n its unsourced, every link in that section is broken, and leads to blogs with empty pages. thus it is unsourced.
Advertisement
by Sociobiology » Sun Mar 03, 2013 6:32 pm
by Wikipedia and Universe » Sun Mar 03, 2013 6:33 pm
An ODECON Naval Analyst wrote:Superior tactics and training can in fact triumph over force of numbers and missile spam.
Bottle wrote:This is not rocket surgery, folks.
Senestrum wrote:This is relativity, the theory that takes everything we know about the world, bends it over, and fucks it to death with a spiked dildo.
by Sociobiology » Sun Mar 03, 2013 6:37 pm
Like I said your judging us based on civilian status.
by The Ben Boys » Sun Mar 03, 2013 6:39 pm
by Occupied Deutschland » Sun Mar 03, 2013 6:39 pm
by Chernoslavia » Sun Mar 03, 2013 6:40 pm
by Occupied Deutschland » Sun Mar 03, 2013 6:41 pm
Sociobiology wrote:[snip]
worried about your government? get off your ass and vote, petition your representatives, become informed, instead of planning to lose.
by Chernoslavia » Sun Mar 03, 2013 6:43 pm
Sociobiology wrote:Chernoslavia wrote:Navy seals carry small arms too.
no shit
see underlined.Like I said your judging us based on civilian status.
no on your lack of intel, infrastructure, and equipment.
worried about your government? get off your ass and vote, petition your representatives, become informed, instead of planning to lose.
by Free Council Communes » Sun Mar 03, 2013 6:48 pm
by Curiosityness » Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:02 pm
by Free Council Communes » Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:04 pm
Curiosityness wrote:the rise in school shootings in america is ridiculous,assualt rifles should be banned. people should be allowed to own a gun. just not an assualt rifle
by Occupied Deutschland » Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:14 pm
Curiosityness wrote:the rise in school shootings in america is ridiculous,assualt rifles should be banned. people should be allowed to own a gun. just not an assualt rifle
by The New One » Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:14 pm
Curiosityness wrote:the rise in school shootings in america is ridiculous,assualt rifles should be banned. people should be allowed to own a gun. just not an assualt rifle
by Dilange » Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:37 pm
The New One wrote:Curiosityness wrote:the rise in school shootings in america is ridiculous,assualt rifles should be banned. people should be allowed to own a gun. just not an assualt rifle
Why not? This kid would be dead if they were illegal: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBe48u6ERiI
by The New One » Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:43 pm
Dilange wrote:The New One wrote:
Why not? This kid would be dead if they were illegal: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBe48u6ERiI
So obviously they shouldnt be illegal due to one occurance?
by Jentoan » Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:53 pm
by Wirbel » Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:56 pm
Mikoyan-Guryevich wrote:Don't RP that your naval strike force has just launched 1000 fighter jets, this is just pure shit.
by The New One » Sun Mar 03, 2013 8:00 pm
Genivaria wrote:First define 'assault weapons'.
I AM very much in favor of banning outright all fully automatic weapons.
by Empire of the Confederacy » Sun Mar 03, 2013 8:03 pm
Divair wrote:Big Jim P wrote:
You KNOW I meant ask them about how a rifle helps against a trained army etc.
I'm sure a trained army having a better rifle than another trained army is great. But a bunch of civilians having rifles against the entire armada of the USA?
lolwat
That's all that can be said.
by Idaho Conservatives » Sun Mar 03, 2013 8:04 pm
Genivaria wrote:First define 'assault weapons'.
I AM very much in favor of banning outright all fully automatic weapons.
by Genivaria » Sun Mar 03, 2013 8:07 pm
Idaho Conservatives wrote:Genivaria wrote:First define 'assault weapons'.
I AM very much in favor of banning outright all fully automatic weapons.
IMO, if you want to go thru a thorough background check, put down as much as $100,000 for the gun, and spend around $10 in ammo per second of trigger time to get a machine gun, then the ball is in your court.
by Idaho Conservatives » Sun Mar 03, 2013 8:08 pm
Genivaria wrote:Idaho Conservatives wrote:
IMO, if you want to go thru a thorough background check, put down as much as $100,000 for the gun, and spend around $10 in ammo per second of trigger time to get a machine gun, then the ball is in your court.
Would that not still effectively put automatic weapons out of reach of the majority of Americans?
Actually let me put it another way.
Which is cheaper and more effective?
Banning automatic weapons outright, or making them prohibitively expensive?
by Nua Corda » Sun Mar 03, 2013 8:08 pm
by Gun Manufacturers » Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:21 pm
Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...
Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo
Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.
Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Hidrandia, Philjia, Quincy, Spirit of Hope
Advertisement