NATION

PASSWORD

Iceland Plans to Ban Internet Porn

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should we ban the naughty videos from the interwebz?

Turn Safesearch ON.....forever.
27
15%
NO! I need my pictures and videos of people and their naughty bits.
91
52%
Here's a better idea.....BAN THE INTERNET!
4
2%
Ban the Internet? But that will make Al Gore cry.
16
9%
Who gives a s#!t about Al Gore?
16
9%
As long as I can still watch Hasselhoff eat a cheeseburger off the floor, I'm ok.
22
13%
 
Total votes : 176

User avatar
Lolination
Attaché
 
Posts: 93
Founded: Jul 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lolination » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:23 am

Ifreann wrote:
Lolination wrote:How does possessing someone's video help the video creator?

Obviously because that was their goal: to distribute that video. By taking possession of it, you have helped them achieve that goal. Or do you imagine that videos get onto the internet of their own volition?

So helping a criminal achieve their goal should be illegal even if that goal isn't illegal? Why? Surely I don't have to explain how broadly this could apply and how many rights of expression could be violated in the process.
Last edited by Lolination on Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:24 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:23 am

Scholencia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:We're not all paedophiles, dear.

Yeah, you are right. You are just fighters for human rights.

the pedophiles have also human right why just give them some bunch of kids so that their human right are not violeted. :roll:


You're calling the people who want to ban the possession of child pornography pedophiles? Seriously?
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Choronzon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9936
Founded: Apr 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Choronzon » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:23 am

The Rebel Alliances wrote:
Choronzon wrote:The problem was your upbringing. Not the porn.


So wait...7 and 8 year olds are supposed to watch porn?
Tell me I am mistaking your post.

You are.

Your upbringing is what caused you to react that way to what you saw. Not the porn itself.

More clear?
Last edited by Choronzon on Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:25 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Armenia II
Minister
 
Posts: 3468
Founded: Oct 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Armenia II » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:23 am

Night Elven Empire wrote:
Armenia II wrote:They can't ban Icelandic porn! It's my favourite, next to the furry stuff.


I've never even seen Icelandic porn.

I want to now before they ban it.


Neither have I. Now that you mention it, I want to find some before it's taken down.

Also, how the hell do they plan on enforcing this? We all know they're just gonna move the sever to Stockholm.
"Winners write the history books, because the losers are usually poor...and illiterate" ~Winston Churchill

My Political Compass

You can call me whatever, I don't really care.


☻/
/▌
/ \

Big Jim P wrote:
Eoghania wrote:Hydrogen. Clean, efficient, only issue is how to store the damn stuff.


Chemically bonded with carbon. ;)


Hey Trans, will the next TET not have a sucky name?


Considering that someone bitches about every name no matter what it is?

Probably not.

Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:Armenia II - not funny.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:24 am

i am a veteran of laissez faireholm so i'm kind of used to people trying to legalize videos of 7 year olds being raped and abused

i've been working on the script for a comic, it goes like this

child porn is banned
but it harms no one!!!
child porn is banned
there are no victims
child porn is banned
you're just making it more profitable!
child porn is banned
but what about videos of other crimes?! are you going to make them illegal too?!
child porn is banned
you can't legislate your morality
child porn is banned
well? banning it won't stop it? what's the point?
child porn is banned

any comments and constructive criticism are welcome

Yeah, you are right. You are just fighters for human rights.

the pedophiles have also human right why just give them some bunch of kids so that their human right are not violeted. :roll:

It is disgusting of you.


pretty sure most of the liberals here and the person you quoted here are also in favour of banning child porn. you are making my brain hurt. please stop.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65244
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:25 am

Scholencia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:We're not all paedophiles, dear.

Yeah, you are right. You are just fighters for human rights.

the pedophiles have also human right why just give them some bunch of kids so that their human right are not violeted. :roll:

There difference between having urges and acting on them.
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Oterro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16939
Founded: May 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Oterro » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:25 am

Souseiseki wrote:i am a veteran of laissez faireholm so i'm kind of used to people trying to legalize videos of 7 year olds being raped and abused

i've been working on the script for a comic, it goes like this

child porn is banned
but it harms no one!!!
child porn is banned
there are no victims
child porn is banned
you're just making it more profitable!
child porn is banned
but what about videos of other crimes?! are you going to make them illegal too?!
child porn is banned
you can't legislate your morality
child porn is banned
well? banning it won't stop it? what's the point?
child porn is banned

any comments and constructive criticism are welcome

you did not mention market of babies
we, unlike the bourgeoisie, have nothing to lose and therefore our expression will be the only honest one, our words will be the only challenging ones and our art will be the one revolutionary expression. We need new noise and new voices and new canvases to become something more than the last poets of a useless generation.

User avatar
Lolination
Attaché
 
Posts: 93
Founded: Jul 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lolination » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:26 am

Scholencia wrote:the pedophiles have also human right why just give them some bunch of kids so that their human right are not violeted. :roll:

Nobody has a right to another person, grow up. Humans have a natural right to life, liberty, and property. Neither of those three rights are violated when you watch child pornography, so therefore pedophiles should be able to watch them.

