NATION

PASSWORD

Would you date a transgender?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

?

Yes
335
41%
No
477
59%
 
Total votes : 812

User avatar
Nadkor
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12114
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Nadkor » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:42 am

Calimera II wrote:No. It's a male in a identity crisis.


Even FtMs?

That's interesting.

Oh, wait. No.

I meant "bullshit"

Sorry.
economic left/right: -7.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: -7.59
thekidswhopoptodaywillrocktomorrow

I think we need more post-coital and less post-rock
Feels like the build-up takes forever but you never get me off

User avatar
Zottistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14894
Founded: Nov 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zottistan » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:42 am

I don't see why not, I guess.
Ireland, BCL and LLM, Training Barrister, Cismale Bi Dude and Gym-Bro, Generally Boring Socdem Eurocuck

User avatar
Urmanian
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8984
Founded: Oct 13, 2007
Democratic Socialists

Postby Urmanian » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:43 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:A tatoo should be required (a T on the forehead which could be covered with bangs) if somebody wishes for that surgery. This might decrease people wishing to get the surgery and decrease transgenders. It will also decrease mistaken relationship gender misunderstandings.

are you fucking serious. people must be forcibly branded because of your insecurities?

or, I actually agree - but only if a tattoo on a forehead is also required from conservative nutjobs so normal people could avoid them
Freiheit Reich wrote:Transgenders will not get murdered if they tell before any physical actions have taken place. Laughed at, yes but not murdered.

yes, yes they will. homosexuals are routinely murdered for their sexual orientation; transexuals, who are considered even more "icky" and "wrong" by the society at large, well
Last edited by Urmanian on Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
✮ The Vermillion Republic of Sorrelia ✮
Commie ponies with guns and such. One of the OG MLP nations, funnily enough I don't care for EaW pretty much at all.

This nation represents the voices in my head.

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:44 am

Souseiseki wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:What if a man was really bothered and killed himself because he felt that way? It would personally sicken me (although I would not kill myself). It is very unfair to the other person.


it'd kinda suck but i'm not sure why you'd kill yourself for being attracted to femininity because the lips they have the Y

A tatoo should be required (a T on the forehead which could be covered with bangs) if somebody wishes for that surgery. This might decrease people wishing to get the surgery and decrease transgenders. It will also decrease mistaken relationship gender misunderstandings.


will it be be a legal requirement

what's the point in branding them if they can just hide it!

Transgenders will not get murdered if they tell before any physical actions have taken place. Laughed at, yes but not murdered.


how naive


The man could push back the hair before kissing to see if there it the infamous 'T', it would work. If there was lying it would be tough to prove though. Revealing it could be required for a marriage license though. Perhaps a question box 'are you a transgender'? and if the box is falsely marked this is grounds for divorce and no money given to the liar.
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Nadkor
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12114
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Nadkor » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:46 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:
it'd kinda suck but i'm not sure why you'd kill yourself for being attracted to femininity because the lips they have the Y



will it be be a legal requirement

what's the point in branding them if they can just hide it!



how naive


The man could push back the hair before kissing to see if there it the infamous 'T', it would work. If there was lying it would be tough to prove though. Revealing it could be required for a marriage license though. Perhaps a question box 'are you a transgender'? and if the box is falsely marked this is grounds for divorce and no money given to the liar.


How about people who think like you get "C" forcibly tattooed on their foreheads?

You know, for "See You Next Tuesday".
economic left/right: -7.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: -7.59
thekidswhopoptodaywillrocktomorrow

I think we need more post-coital and less post-rock
Feels like the build-up takes forever but you never get me off

User avatar
Choronzon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9936
Founded: Apr 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Choronzon » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:46 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:The man could push back the hair before kissing to see if there it the infamous 'T', it would work. If there was lying it would be tough to prove though. Revealing it could be required for a marriage license though. Perhaps a question box 'are you a transgender'? and if the box is falsely marked this is grounds for divorce and no money given to the liar.

I'm waiting for the day when you have one idea that isn't completely stupid.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:47 am

can't you just brand yourself with a C instead? perhaps with also some sort of certification, you know, to start the trend off.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45990
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:47 am

Choronzon wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:The man could push back the hair before kissing to see if there it the infamous 'T', it would work. If there was lying it would be tough to prove though. Revealing it could be required for a marriage license though. Perhaps a question box 'are you a transgender'? and if the box is falsely marked this is grounds for divorce and no money given to the liar.

I'm waiting for the day when you have one idea that isn't completely stupid.


I hope you have a veeeeeeeeeeery long calendar Choro~
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1925
Founded: Nov 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:49 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:Absolutely agreed. I wonder what makes him so sure of his response when he finds out. I, for one, wouldn't be so sure.


These cases are on talk shows so I had the chance to ask myself how I would react. It would be very hurtful, especally if I had sex with it and was married.

Holy crap. He calls transsexuals "it" (emphasis mine).
Last edited by Grad Duchy of Luxembourg on Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: -3.00
Member of Caninope Contingent

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.64

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:50 am

Actually that's not true.

