NATION

PASSWORD

Communism

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Are you in favor of communism?

Yes
254
38%
No
313
47%
Other (explain)
93
14%
 
Total votes : 660

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Sun Feb 24, 2013 12:36 pm

Lemanrussland wrote:The whole "left-right" political spectrum is quite silly and antiquated, really. I wouldn't get too hung up on defining what "left wing" or "right wing" means, or which ideologies are left or right wing.

The left-right spectrum is not antiquated. It's misused.

User avatar
Lemanrussland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5078
Founded: Dec 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lemanrussland » Sun Feb 24, 2013 12:53 pm

Conscentia wrote:
Lemanrussland wrote:The whole "left-right" political spectrum is quite silly and antiquated, really. I wouldn't get too hung up on defining what "left wing" or "right wing" means, or which ideologies are left or right wing.

The left-right spectrum is not antiquated. It's misused.

It is far too simplistic to accurately map people's ideological beliefs, in my opinion. The "political compass", though not perfect, does a much better job by separating the social and economic factors from each other.

Hitler and Ron Paul both being "right wing", and Gandhi and Stalin being "left wing" really makes no sense.

User avatar
Empire of Vlissingen
Minister
 
Posts: 2354
Founded: Jul 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Empire of Vlissingen » Sun Feb 24, 2013 1:23 pm

Lemanrussland wrote:
Conscentia wrote:The left-right spectrum is not antiquated. It's misused.

It is far too simplistic to accurately map people's ideological beliefs, in my opinion. The "political compass", though not perfect, does a much better job by separating the social and economic factors from each other.

Hitler and Ron Paul both being "right wing", and Gandhi and Stalin being "left wing" really makes no sense.

You could use government power slide on the extreme left there is total government like kings. On the extreme right there is no government.
I live in The Netherlands.
Economic Left/Right: 4.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.31

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Sun Feb 24, 2013 1:24 pm

Empire of Vlissingen wrote:
Lemanrussland wrote:It is far too simplistic to accurately map people's ideological beliefs, in my opinion. The "political compass", though not perfect, does a much better job by separating the social and economic factors from each other.

Hitler and Ron Paul both being "right wing", and Gandhi and Stalin being "left wing" really makes no sense.

You could use government power slide on the extreme left there is total government like kings. On the extreme right there is no government.


Which would still put anarcho-capitalists and communists at the same point. It's clearly lacking.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Sun Feb 24, 2013 1:52 pm

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:You could use government power slide on the extreme left there is total government like kings. On the extreme right there is no government.


Which would still put anarcho-capitalists and communists at the same point. It's clearly lacking.[/quote]Anarchism is the lack of social hierarchy, most notably the state. Governments would certainly still exist.
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Indira
Minister
 
Posts: 3339
Founded: Feb 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Indira » Sun Feb 24, 2013 2:07 pm

I'm against communism on the basis that in its purest form, it's unobtainable and in it's impure form, it only leads to tyrants

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Sun Feb 24, 2013 2:14 pm

Indira wrote:I'm against communism on the basis that in its purest form, it's unobtainable

Revolutionary Catalonia, the Paris Commune, Ukrainian Free Territory, Israeli Kibbutz, Shinmin Autonomous Region, Twin Oaks Community, and numerous other communes throughout the world would like to have a word with you.
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sun Feb 24, 2013 2:18 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
Indira wrote:I'm against communism on the basis that in its purest form, it's unobtainable

Revolutionary Catalonia, the Paris Commune, Ukrainian Free Territory, Israeli Kibbutz, Shinmin Autonomous Region, Twin Oaks Community, and numerous other communes throughout the world would like to have a word with you.

That way of doing things is stupid.It never works.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Sun Feb 24, 2013 2:26 pm

CTALNH wrote:That way of doing things is stupid.It never works.
Yes, clearly it is far better to vastly increase the power of the state if we wish to remove it. I mean, it's not like the Party members will be just as corrupt and in many ways even more brutal than our previous oppressors right? If we ever want the people to be ready for communism, we also of course must make sure they have almost no influence in the political process, so that way they will be prepared to make informed decisions once they are given power.
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sun Feb 24, 2013 2:54 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
CTALNH wrote:That way of doing things is stupid.It never works.
Yes, clearly it is far better to vastly increase the power of the state if we wish to remove it. I mean, it's not like the Party members will be just as corrupt and in many ways even more brutal than our previous oppressors right? If we ever want the people to be ready for communism, we also of course must make sure they have almost no influence in the political process, so that way they will be prepared to make informed decisions once they are given power.

