Well, many of the people posting such would not be given that trust.
Advertisement

by The Emerald Dawn » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:25 pm

by Arglorand » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:27 pm

by Nadkor » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:28 pm

by Snafturi » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:46 pm

by The Emerald Dawn » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:49 pm
Snafturi wrote:Nadkor wrote:
You would think some people would realise that your partner telling you that they're trans is actually a fairly huge declaration of their trust in you.
I find it funny that some of the people in this thread who have brought up the whole, "how could they not trust me?" thing also say how upset they'd be to hear that news in the first place.
It's almost as if waiting until you know the person won't lose their shit is a perfectly rational way to behave.

by Xathranaar » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:54 pm

by Snafturi » Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:02 pm
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Snafturi wrote:I find it funny that some of the people in this thread who have brought up the whole, "how could they not trust me?" thing also say how upset they'd be to hear that news in the first place.
It's almost as if waiting until you know the person won't lose their shit is a perfectly rational way to behave.
You're a heretic, you know that?


by Threlizdun » Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:44 pm
I have to be honest, I am truly rather suprised that our resident conservative Orthodox would have such views. The acceptance of transgenders I suppose I could see, as your definition of a conservative lifestyle often has actually been far more inclusive than others, though the consideration of practicing polyamory really caught me off guard.Distruzio wrote:I have before and, assuming my fiance kicks me to the curb, would again. In fact, she knows my tastes in women and has asked that, should we ever decide to introduce a third into our relationship, it be a trans.

by Umbra Ac Silentium » Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:49 pm
Threlizdun wrote:I have to be honest, I am truly rather suprised that our resident conservative Orthodox would have such views. The acceptance of transgenders I suppose I could see, as your definition of a conservative lifestyle often has actually been far more inclusive than others, though the consideration of practicing polyamory really caught me off guard.Distruzio wrote:I have before and, assuming my fiance kicks me to the curb, would again. In fact, she knows my tastes in women and has asked that, should we ever decide to introduce a third into our relationship, it be a trans.
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.

by Quelesh » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:46 pm
Trollgaard wrote:Never really thought about it...but probably not. I want kids at some point, so dating a transgender would be a waste of time.
Hathradic States wrote:Yeah....No.
CVT Temp wrote:Is it okay to call some "a transgender"? Shouldn't you call them a transgender person?
Trollgaard wrote:What the hell are you talking about? Genetic lineage is just about the most important thing in this world. It matter's if a child is mine or not\ because, you know, it would be MINE, a part of me. Just like family members are more important than strangers. That kinda deal. Passing down your family name and genetics is an important goal. Not for everyone, granted, but for many people it is.
How can you even say that it makes no difference if a child is yours or not? Of course it matters...
Jassysworth 1 wrote:almost NONE of you will EVER date a transgender
The Blaatschapen wrote:Someone who has a criminal record is less likely to be compatible with me.
Snafturi wrote:Nadkor wrote:You would think some people would realise that your partner telling you that they're trans is actually a fairly huge declaration of their trust in you.
I find it funny that some of the people in this thread who have brought up the whole, "how could they not trust me?" thing also say how upset they'd be to hear that news in the first place.
It's almost as if waiting until you know the person won't lose their shit is a perfectly rational way to behave.

by Lantianguo » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:36 pm
Threlizdun wrote:I have to be honest, I am truly rather suprised that our resident conservative Orthodox would have such views. The acceptance of transgenders I suppose I could see, as your definition of a conservative lifestyle often has actually been far more inclusive than others, though the consideration of practicing polyamory really caught me off guard.Distruzio wrote:I have before and, assuming my fiance kicks me to the curb, would again. In fact, she knows my tastes in women and has asked that, should we ever decide to introduce a third into our relationship, it be a trans.

by Jassysworth 1 » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:51 pm
[/quote]Central European Commonwealth wrote:

by Umbra Ac Silentium » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:54 pm
Jassysworth 1 wrote:I'm sorry but that's not what the OP was asking. Hell if he had asked it that way (''...you meet the woman of your dreams who happens to [be a transexual]...) it would have been VERY BIASED and a stupid question.
Because then the only people who would even have the right to answer this poll would be the type of people for whom it is even remotely possible for their ''dream woman/ideal woman'' to be a transexual.
That does not include myself or most people. For most people, their ''women of their dreams'' and the categorization of ''transsexual'' will be mutually exclusive.
The bolded are his actual questions and in none of them do you assume that the partner is ''the woman of your dreams'... just someone who is transgender you are ALREADY dating (you didn't know before) OR an openly transgender person who wants to date you.
I agree that you should only be dating people you are interested in but you don't always have the luxury of dating the ''women of your dreams...''
As such, I just don't believe that 40% of people here could really continue to date someone if they suddenly found out she/he was a transgender...
OR that if an openly transgender person came up to them to ask for a date that they could REALLY as human beings be unbiased about that and really keep the option of dating them in the field.
How can you even kiss a woman if you knew he/she had once been a man? It's just... ILL...
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.

