NATION

PASSWORD

Would you date a transgender?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

?

Yes
335
41%
No
477
59%
 
Total votes : 812

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:25 pm

Nadkor wrote:
Meryuma wrote:
What part of people being beaten, raped and killed over this stuff do you not get?


You would think some people would realise that your partner telling you that they're trans is actually a fairly huge declaration of their trust in you.

Well, many of the people posting such would not be given that trust.

User avatar
Arglorand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12597
Founded: Jan 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arglorand » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:27 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Nadkor wrote:
You would think some people would realise that your partner telling you that they're trans is actually a fairly huge declaration of their trust in you.

Well, many of the people posting such would not be given that trust.

Not to mention I'd imagine you'd have to wait quite a while before you earned such trust to begin with.

Relationships need to be built.
Kosovo is Morrowind. N'wah.
Impeach Dagoth Ur, legalise Daedra worship, the Empire is theft. Nerevarine 3E 427.

Pros: Dunmeri independence, abolition of the Empire, the Daedra, Morag Tong, House Redoran, Ashlander interests, abolitionism, Dissident Priests, canonisation of St. Jiub the Cliff Racer Slayer.
Cons: Imperials, the Empire, the False Tribunal, Dagoth Ur, House Hlaalu, Imperials, the Eight Divines, "Talos", "Nords", Imperial unionism, Imperials.

I am a: Social Democrat | Bright green | Republican | Intersectional feminist | Civic nationalist | Multiculturalist
(and i blatantly stole this from Old Tyrannia)

User avatar
Nadkor
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12114
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Nadkor » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:28 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Nadkor wrote:
You would think some people would realise that your partner telling you that they're trans is actually a fairly huge declaration of their trust in you.

Well, many of the people posting such would not be given that trust.


Quite.
economic left/right: -7.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: -7.59
thekidswhopoptodaywillrocktomorrow

I think we need more post-coital and less post-rock
Feels like the build-up takes forever but you never get me off

User avatar
Snafturi
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1356
Founded: Sep 19, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Snafturi » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:46 pm

Nadkor wrote:
Meryuma wrote:
What part of people being beaten, raped and killed over this stuff do you not get?


You would think some people would realise that your partner telling you that they're trans is actually a fairly huge declaration of their trust in you.

I find it funny that some of the people in this thread who have brought up the whole, "how could they not trust me?" thing also say how upset they'd be to hear that news in the first place.

It's almost as if waiting until you know the person won't lose their shit is a perfectly rational way to behave.
[color=#000080]
The four most overrated things in life are champagne, lobsters,... and picnics -Hitchen

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:49 pm

Snafturi wrote:
Nadkor wrote:
You would think some people would realise that your partner telling you that they're trans is actually a fairly huge declaration of their trust in you.

I find it funny that some of the people in this thread who have brought up the whole, "how could they not trust me?" thing also say how upset they'd be to hear that news in the first place.

It's almost as if waiting until you know the person won't lose their shit is a perfectly rational way to behave.

You're a heretic, you know that?

User avatar
Xathranaar
Minister
 
Posts: 3384
Founded: Jul 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Xathranaar » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:54 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
Stormdawn wrote:Fair enough. Just something I'm a bit touchy on, since my girlfriend has to deal with people who do mean that sort of thing badly.

Yeah, if I weren't rushed I'd probably make a better rebuttal post.

Too good for 'em, I say.
My views summarized.
The Gospel According to Queen.
It is possible that some of my posts may not be completely serious.

User avatar
Snafturi
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1356
Founded: Sep 19, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Snafturi » Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:02 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Snafturi wrote:I find it funny that some of the people in this thread who have brought up the whole, "how could they not trust me?" thing also say how upset they'd be to hear that news in the first place.

It's almost as if waiting until you know the person won't lose their shit is a perfectly rational way to behave.

You're a heretic, you know that?