User avatar
Night Elven Empire
Envoy
 
Posts: 224
Founded: Nov 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Night Elven Empire » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:26 am

Armenia II wrote:
Night Elven Empire wrote:
I've never even seen Icelandic porn.

I want to now before they ban it.


Neither have I. Now that you mention it, I want to find some before it's taken down.

Also, how the hell do they plan on enforcing this? We all know they're just gonna move the sever to Stockholm.


Government can't ban anything without a black market rising up. Am I the only cynic who wonders if this is on purpose?
"Ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country" - President John F. Kennedy

Political Matrix Score (I'll switch to the Political Compass if this becomes too much of an issue):
Economic score: +8.9
Social score: -3.3

User avatar
Oterro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16939
Founded: May 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Oterro » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:27 am

Lolination wrote:
Scholencia wrote:the pedophiles have also human right why just give them some bunch of kids so that their human right are not violeted. :roll:

Nobody has a right to another person, grow up. Humans have a natural right to life, liberty, and property. Neither of those three rights are violated when you watch child pornography, so therefore pedophiles should be able to watch them.

right to privacy.

holy fuck i cant believe i'm actually talking to a human being who uses the term 'loli' in anything other than derision of pseudo pedophile apologists.

i would literally ban you permanently forever instantly without warning.
Last edited by Oterro on Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
we, unlike the bourgeoisie, have nothing to lose and therefore our expression will be the only honest one, our words will be the only challenging ones and our art will be the one revolutionary expression. We need new noise and new voices and new canvases to become something more than the last poets of a useless generation.

User avatar
The Rebel Alliances
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11798
Founded: Jan 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rebel Alliances » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:27 am

TotallyNotEvilLand wrote:Yes, blame other people for your kids finding nasty things, not your crappy supervision.


Well, I am not really pinning blame on one person here. In fact, I am not really blaming anyone at this point. It was a long time ago and hey I turned out pretty good.

But looking at it again I can see a couple mistakes made. First, the family friend knew we were coming over. And he knew I would be with my parents. So logically you would put something like that on a top shelf or out of reach of kids.

Secondly, after I wondered off from my parents and found the tape. Again, laying on the floor. In plain view. My parents could of watched me a bit closer. But if they had expected there to be porn vids just laying around they would have left me at home with a baby sitter or something.

But it is off topic and not really worth discussing in any detail. Just posted it on a whim. Sorry.
Last edited by The Rebel Alliances on Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
My RP Nation is the Islamic Republic of Alamon

The Starlight wrote:Rebel Force: Noun - A strange power associated with street-level characters who are the weakest, yet most powerful of all.

User avatar
The Rebel Alliances
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11798
Founded: Jan 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rebel Alliances » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:28 am

...
Last edited by The Rebel Alliances on Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
My RP Nation is the Islamic Republic of Alamon

The Starlight wrote:Rebel Force: Noun - A strange power associated with street-level characters who are the weakest, yet most powerful of all.

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:28 am

Lolination wrote:
Scholencia wrote:the pedophiles have also human right why just give them some bunch of kids so that their human right are not violeted. :roll:

Nobody has a right to another person, grow up. Humans have a natural right to life, liberty, and property. Neither of those three rights are violated when you watch child pornography, so therefore pedophiles should be able to watch them.

Wait, so the production of child pornography is not inherently exploitative? O.o

What kind of sick logic are you using?!?
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:29 am

Lolination wrote:
Scholencia wrote:the pedophiles have also human right why just give them some bunch of kids so that their human right are not violeted. :roll:

Nobody has a right to another person, grow up. Humans have a natural right to life, liberty, and property. Neither of those three rights are violated when you watch child pornography, so therefore pedophiles should be able to watch them.

:roll: Property is a fiction. Liberty is not something that can be guaranteed in the locke-ian sense, since we're all at the mercy of our social lives. Humans have the right to life and equal access to the resources necessary for that life and its enrichment. Child pornography is a violation of the right to life, as it violates the rights of a child in its production.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:29 am

Individuality-ness wrote:
Lolination wrote:Nobody has a right to another person, grow up. Humans have a natural right to life, liberty, and property. Neither of those three rights are violated when you watch child pornography, so therefore pedophiles should be able to watch them.

Wait, so the production of child pornography is not inherently exploitative? O.o

What kind of sick logic are you using?!?

their argument is that production is bad, but possession and distribution is like, totally ok man, victimless crimes. it's just like smoking weed!
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:30 am

Your polls are the greatest!
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Lolination
Attaché
 
Posts: 93
Founded: Jul 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lolination » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:30 am

Individuality-ness wrote:Wait, so the production of child pornography is not inherently exploitative? O.o

Stop putting words in my mouth. I said the possession / watching of child porn, not production. Come on...

User avatar
The Two Jerseys
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19610
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Two Jerseys » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:30 am

GrandKirche wrote:
Tyrants wrote: :rofl:
I'm so picturing this.


