Advertisement

by Aussie Republic » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:08 am

by Desperate Measures » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:08 am

by Grenartia » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:08 am
by Auralia » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:12 am
Tsuntion wrote:Auralia wrote:
No, you can't. Sex is a genetic characteristic; no amount of cosmetic surgery and hormone therapy will change it.
You actually check the chromosomes of every person you consider dating and won't go out with them if they're not a perfect XX/XY in line with their appearance?

by Desperate Measures » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:12 am

by Grenartia » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:13 am

by Souseiseki » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:15 am
Auralia wrote:Tsuntion wrote:
You actually check the chromosomes of every person you consider dating and won't go out with them if they're not a perfect XX/XY in line with their appearance?
If I were to date someone, I would assume that they are who they appear to be, and would expect them to tell me if they are not.

by Ifreann » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:16 am
Grenartia wrote:Auralia wrote:
No, you can't. Sex is a genetic characteristic; no amount of cosmetic surgery and hormone therapy will change it.
Aside from chromosomes, you're wrong. But, then again, of what relevance to social interactions such as dating are chromosomes? I mean, when there's things like Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome that allow a woman to be born (and develop, save for certain reproductive aspects) phenotypically female, and yet have XY chromosomes, do they (chromosomes) really fucking matter in a social context?
by Auralia » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:19 am
Grenartia wrote:Auralia wrote:
No, you can't. Sex is a genetic characteristic; no amount of cosmetic surgery and hormone therapy will change it.
Aside from chromosomes, you're wrong. But, then again, of what relevance to social interactions such as dating are chromosomes? I mean, when there's things like Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome that allow a woman to be born (and develop, save for certain reproductive aspects) phenotypically female, and yet have XY chromosomes, do they (chromosomes) really fucking matter in a social context?

by Grenartia » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:19 am
Ifreann wrote:Grenartia wrote:
Aside from chromosomes, you're wrong. But, then again, of what relevance to social interactions such as dating are chromosomes? I mean, when there's things like Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome that allow a woman to be born (and develop, save for certain reproductive aspects) phenotypically female, and yet have XY chromosomes, do they (chromosomes) really fucking matter in a social context?
Not to defend the anti-trans folks, but things like CAIS or what have you can be relevant to romantic relationships because to some people, having kids with their significant other is an important consideration.

by Camelza » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:21 am
Grenartia wrote:Ifreann wrote:Not to defend the anti-trans folks, but things like CAIS or what have you can be relevant to romantic relationships because to some people, having kids with their significant other is an important consideration.
I know. But I'd consider that more of a medical context than a social one.


by Grenartia » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:23 am
Auralia wrote:Grenartia wrote:
Aside from chromosomes, you're wrong. But, then again, of what relevance to social interactions such as dating are chromosomes? I mean, when there's things like Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome that allow a woman to be born (and develop, save for certain reproductive aspects) phenotypically female, and yet have XY chromosomes, do they (chromosomes) really fucking matter in a social context?
I'll admit I don't know where I stand on corner cases like CAIS. But as a general rule, yes, chromosomes do matter.

by New Matawan » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:27 am

by Grenartia » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:28 am
New Kriegizstan wrote:Absolutely not.

by Ifreann » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:29 am
Grenartia wrote:Ifreann wrote:Not to defend the anti-trans folks, but things like CAIS or what have you can be relevant to romantic relationships because to some people, having kids with their significant other is an important consideration.
I know. But I'd consider that more of a medical context than a social one.

by Grenartia » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:33 am

by Camelza » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:36 am
Ifreann wrote:Grenartia wrote:
I know. But I'd consider that more of a medical context than a social one.
I suppose the fact of kids not being on the table for one person matters more than exactly why.
I would doubt it. I'm not really au fait with this kind of thing, but to the best of my knowledge one can't surgically create a functioning uterus.

by GraySoap » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:36 am

by Grenartia » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:42 am
GraySoap wrote:I'd say no. I'm generally against plastic surgery and altering your appearance beyond simple things such as cutting your hair. I'll make small exceptions from time to time.

by Ifreann » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:54 am
Grenartia wrote:GraySoap wrote:I'd say no. I'm generally against plastic surgery and altering your appearance beyond simple things such as cutting your hair. I'll make small exceptions from time to time.
Sex reassignment surgery is necessary for those individuals who get it. Not 'elective', not 'cosmetic', contrary to what you may have been told or otherwise led to believe.

by Grenartia » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:58 am
Ifreann wrote:Grenartia wrote:
Sex reassignment surgery is necessary for those individuals who get it. Not 'elective', not 'cosmetic', contrary to what you may have been told or otherwise led to believe.
And those who don't get SRS can massively change their appearance with hormones, which, as I've previously posited, are basically witchcraft.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bovad, Dreria, Eahland, EuroStralia, Hubaie, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Shrillland, States of Glory, Tarsonis, Vistulange
Advertisement