The Pope is a baboon!
Image

I regret nothing!
[color=#000080]
The four most overrated things in life are champagne, lobsters,... and picnics -Hitchen

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:44 pm

Distruzio wrote:I have before and, assuming my fiance kicks me to the curb, would again. In fact, she knows my tastes in women and has asked that, should we ever decide to introduce a third into our relationship, it be a trans.
I have to be honest, I am truly rather suprised that our resident conservative Orthodox would have such views. The acceptance of transgenders I suppose I could see, as your definition of a conservative lifestyle often has actually been far more inclusive than others, though the consideration of practicing polyamory really caught me off guard.
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Umbra Ac Silentium
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11724
Founded: Aug 03, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Umbra Ac Silentium » Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:49 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
Distruzio wrote:I have before and, assuming my fiance kicks me to the curb, would again. In fact, she knows my tastes in women and has asked that, should we ever decide to introduce a third into our relationship, it be a trans.
I have to be honest, I am truly rather suprised that our resident conservative Orthodox would have such views. The acceptance of transgenders I suppose I could see, as your definition of a conservative lifestyle often has actually been far more inclusive than others, though the consideration of practicing polyamory really caught me off guard.

He's explained why before.
I recall him mentioning how transwomen frequently take on traditional female "roles" or something like that.

Economic Left/Right: -0.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.97
Other Compass
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.

User avatar
Quelesh
Minister
 
Posts: 2942
Founded: Jun 09, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Quelesh » Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:46 pm

Trollgaard wrote:Never really thought about it...but probably not. I want kids at some point, so dating a transgender would be a waste of time.


I hadn't thought about that, but then I'm not too keen on procreating. That said, you could always reproduce some other way (e.g. sperm/egg donation, surrogacy).

Hathradic States wrote:Yeah....No.


Heh, heh.

Sorry, I couldn't help but chuckle seeing this post from you.

Hathradic States wrote:
Grenartia wrote:I won't say anything. :p

It's called not knowing, which, one could say, ultimately embittered me towards the entire experience. Being lied to sucks.


I understand how you feel, but I wouldn't say that she lied to you. She had a good reason for not telling anyone, and it took no small amount of courage to "come out" on here, even just being online.

CVT Temp wrote:Is it okay to call some "a transgender"? Shouldn't you call them a transgender person?


It seems grammatically problematic to me, as "transgender" is an adjective. I'm not sure it can properly be used as a noun.

Trollgaard wrote:What the hell are you talking about? Genetic lineage is just about the most important thing in this world. It matter's if a child is mine or not\ because, you know, it would be MINE, a part of me. Just like family members are more important than strangers. That kinda deal. Passing down your family name and genetics is an important goal. Not for everyone, granted, but for many people it is.

How can you even say that it makes no difference if a child is yours or not? Of course it matters...


http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=2241

Jassysworth 1 wrote:almost NONE of you will EVER date a transgender


Unlike most of the rest of your post, this statement is probably true, if only because the occasion will simply never present itself to most, given that most people aren't trans.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Someone who has a criminal record is less likely to be compatible with me.


Gee, it's the exact opposite for me.

Snafturi wrote:
Nadkor wrote:You would think some people would realise that your partner telling you that they're trans is actually a fairly huge declaration of their trust in you.

I find it funny that some of the people in this thread who have brought up the whole, "how could they not trust me?" thing also say how upset they'd be to hear that news in the first place.

It's almost as if waiting until you know the person won't lose their shit is a perfectly rational way to behave.


I've only read a minority of pages in this thread (I'm sure not spending hours reading them all), but I've noticed that many who say that not being told is a breach of trust also say that if they were told right away they would not date the person, which leads me to believe that, at least for some of them, it's transsexuality per se that is the determining factor.
"I hate mankind, for I think myself one of the best of them, and I know how bad I am." - Samuel Johnson

"Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." - George Bernard Shaw
Political Compass | Economic Left/Right: -7.75 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -10.00

User avatar
Lantianguo
Envoy
 
Posts: 225
Founded: Jan 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Lantianguo » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:36 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
Distruzio wrote:I have before and, assuming my fiance kicks me to the curb, would again. In fact, she knows my tastes in women and has asked that, should we ever decide to introduce a third into our relationship, it be a trans.
I have to be honest, I am truly rather suprised that our resident conservative Orthodox would have such views. The acceptance of transgenders I suppose I could see, as your definition of a conservative lifestyle often has actually been far more inclusive than others, though the consideration of practicing polyamory really caught me off guard.

