NATION

PASSWORD

Communism

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Are you in favor of communism?

Yes
254
38%
No
313
47%
Other (explain)
93
14%
 
Total votes : 660



User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:42 am

Conscentia wrote:
Alekera wrote:My big question is: Without using the word "Stalinist", what political ideology would you use to describe Stalin's political views.

Totalitarianism.

Anti revisionist Marxist Leninism.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:42 am

Conscentia wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Just revolutionary terror.

Nonsense again.

:eyebrow: Marx said it not Stalin nor Lenin.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist


User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:46 am

Conscentia wrote:
CTALNH wrote: :eyebrow: Marx said it not Stalin nor Lenin.

I don't care what Marx said.

Then get out of the tread.

If you are gonna discuss then know your facts.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:51 am

CTALNH wrote:
Conscentia wrote:I don't care what Marx said.

Then get out of the tread.
If you are gonna discuss then know your facts.

Socialism pre-dates Marx - that is a fact.
What Marx said on the subject is therefore irrelevant to anyone who is not a Marxist.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:53 am

Conscentia wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Then get out of the tread.
If you are gonna discuss then know your facts.

Socialism pre-dates Marx - that is a fact.
What Marx said on the subject is therefore irrelevant to anyone who is not a Marxist.

Tread says "Communism"

While I know communists are socialists and not all socialists are communists and that socialism pre dates marxism.

The tread still says "Communism"
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:57 am

CTALNH wrote:
Conscentia wrote:Socialism pre-dates Marx - that is a fact.
What Marx said on the subject is therefore irrelevant to anyone who is not a Marxist.

Tread says "Communism"

While I know communists are socialists and not all socialists are communists and that socialism pre dates marxism.

The tread still says "Communism"

I responded to a post that claimed that "socialism" requires a strengthened state. That is nonsense.
You then responded with "Just revolutionary terror" which is also nonsense. Socialism doesn't require revolutionary terror.
What was being discussed was socialism, not what Marx said.

Additionally, there is such a thing as non-Marxian communism.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:00 am

Conscentia wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Tread says "Communism"

While I know communists are socialists and not all socialists are communists and that socialism pre dates marxism.

The tread still says "Communism"

I responded to a post that claimed that "socialism" requires a strengthened state. That is nonsense.
You then responded with "Just revolutionary terror" which is also nonsense. Socialism doesn't require revolutionary terror.
What was being discussed was socialism, not what Marx said.

Additionally, there is such a thing as non-Marxian communism.

Tribal Communalism or Collectivist Anarchism?
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:12 am

CTALNH wrote:
Conscentia wrote:I responded to a post that claimed that "socialism" requires a strengthened state. That is nonsense.
You then responded with "Just revolutionary terror" which is also nonsense. Socialism doesn't require revolutionary terror.
What was being discussed was socialism, not what Marx said.

Additionally, there is such a thing as non-Marxian communism.

Tribal Communalism or Collectivist Anarchism?

There's more than two, and most non-Marxist communists simply associate with "communism" rather than some new specifically non-Marxist variant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Marxist_Communism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_communism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism#Early_Communism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism:
Council communists and non-Marxist libertarian communists and anarcho-communists oppose the ideas of a vanguard party and a transition stage, and advocate for the construction of full communism to begin immediately upon the abolition of capitalism.
[...]
Last edited by Conscentia on Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:16 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:23 am

Conscentia wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Tribal Communalism or Collectivist Anarchism?

There's more than two, and most non-Marxist communists simply associate with "communism" rather than some new specifically non-Marxist variant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Marxist_Communism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_communism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism#Early_Communism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism:
Council communists and non-Marxist libertarian communists and anarcho-communists oppose the ideas of a vanguard party and a transition stage, and advocate for the construction of full communism to begin immediately upon the abolition of capitalism.
[...]

Indeed thats why we shoot them.

