Advertisement

by Los Malvinas Son Peruano » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:21 pm


by Grenartia » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:22 pm
Freiheit Reich wrote:Xathranaar wrote:From what popular culture has informed me, it has to do with the number of roads one has walked down, and being curvaceous/sultry, respectively.
The body parts we were born with.
Hermaphordites are tricky. 'It' might be acceptable. 'It' is fine if you don't know the gender, I have used it to describe babies I was unsure of. I believe the grammar police will allow it.

by Xathranaar » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:22 pm
Freiheit Reich wrote:Xathranaar wrote:From what popular culture has informed me, it has to do with the number of roads one has walked down, and being curvaceous/sultry, respectively.
The body parts we were born with.
Hermaphordites are tricky. 'It' might be acceptable. 'It' is fine if you don't know the gender, I have used it to describe babies I was unsure of. I believe the grammar police will allow it.

by Grenartia » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:24 pm
Xathranaar wrote:Freiheit Reich wrote:
The body parts we were born with.
Hermaphordites are tricky. 'It' might be acceptable. 'It' is fine if you don't know the gender, I have used it to describe babies I was unsure of. I believe the grammar police will allow it.
Your view lacks all nuance.
What would you possibly say to someone with androgen insensitivity syndrome?

by Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:25 pm
Freiheit Reich wrote:Xathranaar wrote:From what popular culture has informed me, it has to do with the number of roads one has walked down, and being curvaceous/sultry, respectively.
The body parts we were born with.
Hermaphordites are tricky. 'It' might be acceptable. 'It' is fine if you don't know the gender, I have used it to describe babies I was unsure of. I believe the grammar police will allow it.

by Scholencia » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:25 pm
Los Malvinas Son Peruano wrote:No señor, I would not even if I knew it before dating. The idea that it was a man is disgusting to me.
Also, I would like biological children with a women that is my partner. Thank you.

by Nadkor » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:25 pm

by Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:26 pm
Los Malvinas Son Peruano wrote:No señor, I would not even if I knew it before dating. The idea that it was a man is disgusting to me.
Also, I would like biological children with a women that is my partner. Thank you.

by Oterro » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:26 pm

by Urmanian » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:26 pm
Los Malvinas Son Peruano wrote:Also, I would like biological children with a women that is my partner. Thank you.

by Meryuma » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:27 pm
Los Malvinas Son Peruano wrote:No señor, I would not even if I knew it before dating. The idea that it was a man is disgusting to me.
Also, I would like biological children with a women that is my partner. Thank you.
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

by Freiheit Reich » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:27 pm
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Freiheit Reich wrote:
The body parts we were born with.
Hermaphordites are tricky. 'It' might be acceptable. 'It' is fine if you don't know the gender, I have used it to describe babies I was unsure of. I believe the grammar police will allow it.
Firstly, it's intersex, secondly, "they' is an acceptable gender neutral pronoun. 'It' is dehumanizing.

by Individuality-ness » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:28 pm

by Urmanian » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:28 pm
Freiheit Reich wrote:Yes, sounds less friendly but done with that intention. We have to discourage people from becoming transgenders. I am for non-taxpayer funded propoganda campaigns discouraging the transgender surgeries.

by Quelesh » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:28 pm
Rereumrari wrote:gender and sex are the same thing
either of the two major forms of individuals that occur in many species and that are distinguished respectively as female or male especially on the basis of their reproductive organs and structures
the behavioral, cultural, or psychological traits typically associated with one sex
Grenartia wrote:'It' refers to INANIMATE OBJECTS. NOT PEOPLE.

by Ceannairceach » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:28 pm
Freiheit Reich wrote:The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Firstly, it's intersex, secondly, "they' is an acceptable gender neutral pronoun. 'It' is dehumanizing.
'It' is talking about one person. 'It' stole my TV (vs. 'They stole my TV) is a different meaning.
Yes, sounds less friendly but done with that intention. We have to discourage people from becoming transgenders. I am for non-taxpayer funded propoganda campaigns discouraging the transgender surgeries.

by Agymnum » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:28 pm
Freiheit Reich wrote:The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Firstly, it's intersex, secondly, "they' is an acceptable gender neutral pronoun. 'It' is dehumanizing.
'It' is talking about one person. 'It' stole my TV (vs. 'They stole my TV) is a different meaning.
Yes, sounds less friendly but done with that intention. We have to discourage people from becoming transgenders. I am for non-taxpayer funded propoganda campaigns discouraging the transgender surgeries.

by Los Malvinas Son Peruano » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:29 pm
Meryuma wrote:Los Malvinas Son Peruano wrote:No señor, I would not even if I knew it before dating. The idea that it was a man is disgusting to me.
Also, I would like biological children with a women that is my partner. Thank you.
There it goes, prattling off on things it knows nothing about...
Have you talked to Freihet Reich? I feel you and it would make great pals.

by Ceannairceach » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:29 pm
Agymnum wrote:Freiheit Reich wrote:
'It' is talking about one person. 'It' stole my TV (vs. 'They stole my TV) is a different meaning.
Yes, sounds less friendly but done with that intention. We have to discourage people from becoming transgenders. I am for non-taxpayer funded propoganda campaigns discouraging the transgender surgeries.
So you want propaganda?
Seriously, propaganda? I thought we were educated enough to understand that propaganda is a bad thing.

by Oterro » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:29 pm
Individuality-ness wrote:Are we suddenly the morality police here? Are we required to love everyone and to not have preferences in regards to who I'd want to date? Gah.

by Grenartia » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:29 pm
Freiheit Reich wrote:The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Firstly, it's intersex, secondly, "they' is an acceptable gender neutral pronoun. 'It' is dehumanizing.
1. 'It' is talking about one person. 'It' stole my TV (vs. 'They stole my TV) is a different meaning.
2. Yes, sounds less friendly but done with that intention. 3. We have to discourage people from becoming transgenders. I am for non-taxpayer funded propoganda campaigns discouraging the transgender surgeries.

by Choronzon » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:29 pm
Agymnum wrote:Freiheit Reich wrote:
'It' is talking about one person. 'It' stole my TV (vs. 'They stole my TV) is a different meaning.
Yes, sounds less friendly but done with that intention. We have to discourage people from becoming transgenders. I am for non-taxpayer funded propoganda campaigns discouraging the transgender surgeries.
So you want propaganda?
Seriously, propaganda? I thought we were educated enough to understand that propaganda is a bad thing.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Angeloid Astraea, Atlantic Faroe Islands, Cannot think of a name, Cyrillac, Ethel mermania, Ifreann, Mutualist Chaos, Neo-American States, Sauros, Shrillland, The Jamesian Republic, The Two Jerseys, Uiiop, Valrifall
Advertisement