Fritzl?
Advertisement

by The Emerald Dawn » Wed Feb 27, 2013 2:51 pm

by The Nuclear Fist » Wed Feb 27, 2013 2:52 pm
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by The Emerald Dawn » Wed Feb 27, 2013 2:53 pm

by Trotskylvania » Wed Feb 27, 2013 2:54 pm
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

by Mistelemr » Wed Feb 27, 2013 2:54 pm

by Lunatic Goofballs » Wed Feb 27, 2013 2:56 pm

by Lunatic Goofballs » Wed Feb 27, 2013 2:57 pm


by Nationalist State of Knox » Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:00 pm
Ifreann wrote:Knox: /ˈɡɪl.ɡə.mɛʃ/

by Meryuma » Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:06 pm
Ralkovia wrote:Wamitoria wrote:Because trying to induce certain genetic reactions by treating an entire population like animals is generally a bad idea.
Not to mention the fact that most eugenicists in history have been woefully inadequate when it comes to actual knowledge of human genetics.
Are you saying human's aren't animals? What are we then?
Considering are current technology are you saying it wouldn't be prudent to stop people who have a high probability of giving their children a life threatening disease like Tay-Sachs that will kill them within 13 or 14 years of their life?
Ralkovia wrote:Seperates wrote:This is true only when applied to extremely dibilitating diseases. Look at autism. The problem isn't that they are not intellegent, nor that they are physically diblitated. The problem is that they cannot comminicate effectivly. Should we eliminate autism then?
Autism is way to widespread to effectively combat and so far we yet to figure out conclusively if Autism is genetic or not. There are large amounts of evidence to point to Autism being genetic, but there isn't a conclusive 100% answer as of yet.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Seperates wrote:The difference is that with humans it is cultural diversity, not phenological diversity. Which is why Europeans could still have children with Native Americans despite thousands of years of physical seperation.
But cultural diversity isn't at risk when eugenics is in play. People don't stop being Jewish because suddenly SE Asian Dad.
You can be the most Jewish Half-Cantonese motherfucker ever.
Mistelemr wrote:and the Anarchists are Nationalistic.
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

by Czechanada » Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:08 pm

by Fedeledland » Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:12 pm

by TomKirk » Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:31 pm
Saiwania wrote:Republica Newland wrote::palm:
This reminds me of Putin's outcry to the people of Russia to make more kids because without Russians to inhabit it,Russia wouldn't really be that big a deal anymore. "3 children should be the norm!!!"
They are right to be worried, if Russia eventually no longer has a big or powerful enough military to provide an effective deterrent, China and several of its neighbors could begin to carve Russia up and lay claim to some of its land. Diplomacy or threatening to retaliate with your nuclear arsenal can only go so far if the opposing side also has nukes. I anticipate China as the future rival for power with Russia.

by TomKirk » Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:32 pm

by TomKirk » Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:35 pm
Republica Newland wrote:Seperates wrote:This is true only when applied to extremely dibilitating diseases. Look at autism. The problem isn't that they are not intellegent, nor that they are physically diblitated. The problem is that they cannot comminicate effectivly. Should we eliminate autism then?
How about you ask them whether or not they like being autistic? Maybe that will answer your own question.

by TomKirk » Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:38 pm

by The Emerald Dawn » Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:39 pm

by Individuality-ness » Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:40 pm


by The Emerald Dawn » Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:40 pm

by TomKirk » Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:41 pm

by Ruridova » Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:41 pm

by The Emerald Dawn » Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:42 pm

by Individuality-ness » Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:42 pm


by TomKirk » Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:43 pm
Ralkovia wrote:The Emerald Dawn wrote:....You're not very good at this. If you put an issue to the "will of the people", or a general consensus, you're already giving the power over a group of people to those people.
Last census, 14% of America was black-ish.
Guess that's the perfect solution then. Government mandated eugenics of the blacks.
Wait a second....
Why does that sound SO familiar?
So is being black a genetic disease that affects lifespan, etc, etc?

by The Emerald Dawn » Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:43 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aguaria Major, Alris, Bornada, Elejamie, Eragon Island, Floofybit, Habsburg Mexico, Kingdom Of Casetaria, Necroghastia, Omnicontrol, Port Caverton, Rary, Rusozak, The Rio Grande River Basin, Tviari, Umeria, Valyxias
Advertisement