Iceland Plans to Ban Internet Porn

[Individuality-ness]

But if you can get someone to view said videos, that is a demand for more. How do you not see this?

I can't see that because it's wrong. If getting someone to view something increases demand, then marketers would be out of a job, because all people would need to do is show them their product to instill a demand automatically.

Video demand is generated by the amount of views. *palm*

This is not including the fact that if it's posted online, the maker gets ad revenues with said video.

[Lolination]

Yes, let's say child pornography is harmless because the abused children aren't still scarred horribly by it in their 40s. Makes perfect sense.

How does child pornography abuse children? How does a video or an image harm someone? Did an image rape you as a child?

[Hatsunia]

I'm too prudish to watch porn, but I guess this will work as well as Prohibition in the U.S.

[Minoriteeburg]

I can't see that because it's wrong. If getting someone to view something increases demand, then marketers would be out of a job, because all people would need to do is show them their product to instill a demand automatically.

Video demand is generated by the amount of views. *palm*

This is not including the fact that if it's posted online, the maker gets ad revenues with said video.

Yup.

No one knows that a product exists, until it is seen or heard by people. Then if interest grows in the product, the product sells.

Basic marketing right there.

[The Zeonic States]

Well who needs Empirical Research anyway.

A study without research is not much of a study.

Yes, let's say child pornography is harmless because the abused children aren't still scarred horribly by it in their 40s. Makes perfect sense.

When you have eight thousand cases suggesting Yes, Then Yeah it makes sense.

Sorry to the few folks that fell through the cracks but tough.

I don't advocate rape anyway but i do believe that a sexual or rommantic relation shouldn't be restricted to two consenting people.

[Minoriteeburg]

I'm too prudish to watch porn, but I guess this will work as well as Prohibition in the U.S.

I can just imagine the great Icelandic Porn Barons.

[New England and The Maritimes]

Yes, let's say child pornography is harmless because the abused children aren't still scarred horribly by it in their 40s. Makes perfect sense.

When you have eight thousand cases suggesting Yes, Then Yeah it makes sense.

Sorry to the few folks that fell through the cracks but tough.

I don't advocate rape anyway but i do believe that a sexual or rommantic relation shouldn't be restricted to two consenting people.

Consent requires being capable of understanding, and while age is arbitrary an arbitrarily assigned barrier for something this important is better than no barrier at all.

[Nationalist State of Knox]

Ban the French.

That's 50% of the problem gone right there.

[Oterro]

Yes, let's say child pornography is harmless because the abused children aren't still scarred horribly by it in their 40s. Makes perfect sense.

How does child pornography abuse children? How does a video or an image harm someone? Did an image rape you as a child?

if you're not being punched or physically violated you're not being hurt right.

Ban the French.

That's 50% of the problem gone right there.

don't shitpost.

[The Zeonic States]

I'm too prudish to watch porn, but I guess this will work as well as Prohibition in the U.S.

I can just imagine the great Iceland Porn Barons.

Porn Barons

[Souseiseki]

there's no doubt it's rape, but there's no doubt that most rape is kinda sex too, so i'm wondering where you got the "sex only refers to consensual sex" thing from, but hey

Rape is kinda sex?

Rape is rape. End of story.

there are some things i'd call rape (shoving a dildo down your throat) that are to my knowledge classified as sexual assault and not rape. so rape without sex, woah. unless you consider that sex. which you might. and oh god i can't believe i'm digging myself a hole in the same thread this shit is happening.

[Minoriteeburg]

Ban the French.

That's 50% of the problem gone right there.

And the other 50% is......

[Immoren]

Yes, let's say child pornography is harmless because the abused children aren't still scarred horribly by it in their 40s. Makes perfect sense.

How does child pornography abuse children? How does a video or an image harm someone? Did an image rape you as a child?

Me thinks someone's intentionally obtuse.

I'm too prudish to watch porn, but I guess this will work as well as Prohibition in the U.S.

I can just imagine the great Iceland Porn Barons.

In their Longships.

[Nationalist State of Knox]

Ban the French.

That's 50% of the problem gone right there.

And the other 50% is......

Erm... in-invade F-France?

[Hatsunia]

I'm too prudish to watch porn

Also I don't believe in enforcing this belief on anyone else.

[The Zeonic States]

When you have eight thousand cases suggesting Yes, Then Yeah it makes sense.

Sorry to the few folks that fell through the cracks but tough.

I don't advocate rape anyway but i do believe that a sexual or rommantic relation shouldn't be restricted to two consenting people.

Consent requires being capable of understanding, and while age is arbitrary an arbitrarily assigned barrier for something this important is better than no barrier at all.

And of course a thirteen year old mind is incapable of understanding the concept of relations? Which this modern generation has sort of shot to **** that concept anyway.

._. Ergo that Yeah i believe consent can be established lower then 20,18,21, or 17.

This Modern society has sexually charged this generation and exposed them to the concepts earlier, they are becoming sexually active Earlier so Yeah that arbitrarily assigned line sort of has no meaning now.

[Immoren]

Ban the French.

That's 50% of the problem gone right there.

That's your answer to everything.

[Nationalist State of Knox]

Ban the French.

That's 50% of the problem gone right there.

That's your answer to everything.

I can't help it if it's true.

[Minoriteeburg]

Ban the French.

That's 50% of the problem gone right there.

That's your answer to everything.

50% of the time it is the correct answer.

[Minoriteeburg]

And the other 50% is......

Erm... in-invade F-France?

No need, just ask them to surrender.

[The Zeonic States]

That's your answer to everything.

50% of the time it is the correct answer.

The french are at the root of every concern?

[Oterro]

And of course a thirteen year old mind is incapable of understanding the concept of relations?

yeah most of them are.

sorry bucko.

[Minoriteeburg]

And of course a thirteen year old mind is incapable of understanding the concept of relations?

yeah most of them are.

sorry bucko.

^This.

[The Zeonic States]

And of course a thirteen year old mind is incapable of understanding the concept of relations?

yeah most of them are.

sorry bucko.

Is that denouncing my agrument or favoring it?

I didn't understand the wording.

[Lolination]

How does child pornography abuse children? How does a video or an image harm someone? Did an image rape you as a child?

Me thinks someone's intentionally obtuse.

No, there's an important distinction to me made. You cannot equate child pornography with child abuse simply because it required abuse to create. Abused children are scarred because of the abuse, even if no pornography was created, the pornography isn't relevant.

Video demand is generated by the amount of views. *palm*

This is not including the fact that if it's posted online, the maker gets ad revenues with said video.

Wrong. The view count is an indicator of the demand, not the creator of demand.

Child pornography has no ad revenue.