Advertisement
by Nightkill the Emperor » Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:30 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Ethel mermania » Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:36 pm
by Ethel mermania » Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:48 pm
by Empire of Vlissingen » Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:48 pm
Zweite Alaje wrote:Germany can't help it OP, she's Europe's core. Any such European superstate would naturally be built around her.
by The Blaatschapen » Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:49 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:the cm was not created by nazi's.
that said, you could make the arguement that pre war german economists would be in favor of the EU and expect it to be german dominated. (based upon germany larger population, and greater levels of industrial production in europe).
by Ethel mermania » Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:55 pm
The Blaatschapen wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:the cm was not created by nazi's.
that said, you could make the arguement that pre war german economists would be in favor of the EU and expect it to be german dominated. (based upon germany larger population, and greater levels of industrial production in europe).
A very hypothetical argument though. Why care about what some dead people from another era would think about the situation now?
by Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Sun Mar 03, 2013 4:22 pm
by Neu Leonstein » Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:54 am
Ethel mermania wrote:i like history, and try to see things from a longer perspective, and i think part of that is "what would they think"?, and where do these ideas come from?
by Hurdegaryp » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:33 am
Neu Leonstein wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:i like history, and try to see things from a longer perspective, and i think part of that is "what would they think"?, and where do these ideas come from?
The idea came from: if we need heavy industry to build tanks and guns to shoot at each other, then if we link those industries closer together, it'll be harder to build tanks and guns and maybe we won't shoot at each other anymore.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Immoren » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:28 am
Zweite Alaje wrote:Germany can't help it OP, she's Europe's core. Any such European superstate would naturally be built around her.
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Estovakia 13 » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:49 am
by The Korrelian Union » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:52 am
Neu Leonstein wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:i like history, and try to see things from a longer perspective, and i think part of that is "what would they think"?, and where do these ideas come from?
The idea came from: if we need heavy industry to build tanks and guns to shoot at each other, then if we link those industries closer together, it'll be harder to build tanks and guns and maybe we won't shoot at each other anymore.
by Juristonia » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:56 am
The Korrelian Union wrote:Neu Leonstein wrote:The idea came from: if we need heavy industry to build tanks and guns to shoot at each other, then if we link those industries closer together, it'll be harder to build tanks and guns and maybe we won't shoot at each other anymore.
In essence, the ECSC were the first building blocks of a EU Military Industrial Complex
Anyway Euroscepticism is on the rise throughout Europe. Not unexpectedly though - after ignoring referenda rejecting the Lisbon treaty and the systemic clusterfuck the €uro turned out to be, I kinda understand people being critical. It's too bad that the loudest critics are figures like that Vlissingen dude, otherwise the criticism might've lead to something more constructive.
Liriena wrote:Say what you will about fascists: they are remarkably consistent even after several decades of failing spectacularly elsewhere.
Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.
Cannot think of a name wrote:Anyway, I'm from gold country, we grow up knowing that when people jump up and down shouting "GOLD GOLD GOLD" the gold is gone and the only money to be made is in selling shovels.
And it seems to me that cryptocurrency and NFTs and such suddenly have a whooooole lot of shovel salespeople.
by The Korrelian Union » Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:14 am
Juristonia wrote:
Amen.
I'm pretty eurosceptic (at least the way it's being done now) but guys like that screaming over everybody just kills any chance of a reasonable debate.
But then I guess it's in line with Wilders and his cronies way of "debating".
by Ethel mermania » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:01 am
Neu Leonstein wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:i like history, and try to see things from a longer perspective, and i think part of that is "what would they think"?, and where do these ideas come from?
The idea came from: if we need heavy industry to build tanks and guns to shoot at each other, then if we link those industries closer together, it'll be harder to build tanks and guns and maybe we won't shoot at each other anymore.
by Veceria » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:04 am
Samuraikoku wrote:Sounds like a Call of Duty script.
Zeth Rekia wrote:You making Zeno horny.
DesAnges wrote:People don't deserve respect, they earn it.
FoxTropica wrote:And then Hurdegaryp kissed Thafoo, Meanwhile Fox-Mary-"Sue"-Tropica saved TET from destruction and everyone happily forever.
Then suddenly fights broke out because hey, it's the internet.
by Samuraikoku » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:06 am
by The Blaatschapen » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:10 am
Ethel mermania wrote:Neu Leonstein wrote:The idea came from: if we need heavy industry to build tanks and guns to shoot at each other, then if we link those industries closer together, it'll be harder to build tanks and guns and maybe we won't shoot at each other anymore.
the idea of a european superstate dominated by germany predates the second world war.
by Ethel mermania » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:10 am
by Ethel mermania » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:12 am
by Empire of Vlissingen » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:21 am
Ethel mermania wrote:i think the common market was an excellent idea. i think the eu is a bad idea.
by Risottia » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:52 am
The Korrelian Union wrote:If you ask me the EU should stop for a second. Fix the current problems with the current institutions and bridge the gap between the institutions and the people. Stop trying to get the nations to transfer more souvereignty to the EU, because Europeans feel we get this union shoved down our throats.
by Empire of Vlissingen » Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:03 am
Risottia wrote:The Korrelian Union wrote:If you ask me the EU should stop for a second. Fix the current problems with the current institutions and bridge the gap between the institutions and the people. Stop trying to get the nations to transfer more souvereignty to the EU, because Europeans feel we get this union shoved down our throats.
Bridge the gap - that is, eliminate the Council of the EU AND the European Council, and have an elected Senate as second house of the European Parliament instead.
Then transfer to the EU all competences about foreign affairs, industrial standards, labour regulations, banking, criminal law and military.
by The Archregimancy » Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:48 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ameriganastan, Click Ests Vimgalevytopia, Cyptopir, Eahland, Eurocom, Google [Bot], Keltionialang, Plan Neonie, Senkaku, Shrillland, Statesburg, The Lone Alliance, The Vooperian Union, Tungstan, Welskerland
Advertisement