Which brain?
Advertisement


by Ethel mermania » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:35 pm
The Blaatschapen wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
All prudes, except when around other men while you aren't there.
Then they are sluts.
It's part of the childish and prudish suspicion that someone, somewhere, is having fun and you aren't. So since you aren't having fun you decide to throw the toys out of the pram and say nobody is allowed any.
Ofcourse, the amount of fucking that was going on is inevitably much less fucking than these people suspect.
The trick is to have more fun than anyone else.

by Coccygia » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:37 pm

by The Steel Magnolia » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:37 pm
Natapoc wrote:Many radical feminists have serious issues with the Michigan Womyn's Music Festival. There is a branch of feminism you could call separatism. That's where a lot of the things you don't like come from.
One thing I want to address: Radical feminists are against prostitution. There is no leeway here, prostitution is a form of objectification which radical feminists disagree with along with pornography.
A lot of the conflict between trans activists and radical feminists is centered around the issue of gender but that's not an excuse for trans-phobia.
Here is the problem:
"A trans activist wants the right to be seen as "boy" or "girl", a radical feminist wants the right to be seen as a person." In their efforts to be treated equally and with the respect they deserve many trans people are forced to cling to rigid gender constructs.
* note I know that trans activists want the same thing (to be treated as a person, I'm talking about the focus of their activism)
Radical feminism is against the social construction of gender (not sex), or as one radical feminist put it: "What I do rightly criticize is the social construction of gender (not sex) as an idea, not an attack on trans people.""
If it means anything to you, I don't think ANY of the radical feminists I know in real life have anything against trans people and are very accepting.

by The Emerald Dawn » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:39 pm

by The Steel Magnolia » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:39 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:The Steel Magnolia wrote:
That'd be great if the whole world did it.
Since they don't, it's a wonderful way to pat yourself on the back for being accepting while not doing a single fucking thing to accomplish any change for oppressed minorities.
If someone differs their action as though the divisions do exist, refuse to accept it and argue against it. Do not give them your patronage if they are commercial. Do not give them your vote if they are political, etc.

by Ethel mermania » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:39 pm
Natapoc wrote:The Steel Magnolia wrote:Perhaps that's a perception issue on my end. The vast majority of self identified radfems I've encountered have been horribly vile individuals, be it in hatred towards sex workers, transgender people, et cetera. I'm aware that such a selection may not be a true sampling of actual radfems, but I would also say that they also have the loudest voices.
At least. I'm pretty sure they did when they found out my personal information and decided to phone all of my contacts, telling them a number of particularly horrid things. I'm not trying to demonize the entire movement (though I realize I am) and I certainly acknowledge that there's likely aspects I'm unaware of, but my experience with it, and the experiences of all the trans* people I know with it have been particularly atrocious. I'm a diehard feminist, make no mistake, but I'm not sure I can ever align myself with that particular ideology.
I'm inclined to agree here.
I find that many radical feminists confuse eliminating gender roles and gender discrimination with eliminating gender.
There are certainly many flaws within the feminist movement, be its actions towards people of colour, political lesbianism, and rampant transphobia within the mainstream establishment (which is admittedly more of a historical problem than one that exists currently, at least insofar as much as trans* people are excluded everywhere. Michigan's Womyn's Music Festival springs to mind). Propping up the patriarchy is not a complaint I have heard levied at feminism however.
I don't disbelieve you, it's just something I had never been aware of before. I appreciate the info though!
Many radical feminists have serious issues with the Michigan Womyn's Music Festival. There is a branch of feminism you could call separatism. That's where a lot of the things you don't like come from.
One thing I want to address: Radical feminists are against prostitution. There is no leeway here, prostitution is a form of objectification which radical feminists disagree with along with pornography.
A lot of the conflict between trans activists and radical feminists is centered around the issue of gender but that's not an excuse for trans-phobia.
Here is the problem:
"A trans activist wants the right to be seen as "boy" or "girl", a radical feminist wants the right to be seen as a person." In their efforts to be treated equally and with the respect they deserve many trans people are forced to cling to rigid gender constructs.
* note I know that trans activists want the same thing (to be treated as a person, I'm talking about the focus of their activism)
Radical feminism is against the social construction of gender (not sex), or as one radical feminist put it: "What I do rightly criticize is the social construction of gender (not sex) as an idea, not an attack on trans people.""
If it means anything to you, I don't think ANY of the radical feminists I know in real life have anything against trans people and are very accepting.
On the internet it's a different story. I don't know what it is with the internet and attracting bully's.

by The Blaatschapen » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:41 pm

by The Blaatschapen » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:42 pm
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
If someone differs their action as though the divisions do exist, refuse to accept it and argue against it. Do not give them your patronage if they are commercial. Do not give them your vote if they are political, etc.
So... argue against the entire world, refuse to buy anything, and refuse to engage in political processes.
That'll help minorities!

by Ethel mermania » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:44 pm
Vareiln wrote:What? That's not at all representative of the actual problems a male-gender person faces... If anything, it seems more like misanthropic MRA's acting up again and assuming that gender stereotypes are 100% true, even for males.

by Vareiln » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:46 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:Vareiln wrote:What? That's not at all representative of the actual problems a male-gender person faces... If anything, it seems more like misanthropic MRA's acting up again and assuming that gender stereotypes are 100% true, even for males.
sex not gender.
men do die earlier than women
men have les impulse control than women
men lie to women about their earning more than women lie to men about it.
as per kinsey men have a higher sex drive than women
that said, its a joke article

by Natapoc » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:47 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:Natapoc wrote:
Many radical feminists have serious issues with the Michigan Womyn's Music Festival. There is a branch of feminism you could call separatism. That's where a lot of the things you don't like come from.
One thing I want to address: Radical feminists are against prostitution. There is no leeway here, prostitution is a form of objectification which radical feminists disagree with along with pornography.
A lot of the conflict between trans activists and radical feminists is centered around the issue of gender but that's not an excuse for trans-phobia.
Here is the problem:
"A trans activist wants the right to be seen as "boy" or "girl", a radical feminist wants the right to be seen as a person." In their efforts to be treated equally and with the respect they deserve many trans people are forced to cling to rigid gender constructs.
* note I know that trans activists want the same thing (to be treated as a person, I'm talking about the focus of their activism)
Radical feminism is against the social construction of gender (not sex), or as one radical feminist put it: "What I do rightly criticize is the social construction of gender (not sex) as an idea, not an attack on trans people.""
If it means anything to you, I don't think ANY of the radical feminists I know in real life have anything against trans people and are very accepting.
On the internet it's a different story. I don't know what it is with the internet and attracting bully's.
camille paglia would disagree with you about prostitution

by Ethel mermania » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:48 pm

by The Blaatschapen » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:51 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:The Blaatschapen wrote:
My goal is just to have fun and not care about what the rest is doing, as long as they're not spoiling mine(by finishing the beer for example).
well that is a crime against humanity, unless i am going to get laid out of the deal.
that said, you get one ride in this life, you may as well enjoy it, because that is all you get.

by Ethel mermania » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:53 pm
Vareiln wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:sex not gender.
men do die earlier than women
men have les impulse control than women
men lie to women about their earning more than women lie to men about it.
as per kinsey men have a higher sex drive than women
that said, its a joke article
Sorry about the mistake. I've been trying to catch it, but it slips through sometimes.
Well, yeah, but other than the first, that's all stuff that isn't impossible to overcome.

by Augarundus » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:56 pm

by Ethel mermania » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:57 pm
The Blaatschapen wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:
well that is a crime against humanity, unless i am going to get laid out of the deal.
that said, you get one ride in this life, you may as well enjoy it, because that is all you get.
I don't care if you get laid. That's entirely up to you. (Edit: And well.... Miss Mermania in this particular case I guess).
And at this very moment it is only one ride. Technology might be able to make it multiple. Or an eternal one. We'll see what's the better option. But that's waaaay off topic.

