NATION

PASSWORD

No apologies needed

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

What to do with the screaming brat?

Poll ended at Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:45 pm

Don't let kids under five fly, period.
8
9%
Sedate them before they get on the plane and keep them sedated.
16
19%
They paid for the ticket, they should fly - other passengers suck it up, it's only for couple of hours.
26
30%
If they disrupt things before the plane takes off, it's only fair to kick them off - with a refund or a voucher for the next available flight.
20
23%
Other solution - explain.
6
7%
LG would know what to do.
10
12%
 
Total votes : 86

User avatar
Anti-Social Darwinism
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1282
Founded: Dec 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

No apologies needed

Postby Anti-Social Darwinism » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:45 pm

as far as I'm concerned. No compensation, either - other than refunding the cost of the ticket.

I've flown with crying, screaming brats. Even on a short flight, it's enough to turn a calm, nurturing grandmotherly type into a fire-eyed, raving maniac. My feeling is if the kid can't keep quiet, he/she shouldn't be on the plane. It's distracting at best and infuriating at worst, it distracts the flight crew, it irritates the other passengers and, I would hope, is embarassing to the parent(s).

I'm sure there are things that can be done to keep the kids under control - ranging from explaining appropriate behavior to the more intelligent ones to making sure that they aren't hungry or tired to sedation.

But the question is - does NSG think that the rights of the parent and child to travel supercede the rights of the other passengers to have a quiet flight? Especially considering how uncomfortable flying has become - unless you go first class.

http://news.aol.com/article/southwest-a ... r%2F745890
NSG's resident curmudgeon.

Add 6,771 posts from the old NSG.

User avatar
LOL ANARCHY NUBZ
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1181
Founded: Dec 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby LOL ANARCHY NUBZ » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:49 pm

Shut up and get over it.

User avatar
Chrobalta
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5324
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Chrobalta » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:49 pm

Set aside a special section for them (and by that I mean the back of the plane near the bathrooms).
Democratic Socialist
Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.79

User avatar
Azzers
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 446
Founded: Jun 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Azzers » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:50 pm

I personally absolutely HATE little children, they are usally unbehaved and hyperactive and I think the little -censored- deserved to get kicked off.
Religion, because 'it just did' doesn't seem like a very good argument
Just because I believe in Allah, doesn't make me stupid
I will strum the strings of your soul for all eternity, and every pluck will draw a thousand screams
Freedom of speech is only apparent when insulting religion
"The more unintelligent a man is, the less mysterious existence seems to him." - Arthur Schopenhauer
Respect your mother and father, they are the best friends you will ever have.

User avatar
Buffett and Colbert
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32382
Founded: Oct 05, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Buffett and Colbert » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:50 pm

Anti-Social Darwinism wrote:to sedation.

Mmm, sorry. This is really infringes on the child's rights.

I think that these things in general are inevitable and us passengers just have to suck it up.
If the knowledge isn't useful, you haven't found the lesson yet. ~Iniika
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Clever, but your Jedi mind tricks don't work on me.

His Jedi mind tricks are insignificant compared to the power of Buffy's sex appeal.
Keronians wrote:
Buffett and Colbert wrote:My law class took my virginity. And it was 100% consensual.

I accuse your precious law class of statutory rape.

User avatar
Azzers
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 446
Founded: Jun 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Azzers » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:52 pm

Chrobalta wrote:Set aside a special section for them (and by that I mean the back of the plane near the bathrooms).


How about off the plane with no parachute?
Religion, because 'it just did' doesn't seem like a very good argument
Just because I believe in Allah, doesn't make me stupid
I will strum the strings of your soul for all eternity, and every pluck will draw a thousand screams
Freedom of speech is only apparent when insulting religion
"The more unintelligent a man is, the less mysterious existence seems to him." - Arthur Schopenhauer
Respect your mother and father, they are the best friends you will ever have.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:52 pm

Personally, the other passengers should suck it up, and she deserves the refund...

Unless you specify no children on planes, you, as an airline have to put up with it...

User avatar
Lackadaisical2
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 50831
Founded: Mar 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Lackadaisical2 » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:52 pm

well, heres the key to it:

"The crew bounced Root and her son Adam off the San Jose-bound flight because passengers could not hear preflight safety announcements"

Her kid was disrupting the actual take off time of the flight, they couldn't leave if people couldn't hear the safety announcements. I fully support their decision to boot them off, and I don't think they should be required to compensate unruly people (however, they did, and quite handsomely, probably so they don't look bad).

Also, that kid must have been really fucking annoying and loud if people couldn't even hear anything.
Last edited by Lackadaisical2 on Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

User avatar
Northwest Slobovia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12531
Founded: Sep 16, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Northwest Slobovia » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:53 pm

I'm torn between "they shouldn't fly" and "they should be kept happy, by chemical methods if necessary". Tho I don't view age as a criterion: it's the kid's ability to stay quiet and amused for a few hours.