by Desperate Measures » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:55 pm
Jassysworth 1 wrote:I'm sorry but that's not what the OP was asking. Hell if he had asked it that way (''...you meet the woman of your dreams who happens to [be a transexual]...) it would have been VERY BIASED and a stupid question.
Because then the only people who would even have the right to answer this poll would be the type of people for whom it is even remotely possible for their ''dream woman/ideal woman'' to be a transexual.
That does not include myself or most people. For most people, their ''women of their dreams'' and the categorization of ''transsexual'' will be mutually exclusive.
''If you're in a relationship now, and the person you're with turns out to be transgender, would you stay with them?
Or if a transgender person wanted you to date them, would you?''
The bolded are his actual questions and in none of them do you assume that the partner is ''the woman of your dreams'... just someone who is transgender you are ALREADY dating (you didn't know before) OR an openly transgender person who wants to date you.
I agree that you should only be dating people you are interested in but you don't always have the luxury of dating the ''women of your dreams...''
As such, I just don't believe that 40% of people here could really continue to date someone if they suddenly found out she/he was a transgender...
OR that if an openly transgender person came up to them to ask for a date that they could REALLY as human beings be unbiased about that and really keep the option of dating them in the field.
How can you even kiss a woman if you knew he/she had once been a man? It's just... ILL...

by Jassysworth 1 » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:56 pm
Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:Jassysworth 1 wrote:I'm sorry but that's not what the OP was asking. Hell if he had asked it that way (''...you meet the woman of your dreams who happens to [be a transexual]...) it would have been VERY BIASED and a stupid question.
Because then the only people who would even have the right to answer this poll would be the type of people for whom it is even remotely possible for their ''dream woman/ideal woman'' to be a transexual.
That does not include myself or most people. For most people, their ''women of their dreams'' and the categorization of ''transsexual'' will be mutually exclusive.
The bolded are his actual questions and in none of them do you assume that the partner is ''the woman of your dreams'... just someone who is transgender you are ALREADY dating (you didn't know before) OR an openly transgender person who wants to date you.
I agree that you should only be dating people you are interested in but you don't always have the luxury of dating the ''women of your dreams...''
As such, I just don't believe that 40% of people here could really continue to date someone if they suddenly found out she/he was a transgender...
OR that if an openly transgender person came up to them to ask for a date that they could REALLY as human beings be unbiased about that and really keep the option of dating them in the field.
How can you even kiss a woman if you knew he/she had once been a man? It's just... ILL...
There's your problem.
She's never been a man.
She's just looked like one for a period of her life.

by Urmanian » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:57 pm
Jassysworth 1 wrote:How can you even kiss a woman if you knew he/she had once been a man? It's just... ILL...

by Umbra Ac Silentium » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:58 pm
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.

by Xathranaar » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:59 pm

by Desperate Measures » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:59 pm


by YellowApple » Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:05 pm
Jassysworth 1 wrote:Central European Commonwealth wrote:
I'm sorry but that's not what the OP was asking. Hell if he had asked it that way (''...you meet the woman of your dreams who happens to [be a transexual]...) it would have been VERY BIASED and a stupid question.
Because then the only people who would even have the right to answer this poll would be the type of people for whom it is even remotely possible for their ''dream woman/ideal woman'' to be a transexual.

by Imperial Nilfgaard » Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:05 pm

by Farnhamia » Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:06 pm
Imperial Nilfgaard wrote:No.

by Desperate Measures » Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:09 pm

by Stormdawn » Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:10 pm

by Person012345 » Mon Mar 04, 2013 10:08 pm
Jassysworth 1 wrote:How can you even kiss a woman if you knew he/she had once been a man? It's just... ILL...
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Angeloid Astraea, Atlantic Faroe Islands, Cannot think of a name, Cyrillac, Ethel mermania, Mutualist Chaos, Neo-American States, Sauros, Shrillland, The Jamesian Republic, The Two Jerseys, Uiiop, Valrifall, Wawa Cat Republic
Advertisement