The people are stupid.

Vanguard party is best.You know people that actually have realized their place and class etc,etc

Not like mine is any better its just is more plausible.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Carena
Diplomat
 
Posts: 993
Founded: Aug 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Carena » Sun Feb 24, 2013 2:56 pm

I prefer Democratic Socialism then actual communism.
FEDERATION OF CARENA

Early PMT nation in a 3 nation universe (Late PMT/FT)
Set on Earth with a focus on exploring near-future geopoltical scenarios & the implications of anthropocentric climate change
NEW NEW YORK TIMES|October 2nd, 2122|Omnicore loses 3 year long legal battle over Martian mining accident|Golden State Warriors sign former MVP Melvin Turant to 2 year/226 mil contract with a player option|Empress Xi Mingze denounces Carena & President Gerald Traugott, warning the world they are not to be trusted|Biafra declares independence from Nigeria, experts believe civil war is imminent

User avatar
Brition
Envoy
 
Posts: 281
Founded: Oct 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Brition » Sun Feb 24, 2013 3:07 pm

I'm glad to see that at least 46% of the people who voted have a bit of common sense.
Last edited by Brition on Sun Feb 24, 2013 3:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: -5.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.13
For National Community AND Worker's Rights
"This is a war Budget. It is for raising money to wage implacable warfare against poverty and squalidness" - David Lloyd George
About me:
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 23
Pet peeves: Europhilia, Sinophilia, Islamophilia, Trumpophobia.

User avatar
Communistic Belgium
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 23
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Communistic Belgium » Sun Feb 24, 2013 3:12 pm

Communism is an ideology, you can believe in it or you don't believe in it. It isn't that hard.

In the poll 46 out of 100 have chosen for not liking or accepting Communism. 40 out of 100 have chosen to accept and even like Communism. You can see that both numbers are almost the same.
I believe in Communism!!!
Socialism is only the beginning of a new nation!

Communistic Belgium

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Sun Feb 24, 2013 4:06 pm

Brition wrote:I'm glad to see that at least 46% of the people who voted have a bit of common sense.

Communistic Belgium wrote:Communism is an ideology, you can believe in it or you don't believe in it. It isn't that hard.

In the poll 46 out of 100 have chosen for not liking or accepting Communism. 40 out of 100 have chosen to accept and even like Communism. You can see that both numbers are almost the same.

Which is why exactly Communism will be unsuccessful.
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Sun Feb 24, 2013 4:43 pm

Lemanrussland wrote:
Conscentia wrote:The left-right spectrum is not antiquated. It's misused.

It is far too simplistic to accurately map people's ideological beliefs, in my opinion. The "political compass", though not perfect, does a much better job by separating the social and economic factors from each other.

Hitler and Ron Paul both being "right wing", and Gandhi and Stalin being "left wing" really makes no sense.

It's not supposed to map people's ideological beliefs. Using it for that, as most people do, is using it wrong.
Position on the scale reflects a person's attitude to equality.

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Sun Feb 24, 2013 4:48 pm

CTALNH wrote:
Threlizdun wrote:Yes, clearly it is far better to vastly increase the power of the state if we wish to remove it. I mean, it's not like the Party members will be just as corrupt and in many ways even more brutal than our previous oppressors right? If we ever want the people to be ready for communism, we also of course must make sure they have almost no influence in the political process, so that way they will be prepared to make informed decisions once they are given power.

The people are stupid.

Vanguard party is best.You know people that actually have realized their place and class etc,etc

Not like mine is any better its just is more plausible.

This is why no one believes you when you call thyself a leftist.

User avatar
Riserland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 781
Founded: Jan 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Riserland » Sun Feb 24, 2013 4:50 pm

Brition wrote:I'm glad to see that at least 46% of the people who voted have a bit of common sense.


To clarify, I did not make this to get a sample of what people in the world think- we're all complete nerds here with no hope of changing anything but I wanted to see if there was at least one response that would profoundly affect my world outlook and give me some new food for thought. Thus far what I've read has been very disappointing.
Last edited by Riserland on Sun Feb 24, 2013 4:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nationstates' favorite American communist!

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Sun Feb 24, 2013 6:12 pm

CTALNH wrote:The people are stupid.