"What did you do during the war with Iceland daddy?"
"Well son, I dropped porn films with little parachutes attached onto Iceland. We brought happiness to thousands. I still remember watching those Icelandic ministers rush out to get the DVDs and memory sticks. People were getting happy in the streets. Poor Bobby never made it back, he had to look whilst flying his plane...YOU WEREN'T THERE TIMMY STOP LAUGHING..." etc

I cant wait for them to make a movie about 69 Squadron's daring low-level porn-bombing run. It'll be called The Nut Busters. :lol2:
"The Duke of Texas" is too formal for regular use. Just call me "Your Grace".
"If I would like to watch goodness, sanity, God and logic being fucked I would watch Japanese porn." -Nightkill the Emperor
"This thread makes me wish I was a moron so that I wouldn't have to comprehend how stupid the topic is." -The Empire of Pretantia
Head of State: HM King Louis
Head of Government: The Rt. Hon. James O'Dell MP, Prime Minister
Ambassador to the World Assembly: HE Sir John Ross "J.R." Ewing II, Bt.
Join Excalibur Squadron. We're Commandos who fly Spitfires. Chicks dig Commandos who fly Spitfires.

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:32 am

Lolination wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Wait, so the production of child pornography is not inherently exploitative? O.o

Stop putting words in my mouth. I said the possession / watching of child porn, not production. Come on...

You're arguing that child porn should be legal because no one gets hurt (I suspect it was a strawman but I am not going to check). I'm giving you the reason why NO sane person would legalize it.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Scholencia
Minister
 
Posts: 3017
Founded: Feb 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Scholencia » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:32 am

Lolination wrote:
Scholencia wrote:You watch porn because you feel a desire (lust) for that and to get horny, watching some man burned is defintly not because you want to feel the same feeling as porn. In first case you are part of the crime since you have pleasure because of it, while in second case not.

But I understand that to you sick pedophile liberals that is all the same, well it is not.

It is proven that some people are aroused by violence and abuse, why else would sadomasochism be so popular? Some people are aroused by murder, so should it be illegal in this case?

Sorry, could you be more clear?

The only persons who would be aroused by violence are serial killers, I guess. So, you think they should notbe in jail?

I agree that you sick perverts should stop being obsesed by your desire, but that is why mental hospitals exists. You should go there and have a talk with a pschyatrist.
Last edited by Scholencia on Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:34 am

Scholencia wrote:
Lolination wrote:It is proven that some people are aroused by violence and abuse, why else would sadomasochism be so popular? Some people are aroused by murder, so should it be illegal in this case?

Sorry, could you be more clear?

The only persons who would be aroused by violence are serial killers, I guess. So, you think they should notbe in jail?

yes, literally everyone who has ever even through about trying some light spanking is literally a serial killer. that is how it works.

e: my brain
Last edited by Souseiseki on Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Oterro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16939
Founded: May 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Oterro » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:34 am

Scholencia wrote:The only persons who would be aroused by violence are serial killers,

Souseiseki wrote:please stop.
we, unlike the bourgeoisie, have nothing to lose and therefore our expression will be the only honest one, our words will be the only challenging ones and our art will be the one revolutionary expression. We need new noise and new voices and new canvases to become something more than the last poets of a useless generation.

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:34 am

Individuality-ness wrote:
Lolination wrote:Stop putting words in my mouth. I said the possession / watching of child porn, not production. Come on...

You're arguing that child porn should be legal because no one gets hurt (I suspect it was a strawman but I am not going to check). I'm giving you the reason why NO sane person would legalize it.

Child porn doesn't hurt anybody. Except the children. Hurrdurr.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
Minoriteeburg
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13274
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Minoriteeburg » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:34 am

Disserbia wrote:Your polls are the greatest!


Thanks. :lol:

I do what I can.
MINOR/BLAAT 2016: They'll Drink To That For America
Dumb Ideologies - NSG is argument porn
Greater Cabinda - You are the Drunken Master.
Nanatsu no Tsuki - Titty... titties are so beautiful.
Ailiailia - It's Minoriteeburg, our cheap substitute for Drunk Commies.
The Blaatschapen - Now, if there exists a person with two penises, he can shave the pubes of the right one that way. If he then gets an erection he could say he's doing a Nazi salute.
WHAT HAVE YOU LEARNED TODAY: THE THREAD WHO LOVED ME

User avatar
The Serbian Empire
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58107
Founded: Apr 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Serbian Empire » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:36 am

San Leggera wrote:This will make sense when porn exclusively becomes gameplay from Grand Theft Auto.

Then they ban video games.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~ WOMAN
Level 12 Myrmidon, Level ⑨ Tsundere, Level ✿ Hold My Flower
Bad Idea Purveyor
8 Values: https://8values.github.io/results.html?e=56.1&d=70.2&g=86.5&s=91.9
Political Compass: Economic -10.00 Authoritarian: -9.13
TG for Facebook if you want to friend me
Marissa, Goddess of Stratospheric Reach
preferred pronouns: Female ones
Primarily lesbian, but pansexual in nature

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bombadil, Bovad, Celritannia, Con Nihawitan, Destructive Government Economic System, Dimetrodon Empire, Ethel mermania, EuroStralia, Misdainana, Mobil7997, Necroghastia, Nova Paradisius, Querria, The Orson Empire, Washington-Columbia

Advertisement

Remove ads