Mostly, I figure parents know how well their kids behave, so I blame them entirely for their kids' misbehavior on planes (and in restaurants... and other enclosed spaces meant for civilized adults).
Gollum died for your sins.
Power is an equal-opportunity corrupter.

User avatar
Czardas
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6922
Founded: Feb 25, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Czardas » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:53 pm

The airline is a private institution. It is within its rights to kick off any passenger from the airplane for any reason, if it refunds the passenger the cost of their ticket afterwards (according to law). If you're not happy about getting kicked off, you can choose to fly with a different airline next time.
Last edited by Czardas on Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
30 | she/her | USA | ✡︎ | ☭ | ♫

I have devised a truly marvelous signature, which this textblock is too small to contain

User avatar
Dimoniquid
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9819
Founded: Jul 10, 2009
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Dimoniquid » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:54 pm

Something from Jimmy Carr.

Jimmy Carr wrote:GET OVER IT, NO-ONE CARES.

User avatar
Kirgoslav
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 105
Founded: Oct 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Kirgoslav » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:54 pm

Azzers wrote:
Chrobalta wrote:Set aside a special section for them (and by that I mean the back of the plane near the bathrooms).


How about off the plane with no parachute?

Oh shut up, I am now starting to question your sanity.

User avatar
Lunatic Goofballs
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 23629
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Lunatic Goofballs » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:54 pm

Image
Life's Short. Munch Tacos.

“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!”
Hunter S. Thompson

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:54 pm

Czardas wrote:The airline is a private institution. It is within its rights to kick off any passenger from the airplane for any reason, if it refunds the passenger the cost of their ticket afterwards (according to law). If you're not happy about getting kicked off, you can choose to fly with a different airline next time.

Agreed, but they should be required to refund them if they kick them off, of course, which is where I would disagree with the OP...

User avatar
The Tofu Islands
Minister
 
Posts: 2872
Founded: Mar 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tofu Islands » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:55 pm

I’m kinda reluctant to say that it should be banned completely*, however some kind of scheme for preventing it being too disruptive (such as putting young children in a separate part of the plane, possibly with some sort of (partial) soundproofing to minimise noise for other passengers makes sense. Sedation is a no-no though.


* This might be something to do with the fact that my first flight (after birth) was at 2 weeks old.
In its majestic equality, the law forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal loaves of bread.

User avatar
Northwest Slobovia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12531
Founded: Sep 16, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Northwest Slobovia » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:55 pm

Maurepas wrote:Unless you specify no children on planes, you, as an airline have to put up with it...

Well, it looks like a simple solution exists...
Gollum died for your sins.
Power is an equal-opportunity corrupter.

User avatar
Czardas
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6922
Founded: Feb 25, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Czardas » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:56 pm

Maurepas wrote:
Czardas wrote:The airline is a private institution. It is within its rights to kick off any passenger from the airplane for any reason, if it refunds the passenger the cost of their ticket afterwards (according to law). If you're not happy about getting kicked off, you can choose to fly with a different airline next time.

Agreed, but they should be required to refund them if they kick them off, of course, which is where I would disagree with the OP...

That's what I said. :P
30 | she/her | USA | ✡︎ | ☭ | ♫

I have devised a truly marvelous signature, which this textblock is too small to contain

User avatar
Dimoniquid
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9819
Founded: Jul 10, 2009
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Dimoniquid » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:56 pm

Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Image

:clap: You learn something new everyday.

User avatar
AB Again
Attaché
 
Posts: 83
Founded: Feb 14, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby AB Again » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:56 pm

Azzers wrote:I personally absolutely HATE little children, they are usally unbehaved and hyperactive and I think the little -censored- deserved to get kicked off.


And you never were a little child!

Small children have as much right to travel as you do. Not everyone on a long flight is going to behave in a manner that everyone else condones. Such is the variety of humankind. Why are the young kids being singled out here? There are obnoxious adults, intransigent geriatrics, and unbearable adolescents as well on most long haul flights. Unfortunately we can not, and should not, make everyone behave according to our personal values - so we just have to put up with the annoyance.

If it is a short flight then just get over it already

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:56 pm

Northwest Slobovia wrote:
Maurepas wrote:Unless you specify no children on planes, you, as an airline have to put up with it...

Well, it looks like a simple solution exists...

Well, from a business perspective, all those family vacations you've denied would get rather costly, so I doubt theyd actually do it...which was the point, of course, ;)

User avatar
Ryadn
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8028
Founded: Sep 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Ryadn » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:57 pm

A certain amount of crying and fuss, especially from small children during takeoff and landing (the air pressure change can make even *me* cry sometimes) is to be expected. It's annoying, but there's no way to completely eliminate it.