Vanguard party is best.You know people that actually have realized their place and class etc,etc

Not like mine is any better its just is more plausible.
Ah, perhaps I can actually get some who opposes democracy to answer this question for once. Let's say that you are right, that the people are too stupid/greedy/etc. to be able to form a functioning society that serves their interests. If this is true, then where exactly are you getting your enlightened despots from to rule? Does the sky open up and the light of heaven shine upon a newborn child and they declare them suitable? You must have some process for which to select your leaders, and for this to even be worth listening to, it has to be one that is incorruptable and without error, otherwise we are just given the option between flawed liberty and flawed tyranny, to which the choice seems pretty obvious.
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
The Joseon Dynasty
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6015
Founded: Jan 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Joseon Dynasty » Sun Feb 24, 2013 6:17 pm

Riserland wrote:I personally am entirely in favor of it and identify myself as a communist. My definition stems directly from the works of Marx and Engels: A WORLD* split up into interconnected communes in which there are no classes or private property and all people collectively own the means of production.


In what way would these communes be "interconnected"?
  • No, I'm not Korean. I'm British and as white as the Queen's buttocks.
  • Bio: I'm a PhD student in Statistics. Interested in all sorts of things. Currently getting into statistical signal processing for brain imaging. Currently co-authoring a paper on labour market dynamics, hopefully branching off into a test of the Markov property for labour market transition rates.

User avatar
Alekera
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1144
Founded: Oct 13, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alekera » Sun Feb 24, 2013 6:21 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
CTALNH wrote:The people are stupid.

Vanguard party is best.You know people that actually have realized their place and class etc,etc

Not like mine is any better its just is more plausible.
Ah, perhaps I can actually get some who opposes democracy to answer this question for once. Let's say that you are right, that the people are too stupid/greedy/etc. to be able to form a functioning society that serves their interests. If this is true, then where exactly are you getting your enlightened despots from to rule? Does the sky open up and the light of heaven shine upon a newborn child and they declare them suitable? You must have some process for which to select your leaders, and for this to even be worth listening to, it has to be one that is incorruptable and without error, otherwise we are just given the option between flawed liberty and flawed tyranny, to which the choice seems pretty obvious.


Why does this remind me of monty python and the search for the holy grail?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8bqQ-C1PSE

"Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony."

User avatar
The Realm of God
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7562
Founded: Jan 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Realm of God » Sun Feb 24, 2013 6:33 pm

Densaner wrote:Communism in the Manifesto sounds compelling.

In practice it sucks. Corruption, tyranny and oppression.


Although I disagree with Marx and Marxism as he treats classes as distinct and hostile to each other, while in practice classes are often joined by relationships and association, soft class cooperation is the state of normality, in a capitalist system workers and entrepreneurs cooperate to produce profit. However you can't fault the rhetoric, which makes you want to grab a pitchfork.

As for the OP

As a centrist I like several aspects of both left and right ideology. I would prefer to see a natural (non coerced) transition to cooperative businesses , such as the UK's CoOp supermarket were workers are allowed to participate in the running of stores through workplace democracy and shares of the profit. In matters of the state a transition through referendum to direct democracy should be made, at least on the local level. So you could call me a social democrat or 'softly leaning on the side of Syndicalism'. I think that this will be achieved naturally over a long period of time, as part of the growing trend of liberalisation that has been occurring since the enlightenment.

I find communism too sudden and different from the status quo for a people to accept in this age, change has to be gradual rather than sudden and extreme.
British, Orthodox Christian, humanist and stoic.

Pro. Disraelian Progressive Conservatism, One Nation Toryism, Distributionism, Civil Liberties, Pro UK, Pro US Constitution. Pro USA.

Progressive Conservative Economic Right: 0.38 Social Libertarian -2.00.

Christian Democrat NSG Senate.

User avatar
New Rogernomics
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9422
Founded: Aug 22, 2006
Left-wing Utopia

Postby New Rogernomics » Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:14 pm

I am an anarchist-communist, so don't abscribe myself to forms of state communism. But if capitalism collapsed I would be sure to celebrate it's demise.
Herald (Vice-Delegate) of Lazarus
First Citizen (PM) of Lazarus
Chocolate & Italian ice addict
"Ooh, we don't talk about Bruno, no, no, no..."
  • Former Proedroi (Minister) of Foreign Affairs of Lazarus
  • Former Lazarus Delegate (Humane Republic of Lazarus, 2015)
  • Minister of Culture & Media (Humane Republic of Lazarus)
  • Foreign Minister of The Ascendancy (RIP, and purged)
  • Senator of The Ascendancy (RIP, and purged)
  • Interior Commissioner of Lazarus (Pre-People's Republic of Lazarus)
  • At some point a member of the Grey family...then father vanished...
  • Foreign Minister of The Last Kingdom (RIP)
  • ADN:DSA Rep for Eastern Roman Empire
  • Honoratus Servant of the Holy Land (Eastern Roman Empire)
  • UN/WA Delegate of Trans Atlantice (RIP)

User avatar
Jassysworth 1
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1484
Founded: Jan 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jassysworth 1 » Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:19 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
Indira wrote:I'm against communism on the basis that in its purest form, it's unobtainable

Revolutionary Catalonia, the Paris Commune, Ukrainian Free Territory, Israeli Kibbutz, Shinmin Autonomous Region, Twin Oaks Community, and numerous other communes throughout the world would like to have a word with you.