There are, more or less, three definitions of sex used in biology: genetic sex, gonadal sex, and phenotypic sex.

Genetic sex is the ~chromosomes~ one. In mammals, the Y chromosome normally contains a gene named SRY, which is the main trigger that causes a fetus to begin developing along a male pathway. Occasionally, due to random errors in the process of copying DNA, an SRY gene can fall off a Y chromosome or even jump over to an X chromosome: this is one of the ways you get people with XX chromosomes who develop physically as male, or people with XY chromosomes who develop physically as female. (There are other ways too, related to other genetic or environmental factors.) Now, the thing about genetic sex is that it's not actually used all that often by working biologists outside of the field of molecular genetics -- there's usually no point looking at chromosomes if what you're interested in is anatomy or biochemistry. So chromosomal sex is by no means the final word on whether we call an organism "male" or "female".

Gonadal sex is probably the one that gets used most often by biologists when they're identifying whether the unfortunate little critter they've just dissected is male or female: it's whether an animal has testes, ovaries, or something in between. While we don't yet have the technology to give trans women ovaries or trans men testes, long-term hormone therapy does render the birth gonads mostly non-functional, and of course they can also be surgically removed.

Phenotypic sex is the one that's of most interest to you and me in our daily lives. It refers to the development of sexually dimorphic characteristics, such as genital organs, and facial and body hair. It's mostly influenced by sex hormones, and there's a great deal that modern medicine can do to bring a trans person's sexual characteristics closer to their target sex than their birth sex. Phenotypic sex is just as biologically valid a definition of sex as the other two, and unless you're planning to either perform medical procedures on someone or have kids with them, it's the only one that's likely to have much relevance to you when you interact with other people.

Finally, we humans add an extra layer on top of all this, which we call gender. Gender includes all of the standards that are used in a society to differentiate men from women (and other genders, in cultures or subcultures that recognise more than two genders). Some of the characteristics by which people are categorised into one gender or another are related to phenotypic sex, but others are purely behavioural -- dress, grooming and so on. There are differences between gender expression and gender, but we won't get into that now.

So when it comes to how we decide whether to call someone a man or a woman, chromosomes are really a very small part of the story. After all, societies were categorising people into genders long before chromosomes were even discovered, and we easily discern whether people are men or women every day without it even occurring to us to look at their chromosomes first.
Last edited by The Steel Magnolia on Fri Jul 26, 2013 7:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Stuckenburg
Envoy
 
Posts: 264
Founded: Dec 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Stuckenburg » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:50 am

I am an asexual, so probably not.
All the "stuck in a burg"-references has become old, please stop using them.

Conflict status:
1. Peace, no army.[X]
2. Conflict growing, no army.[]
2,5. Truce, temporary army.[]
3. Cold War, propaganda for discipline education.[]
4. Edge of War, people may sign up for the army.[]
5. War, an army exists.[]

Take some time to read our Laws, you may learn a lot about us.

OOC:
Pro: European Union, Cosmopolitanism, Indirect democracy, World Government, Social Liberalism, Parliamentarism, Bureaucracy, Public Education, Multiculturalism, Environmentalism, Universal Suffrage.
Anti: Nationalism, Patriotism, Monarchism, Presidentialism, Totalitarianism, Discrimination, Communism, Fascism, Extremism, Anarchism, "Barbarianism", Pointless violence.

User avatar
Xathranaar
Minister
 
Posts: 3384
Founded: Jul 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Xathranaar » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:51 am

Hockenberg wrote:I'm a zoophile, so no.

Alright. Would you date a female mountain lion that used to be a male mountain lion?
My views summarized.
The Gospel According to Queen.
It is possible that some of my posts may not be completely serious.

User avatar
Oterro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16939
Founded: May 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Oterro » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:52 am

Stuckenburg wrote:I am an asexual, so probably not.

my asexual buddy says some asexuals have life partners they just dont have sex? i dont know it sounded a bit weird to me so maybe not. then again if you dont care about the physicality of your partner then i doubt it'd matter.
Xathranaar wrote:
Hockenberg wrote:I'm a zoophile, so no.

Alright. Would you date a female mountain lion that used to be a male mountain lion?

would he fuck lassy
or the dinosaurs from jurassic park
Last edited by Oterro on Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:53 am, edited 2 times in total.
we, unlike the bourgeoisie, have nothing to lose and therefore our expression will be the only honest one, our words will be the only challenging ones and our art will be the one revolutionary expression. We need new noise and new voices and new canvases to become something more than the last poets of a useless generation.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:52 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:Scary. Also a good reason for divorce. That is a HUGE secret your spouse kept from you. Transgender people should be honest before any kissing/intimate contact is made in the relationship (first date would be best) for obvious reasons.


I'm sorry are our tongues magical beings now?

...

Well. Mine certainly is. Or so I've been told.

