If we kick up enough dust, everyone will look dirty!
Advertisement
by Cannot think of a name » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:46 am

by Gauntleted Fist » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:46 am

by Individuality-ness » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:48 am
The likelihood of him not having a fuck-up record or a very low one is quite high. Furthermore, the hiring practices of one clinic does not reflect on the organization as a whole; it never has.
by Catness » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:49 am
Individuality-ness wrote:Zweite Alaje wrote:First we investigate the associates, then Planned "Parenthood" itself.
The likelihood of him not having a fuck-up record or a very low one is quite high. Furthermore, the hiring practices of one clinic does not reflect on the organization as a whole; it never has.
Why are you being dishonest and contradictory when it comes to Planned Parenthood?

by Individuality-ness » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:50 am
Catness wrote:Individuality-ness wrote:The likelihood of him not having a fuck-up record or a very low one is quite high. Furthermore, the hiring practices of one clinic does not reflect on the organization as a whole; it never has.
Why are you being dishonest and contradictory when it comes to Planned Parenthood?
Because much like the OP, he wishes to engage in a witch hunt. When have witch hunts ever been reasonable?

by Costa Alegria » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:50 am

by Catness » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:51 am

by Individuality-ness » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:52 am

by Catness » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:54 am
by Cannot think of a name » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:54 am
Individuality-ness wrote:
Why are you being dishonest and contradictory when it comes to Planned Parenthood?

by Individuality-ness » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:56 am
Catness wrote:Individuality-ness wrote:But one can dream Nana, one can dream... dream... *falls asleep* *snores*
Should I cover her with a blanket or not?
For what is worth, Indy, I understand your desire. If people were more intellectually honest, some debates would actually take us somewhere other than the beating of a dead horse.
Alas, perhaps some people aren't ready or incapable of engaging in an honest exchange.

by Zweite Alaje » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:56 am
Gauntleted Fist wrote:Zweite Alaje wrote:
First we investigate the associates, then Planned "Parenthood" itself.
And when it turns out Planned Parenthood has done nothing wrong? Then what? Do you keep up your witch hunt in hopes of finding someone to burn because you hate abortion?
Who am I kidding, of course you do. You don't actually care about wrong doing. You just want to destroy Planned Parenthood because.
Individuality-ness wrote:Zweite Alaje wrote:First we investigate the associates, then Planned "Parenthood" itself.
The likelihood of him not having a fuck-up record or a very low one is quite high. Furthermore, the hiring practices of one clinic does not reflect on the organization as a whole; it never has.
Why are you being dishonest and contradictory when it comes to Planned Parenthood?

by Individuality-ness » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:56 am

by Individuality-ness » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:58 am
Zweite Alaje wrote:Individuality-ness wrote:The likelihood of him not having a fuck-up record or a very low one is quite high. Furthermore, the hiring practices of one clinic does not reflect on the organization as a whole; it never has.
Why are you being dishonest and contradictory when it comes to Planned Parenthood?
The clinic reflects on the company's reputation regardless. I'm not being dishonest or contradictory, I simply desire their destruction.

by Catness » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:59 am
Individuality-ness wrote:Catness wrote:Should I cover her with a blanket or not?
For what is worth, Indy, I understand your desire. If people were more intellectually honest, some debates would actually take us somewhere other than the beating of a dead horse.
Alas, perhaps some people aren't ready or incapable of engaging in an honest exchange.
*nods and mumbles* It would be nice... *yawn*... to have a debate... where we... get... somewhere... away from... dead... horses...
Man, it's nearly 2AM. Need sleep.
by Cannot think of a name » Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:03 am


by Zweite Alaje » Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:20 am
Individuality-ness wrote:Zweite Alaje wrote:The clinic reflects on the company's reputation regardless. I'm not being dishonest or contradictory, I simply desire their destruction.
Which means that you're not going to ever be able to judge them honestly without bias, due to your personal agenda. It's so convenient that the right-wingers ignore the fact that PP provides other services like mammograms and birth control, but then again, the right-wing isn't known for thinking of women as anything more than baby-making kitchen-wrenches.

by AiliailiA » Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:44 am

Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.

by Zweite Alaje » Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:50 am


by AiliailiA » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:13 am
Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.

by Grave_n_idle » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:19 am
Zweite Alaje wrote:I hope her lawsuit will encourage more women to report PP's terrible practices, death to Planned "Parenthood".

by Grave_n_idle » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:22 am
Snafturi wrote:Individuality-ness wrote:No, it's not, but let's presume that she's right and it was the doctor's fault.
Ah, okay. Then in that case, I'm in full agreement with you. The only way a health care establishment should be held in any way accountable for a prover's screw up is if they had significant evidence they shouldn't have hired the person.Individuality-ness wrote:Actually, no, it was an infection IIRC.
An infection causes by some missed tissue, which happens in about 2% of EVAs.

by Grave_n_idle » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:26 am
Christian Democrats wrote:According to the complaint, they had not started the procedure yet.

by AiliailiA » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:31 am
Zweite Alaje wrote:Individuality-ness wrote:Which means that you're not going to ever be able to judge them honestly without bias, due to your personal agenda. It's so convenient that the right-wingers ignore the fact that PP provides other services like mammograms and birth control, but then again, the right-wing isn't known for thinking of women as anything more than baby-making kitchen-wrenches.
>says I'm a right winger
>I'm a socialist
![]()
I don't care if they do other things, yay for them, they can do that. I care only about ending their abortions services.
Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.

by AiliailiA » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:32 am
Grave_n_idle wrote:Snafturi wrote:Ah, okay. Then in that case, I'm in full agreement with you. The only way a health care establishment should be held in any way accountable for a prover's screw up is if they had significant evidence they shouldn't have hired the person.
An infection causes by some missed tissue, which happens in about 2% of EVAs.
It's worth pointing out that the 'missed tissue' wasn't really 'missed' - the patient aborted the procedure, against medical advice.
Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
Advertisement
Advertisement