The Andrewtopian Republic wrote:Here's where I stand:
-total ban on fully automatic weapons
-tighter handgun regulations; stronger background checks, a registry system, and a pistol license similar to a drivers' license
Basically, I see no legitimate reason to own an AK-47. There are better things out there for hunting or range shooting. And I can see wanting to own a semi-automatic pistol for self-defense or hunting, but due to the high rate of pistol crime, tighter regulations are obviously needed. A registry and license system should suffice.
What would banning full auto/select fire weapons do? It won't impact crime (IIRC, there have been 1-2 crimes committed by legally owned full auto/select fire weapons since the National Firearms Act of 1934, and one of those was committed by a police officer), so what benefit are we looking for?
Just because you don't see a legitimate reason for something, doesn't mean it should be banned.