So helping a criminal achieve their goal should be illegal even if that goal isn't illegal? Why? Surely I don't have to explain how broadly this could apply and how many rights of expression could be violated in the process.
Advertisement

by Lolination » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:23 am

by Armenia II » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:23 am
☭
☻/
/▌
/ \
Hey Trans, will the next TET not have a sucky name?
Considering that someone bitches about every name no matter what it is?
Probably not.
Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:Armenia II - not funny.
by Souseiseki » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:24 am
Yeah, you are right. You are just fighters for human rights.
the pedophiles have also human right why just give them some bunch of kids so that their human right are not violeted.
It is disgusting of you.

by Immoren » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:25 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Oterro » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:25 am
Souseiseki wrote:i am a veteran of laissez faireholm so i'm kind of used to people trying to legalize videos of 7 year olds being raped and abused
i've been working on the script for a comic, it goes like this
child porn is banned
but it harms no one!!!
child porn is banned
there are no victims
child porn is banned
you're just making it more profitable!
child porn is banned
but what about videos of other crimes?! are you going to make them illegal too?!
child porn is banned
you can't legislate your morality
child porn is banned
well? banning it won't stop it? what's the point?
child porn is banned
any comments and constructive criticism are welcome

by Lolination » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:26 am
Scholencia wrote:the pedophiles have also human right why just give them some bunch of kids so that their human right are not violeted.

by Night Elven Empire » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:26 am
Armenia II wrote:
Neither have I. Now that you mention it, I want to find some before it's taken down.
Also, how the hell do they plan on enforcing this? We all know they're just gonna move the sever to Stockholm.

by Oterro » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:27 am
Lolination wrote:Scholencia wrote:the pedophiles have also human right why just give them some bunch of kids so that their human right are not violeted.
Nobody has a right to another person, grow up. Humans have a natural right to life, liberty, and property. Neither of those three rights are violated when you watch child pornography, so therefore pedophiles should be able to watch them.

by The Rebel Alliances » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:27 am
TotallyNotEvilLand wrote:Yes, blame other people for your kids finding nasty things, not your crappy supervision.
The Starlight wrote:Rebel Force: Noun - A strange power associated with street-level characters who are the weakest, yet most powerful of all.

by The Rebel Alliances » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:28 am
The Starlight wrote:Rebel Force: Noun - A strange power associated with street-level characters who are the weakest, yet most powerful of all.

by Individuality-ness » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:28 am
Lolination wrote:Scholencia wrote:the pedophiles have also human right why just give them some bunch of kids so that their human right are not violeted.
Nobody has a right to another person, grow up. Humans have a natural right to life, liberty, and property. Neither of those three rights are violated when you watch child pornography, so therefore pedophiles should be able to watch them.

by New England and The Maritimes » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:29 am
Lolination wrote:Scholencia wrote:the pedophiles have also human right why just give them some bunch of kids so that their human right are not violeted.
Nobody has a right to another person, grow up. Humans have a natural right to life, liberty, and property. Neither of those three rights are violated when you watch child pornography, so therefore pedophiles should be able to watch them.
Property is a fiction. Liberty is not something that can be guaranteed in the locke-ian sense, since we're all at the mercy of our social lives. Humans have the right to life and equal access to the resources necessary for that life and its enrichment. Child pornography is a violation of the right to life, as it violates the rights of a child in its production.Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.
by Souseiseki » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:29 am
Individuality-ness wrote:Lolination wrote:Nobody has a right to another person, grow up. Humans have a natural right to life, liberty, and property. Neither of those three rights are violated when you watch child pornography, so therefore pedophiles should be able to watch them.
Wait, so the production of child pornography is not inherently exploitative? O.o
What kind of sick logic are you using?!?

by Disserbia » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:30 am

by Lolination » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:30 am
Individuality-ness wrote:Wait, so the production of child pornography is not inherently exploitative? O.o

by The Two Jerseys » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:30 am
GrandKirche wrote:
"What did you do during the war with Iceland daddy?"
"Well son, I dropped porn films with little parachutes attached onto Iceland. We brought happiness to thousands. I still remember watching those Icelandic ministers rush out to get the DVDs and memory sticks. People were getting happy in the streets. Poor Bobby never made it back, he had to look whilst flying his plane...YOU WEREN'T THERE TIMMY STOP LAUGHING..." etc

by Individuality-ness » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:32 am

by Scholencia » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:32 am
Lolination wrote:Scholencia wrote:You watch porn because you feel a desire (lust) for that and to get horny, watching some man burned is defintly not because you want to feel the same feeling as porn. In first case you are part of the crime since you have pleasure because of it, while in second case not.
But I understand that to you sick pedophile liberals that is all the same, well it is not.
It is proven that some people are aroused by violence and abuse, why else would sadomasochism be so popular? Some people are aroused by murder, so should it be illegal in this case?
by Souseiseki » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:34 am
Scholencia wrote:Lolination wrote:It is proven that some people are aroused by violence and abuse, why else would sadomasochism be so popular? Some people are aroused by murder, so should it be illegal in this case?
Sorry, could you be more clear?
The only persons who would be aroused by violence are serial killers, I guess. So, you think they should notbe in jail?

by Oterro » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:34 am
Scholencia wrote:The only persons who would be aroused by violence are serial killers,
Souseiseki wrote:please stop.

by New England and The Maritimes » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:34 am
Individuality-ness wrote:Lolination wrote:Stop putting words in my mouth. I said the possession / watching of child porn, not production. Come on...
You're arguing that child porn should be legal because no one gets hurt (I suspect it was a strawman but I am not going to check). I'm giving you the reason why NO sane person would legalize it.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Minoriteeburg » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:34 am

by The Serbian Empire » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:36 am
San Leggera wrote:This will make sense when porn exclusively becomes gameplay from Grand Theft Auto.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bombadil, Bovad, Celritannia, Con Nihawitan, Destructive Government Economic System, Dimetrodon Empire, Ethel mermania, EuroStralia, Misdainana, Mobil7997, Necroghastia, Nova Paradisius, Querria, The Orson Empire, Washington-Columbia
Advertisement