Yeah, "assault weapons"! What kind of weapon isn't capable of assault?
Advertisement
by Provisional America » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:17 am

by Immoren » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:18 am

discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Republica Newland » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:19 am
Those who would give up Essential Liberty
to purchase a little Temporary Safety,
deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
by Provisional America » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:20 am
by Provisional America » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:23 am
Republica Newland wrote:Those who would give up Essential Liberty
to purchase a little Temporary Safety,
deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
Benjamin Franklin

by Immoren » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:27 am
Republica Newland wrote:Those who would give up Essential Liberty
to purchase a little Temporary Safety,
deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
Benjamin Franklin
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Republica Newland » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:36 am

by Republica Newland » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:38 am

by Immoren » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:40 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Republica Newland » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:41 am

by Republica Newland » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:42 am
everyone is an american that worships the words of the american founding fathers as holy infallible truth

by Immoren » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:42 am

discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Republica Newland » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:44 am

by Luveria » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:47 am
Republica Newland wrote:Luveria wrote:
The quotes from benjamin franklin being used as implied reasons to oppose an assault weapons ban.
And how does this equal this:everyone is an american that worships the words of the american founding fathers as holy infallible truth
L.E.: I see logic is really really hard for the gun control crowd,considering how their answer to the supposedly "OMG SKY HIGH GUN-RELATED MURDER RATES" is the banning of a made-up "class" of firearms used in 1% of all gun crime.

by Immoren » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:48 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Republica Newland » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:51 am
Luveria wrote:Republica Newland wrote:
And how does this equal this:
L.E.: I see logic is really really hard for the gun control crowd,considering how their answer to the supposedly "OMG SKY HIGH GUN-RELATED MURDER RATES" is the banning of a made-up "class" of firearms used in 1% of all gun crime.
*shrugs*
I would favour registry of all guns rather than banning assault weapons. Not everyone in the gun control crowd wants to take away your precious guns.

by Luveria » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:56 am
Republica Newland wrote:Luveria wrote:
*shrugs*
I would favour registry of all guns rather than banning assault weapons. Not everyone in the gun control crowd wants to take away your precious guns.
This post further proves my point that the bulk of anti-gun people either suffer from Hoplophobia or have various preconceptions regarding guns. Or defending yourself with one doesn't live up to their moral high grounds. Otherwise I see no reason to use the word precious in the way you did.


by Immoren » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:59 am
Meself wrote:I want to throw everyone who uses "defense against tyranny" reasoning for gun ownership into gauntlet where they will be targeted with snipers, machine guns, cannon fire, artillery, etc with occasional minefield they need to navigate through.
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by New Rayhaven » Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:00 am
Luveria wrote:Republica Newland wrote:
This post further proves my point that the bulk of anti-gun people either suffer from Hoplophobia or have various preconceptions regarding guns. Or defending yourself with one doesn't live up to their moral high grounds. Otherwise I see no reason to use the word precious in the way you did.
The most common reason I see for american opposition to gun control is this:


by Immoren » Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:01 am

discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Republica Newland » Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:06 am
Luveria wrote:Republica Newland wrote:
This post further proves my point that the bulk of anti-gun people either suffer from Hoplophobia or have various preconceptions regarding guns. Or defending yourself with one doesn't live up to their moral high grounds. Otherwise I see no reason to use the word precious in the way you did.
The most common reason I see for american opposition to gun control is this:
Call me when the US military finds some telepathic target acquisition system,until then have fun picking out the rebels out of your own civilian population,unless the military would totally fire on their own families indiscriminately and totally not defect the fuck out while doing it,obviously.
by New Rayhaven » Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:08 am

by Immoren » Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:08 am
Republica Newland wrote:,until then have fun picking out the rebels out of your own civilian population

discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Dimetrodon Empire, Dumb Ideologies, Enormous Gentiles, Fractalnavel, Ifreann, Mutualist Chaos, Primitive Communism, Rary, Shidei, Subi Bumeen, The Astral Mandate, The Black Forrest, The Jamesian Republic, The North Polish Union, Treadwellia, Umeria
Advertisement