He sounds much more libertarian than conservative to me. A good thing, I might add!
风向转变时,有人筑墙,有人造风车.
(feng1xiang4 zhuan4bian4 shi2, you3ren2 zhu2 qiang2, you3ren2 zao4 feng1che1)
[When the wind of change blows, some build walls, while others build windmills]


Am: Transgendered (MtF, 3 years HRT), Bisexual (Kinsey 4), Computer Scientist
Pro: Privacy, Freedom, Secularism, Transhumanism, Social Libertarianism, Mutualism, LGBT Rights
Anti: Establishmentarianism, Nationalism, Corporatism, Authoritarianism, Totalitarianism

User avatar
Jassysworth 1
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1484
Founded: Jan 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jassysworth 1 » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:51 pm

Central European Commonwealth wrote:
[/quote]

I'm sorry but that's not what the OP was asking. Hell if he had asked it that way (''...you meet the woman of your dreams who happens to [be a transexual]...) it would have been VERY BIASED and a stupid question.

Because then the only people who would even have the right to answer this poll would be the type of people for whom it is even remotely possible for their ''dream woman/ideal woman'' to be a transexual.

That does not include myself or most people. For most people, their ''women of their dreams'' and the categorization of ''transsexual'' will be mutually exclusive.

''If you're in a relationship now, and the person you're with turns out to be transgender, would you stay with them?
Or if a transgender person wanted you to date them, would you?''


The bolded are his actual questions and in none of them do you assume that the partner is ''the woman of your dreams'... just someone who is transgender you are ALREADY dating (you didn't know before) OR an openly transgender person who wants to date you.

I agree that you should only be dating people you are interested in but you don't always have the luxury of dating the ''women of your dreams...''

As such, I just don't believe that 40% of people here could really continue to date someone if they suddenly found out she/he was a transgender...

OR that if an openly transgender person came up to them to ask for a date that they could REALLY as human beings be unbiased about that and really keep the option of dating them in the field.

How can you even kiss a woman if you knew he/she had once been a man? It's just... ILL...
Last edited by Jassysworth 1 on Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:54 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Umbra Ac Silentium
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11724
Founded: Aug 03, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Umbra Ac Silentium » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:54 pm

Jassysworth 1 wrote:I'm sorry but that's not what the OP was asking. Hell if he had asked it that way (''...you meet the woman of your dreams who happens to [be a transexual]...) it would have been VERY BIASED and a stupid question.

Because then the only people who would even have the right to answer this poll would be the type of people for whom it is even remotely possible for their ''dream woman/ideal woman'' to be a transexual.

That does not include myself or most people. For most people, their ''women of their dreams'' and the categorization of ''transsexual'' will be mutually exclusive.

The bolded are his actual questions and in none of them do you assume that the partner is ''the woman of your dreams'... just someone who is transgender you are ALREADY dating (you didn't know before) OR an openly transgender person who wants to date you.

I agree that you should only be dating people you are interested in but you don't always have the luxury of dating the ''women of your dreams...''

As such, I just don't believe that 40% of people here could really continue to date someone if they suddenly found out she/he was a transgender...

OR that if an openly transgender person came up to them to ask for a date that they could REALLY as human beings be unbiased about that and really keep the option of dating them in the field.

How can you even kiss a woman if you knew he/she had once been a man? It's just... ILL...

There's your problem.
She's never been a man.
She's just looked like one for a period of her life.
Last edited by Umbra Ac Silentium on Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:55 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Economic Left/Right: -0.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.97
Other Compass
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:55 pm

Jassysworth 1 wrote:I'm sorry but that's not what the OP was asking. Hell if he had asked it that way (''...you meet the woman of your dreams who happens to [be a transexual]...) it would have been VERY BIASED and a stupid question.

Because then the only people who would even have the right to answer this poll would be the type of people for whom it is even remotely possible for their ''dream woman/ideal woman'' to be a transexual.

That does not include myself or most people. For most people, their ''women of their dreams'' and the categorization of ''transsexual'' will be mutually exclusive.