User avatar
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1925
Founded: Nov 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:53 am

Person012345 wrote:
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:Absolutely agreed. I wonder what makes him so sure of his response when he finds out. I, for one, wouldn't be so sure.

To be fair, he didn't even say that he would divorce them, merely that he considers it to be legitimate reason for divorce. I'm not sure that lets you discern that he is sure he would divorce them if it happened to him.

You are right. I'm not just not sure why he is so sure, when he finds out, he would automatically consider it to be a reason for divorce. I wouldn't be so sure of how I would feel if I were in that situation, let alone reasonably assume.
Last edited by Grad Duchy of Luxembourg on Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: -3.00
Member of Caninope Contingent

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.64

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:53 am

Warinemachine wrote:Honestly I do not think transgender people have switched genders.


Well, they haven't.

Since that's not actually what it is. Or, y'know, possible.

Question. Do you actually know what gender is?

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:54 am

Xathranaar wrote:
Hockenberg wrote:I'm a zoophile, so no.

Alright. Would you date a female mountain lion that used to be a male mountain lion?

this gives "i used to be a man" a whole new meaning, that poor lion

e: i know, it is a (bad) joke
Last edited by Souseiseki on Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Choronzon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9936
Founded: Apr 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Choronzon » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:55 am

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Warinemachine wrote:Honestly I do not think transgender people have switched genders.


Well, they haven't.

Since that's not actually what it is. Or, y'know, possible.

Question. Do you actually know what gender is?

You just had to ask, didn't you?

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:55 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:indeed. otherwise i might kiss a transwoman and that might make me gay and i don't wanna be gay guys


What if a man was really bothered and killed himself because he felt that way? It would personally sicken me (although I would not kill myself). It is very unfair to the other person.

A tatoo should be required (a T on the forehead which could be covered with bangs) if somebody wishes for that surgery. This might decrease people wishing to get the surgery and decrease transgenders. It will also decrease mistaken relationship gender misunderstandings.

Transgenders will not get murdered if they tell before any physical actions have taken place. Laughed at, yes but not murdered. I would be happier if the shemale told me before I kissed it than after.



Are you actually serious.

Literally none of that is remotely true, but hey guys!

Apparently no one will try and kill us as we walk down the street! Quick, someone tell the people who assaulted me! They'll apologize right quick.

User avatar
Choronzon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9936
Founded: Apr 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Choronzon » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:56 am

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
What if a man was really bothered and killed himself because he felt that way? It would personally sicken me (although I would not kill myself). It is very unfair to the other person.

A tatoo should be required (a T on the forehead which could be covered with bangs) if somebody wishes for that surgery. This might decrease people wishing to get the surgery and decrease transgenders. It will also decrease mistaken relationship gender misunderstandings.

Transgenders will not get murdered if they tell before any physical actions have taken place. Laughed at, yes but not murdered. I would be happier if the shemale told me before I kissed it than after.



Are you actually serious.

Literally none of that is remotely true, but hey guys!

Apparently no one will try and kill us as we walk down the street! Quick, someone tell the people who assaulted me! They'll apologize right quick.


You never would have been assaulted if we had just permanently marked your body.

User avatar
Xathranaar
Minister
 
Posts: 3384
Founded: Jul 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Xathranaar » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:58 am

Yue-Laou wrote:No, I wouldn't. The second he tells me he's a trans all attraction would be gone.

I suppose it isn't entirely out of the question that such a thing might happen. But if someone told me they were trans and my feelings for them suddenly changed I would be extremely disappointed in myself.
My views summarized.
The Gospel According to Queen.
It is possible that some of my posts may not be completely serious.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63227
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:59 am

Warning: I've only read the OP.

I won't date someone who's had a sex change. I'm just not attracted to them.
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Oterro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16939
Founded: May 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Oterro » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:00 pm

The Blaatschapen wrote:Warning: I've only read the OP.

I won't date someone who's had a sex change. I'm just not attracted to them.

are you gay?
we, unlike the bourgeoisie, have nothing to lose and therefore our expression will be the only honest one, our words will be the only challenging ones and our art will be the one revolutionary expression. We need new noise and new voices and new canvases to become something more than the last poets of a useless generation.

User avatar
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1925
Founded: Nov 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:01 pm

Choronzon wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:

Are you actually serious.

Literally none of that is remotely true, but hey guys!

Apparently no one will try and kill us as we walk down the street! Quick, someone tell the people who assaulted me! They'll apologize right quick.


You never would have been assaulted if we had just permanently marked your body.

Of course, of course! Just like how the jews were marked, right?
Economic Left/Right: -3.00
Member of Caninope Contingent

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.64

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:01 pm

Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
These cases are on talk shows so I had the chance to ask myself how I would react. It would be very hurtful, especally if I had sex with it and was married.

Holy crap. He calls transsexuals "it" (emphasis mine).


Not a real man, not a real woman. 'It' is the proper pronoun to use.
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Camtropia, Glorious Freedonia, Ifreann, Mateorossi, Page, Philjia, The Newlands Peninsula, The PIA, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads