachable source, that Dark Side cookies look like the Death Star. The other ones look like butterflies, or bunnies, or something.-Grave_n_Idle

Proud Member of FMGADHPAC. Join today!

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41256
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sun Nov 01, 2009 12:21 am

NERVUN wrote:Oh yeah, that'll work. It's not like I might not have any reason whatsoever to return to the US with my son for the next three years. No sudden tragedy, no death in the family, no need or want to see family or friends, no chance that something might happen that requires my presence back in the States. Nothing at all could POSSIBLY happen before my son turns five that would require me and my family to fly home from Japan to the US. No, nothing at all. :roll:


Send the kid freight.

User avatar
Daistallia 2104
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7848
Founded: Jan 14, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Daistallia 2104 » Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:41 am

Dimoniquid wrote:
Maurepas wrote:
Azzers wrote:
Kantria wrote:This woman should have slapped her kid upside that head. That way, instead of being kicked off the plane, she'd be under arrest for child abuse.

What the fuck do you want her to do?


Close her fanny till she can control what pops out of it

:blink:

:blink: :blink:
What just happened? Did he lose the freaking game?!


Probabaly a bit of confusion over the term "fanny". It has rather different meanings depending on the dialect. In NA dialects fanny refers to the buttocks, while in most others it's usually a vulgar term for the vulva, but in this context, mouth.
NSWiki|HP
Stupidity is like nuclear power; it can be used for good or evil, and you don't want to get any on you. - Scott Adams
Sometimes it's better to light a flamethrower than curse the darkness. - Terry Pratchett
Sometimes the smallest softest voice carries the grand biggest solutions
How our economy really works.
Obama is a conservative, not a liberal, and certainly not a socialist.

User avatar
Aveasta
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 43
Founded: Oct 09, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Aveasta » Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:49 am

Personally I found a good way to keep kids quiet on planes, if you're sitting next to 'em, is to smile at them.

Unless of course you're ugly.
Political compass:
Economic Left/Right: -4.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.41

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:06 am

Fartsniffage wrote:I would advocate the parent and child are removed from the flight, regardless of altitude.


Some would say that's a bad attitude to have.

Fartsniffage wrote:My experience of kids kicking chairs is 4 off the top of my head. One involved me telling the kid to stop and the parent apoligising and then stopping the child to the best of their ability, this I have no problem with, the other 3 involved me telling the kid to stop and my recieving a mouthful from the parent.


You 'told' the parents, and you 'told' the kid?

Some would say the problem isn't the kid OR the parents.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Skibereen
Minister
 
Posts: 2724
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Skibereen » Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:23 am

Anti-Social Darwinism wrote:as far as I'm concerned. No compensation, either - other than refunding the cost of the ticket.

I've flown with crying, screaming brats.

You sound like one.


Anti-Social Darwinism wrote: Even on a short flight, it's enough to turn a calm, nurturing grandmotherly type into a fire-eyed, raving maniac.

What is a "grandmotherly" type? Someone who failed at accomplishing a family group but still wants to be given some platitude as a lonely old codger?

Anti-Social Darwinism wrote: My feeling is if the kid can't keep quiet, he/she shouldn't be on the plane.

What about people with chronic gas due to colitis? Women who dont ever shut up about what everyone else's problems are? Just curious since you seem to know how soceity in its full dynamic should function..which it would seem whatever is most comfortable for you. As it appears women who have choosen the most vaunted and important profession of all(Motherhood) should be denied the right of free movement in this country or the world because your a bitch.
Anti-Social Darwinism wrote: It's distracting at best and infuriating at worst, it distracts the flight crew, it irritates the other passengers and, I would hope, is embarassing to the parent(s).

Distracting from WHAT? Are you flying the plane from your tray table? Buy the headphones you cow and mind your own business.
Distracting the Flight Crew? was the child seated in the cock pit? Or was flight attendant aiding child and so you didnt get your peanuts and pillow fast enough?
Ah, so because you are irratable and obviously lacking in genuine empathy you feel others should be suffering emotional distress because you cant handle the sound of a crying child...very mature.


Anti-Social Darwinism wrote:I'm sure there are things that can be done to keep the kids under control - ranging from explaining appropriate behavior to the more intelligent ones to making sure that they aren't hungry or tired to sedation.
Well, then I guess you shouldve helped if that damned distressing Doctor Spock, sometimes kids are just frightened...or obnoxious and irritable of which you should be entirely sensitive to. Great so for your comfort people should drug their children...just exactly how self centered are you? The world would fecking stop if you fell over dead wouldnt it.
Anti-Social Darwinism wrote:But the question is - does NSG think that the rights of the parent and child to travel supercede the rights of the other passengers to have a quiet flight? Especially considering how uncomfortable flying has become - unless you go first class.

I got news for you your rights to travel werent violated. Perhaps we should screen for ugly people, and body odor, anything else that bothers you so we can deny rights to people because it makes you uncomfortable...you dont have a right to be comfortable--rent a car, or learn to fly your damned self.

Wretched fecking people on this board.
Last edited by Skibereen on Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
argumentum ad logicam, seriously think about it.

"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy."
James Madison
First in line for the pie in the sky

User avatar
Saint Jade IV
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6441
Founded: Jul 02, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saint Jade IV » Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:54 am

I get really mad at the parents who don't control their children and feel that they have a right to make everyone else's flight/meal/movie/travel uncomfortable. As a child, my mother was frequently complimented on my behaviour, as I read my book quietly or slept from when we started til we stopped. At restaurants, if my behaviour was out of line, my mother or father took me home, or sat in the car with me until the meal was over and then took me home.

I don't see why it is so difficult to get children to behave on flights or in restaurants or on long distance travel. Naturally, there are circumstances where children are going to misbehave - illness and the like. But I find it difficult to believe that every single one of the unruly, bratty children that I have encountered falls into the category of serious illness or other problems. Most of the time, I find that the parents simply refuse to control their children.
When you grow up, your heart dies.
It's my estimation that every man ever got a statue made of him was one kind of son of a b*tch or another.
RIP Dyakovo...we are all poorer for your loss.

User avatar
Derscon
Minister
 
Posts: 2994
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Derscon » Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:55 am

Czardas wrote:The airline is a private institution. It is within its rights to kick off any passenger from the airplane for any reason, if it refunds the passenger the cost of their ticket afterwards (according to law). If you're not happy about getting kicked off, you can choose to fly with a different airline next time.


This, of course. This "right to travel" shit is silly.
NationStates remains an excellent educational tool for children. It can teach you exactly just how far people will go to gain extrajudicially what they could never gain legitimately. ~ Questers
And congratulations to Derscon, who has finally codified the exact basis on which NS issues work. ~ Ardchoille

瞞天過海

User avatar
Derscon
Minister
 
Posts: 2994
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Derscon » Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:56 am

The Movie of the Book wrote:If there was an airline that had a policy of only allowing adults on board, I would fly with them 100% of the time.


I sense a business opportunity...
NationStates remains an excellent educational tool for children. It can teach you exactly just how far people will go to gain extrajudicially what they could never gain legitimately. ~ Questers
And congratulations to Derscon, who has finally codified the exact basis on which NS issues work. ~ Ardchoille

瞞天過海

User avatar
NERVUN
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 29451
Founded: Mar 24, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby NERVUN » Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:57 am

Skibereen wrote:
Anti-Social Darwinism wrote:My feeling is if the kid can't keep quiet, he/she shouldn't be on the plane.

What about people with chronic gas due to colitis? Women who dont ever shut up about what everyone else's problems are? Just curious since you seem to know how soceity in its full dynamic should function..which it would seem whatever is most comfortable for you. As it appears women who have choosen the most vaunted and important profession of all(Motherhood) should be denied the right of free movement in this country or the world because your a bitch.

