Advertisement
by L Ron Cupboard » Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:05 pm
by Obamacult » Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:06 pm
Wikkiwallana wrote:So, a study has recently concluded, determining once and for all how the unholy mess known as the Tea Party started. Astroturfed? I knew that. Koch Brothers? Not a surprise at all. Big Tobacco in the 1980's? What the fuck?http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brendan-demelle/study-confirms-tea-party-_b_2663125.html wrote:A new academic study confirms that front groups with longstanding ties to the tobacco industry and the billionaire Koch brothers planned the formation of the Tea Party movement more than a decade before it exploded onto the U.S. political scene.
Far from a genuine grassroots uprising, this astroturf effort was curated by wealthy industrialists years in advance. Many of the anti-science operatives who defended cigarettes are currently deploying their tobacco-inspired playbook internationally to evade accountability for the fossil fuel industry's role in driving climate disruption.
The study, funded by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institute of Health, traces the roots of the Tea Party's anti-tax movement back to the early 1980s when tobacco companies began to invest in third party groups to fight excise taxes on cigarettes, as well as health studies finding a link between cancer and secondhand cigarette smoke.
More at the link.
Long story short, it's being bankrolled by Freedomworks and Americans for Prosperity because the tobacco industry hates getting taxed and having regulations put on their cancer sticks. What's interesting to me is that although they didn't get really popular until 2008, they've had a website as far back as 2002. I had honestly thought the major backers scooped up a fledgling movement because they were pissed about the possibility of a black democrat becoming president. That this has been around for so long, and was the focus of so much planning is downright scary. Even scarier is the apparent fact that they are going international to spread this anti-democracy infection of a "movement" to other countries.
So, what say you NSG? Surprised? Alarmed? Pleased? Indifferent? Hungry?
by Neutraligon » Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:09 pm
Obamacult wrote:Wikkiwallana wrote:So, a study has recently concluded, determining once and for all how the unholy mess known as the Tea Party started. Astroturfed? I knew that. Koch Brothers? Not a surprise at all. Big Tobacco in the 1980's? What the fuck?
More at the link.
Long story short, it's being bankrolled by Freedomworks and Americans for Prosperity because the tobacco industry hates getting taxed and having regulations put on their cancer sticks. What's interesting to me is that although they didn't get really popular until 2008, they've had a website as far back as 2002. I had honestly thought the major backers scooped up a fledgling movement because they were pissed about the possibility of a black democrat becoming president. That this has been around for so long, and was the focus of so much planning is downright scary. Even scarier is the apparent fact that they are going international to spread this anti-democracy infection of a "movement" to other countries.
So, what say you NSG? Surprised? Alarmed? Pleased? Indifferent? Hungry?
Bullshit,
You can't discredit the truth and freedom.
The Tea Party was inspired in opposition to crony capitalism, more specifically the Federal government bailout of the banking and finance industry -- plundering Main Street to save campaign contributors on Wall Street.
Indeed, the revolving door of corruption between Washington and Wall Street remains to this day and it was one of the primary causal mechanisms for the financial crisis of 2008 The bad actors on Wall Street knew they would get bailed out because they are Washington are one in the same.
In sum, it is amusing when someone tries to tell me why me and my friends side with the Tea Party --- I mean how the hell do you know?
by Condunum » Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:16 pm
Obamacult wrote:Wikkiwallana wrote:So, a study has recently concluded, determining once and for all how the unholy mess known as the Tea Party started. Astroturfed? I knew that. Koch Brothers? Not a surprise at all. Big Tobacco in the 1980's? What the fuck?
More at the link.
Long story short, it's being bankrolled by Freedomworks and Americans for Prosperity because the tobacco industry hates getting taxed and having regulations put on their cancer sticks. What's interesting to me is that although they didn't get really popular until 2008, they've had a website as far back as 2002. I had honestly thought the major backers scooped up a fledgling movement because they were pissed about the possibility of a black democrat becoming president. That this has been around for so long, and was the focus of so much planning is downright scary. Even scarier is the apparent fact that they are going international to spread this anti-democracy infection of a "movement" to other countries.
So, what say you NSG? Surprised? Alarmed? Pleased? Indifferent? Hungry?
Bullshit,
You can't discredit the truth and freedom.
The Tea Party was inspired in opposition to crony capitalism, more specifically the Federal government bailout of the banking and finance industry -- plundering Main Street to save campaign contributors on Wall Street.
Indeed, the revolving door of corruption between Washington and Wall Street remains to this day and it was one of the primary causal mechanisms for the financial crisis of 2008 The bad actors on Wall Street knew they would get bailed out because they are Washington are one in the same.
In sum, it is amusing when someone tries to tell me why me and my friends side with the Tea Party --- I mean how the hell do you know?
by Wikkiwallana » Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:16 pm
Obamacult wrote:Wikkiwallana wrote:So, a study has recently concluded, determining once and for all how the unholy mess known as the Tea Party started. Astroturfed? I knew that. Koch Brothers? Not a surprise at all. Big Tobacco in the 1980's? What the fuck?