''If you're in a relationship now, and the person you're with turns out to be transgender, would you stay with them?
Or if a transgender person wanted you to date them, would you?''


The bolded are his actual questions and in none of them do you assume that the partner is ''the woman of your dreams'... just someone who is transgender you are ALREADY dating (you didn't know before) OR an openly transgender person who wants to date you.

I agree that you should only be dating people you are interested in but you don't always have the luxury of dating the ''women of your dreams...''

As such, I just don't believe that 40% of people here could really continue to date someone if they suddenly found out she/he was a transgender...

OR that if an openly transgender person came up to them to ask for a date that they could REALLY as human beings be unbiased about that and really keep the option of dating them in the field.

How can you even kiss a woman if you knew he/she had once been a man? It's just... ILL...

Falling into the transgender definition, I haven't had any problems getting a date.
Last edited by Desperate Measures on Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
Jassysworth 1
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1484
Founded: Jan 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jassysworth 1 » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:56 pm

Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:
Jassysworth 1 wrote:I'm sorry but that's not what the OP was asking. Hell if he had asked it that way (''...you meet the woman of your dreams who happens to [be a transexual]...) it would have been VERY BIASED and a stupid question.

Because then the only people who would even have the right to answer this poll would be the type of people for whom it is even remotely possible for their ''dream woman/ideal woman'' to be a transexual.

That does not include myself or most people. For most people, their ''women of their dreams'' and the categorization of ''transsexual'' will be mutually exclusive.

The bolded are his actual questions and in none of them do you assume that the partner is ''the woman of your dreams'... just someone who is transgender you are ALREADY dating (you didn't know before) OR an openly transgender person who wants to date you.

I agree that you should only be dating people you are interested in but you don't always have the luxury of dating the ''women of your dreams...''

As such, I just don't believe that 40% of people here could really continue to date someone if they suddenly found out she/he was a transgender...

OR that if an openly transgender person came up to them to ask for a date that they could REALLY as human beings be unbiased about that and really keep the option of dating them in the field.

How can you even kiss a woman if you knew he/she had once been a man? It's just... ILL...

There's your problem.
She's never been a man.
She's just looked like one for a period of her life.


No... he was born a man.

And now he wants to be a woman.

User avatar
Urmanian
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8950
Founded: Oct 13, 2007
Democratic Socialists

Postby Urmanian » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:57 pm

Jassysworth 1 wrote:How can you even kiss a woman if you knew he/she had once been a man? It's just... ILL...

"I find it icky - thus everyone should think that way!" is, of course, gold medal debating, but if it's your only argument then perhaps you should just stop.

but

1) She has never been a man; she may have had the sexy parts of a man, but she always was a woman;

2) Your repeated claims that trans* persons are disgusting and would never create romantic feelings and sexual desire in other people are frankly offensive, please be considerate to your fellow posters, some of which are trans*.
✮ The Vermillion Republic of Sorrelia ✮
Commie ponies with guns and such. One of the OG MLP nations, funnily enough I don't care for EaW pretty much at all.

This nation represents the voices in my head.

User avatar
Umbra Ac Silentium
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11724
Founded: Aug 03, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Umbra Ac Silentium » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:58 pm

Jassysworth 1 wrote:
Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:There's your problem.
She's never been a man.
She's just looked like one for a period of her life.


No... he was born a man.

And now he wants to be a woman.

Incorrect.
She's always been a she.
most transgender people report memories of having a problem with their body as back as five. In other words, their earliest memories.
The brain is not the seat of the body. Rather, the other way around.
If the body fails to align with the mind, then there is no fault to be found in correcting that.

Economic Left/Right: -0.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.97
Other Compass
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.

User avatar
Xathranaar
Minister
 
Posts: 3384
Founded: Jul 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Xathranaar » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:59 pm

Jassysworth 1 wrote:
Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:There's your problem.
She's never been a man.
She's just looked like one for a period of her life.


No... he was born a man.

And now he wants to be a woman.

Born a man? You saying my bar mitzvah was for nothing?
My views summarized.
The Gospel According to Queen.
It is possible that some of my posts may not be completely serious.