Skibereen, watch the personal attacks. You might be upset with ASD's position, but that does not give you an excuse to use abusive language.
To those who feel, life is a tragedy. To those who think, it's a comedy.
"Men, today you'll be issued small trees. Do what you can for the emperor's glory." -Daistallia 2104 on bonsai charges in WWII
Science may provide the means while religion provides the motivation but humanity and humanity alone provides the vehicle -DaWoad

One-Stop Rules Shop, read it, love it, live by it. Getting Help Mod email: nervun@nationstates.net NSG Glossary
Add 10,145 to post count from Jolt: I have it from an unimpeachable source, that Dark Side cookies look like the Death Star. The other ones look like butterflies, or bunnies, or something.-Grave_n_Idle

Proud Member of FMGADHPAC. Join today!

User avatar
Derscon
Minister
 
Posts: 2994
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Derscon » Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:59 am

NERVUN wrote:
Skibereen wrote:
Anti-Social Darwinism wrote:My feeling is if the kid can't keep quiet, he/she shouldn't be on the plane.

What about people with chronic gas due to colitis? Women who dont ever shut up about what everyone else's problems are? Just curious since you seem to know how soceity in its full dynamic should function..which it would seem whatever is most comfortable for you. As it appears women who have choosen the most vaunted and important profession of all(Motherhood) should be denied the right of free movement in this country or the world because your a bitch.

Skibereen, watch the personal attacks. You might be upset with ASD's position, but that does not give you an excuse to use abusive language.


Nor should we tolerate the wrong use of "you're." That's far more reprehensible.

Also, replace travel with healthcare and I see this thread turning lulzy.
NationStates remains an excellent educational tool for children. It can teach you exactly just how far people will go to gain extrajudicially what they could never gain legitimately. ~ Questers
And congratulations to Derscon, who has finally codified the exact basis on which NS issues work. ~ Ardchoille

瞞天過海

User avatar
Derscon
Minister
 
Posts: 2994
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Derscon » Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:02 am

Skibereen wrote:What about people with chronic gas due to colitis? Women who dont ever shut up about what everyone else's problems are? Just curious since you seem to know how soceity in its full dynamic should function..which it would seem whatever is most comfortable for you. As it appears women who have choosen the most vaunted and important profession of all(Motherhood) should be denied the right of free movement in this country or the world because your a bitch.


What is this "right to free movement" shit?" The corporations have no obligation to provide you this service. They are doing it on their on volition because they saw a profit. Or are you seriously saying it's justified to hold the CEO at gunpoint and say "YOU WILL FORM AN AIRLINE COMPANY?" They are providing a privately provided service in the market (ignoring the massive amount of regulations and control by the state, of course) that they have no obligation to give you.

If you disagree, I need a box of oreos, and if you have them, you have an obligation to give them to me.
NationStates remains an excellent educational tool for children. It can teach you exactly just how far people will go to gain extrajudicially what they could never gain legitimately. ~ Questers
And congratulations to Derscon, who has finally codified the exact basis on which NS issues work. ~ Ardchoille

瞞天過海

User avatar
Vault 10
Minister
 
Posts: 2471
Founded: Sep 15, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Vault 10 » Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:02 am

Skibereen wrote:Perhaps we should screen for ugly people, and body odor, anything else that bothers you

I would fly it.

If I pass of course, I'm not model pretty, but no hard feelings if I don't; who am I to deny the model pretty people the right of having an airline for model pretty people only.
There is a line most people say they will never cross. It is usually something they have done long ago when they thought no one was watching.




User avatar
Christmahanikwanzikah
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12073
Founded: Nov 24, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Christmahanikwanzikah » Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:03 am

Grave_n_idle wrote:
Vault 10 wrote:
Anti-Social Darwinism wrote:I've flown with crying, screaming brats. Even on a short flight, it's enough to turn a calm, nurturing grandmotherly type into a fire-eyed, raving maniac. My feeling is if the kid can't keep quiet, he/she shouldn't be on the plane. [...]
But the question is - does NSG think that the rights of the parent and child to travel supercede the rights of the other passengers to have a quiet flight?

Distribute free ball gags.

Problem solved.