Damned Bakunin!
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Kaesar the invincible
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 398
Founded: Aug 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaesar the invincible » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:24 am

I am against communism for many reasons

Firstly, because I have always been a moderate objectivist. I agree that some regulations need to be put on buisnesses and we need taxes for some things but selfishness is a virtue and is what drives the economy and even the world. without capitalism what would be my motivation to work if I know Ill still get benifits? are we all not entitled to the sweat of our own brow? communism is in direct violation of our rights to property which is one of the most fundamental freedoms. It is also in direct violation of human nature which is to be selfish. being selfish is not bad it is good. the store owner doesnt sell to you out of the goodness of his heart he offers you a fair price so you keep coming back. human nature is commerce, without it we cease to be who we are. and the lack of personal choice is also a problem in a capitalist society you can choose your job and choose what you buy with the money you earned, in communism none of that happens.
I was raised in a former USSR country and my parents were of the mid upper class and had all their wealth taken away which is utterly unfair and is basically theft they also took our house and our neighbours's houses and built an appartment block where a bunch of houses used to be again taking personal property and having liberties with it should not be allowed.
A is A
I am an Anarcho-Capitalist!
We are a libertarian "nation" ruled by the free market.
I am a cynical existentialist, antihuman humanist, antisocial social darwinist, realistic idealist and godlike atheist also a PROUD METALHEAD \m/
“Throughout the centuries there were men who took first steps, down new roads, armed with nothing but their own vision.”

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:31 am

Kaesar the invincible wrote:I am against communism for many reasons

Firstly, because I have always been a moderate objectivist. I agree that some regulations need to be put on buisnesses and we need taxes for some things but selfishness is a virtue and is what drives the economy and even the world. without capitalism what would be my motivation to work if I know Ill still get benifits? are we all not entitled to the sweat of our own brow? communism is in direct violation of our rights to property which is one of the most fundamental freedoms. It is also in direct violation of human nature which is to be selfish. being selfish is not bad it is good. the store owner doesnt sell to you out of the goodness of his heart he offers you a fair price so you keep coming back. human nature is commerce, without it we cease to be who we are. and the lack of personal choice is also a problem in a capitalist society you can choose your job and choose what you buy with the money you earned, in communism none of that happens.
I was raised in a former USSR country and my parents were of the mid upper class and had all their wealth taken away which is utterly unfair and is basically theft they also took our house and our neighbours's houses and built an appartment block where a bunch of houses used to be again taking personal property and having liberties with it should not be allowed.

Sadly I am not a moderate communist.
Guess the rest.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:32 am

CTALNH wrote:Indeed thats why we shoot them.

Damned Bakunin!

If you kill everyone who doesn't agree with you, you'll end up with a planet with a only 10 people on and an omnipresent smell of death.
How about not killing everyone who doesn't agree with you?
Last edited by Conscentia on Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:32 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Nicer potlimitomaha
Minister
 
Posts: 3226
Founded: Jan 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Nicer potlimitomaha » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:32 am

Densaner wrote:Communism in the Manifesto sounds compelling.

In practice it sucks. Corruption, tyranny and oppression.



This
Joined in 2012. Recently rejoined after a 6 year pause.

User avatar
Renetopia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1625
Founded: Jun 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Renetopia » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:35 am

I really don't like communism. Socialism, on the other hand, I favor it.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:38 am

Conscentia wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Indeed thats why we shoot them.

Damned Bakunin!

If you kill everyone who doesn't agree with you, you'll end up with a planet with a only 10 people on and an omnipresent smell of death.
How about not killing everyone who doesn't agree with you?

Oh mind control...

Nah its better to be respected and feared than to be loved.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Sociobiology
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18396
Founded: Aug 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sociobiology » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:38 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Lemanrussland wrote:How else will you create a collective society in a post-revolutionary environment? Capitalists, and really, most normal people will not voluntarily relinquish their property.


No-one's asking anyone else to relinquish personal property unwillingly. If capitalists don't want to live in a communal society they're free to start a capitalist commune or just leave.

so how is that different than those of us living in a state telling you people who don't wan't one to leave?
At least we have the decency to give you an education first.
I think we risk becoming the best informed society that has ever died of ignorance. ~Reuben Blades

I got quite annoyed after the Haiti earthquake. A baby was taken from the wreckage and people said it was a miracle. It would have been a miracle had God stopped the earthquake. More wonderful was that a load of evolved monkeys got together to save the life of a child that wasn't theirs. ~Terry Pratchett

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:39 am

CTALNH wrote:
Conscentia wrote:If you kill everyone who doesn't agree with you, you'll end up with a planet with a only 10 people on and an omnipresent smell of death.
How about not killing everyone who doesn't agree with you?