by The Emerald Dawn » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:58 pm

by Natapoc » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:58 pm
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Natapoc wrote:Many radical feminists have serious issues with the Michigan Womyn's Music Festival. There is a branch of feminism you could call separatism. That's where a lot of the things you don't like come from.
Alright, cheers for the info. I appreciate it.One thing I want to address: Radical feminists are against prostitution. There is no leeway here, prostitution is a form of objectification which radical feminists disagree with along with pornography.
Then I definitely can't align myself with the movement. I don't deny that the porn industry is problematic in the extreme, but I personally adhere to aspects more along the lines of choice feminism, though that too has its problems.
The Steel Magnolia wrote:A lot of the conflict between trans activists and radical feminists is centered around the issue of gender but that's not an excuse for trans-phobia.
Here is the problem:
"A trans activist wants the right to be seen as "boy" or "girl", a radical feminist wants the right to be seen as a person." In their efforts to be treated equally and with the respect they deserve many trans people are forced to cling to rigid gender constructs.
* note I know that trans activists want the same thing (to be treated as a person, I'm talking about the focus of their activism)
That's a bit of a simplification, and I don't agree with the notion that trans* people are forced to cling to rigid gender constructs. I think that's much more of a 80s/90s phenomenon, and I'm unaware of any transgender person who doesn't know the difference between gender expression and gender identity.Radical feminism is against the social construction of gender (not sex), or as one radical feminist put it: "What I do rightly criticize is the social construction of gender (not sex) as an idea, not an attack on trans people.""
I would assert that any attack on gender as a social as opposed to the importance we place upon it, or at least doing so without acknowledging the difference between gender identity and gender is by necessity problematic. By seeking to destroy a fundamental part of one's identity, you destroy them. That's something I don't think I can ever support.
The Steel Magnolia wrote:If it means anything to you, I don't think ANY of the radical feminists I know in real life have anything against trans people and are very accepting.
It does, actually. I do appreciate knowing that my anger was misdirected - I don't like attacking groups undeserving of my ire.

by The Emerald Dawn » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:59 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:The Blaatschapen wrote:
I don't care if you get laid. That's entirely up to you. (Edit: And well.... Miss Mermania in this particular case I guess).
And at this very moment it is only one ride. Technology might be able to make it multiple. Or an eternal one. We'll see what's the better option. But that's waaaay off topic.
true enough, mrs mermainia would take my head off, if i played without her. her rule is i cant bring anything home, window shopping is ok.

by Ethel mermania » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:59 pm

by The Blaatschapen » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:02 pm

by Natapoc » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:03 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:
source for dying younger is not true?
source for women not having better impulse control than men?
source for women having the same sex drive as men?
im not saying who has it better or worse, cause that is a load of crap. but you made a few claims, please source them
by Cannot think of a name » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:03 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:The Steel Magnolia wrote:
That... doesn't actually change the underlying point.
I'd argue that it fundamentally does.
Pretending doesn't include action.
And yes, it really would fix things if people thought and acted in ways that did not acknowledge social divisions. I can't think of a single issue where this isn't true.

by The Blaatschapen » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:03 pm
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:
true enough, mrs mermainia would take my head off, if i played without her. her rule is i cant bring anything home, window shopping is ok.
If I window shop and don't point out to The and/or Gif, I end up in trouble. If I bring someone home, my wife has sworn up and down that she'll happily engage in foursome. I've always been tempted to try, but I doubt I'll ever actually do.

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Drugs for life, Fractalnavel, Habsburg Mexico, IRA Bandit Country, Of Memers, Pizza Friday Forever91, Sorcery, The Great Nevada Overlord, The Jamesian Republic, The North Polish Union, Urkennalaid, Violetist Britannia
Advertisement