In my defense, my dangly bits are preciousssss.
Advertisement
by The Blaatschapen » Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:33 am
by Ostroeuropa » Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:34 am
Desperate Measures wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
If you think the entire concept of masculinity and femininity is bullshit from the get go you can't really believe in gender. At least that definition of it.
If you mean gender/sex then sure. I recognize more than two.
By this definition I can't be cisgender either.
The key word being acceptance. I don't accept that those categories have any real baring on identity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_abolitionism
I am physically a male. I wouldn't consider myself male gendered in anything but the physical sense. If anything I have more traditional feminine characteristics. If by gender identity you mean "Do you feel ok with having a penis or would you prefer not to?" then it seems like nobody should really care and it's down to whatever the individual wants to do. It's their body. It seems like a lot of effort to go through but then it doesn't really bother me, I suppose if it did I would get it changed. If someone were to tell me they were a transsexual my response would be "Ok." while privately thinking "So what?" which would be my same response if someone angrily declared "That person is a transsexual!" though it that case i'd add "Why do you care exactly?"
I understood, the phrase just entered my head and I had to type it and it wasn't meant to mean anything that wasn't lighthearted.
by Scholencia » Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:35 am
Souseiseki wrote:is this because they always make it fun or because you think they're freaks
by Souseiseki » Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:38 am
by Autismiah » Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:38 am
by Heinzinton » Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:39 am
by Souseiseki » Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:40 am
Autismiah wrote:I support the World Health Organisation in its view of gender dysphoria. It is a mental illness. This is generally accepted by the scientific community.
Find me one transgender person who didn't have serious problems in childhood, usually due to a parent leaving. Saying ''me'' or ''a friend'' is not an appropriate answer.
by Scholencia » Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:41 am
by Ostroeuropa » Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:41 am
Autismiah wrote:I support the World Health Organisation in its view of gender dysphoria. It is a mental illness. This is generally accepted by the scientific community.
Find me one transgender person who didn't have serious problems in childhood, usually due to a parent leaving. Saying ''me'' or ''a friend'' is not an appropriate answer.
by Souseiseki » Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:42 am
by Pillea » Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:42 am
Autismiah wrote:I support the World Health Organisation in its view of gender dysphoria. It is a mental illness. This is generally accepted by the scientific community.
Find me one transgender person who didn't have serious problems in childhood, usually due to a parent leaving. Saying ''me'' or ''a friend'' is not an appropriate answer.
by Ostroeuropa » Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:44 am
Pillea wrote:Autismiah wrote:I support the World Health Organisation in its view of gender dysphoria. It is a mental illness. This is generally accepted by the scientific community.
Find me one transgender person who didn't have serious problems in childhood, usually due to a parent leaving. Saying ''me'' or ''a friend'' is not an appropriate answer.
Me absolutely is applicable in this instance. You said find you one.
I am one. I had a relatively happy childhood, my parents are to this day happily married and involved in my life as much as I allow them. I never had some major childhood crisis that scarred nor marred me. I just am who I am, and that me happens to suffer from major dysphoria due to a lack of similarity in my anatomy and gender. The scientific community is also changing its mind on this, it's not classified as such in the new DSM 5 standards. Don't forget, homosexuality was once a mental illness....
by Scholencia » Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:51 am
by Desperate Measures » Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:01 am
Autismiah wrote:I support the World Health Organisation in its view of gender dysphoria. It is a mental illness. This is generally accepted by the scientific community.
Find me one transgender person who didn't have serious problems in childhood, usually due to a parent leaving. Saying ''me'' or ''a friend'' is not an appropriate answer.
by Ifreann » Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:20 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Pillea wrote:
Me absolutely is applicable in this instance. You said find you one.
I am one. I had a relatively happy childhood, my parents are to this day happily married and involved in my life as much as I allow them. I never had some major childhood crisis that scarred nor marred me. I just am who I am, and that me happens to suffer from major dysphoria due to a lack of similarity in my anatomy and gender. The scientific community is also changing its mind on this, it's not classified as such in the new DSM 5 standards. Don't forget, homosexuality was once a mental illness....