Oh mind control...
Nah its better to be respected and feared than to be loved.

You won't be respected.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:40 am

Sociobiology wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
No-one's asking anyone else to relinquish personal property unwillingly. If capitalists don't want to live in a communal society they're free to start a capitalist commune or just leave.

so how is that different than those of us living in a state telling you people who don't wan't one to leave?
At least we have the decency to give you an education first.

Or just shoot you so you stop bitching.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:40 am

Jassysworth 1 wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
The solution, logically, then, is to not concentrate power.


Except Marx says that to get to communism you must first go through socialism... which requires a strengthened state to set the preconditions to launch into communism over an unspecified length of time.


Marx isn't the be-all and end-all.

''...Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels (interpretation: by the state, who else?)...
...Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly...
...Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State...
...Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan...''

It's part of his theory of historical materialism... you know... the bit where he says history is inevitably progressing to communism starting from slave societies to feudal societies to capitalists than socialists and finally communism?


There's also the fact that the "dictatorship of the proletariat" in actuality refers to the proletarians achieving collective class dominance rather than "hurr durr democide", and the fact that Marx and Engels heartily endorsed the Paris Commune.

Are we now going to completely scrap the socialist stage now in favor of jumping straight into anarchist candyland? Now I wonder why the Stalinists aren't calling YOU guys fake communists...


Yes, because one cannot be a communist and disagree with Marx. Obviously. :roll:

It's not as if Kropotkin and Bakunin were actual people or anything.

Sociobiology wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
No-one's asking anyone else to relinquish personal property unwillingly. If capitalists don't want to live in a communal society they're free to start a capitalist commune or just leave.

so how is that different than those of us living in a state telling you people who don't wan't one to leave?


Because capitalists are being given the option to form their own capitalist communes if they want and if all members within said commune consent to being there?

CTALNH wrote:
Conscentia wrote:If you kill everyone who doesn't agree with you, you'll end up with a planet with a only 10 people on and an omnipresent smell of death.
How about not killing everyone who doesn't agree with you?

Oh mind control...

Nah its better to be respected and feared than to be loved.


You are an absolutely crap leftist.
Last edited by Of the Free Socialist Territories on Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:42 am, edited 2 times in total.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:42 am

Conscentia wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Oh mind control...
Nah its better to be respected and feared than to be loved.

You won't be respected.

When a guy has a metaphorical gun at your face all the time you will learn to respect him sooner or later.


And especially fear him.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:43 am

CTALNH wrote:
Conscentia wrote:You won't be respected.

When a guy has a metaphorical gun at your face all the time you will learn to respect him sooner or later.

And especially fear him.


Again, your fetish for power and death and your hatred of anything that isn't totalitarianism makes you a crap leftist.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:44 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Jassysworth 1 wrote:
Except Marx says that to get to communism you must first go through socialism... which requires a strengthened state to set the preconditions to launch into communism over an unspecified length of time.


Marx isn't the be-all and end-all.

''...Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels (interpretation: by the state, who else?)...
...Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly...
...Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State...
...Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan...''

It's part of his theory of historical materialism... you know... the bit where he says history is inevitably progressing to communism starting from slave societies to feudal societies to capitalists than socialists and finally communism?


There's also the fact that the "dictatorship of the proletariat" in actuality refers to the proletarians achieving collective class dominance rather than "hurr durr democide", and the fact that Marx and Engels heartily endorsed the Paris Commune.

Are we now going to completely scrap the socialist stage now in favor of jumping straight into anarchist candyland? Now I wonder why the Stalinists aren't calling YOU guys fake communists...


Yes, because one cannot be a communist and disagree with Marx. Obviously. :roll:

It's not as if Kropotkin and Bakunin were actual people or anything.

Sociobiology wrote:so how is that different than those of us living in a state telling you people who don't wan't one to leave?


Because capitalists are being given the option to form their own capitalist communes if they want and if all members within said commune consent to being there?

CTALNH wrote:Oh mind control...

Nah its better to be respected and feared than to be loved.


You are an absolutely crap leftist.

Crap leftist that supports a crap nation that lasted more than a decade! :p
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Asucki, Candesia, Dominos country, Edush, EuroStralia, Ifreann, Point Blob, Socialistic Britain

Advertisement

Remove ads