More at the link.
Long story short, it's being bankrolled by Freedomworks and Americans for Prosperity because the tobacco industry hates getting taxed and having regulations put on their cancer sticks. What's interesting to me is that although they didn't get really popular until 2008, they've had a website as far back as 2002. I had honestly thought the major backers scooped up a fledgling movement because they were pissed about the possibility of a black democrat becoming president. That this has been around for so long, and was the focus of so much planning is downright scary. Even scarier is the apparent fact that they are going international to spread this anti-democracy infection of a "movement" to other countries.
So, what say you NSG? Surprised? Alarmed? Pleased? Indifferent? Hungry?
Bullshit,
You can't discredit the truth and freedom.
The Tea Party was inspired in opposition to crony capitalism, more specifically the Federal government bailout of the banking and finance industry -- plundering Main Street to save campaign contributors on Wall Street.
Indeed, the revolving door of corruption between Washington and Wall Street remains to this day and it was one of the primary causal mechanisms for the financial crisis of 2008 The bad actors on Wall Street knew they would get bailed out because they are Washington are one in the same.
In sum, it is amusing when someone tries to tell me why me and my friends side with the Tea Party --- I mean how the hell do you know?
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
by Choronzon » Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:21 pm
Obamacult wrote:
Bullshit,
You can't discredit the truth and freedom.
The Tea Party was inspired in opposition to crony capitalism, more specifically the Federal government bailout of the banking and finance industry -- plundering Main Street to save campaign contributors on Wall Street.
Indeed, the revolving door of corruption between Washington and Wall Street remains to this day and it was one of the primary causal mechanisms for the financial crisis of 2008 The bad actors on Wall Street knew they would get bailed out because they are Washington are one in the same.
In sum, it is amusing when someone tries to tell me why me and my friends side with the Tea Party --- I mean how the hell do you know?
by Stanisburg » Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:44 pm
Hippostania wrote:Neo Art wrote:
FINALLY somebody gets it!
Well, no, in fairness, the Tea Party as an entity is more that corporate shills. It's corporate shills and people too unaware to recognize they're being manipulated by corporate shills.
Alright, let's say that's the case, the Tea Partiers are being manipulated by corporations. So? They're being manipulated by Americans, and Tea Party is a true American movement. Meanwhile, traitorous OWS'ers are being funded by regimes hostile to the US, like China and Russia.
by Cevalo Nacio » Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:29 pm
Hippostania wrote:Neo Art wrote:
FINALLY somebody gets it!
Well, no, in fairness, the Tea Party as an entity is more that corporate shills. It's corporate shills and people too unaware to recognize they're being manipulated by corporate shills.
Alright, let's say that's the case, the Tea Partiers are being manipulated by corporations. So? They're being manipulated by Americans, and Tea Party is a true American movement. Meanwhile, traitorous OWS'ers are being funded by regimes hostile to the US, like China and Russia.
by Brickistan » Thu Feb 14, 2013 12:19 am
Neo Mitanni wrote:The entire so-called "study" is nothing but an exercise is left-wing mendacity. But that's typical with the extreme left, and indicative of how much they fear that patriotic Americans will eventually take effective action to reduce or, hopefully, eliminate the political power of the left once and for all.
by Risottia » Thu Feb 14, 2013 12:29 am
Hippostania wrote:Neo Art wrote:
FINALLY somebody gets it!
Well, no, in fairness, the Tea Party as an entity is more that corporate shills. It's corporate shills and people too unaware to recognize they're being manipulated by corporate shills.
Alright, let's say that's the case, the Tea Partiers are being manipulated by corporations. So? They're being manipulated by Americans, and Tea Party is a true American movement. Meanwhile, traitorous OWS'ers are being funded by regimes hostile to the US, like China and Russia.
by New Chalcedon » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:08 am
Neo Mitanni wrote:Anyone citing HuffPo for anything immediately sets his credibility circling the bowl.
As someone who has been involved with Tea Party since April 15, 2009, and who was at the 9/12 March with about a million or so of my best friends, I submit that the OP speaks of what he does not know.
To address just a few points, I can say with little fear of contradiction that nobody paid, prompted or encouraged me to join,
that nobody I know in any Tea Party organization gives a rat's rear about tobacco (I don't even know any smokers who are in Tea Party) other than a general opposition to excessive government regulation of any aspect of citizens' lives
and that for every dollar the dreaded Koch Brothers contribute to conservative causes, an order of magnitude more, at the least, goes to extreme-left causes from a whole rogues' gallery of extreme-left, anti-American individuals, groups and foundations.
The entire so-called "study" is nothing but an exercise is left-wing mendacity.
But that's typical with the extreme left, and indicative of how much they fear that patriotic Americans will eventually take effective action to reduce or, hopefully, eliminate the political power of the left once and for all.
by Defensor » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:27 am
by Democratic Koyro » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:37 am
by Dyakovo » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:59 am
by Free South Califas » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:07 am
If that sums up your argument, it can safely be dismissed as completely irrelevant to the topic at hand.Obamacult wrote:In sum, it is amusing when someone tries to tell me why me and my friends side with the Tea Party --- I mean how the hell do you know?
by Spiritwolf » Thu Feb 14, 2013 4:21 am
Condunum wrote:Conscentia wrote:I disagree.
