NATION

PASSWORD

7 Worst Things About Being Male

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:11 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Same thing with the whole trans-exclusive/gender abolitionist shite.

I find it endlessly amusing that they use the same arguments as Riki Wilchins, a (batshit insane) trans person. It's endlessly delightful.


gender abolitionism is fairly mainstream and fits perfectly in line with individualism, except in it's hardcore forms.


Not... really.

I wouldn't call it mainstream at all, firstly, and I would also assume that individualism would allow one to assert one's own gender identity?

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62658
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:11 pm

Esternial wrote:
Nadkor wrote:
Oh, I don't doubt that you do. But for many people there is implied sexual bargaining going on, whether everyone involved realises it at the time or not.

Unfortunately.

Maybe I need to start looking lonely and sad in bars on the off chance that nice people will buy me free beer. Maybe that's where I've been going wrong.

I'll try that as well.

Though I doubt it'll have the same effect.


I did the exact opposite, I was happy and dancing (my friends weren't), girls came and talked to me. No free beer though. Oh well, beggars can't be choosers.
1. The Last Tech Modling
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. Size matters. Bigger is forbidden and won't give the mods pleasure.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:13 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
gender abolitionism is fairly mainstream and fits perfectly in line with individualism, except in it's hardcore forms.


Not... really.

I wouldn't call it mainstream at all, firstly, and I would also assume that individualism would allow one to assert one's own gender identity?


Not according to most radical feminists i've heard. But then ofcourse, society is currently pretty individualist so ofcourse they have to argue it's somehow inherently sexist. I admit that most of the radical feminists that end up being famous are the ones with weird views.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:13 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Not... really.

I wouldn't call it mainstream at all, firstly, and I would also assume that individualism would allow one to assert one's own gender identity?


Not according to most radical feminists i've heard. But then ofcourse, society is currently pretty individualist so ofcourse they have to argue it's somehow inherently sexist.


That's because most radfems are fucking nuts.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62658
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:14 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Not according to most radical feminists i've heard. But then ofcourse, society is currently pretty individualist so ofcourse they have to argue it's somehow inherently sexist.


That's because most radfems are fucking nuts.


All radfems are fucking nuts. Otherwise they wouldn't be radical.
1. The Last Tech Modling
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. Size matters. Bigger is forbidden and won't give the mods pleasure.

User avatar
Esternial
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 54369
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:15 pm

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Esternial wrote:I'll try that as well.

Though I doubt it'll have the same effect.


I did the exact opposite, I was happy and dancing (my friends weren't), girls came and talked to me. No free beer though. Oh well, beggars can't be choosers.

I'm not a one-night stand person. Wouldn't even know how to get around to it.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:16 pm

Esternial wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:
I did the exact opposite, I was happy and dancing (my friends weren't), girls came and talked to me. No free beer though. Oh well, beggars can't be choosers.

I'm not a one-night stand person. Wouldn't even know how to get around to it.


Step 1: Find someone you want to have sex with
Step 2: Get talking
Step 3: Do you still want to have sex with them? If no, go to step 1. If yes, continue to step 4.
Step 4: ???
Step 5: Have sex with them.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Esternial
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 54369
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:18 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Esternial wrote:I'm not a one-night stand person. Wouldn't even know how to get around to it.


Step 1: Find someone you want to have sex with
Step 2: Get talking
Step 3: Do you still want to have sex with them? If no, go to step 1. If yes, continue to step 4.
Step 4: ???
Step 5: Have sex with them.

I think the problem lies with my own confidence. I should do a run of "Rules of the Game" :p

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:18 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Esternial wrote:I'm not a one-night stand person. Wouldn't even know how to get around to it.


Step 1: Find someone you want to have sex with
Step 2: Get talking
Step 3: Do you still want to have sex with them? If no, go to step 1. If yes, continue to step 4.
Step 4: ???
Step 5: Have sex with them.

Step 4 is always the easiest step *nods*
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:19 pm

Esternial wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Step 1: Find someone you want to have sex with
Step 2: Get talking
Step 3: Do you still want to have sex with them? If no, go to step 1. If yes, continue to step 4.
Step 4: ???
Step 5: Have sex with them.

I think the problem lies with my own confidence. I should do a run of "Rules of the Game" :p


My problem is I consistently friendzone myself by being an IRL pinkie pie who decides that my new friend simply must meet all my other friends and ohmygoshyou'reallgonnagetalonggreatandit'llbesofunandwowletsgogogo! *partytime*
Then 3 days later in the middle of shopping i'll realize what i've done and facepalm.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Nadkor
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12114
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Nadkor » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:21 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Nadkor wrote:
Are these random people in the bar that you've never met before or people you'd consider friends (or, I guess, other regulars in the bar, or other people in your group)?


Not random people but not necessarily people you know, They just need to be in the group, "Random" people is also acceptable provided you get talking first, at which point they are no longer random and are part of your group for the night.


This is a thing that happens in most places

It's also a thing that often develops into getting rounds, and that's not what I was talking about.