In this case, however, the kid wasn't scared, or in pain, or too young to talk to and reason with---he was just being a brat. And more than being obnoxious, he was interfering with important safety procedures. There's no excuse for that. The mother said she was focusing on doing "what was best for the child", but I don't see that at all. I see a mother who knew her kid was acting poorly and hoped that he'd tire himself out at some point so she didn't have to do anything. Unacceptable.
"I hate you! I HATE you collectivist society. You can't tell me what to do, you're not my REAL legitimate government. As soon as my band takes off, and I invent a perpetual motion machine, I am SO out of here!" - Neo Art

"But please, explain how a condom breaking is TOTALLY different from a tire getting blown out. I mean, in one case, a piece of rubber you're relying on to remain intact so that your risk of negative consequences won't significantly increase breaks through no inherent fault of your own, and in the other case, a piece of rubber you're relying on to remain intact so that your risk of negative consequences won't significantly increase breaks through no inherent fault of your own." - The Norwegian Blue

User avatar
Anti-Social Darwinism
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1282
Founded: Dec 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Anti-Social Darwinism » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:57 pm

Maurepas wrote:
Czardas wrote:The airline is a private institution. It is within its rights to kick off any passenger from the airplane for any reason, if it refunds the passenger the cost of their ticket afterwards (according to law). If you're not happy about getting kicked off, you can choose to fly with a different airline next time.

Agreed, but they should be required to refund them if they kick them off, of course, which is where I would disagree with the OP...


Where did I say no refund? My first sentence said that there should be no compensation other than a refund. The airline shouldn't have to pay people because they couldn't keep their kids in line.
NSG's resident curmudgeon.

Add 6,771 posts from the old NSG.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:58 pm

Anti-Social Darwinism wrote:
Maurepas wrote:
Czardas wrote:The airline is a private institution. It is within its rights to kick off any passenger from the airplane for any reason, if it refunds the passenger the cost of their ticket afterwards (according to law). If you're not happy about getting kicked off, you can choose to fly with a different airline next time.

Agreed, but they should be required to refund them if they kick them off, of course, which is where I would disagree with the OP...


Where did I say no refund? My first sentence said that there should be no compensation other than a refund. The airline shouldn't have to pay people because they couldn't keep their kids in line.

Ah, sorry, I saw "no compensation" and that was it, :blush: :lol:

Agreed then...

User avatar
Lackadaisical2
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 50831
Founded: Mar 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Lackadaisical2 » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:59 pm

AB Again wrote:
Azzers wrote:I personally absolutely HATE little children, they are usally unbehaved and hyperactive and I think the little -censored- deserved to get kicked off.


And you never were a little child!

Small children have as much right to travel as you do. Not everyone on a long flight is going to behave in a manner that everyone else condones. Such is the variety of humankind. Why are the young kids being singled out here? There are obnoxious adults, intransigent geriatrics, and unbearable adolescents as well on most long haul flights. Unfortunately we can not, and should not, make everyone behave according to our personal values - so we just have to put up with the annoyance.

If it is a short flight then just get over it already


Maybe people are focusing on kids, because you know, its the topic. Anyway, you can't just get over it if the plane CAN NOT take off because some little brat won't shut up. Most kids are far better behaved than that. Also, whats all this, "right to travel" BS. I never knew anyone had a fucking RIGHT to travel. Fuck that, you have as much right to travel as your legs can carry you, beyond that, you better have some cash and follow the rules.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

User avatar
Azzers
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 446
Founded: Jun 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Azzers » Sat Oct 31, 2009 2:00 pm

AB Again wrote:
Azzers wrote:I personally absolutely HATE little children, they are usally unbehaved and hyperactive and I think the little -censored- deserved to get kicked off.


And you never were a little child!

Small children have as much right to travel as you do. Not everyone on a long flight is going to behave in a manner that everyone else condones. Such is the variety of humankind. Why are the young kids being singled out here? There are obnoxious adults, intransigent geriatrics, and unbearable adolescents as well on most long haul flights. Unfortunately we can not, and should not, make everyone behave according to our personal values - so we just have to put up with the annoyance.

If it is a short flight then just get over it already


Well to be honest I am grateful to my parents, god knows how they put up with me, I was a little shit like all little kids, speaking of adolescents, I don't know, nor do I care, but I behave on every single flight, sitting there quietly listening to my music.
Religion, because 'it just did' doesn't seem like a very good argument
Just because I believe in Allah, doesn't make me stupid
I will strum the strings of your soul for all eternity, and every pluck will draw a thousand screams
Freedom of speech is only apparent when insulting religion
"The more unintelligent a man is, the less mysterious existence seems to him." - Arthur Schopenhauer
Respect your mother and father, they are the best friends you will ever have.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Benuty, Neu California, Shazbotdom, The Pirateariat

Advertisement

Remove ads