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:59 pm

Xathranaar wrote:
Jassysworth 1 wrote:
No... he was born a man.

And now he wants to be a woman.

Born a man? You saying my bar mitzvah was for nothing?

:lol:
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
YellowApple
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13821
Founded: Apr 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby YellowApple » Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:05 pm

Jassysworth 1 wrote:
Central European Commonwealth wrote:


I'm sorry but that's not what the OP was asking. Hell if he had asked it that way (''...you meet the woman of your dreams who happens to [be a transexual]...) it would have been VERY BIASED and a stupid question.

Because then the only people who would even have the right to answer this poll would be the type of people for whom it is even remotely possible for their ''dream woman/ideal woman'' to be a transexual.


Right there, I can tell you might not be reading the OP properly - particularly, this pertinent question:

"If you're in a relationship now, and the person you're with turns out to be transgender, would you stay with them?"

Note that qualifier at the beginning:

"If you're in a relationship now"

Most of the responses in this thread have been pertaining to a significant other who late into an intimate relationship reveals him/herself to be a transgender individual who underwent sex reassignment surgery. Considering that attachment already exists, the scenario is much more testing for an individual (like me) who is normally opposed to being in a relationship with a transgender SO due the desire for having a biological family (which - hopefully - full-reproductive sex reassignment surgery and some gene therapy could enable in the future, allowing me to change my answer to that question from "No" to "Yes").

My own rationale for being open to a relationship with a trans* SO (once the ability for us to create biological and genetic children of our own is medically feasible, that is) is based on a computer programming concept called "duck typing". If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then as far as I'm concerned, it's a duck. Meanwhile, if she looks like a woman, acts like a woman, believes she is a woman, and has the reproductive organs of a woman, then as far as I'm concerned (on a sexual and romantic level), she's a woman, and therefore attractive to a heterosexual male like myself.
Last edited by YellowApple on Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Mallorea and Riva should resign
Member of the One True Faith and Church. Join The Church of Derpy today!

User avatar
Imperial Nilfgaard
Senator
 
Posts: 3716
Founded: Jan 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperial Nilfgaard » Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:05 pm

No.
Down with the Banderovists!
Remember Odessa!
Крым
это часть России. Россия Своих Не Бросает!

We are the Great Souled Men of NS.
General-Secretary of the American Compartmentalist Party. ComPart for short.
Great Souled Idols: Vladimir Putin, Aleksandr Dugin, Nigel Farage, Marine Le Pen, Eric Zemmour
Manifesto - A Treatise on Souls

Proud Supporter of Bashar al-Assad's fight against terrorism

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111689
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:06 pm

Imperial Nilfgaard wrote:No.

I bet you wouldn't be able to tell.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:09 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Imperial Nilfgaard wrote:No.

I bet you wouldn't be able to tell.

I wouldn't be so sure. I'm being led to believe there's a species of male that can smell ovaries.
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
Stormdawn
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 365
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Stormdawn » Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:10 pm

Xathranaar wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Yeah, if I weren't rushed I'd probably make a better rebuttal post.

Too good for 'em, I say.


Yes, but it would be nice if it were phrased in such a way that it doesn't overlap onto perfectly lovely people...
Stormdawn, as in my in-game nation, is, pretty much entirely an OOC construct.

For FT, I use the Undying Fleet, a group of pseudo-nomadic humans and AIs.

For FanPMT, I use the Thriceborn Empire, an empire always ruled by sibling pairs. This is my WA nation, not Stormdawn.

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Mon Mar 04, 2013 10:08 pm

Jassysworth 1 wrote:How can you even kiss a woman if you knew he/she had once been a man? It's just... ILL...

Not everyone thinks that kissing people of the same sex is necessarily "ill". Whatever you mean by that. Even if they did, who cares. An always-woman was once a child. How can you kiss her knowing she was once a child?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Angeloid Astraea, Atlantic Faroe Islands, Cannot think of a name, Cyrillac, Ethel mermania, Mutualist Chaos, Neo-American States, Sauros, Shrillland, The Jamesian Republic, The Two Jerseys, Uiiop, Valrifall, Wawa Cat Republic

Advertisement

Remove ads