It typically goes:
"Possessed by demons"
->
"Mental illness"
->
"Has psychological triggers." (Like your favourite colour, incidentally. But we don't round up the damn mauvists just because they are minority...Even if liking mauve as a color is far more debilitating to your sanity and health than being a transgender person)
->
"Sometimes has psychological triggers, sometimes biological in origin."
by Central Slavia » Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:37 am
Autismiah wrote:I support the World Health Organisation in its view of gender dysphoria. It is a mental illness. This is generally accepted by the scientific community.
Find me one transgender person who didn't have serious problems in childhood, usually due to a parent leaving. Saying ''me'' or ''a friend'' is not an appropriate answer.
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]
by Immoren » Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:42 am
Central Slavia wrote:Autismiah wrote:I support the World Health Organisation in its view of gender dysphoria. It is a mental illness. This is generally accepted by the scientific community.
Find me one transgender person who didn't have serious problems in childhood, usually due to a parent leaving. Saying ''me'' or ''a friend'' is not an appropriate answer.
This.
I am supportive of them getting treatment and whatever, even up to reassignment surgery on the state's funds, but there's two genders, and that's it. Anything else is a very,very minor percentage of cases, and definite anomalies that don't have a place in the definition of normal, much like people born with excess limbs don't make us define that a healthy person has "two hands but sometimes three".
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Anarcho-Leftist States of Horseflip » Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:43 am
Souseiseki wrote:
Oh, I do.
by Linux and the X » Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:47 am
Central Slavia wrote:Autismiah wrote:I support the World Health Organisation in its view of gender dysphoria. It is a mental illness. This is generally accepted by the scientific community.
Find me one transgender person who didn't have serious problems in childhood, usually due to a parent leaving. Saying ''me'' or ''a friend'' is not an appropriate answer.
This.
I am supportive of them getting treatment and whatever, even up to reassignment surgery on the state's funds, but there's two genders, and that's it. Anything else is a very,very minor percentage of cases, and definite anomalies that don't have a place in the definition of normal, much like people born with excess limbs don't make us define that a healthy person has "two hands but sometimes three".
by Desperate Measures » Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:50 am
by Cuba Liberty » Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:52 am
by Oneracon » Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:53 am
Desperate Measures wrote:I honestly don't think that the crux of the transgender issue is sexual reassignment surgery funded by the state and it's kind of annoying that that is such a main argument here. Maybe I'm wrong. Paying for the surgery is an issue and so is the question of whether it should be covered under insurance plans or under public healthcare but I feel like that should be separate from acceptance of transgendered individuals in society.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |
by Desperate Measures » Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:56 am
Oneracon wrote:Desperate Measures wrote:I honestly don't think that the crux of the transgender issue is sexual reassignment surgery funded by the state and it's kind of annoying that that is such a main argument here. Maybe I'm wrong. Paying for the surgery is an issue and so is the question of whether it should be covered under insurance plans or under public healthcare but I feel like that should be separate from acceptance of transgendered individuals in society.
Especially since being trans =/= wanting SRS
by YellowApple » Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:15 am
Cuba Liberty wrote:To be or not to be ? That is NOT the question, But rather a choice that clearly must be your own. Respecting the rights of others ,Is the road to peace.
by Distruzio » Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:47 am
Autismiah wrote:I support the World Health Organisation in its view of gender dysphoria. It is a mental illness. This is generally accepted by the scientific community.
Find me one transgender person who didn't have serious problems in childhood, usually due to a parent leaving. Saying ''me'' or ''a friend'' is not an appropriate answer.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cerula, Cyptopir, Dumb Ideologies, Floofybit, Shidei, Statesburg, The Vooperian Union, Tungstan, Western Theram
Advertisement