[/thread]


It's a pity we don't have a similar technology for keyboards.


Oh, I know! Do what Strongbad would do!

*issues boxing gloves*

User avatar
NERVUN
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 29451
Founded: Mar 24, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby NERVUN » Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:03 am

Saint Jade IV wrote:I get really mad at the parents who don't control their children and feel that they have a right to make everyone else's flight/meal/movie/travel uncomfortable. As a child, my mother was frequently complimented on my behaviour, as I read my book quietly or slept from when we started til we stopped. At restaurants, if my behaviour was out of line, my mother or father took me home, or sat in the car with me until the meal was over and then took me home.

I don't see why it is so difficult to get children to behave on flights or in restaurants or on long distance travel. Naturally, there are circumstances where children are going to misbehave - illness and the like. But I find it difficult to believe that every single one of the unruly, bratty children that I have encountered falls into the category of serious illness or other problems. Most of the time, I find that the parents simply refuse to control their children.

Because each child has a different personality and for some children, asking them to stay quiet on a long flight is next to impossible.

Yes, parents do need to control children, but young children sometimes just cannot sit still quietly and there is nothing short of physical violence that can make them do so. Since I refuse to beat my son for your comfort, I'm going to have to ask for your understanding when he wants to talk about airplanes or trains or gets cranky because he doesn't understand yet why he cannot run on an airplane.
To those who feel, life is a tragedy. To those who think, it's a comedy.
"Men, today you'll be issued small trees. Do what you can for the emperor's glory." -Daistallia 2104 on bonsai charges in WWII
Science may provide the means while religion provides the motivation but humanity and humanity alone provides the vehicle -DaWoad

One-Stop Rules Shop, read it, love it, live by it. Getting Help Mod email: nervun@nationstates.net NSG Glossary
Add 10,145 to post count from Jolt: I have it from an unimpeachable source, that Dark Side cookies look like the Death Star. The other ones look like butterflies, or bunnies, or something.-Grave_n_Idle

Proud Member of FMGADHPAC. Join today!

User avatar
Derscon
Minister
 
Posts: 2994
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Derscon » Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:06 am

NERVUN wrote:
Saint Jade IV wrote:I get really mad at the parents who don't control their children and feel that they have a right to make everyone else's flight/meal/movie/travel uncomfortable. As a child, my mother was frequently complimented on my behaviour, as I read my book quietly or slept from when we started til we stopped. At restaurants, if my behaviour was out of line, my mother or father took me home, or sat in the car with me until the meal was over and then took me home.

I don't see why it is so difficult to get children to behave on flights or in restaurants or on long distance travel. Naturally, there are circumstances where children are going to misbehave - illness and the like. But I find it difficult to believe that every single one of the unruly, bratty children that I have encountered falls into the category of serious illness or other problems. Most of the time, I find that the parents simply refuse to control their children.

Because each child has a different personality and for some children, asking them to stay quiet on a long flight is next to impossible.

Yes, parents do need to control children, but young children sometimes just cannot sit still quietly and there is nothing short of physical violence that can make them do so. Since I refuse to beat my son for your comfort, I'm going to have to ask for your understanding when he wants to talk about airplanes or trains or gets cranky because he doesn't understand yet why he cannot run on an airplane.


Image

Well, I won't beat your child in the face with a bat, but you'll have to excuse me if I still hate the little shit for not shutting the hell up during a 3 hour flight.
NationStates remains an excellent educational tool for children. It can teach you exactly just how far people will go to gain extrajudicially what they could never gain legitimately. ~ Questers
And congratulations to Derscon, who has finally codified the exact basis on which NS issues work. ~ Ardchoille

瞞天過海

User avatar
Peisandros
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1305
Founded: Sep 14, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Peisandros » Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:06 am

Must be about time to cull some children.
Vindication, Is all it takes to change your life.

BoF31 runner up. WC44 Second round. CoH37 co-host and runner up. DBC9 third. DBC10 third. WC47 Second round.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Betoni, Point Blob

Advertisement

Remove ads