I wouldn't.
"An entitlement is a guarantee of access to benefits based on established rights or by legislation. A "right" is itself an entitlement associated with a moral or social principle, such that an "entitlement" is a provision made in accordance with legal framework of a society."
by Spiritwolf » Thu Feb 14, 2013 4:26 am
Brickistan wrote:Neo Mitanni wrote:The entire so-called "study" is nothing but an exercise is left-wing mendacity. But that's typical with the extreme left, and indicative of how much they fear that patriotic Americans will eventually take effective action to reduce or, hopefully, eliminate the political power of the left once and for all.
Am I the only one who finds such attitudes downright scary? I mean, Mitanni is basically arguing for the end of democracy and the abolishment of free speech.
Besides, I'm wondering just what he would term as "extreme left" seeing as US politics is so massively biased towards the right that I'm not even sure that OWS is to the left. If you can even talk about such a diverse movement having a particular political leaning in the first place...
In any case, as for the Tea Party, I'm frankly surprised than anyone else is surprised that they're funded by corporations. I though it was pretty obvious from the get-go, that they were under corporate control.
by Dyakovo » Thu Feb 14, 2013 4:28 am
Spiritwolf wrote:Condunum wrote:I wouldn't.
"An entitlement is a guarantee of access to benefits based on established rights or by legislation. A "right" is itself an entitlement associated with a moral or social principle, such that an "entitlement" is a provision made in accordance with legal framework of a society."
Get this much straight at least......... the government OWNS NOTHING. Anything the government GIVES to anyone first has to be TAKEN from someone else. In essence, you (the government/entitlements) are taking away my rights and freedoms and GIVING them to whoever the fuck you feel like giving them to (to include illegal aliens/immigrants currently living in America tax free because they get paid under the table WHILE THEY ARE TAKING JOBS AWAY FROM REAL TAXPAYING AMERICANS). The TEA Party is saying "FUCK THAT!!!" and this is why I support the TEA Party!!!! Screw the Left!!! Screw the Liberals!!! It's time we lived in a FREE America!!!
by Dyakovo » Thu Feb 14, 2013 4:31 am
Spiritwolf wrote:Brickistan wrote:
Am I the only one who finds such attitudes downright scary? I mean, Mitanni is basically arguing for the end of democracy and the abolishment of free speech.
Besides, I'm wondering just what he would term as "extreme left" seeing as US politics is so massively biased towards the right that I'm not even sure that OWS is to the left. If you can even talk about such a diverse movement having a particular political leaning in the first place...
In any case, as for the Tea Party, I'm frankly surprised than anyone else is surprised that they're funded by corporations. I though it was pretty obvious from the get-go, that they were under corporate control.
Nancy Pelosi, Diane Feinstein, Vice President Biden, President Obama, just to name a few........ any more dumbass questions?
by Brickistan » Thu Feb 14, 2013 4:50 am
by Dyakovo » Thu Feb 14, 2013 5:05 am
by Brickistan » Thu Feb 14, 2013 5:16 am
Dyakovo wrote:
I mean there's only one question in the post he responded to...
" Am I the only one who finds such attitudes downrightscary? "
" Nancy Pelosi, Diane Feinstein, Vice President Biden, President Obama, just to name a few....... "
The answer doesn't seem to fit the question...
Although they might find Mitanni's attitude scary...
by Dyakovo » Thu Feb 14, 2013 5:29 am
Brickistan wrote:Dyakovo wrote:I mean there's only one question in the post he responded to...
" Am I the only one who finds such attitudes downrightscary? "
" Nancy Pelosi, Diane Feinstein, Vice President Biden, President Obama, just to name a few....... "
The answer doesn't seem to fit the question...
Although they might find Mitanni's attitude scary...
Seeing as they're probably part of Mitanni's "extreme left", you might have a point there.
by Mavorpen » Thu Feb 14, 2013 6:20 am
by Mavorpen » Thu Feb 14, 2013 6:24 am
Condunum wrote:Obamacult wrote:
Bullshit,
You can't discredit the truth and freedom.
The Tea Party was inspired in opposition to crony capitalism, more specifically the Federal government bailout of the banking and finance industry -- plundering Main Street to save campaign contributors on Wall Street.
Indeed, the revolving door of corruption between Washington and Wall Street remains to this day and it was one of the primary causal mechanisms for the financial crisis of 2008 The bad actors on Wall Street knew they would get bailed out because they are Washington are one in the same.
In sum, it is amusing when someone tries to tell me why me and my friends side with the Tea Party --- I mean how the hell do you know?
----- What the OP said.
--- What you decided the OP said so you could rant.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: East Leaf Republic, Google [Bot], Ineva, Shrillland, The Black Forrest, Tiami
Advertisement