About how most of them didn't last very long, some of them still use money, some of them were in fact still states, ,many of them relied on larger functional states to exist, and all of them were very small?

Yeah no thanks...

User avatar
Jassysworth 1
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1484
Founded: Jan 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jassysworth 1 » Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:25 pm

Bojikami wrote:Yes. Yes I am in favor of communism. Not batshit nuts Stalinism, but communism.


except Stalinism is a part of communism...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalinism

Stalinism is the ideology that Joseph Stalin conceived and implemented in the Soviet Union, and is generally considered a branch of Marxist–Leninist ideology but considered by some historians to be a significant deviation from this philosophy.

GENERALLY (by most people) Stalinism is considered a form of Marxism-Leninism (which is part of the communist ideology/movement).

Only SOME historians (not all and not most) would consider an alternative position (where it isn't communism).



Plus look on the right of the link at the red box. Stalinism is under the series of articles known as Communism and it is also under the series of Marxism-Leninism. Therefore, my source clearly sees Stalinism as part of the communist movement under the Marxist-Leninist umbrella.



Thus, while you can say the Soviet Union never actually REACHED the final stage of communism, you have to recognize it as a thoroughly communist project that failed miserably. While you can say that Stalinism is a disgrace, what you cannot say is that it is not a part of communism (as it refers to the communist movement/communist theories/communist thought).

And by the way... everything Stalin did could be justified by Marx's writings because that old man was just THAT vague on what he wrote and the book was full of incitements to violence.

A vanguard party overthrowing the existing capitalist state with violence to establish a dictatorship of the proletariat to EVENTUALLY transition to communism or wait for the state to wither away as it practically becomes irrelevant/necessary IS COMMUNISM.

Everything that Stalin fits into that narrative. In fact, the Communist Manifesto talks about strengthening the state before the final hitting of communism.

''Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels (by the state or communist rebels)...Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State. ... Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan...''

So yes, Marx himself believed that strengthening a new socialist state first was a realistic way to eventually get to statelessness. Hence where Stalinism fits here...

Again... don't get TOUCHY here.... I didn't say a real country followed Stalinism and actually REACHED communism... I'm only saying that people who follow Stalinism believe it is the most realistic/practical way to eventually reach communism in the end AND that this position has at least some backing from Marx's quotes while he was alive and from his writings.

This is why a very good argument can be made that Stalinism is a part of the communist movement and WHY as wikipedia has stated, MOST PEOPLE consider it a form of Marxist-Leninist communism.



From World English Dictionary...

''Stalinism...the theory and form of government associated with Stalin: a variant of Marxism-Leninism characterized by totalitarianism, rigid bureaucracy, and loyalty to the state''

From Cultural Dictionary...

''The form of Marxism associated with Soviet leader Joseph Stalin. Stalinism emphasizes the repression of all dissent, often by brutal means; a rigid adherence to government management of economic life; and the domination of all communist movements worldwide by the Soviet Union. In holding to these beliefs, Stalin opposed Leon Trotsky.''
Last edited by Jassysworth 1 on Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:27 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Pragia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7540
Founded: May 08, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Pragia » Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:29 pm

Riserland wrote:
Brition wrote:I'm glad to see that at least 46% of the people who voted have a bit of common sense.


To clarify, I did not make this to get a sample of what people in the world think- we're all complete nerds here with no hope of changing anything but I wanted to see if there was at least one response that would profoundly affect my world outlook and give me some new food for thought. Thus far what I've read has been very disappointing.

Alright, so what do you want to see, more huge holes being shot into the failed idea of a utopia? It's impractical, as pointed out over and over. If you wanted a shift, I would've had one if I were pro-communist and I saw all these counterpoints, perhaps you're to dug in, perhaps we are?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Enormous Gentiles, Galloism, Herador, Jerzylvania, Kubra, Lativs, Necroghastia, Pizza Friday Forever91, Raskana, Stellar Colonies, Umeria, Weltkria

Advertisement

Remove ads