I don't know if you missed the start of this particular bit, but it was basically Great Nepal saying (to paraphrase) that something exclusive to males is that they have to buy their own beer in bars, to which I pointed out that I've never had random people buying me beer and the whole idea, more generally, that women can walk into bars and drink for free is a total myth.

It's gone off on quite the tangent since then.

I've never seen anyone buy someone a drink without talking to them, but I admit that'd be extremely strange and seem to imply some kind of expectation.


This is a thing that I was talking about more generally. As I say, it's never happened to me (and, again as I said, I've never had anyone who wasn't a friend or, to widen a bit, an acquaintance get me a free drink in a bar), but as you note it comes with an implication.

As it is, what typically happens in bars around here is that as people get progressively more drunk and people go home, the groups eventually end up merged into one massive group for when the pub closes which ends up at somebodies house to continue drinking. I know most of the people who live in my town (that go to bars) as a result, but that wasn't always the case. It's a good community.


This is a thing that, from experience, happens in smaller places (or bars in student halls or similar), but not so much anywhere with any sizeable population.
Last edited by Nadkor on Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
economic left/right: -7.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: -7.59
thekidswhopoptodaywillrocktomorrow

I think we need more post-coital and less post-rock
Feels like the build-up takes forever but you never get me off

User avatar
Nadkor
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12114
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Nadkor » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:22 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Esternial wrote:I think the problem lies with my own confidence. I should do a run of "Rules of the Game" :p


My problem is I consistently friendzone myself by being an IRL pinkie pie who decides that my new friend simply must meet all my other friends and ohmygoshyou'reallgonnagetalonggreatandit'llbesofunandwowletsgogogo! *partytime*
Then 3 days later in the middle of shopping i'll realize what i've done and facepalm.


Don't be one of those guys that believes in the 'friendzone'.
economic left/right: -7.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: -7.59
thekidswhopoptodaywillrocktomorrow

I think we need more post-coital and less post-rock
Feels like the build-up takes forever but you never get me off

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:23 pm

Nadkor wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Not random people but not necessarily people you know, They just need to be in the group, "Random" people is also acceptable provided you get talking first, at which point they are no longer random and are part of your group for the night.


This is a thing that happens in most places

It's also a thing that often develops into getting rounds, and that's not what I was talking about.

I don't know if you missed the start of this particular tangent, but it was basically Great Nepal saying (to paraphrase) that something exclusive to males is that they have to buy their own beer in bars, to which I pointed out that I've never had random people buying me beer and the whole idea, more generally, that women can walk into bars and drink for free is a total myth.

It's gone off on quite the tangent since then.

I've never seen anyone buy someone a drink without talking to them, but I admit that'd be extremely strange and seem to imply some kind of expectation.


This is a thing that I was talking about more generally. As I say, it's never happened to me (and, again as I said, I've never had anyone who wasn't a friend or, to widen a bit, an acquaintance get me a free drink in a bar), but as you note it comes with an implication.

As it is, what typically happens in bars around here is that as people get progressively more drunk and people go home, the groups eventually end up merged into one massive group for when the pub closes which ends up at somebodies house to continue drinking. I know most of the people who live in my town (that go to bars) as a result, but that wasn't always the case. It's a good community.


This is a thing that, from experience, happens in smaller places (or bars in student halls or similar), but not so much anywhere with any sizeable population.


Yeh I did miss it. And yeh it's probably the size of the town.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62658
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:24 pm

Esternial wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:
I did the exact opposite, I was happy and dancing (my friends weren't), girls came and talked to me. No free beer though. Oh well, beggars can't be choosers.

I'm not a one-night stand person. Wouldn't even know how to get around to it.


I'm also not like that. I prefer a partner for a couple of weeks, so that you can really get to know what she likes, etc.
1. The Last Tech Modling
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. Size matters. Bigger is forbidden and won't give the mods pleasure.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:25 pm

Nadkor wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
My problem is I consistently friendzone myself by being an IRL pinkie pie who decides that my new friend simply must meet all my other friends and ohmygoshyou'reallgonnagetalonggreatandit'llbesofunandwowletsgogogo! *partytime*
Then 3 days later in the middle of shopping i'll realize what i've done and facepalm.


Don't be one of those guys that believes in the 'friendzone'.


It's more that I end up being friends with them, and that I lose any desire to press it further since i'm happy being friends. I enjoy peoples company a lot more than...peoples company i guess. I suspect I may be deluding myself that i'm going out to hit on people when really i'm going out to make more friends and acquire ALL the friends.
I don't believe that women and men have a friendzone, but I do. "Gee, now that I get to talk to this person and hang out with them I don't particularly see the point in going any further!" etc...
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:30 pm, edited 5 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62658
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:36 pm

Nadkor wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
My problem is I consistently friendzone myself by being an IRL pinkie pie who decides that my new friend simply must meet all my other friends and ohmygoshyou'reallgonnagetalonggreatandit'llbesofunandwowletsgogogo! *partytime*
Then 3 days later in the middle of shopping i'll realize what i've done and facepalm.


Don't be one of those guys that believes in the 'friendzone'.


What's a friendzone? Is it like a calzone?
1. The Last Tech Modling
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. Size matters. Bigger is forbidden and won't give the mods pleasure.

User avatar
Nadkor
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12114
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Nadkor » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:37 pm

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Nadkor wrote:
Don't be one of those guys that believes in the 'friendzone'.


What's a friendzone? Is it like a calzone?


Much less tasty.
economic left/right: -7.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: -7.59
thekidswhopoptodaywillrocktomorrow

I think we need more post-coital and less post-rock
Feels like the build-up takes forever but you never get me off

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62658
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:38 pm

Nadkor wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:
What's a friendzone? Is it like a calzone?


Much less tasty.


And it probably contains more carbs.
1. The Last Tech Modling
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. Size matters. Bigger is forbidden and won't give the mods pleasure.

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:40 pm

Nadkor wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:...I buy people drinks if they look like they're lonely or down. I don't expect a whammy, just some conversation or at least a smile.


Oh, I don't doubt that you do. But for many people there is implied sexual bargaining going on, whether everyone involved realises it at the time or not.

Unfortunately.

Maybe I need to start looking lonely and sad in bars on the off chance that nice people will buy me free beer. Maybe that's where I've been going wrong.

My best pick up line has always been, "Nice shoes. Wanna fuck?"

Since I'm going to be sober for sex, I'm going to want her to be sober for sex too. It is a lot less fun if she's inebriated.

Nadkor wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:
What's a friendzone? Is it like a calzone?


Much less tasty.


Smells like toast, tastes like failure.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62658
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:41 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Nadkor wrote:
Oh, I don't doubt that you do. But for many people there is implied sexual bargaining going on, whether everyone involved realises it at the time or not.

Unfortunately.

Maybe I need to start looking lonely and sad in bars on the off chance that nice people will buy me free beer. Maybe that's where I've been going wrong.

My best pick up line has always been, "Nice shoes. Wanna fuck?"


I know that one in Hungarian. It works great. When in Hungary.

Since I'm going to be sober for sex, I'm going to want her to be sober for sex too. It is a lot less fun if she's inebriated.


I've been there.... It's indeed not so much fun. I bailed out after a while and went to my place.
1. The Last Tech Modling
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. Size matters. Bigger is forbidden and won't give the mods pleasure.

User avatar
Freelanderness
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10526
Founded: Feb 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Freelanderness » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:41 pm

I find the massive amount of stereotyping in the article to discredit its legitimacy.

Of course there are down sides to "being male" just as there are downsides to "being female". Is one more important than the other? It depends on the issue, because the majority of times, the issues happen to both genders, just at differing rates.
. ♕ I am your LORD and saviour, for I am Jesus Christina Confess your sins, and ye shall be forgiven. ❤ .
One of Le Sexiest NSers 2013. Call me ¡¥. Now a fascist because rape is bad, mmkay.
Meet the TET Pantheon
"What I hope most of all is that you understand what I mean when I tell you that, even though I do not know you, and even though I may never meet you, laugh with you cry with you or kiss you, I love you." - Evey (V for Vendetta)
Alleniana wrote:
New Manvir wrote:Well, it's obvious the Native Americans didn't really have a history. They were just loafing about, waiting for some white people to show up so the real fun could start.

The party don't start till I walk in
-Tik Tok, by Christopher Columbus

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:45 pm

Freelanderness wrote:I find the massive amount of stereotyping in the article to discredit its legitimacy.

Of course there are down sides to "being male" just as there are downsides to "being female". Is one more important than the other? It depends on the issue, because the majority of times, the issues happen to both genders, just at differing rates.

Everyone's life will suck. For certain values of suck.

User avatar
Esternial
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 54369
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:45 pm

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Esternial wrote:I'm not a one-night stand person. Wouldn't even know how to get around to it.


I'm also not like that. I prefer a partner for a couple of weeks, so that you can really get to know what she likes, etc.

Indeed, though I'm not really an expert on the matter with only one relationship that is now behind me.

User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:46 pm

The Blaatschapen wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
All radfems are fucking nuts. Otherwise they wouldn't be radical.


Radical comes from the latin word meaning "root". Most Radical feminists are NOT nuts. Radical feminism is called such because it seeks to solve the "roots" of the problem of patriarchy, not because it's somehow extreme.

Ostroeuropa wrote:
That's because most radfems are fucking nuts.


Ostroeuropa, how many radical feminists do you know personally? I know several and none of them are "nuts".
Last edited by Natapoc on Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:47 pm

Natapoc wrote:
Ostroeuropa, how many radical feminists do you know personally? I know several and none of them are "nuts".


I'm not the one who called them nuts.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cannonio, El Lazaro, Elejamie, Floofybit, Galloism, Haikuo, Hispida, Ifreann, Narland, Necroghastia, New Imperial Britannia, Picairn, Rary, Ryemarch, The Jamesian Republic

Advertisement

Remove ads