Advertisement

by Wikipedia and Universe » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:53 pm
An ODECON Naval Analyst wrote:Superior tactics and training can in fact triumph over force of numbers and missile spam.
Bottle wrote:This is not rocket surgery, folks.
Senestrum wrote:This is relativity, the theory that takes everything we know about the world, bends it over, and fucks it to death with a spiked dildo.

by Conscentia » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:53 pm
Icesteam wrote:Finally something positive in this administration.
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Minoriteeburg » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:53 pm

by Great Nepal » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:54 pm

by Minoriteeburg » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:55 pm

by Conscentia » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:55 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Conscentia wrote:But in this situation the cards aren't the means of exchange. They're a means to access the means of exchange, which is the currency which exists as data.
You could equally make the case that notes/coins aren't means of exchange and on their own, they mean nothing. They are simply means to access part of the actual currency stored in a bank's vaults.
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
by Sibirsky » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:56 pm
Wikipedia and Universe wrote:I'm in a bit of a hurry, so I didn't watch the video. Is he considering ultimately eliminating the penny entirely from circulation, or is the proposal just to discontinue its minting and production while keeping it in circulation and retaining its status as legal tender? (For example, $2 bills and half-dollar coins are still in circulation and can still buy stuff, even though I believe they've been discontinued.)

by Conscentia » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:56 pm
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Dazchan » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:57 pm
Wikipedia and Universe wrote:I'm in a bit of a hurry, so I didn't watch the video. Is he considering ultimately eliminating the penny entirely from circulation, or is the proposal just to discontinue its minting and production while keeping it in circulation and retaining its status as legal tender? (For example, $2 bills and half-dollar coins are still in circulation and can still buy stuff, even though I believe they've been discontinued.)

by Natair » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:57 pm

by Minoriteeburg » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:58 pm

by Conscentia » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:58 pm
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Minoriteeburg » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:58 pm

by Free South Califas » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:59 pm
Also blacklight verification.YellowApple wrote:Conscentia wrote:A phone is more convenient than a card? Since when?
Since Google Wallet came out and introduced the ability to wave one's phone over a cash register to pay.
Think about it; why carry a wallet and a phone when your phone is capable of using NFC to transmit/authorize a payment and has a screen to display a photo ID and has the computational power and storage capacity to store and replicate a wide variety of barcode-based cards? The only things lacking on a phone are smartcard emulation and magnetic strips, and both of those can be conceivably obsolesced by NFC.
Dyakovo wrote:Free South Califas wrote:Last year I watched the whole series of The West Wing with my partner, and before some of the more violent plot twists, one of the more pointlessly tragic episodes to me was the one with the subplot about abolishing the penny. All through the episode one of the protagonists builds a solid case for stopping production, and frantically lobbies the administration (and Congress IIRC). At the end,he is informed by another protagonist that even though every reasonable person agrees that we should stop making pennies, it "will never happen" because of the Congressional delegation from Illinois, who want to keep the one piece of currency with Lincoln's face on it.
![]()
YellowApple wrote:Free South Califas wrote:Utter nonsense. A great many people in the US alone meet the US govt definition of poverty, which itself has an insanely low threshold which does not take the cost of most relevant goods and services into account.
And even those in poverty tend to have cell phones, or at the very least some form of electronic payment, like a debit or credit card. Credit/debit cards are cheap to manufacture, and most credit unions - being non-profit - have very low charges associated with them, if any at all, making them very suitable for those in poverty. It's silly to argue that poor people would be shut out from an all-electronic currency scheme when said poor people are already more than capable of participation.

by Minoriteeburg » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:59 pm

by Great Nepal » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:59 pm
Conscentia wrote:Great Nepal wrote:You could equally make the case that notes/coins aren't means of exchange and on their own, they mean nothing. They are simply means to access part of the actual currency stored in a bank's vaults.
Notes are actually a promise for the central bank to pay up. ("I promise to pay the bearer...")
I think coins are actually money though.

by Saiwania » Tue Feb 19, 2013 2:00 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Which is why physical documents will be phased out as well.

by The Emerald Dawn » Tue Feb 19, 2013 2:01 pm

by Great Nepal » Tue Feb 19, 2013 2:02 pm

by Hallistar » Tue Feb 19, 2013 2:02 pm

by Conscentia » Tue Feb 19, 2013 2:03 pm
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Minoriteeburg » Tue Feb 19, 2013 2:03 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Freedomanica, Kenmoria, Nilokeras, Picairn, Techocracy101010, The Holy Therns, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement