Natapoc wrote:
Okay you don't need to support it but I hope you understand that it's not an attack on trans people and that if radical feminists got their way trans people would be treated no differently than anyone else and have all rights. The only difference would be that they would not be treated as a specific gender (because no one would be)
I know that it's not intended to be that way, but by denying the existence of gender of a whole, or rather seeking its destruction, you also oppose everyone who considers gender important.
What exactly do you feel constitutes a gender identity? One problem may be that some of what you consider gender identity, others may consider a damaging social construct.
I think gender is a defining feature among the many that make up identity, and I think prejudice and projection of stereotypes are the real issues that make gender problematic. But I'd much rather see the end of prejudice than I would gender. Remove prejudice from the equation, and it's hard to identify any negatives about the idea of gender. I mean, if you identify as male, female, or anything else, that's fine - it's the implications of how other people will treat you based on your identity and your presentation that are the real sticking points.





