Boobs invade Notre-Dame de Paris

by **Individuality-ness** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:09 pm

Carpathia and Moldova wrote:All I can say is that I approve of this protest cuz of free boobs.

WHY DOES EVERYONE FOCUS ON THE FUCKING BOOBS?!

There was a point to be made... but everyone focuses on the boobies... *sigh*

by **G-Tech Corporation** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:09 pm

Big Jim P wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Dude, when I was in the military we had protests every fucking day at our base. EVERY fucking day. We managed to not shoot any of them. I did however bring them water once, because they didn't plan well and we were watching them get sunstroke.

At Fort Hood, they have an annual protest by one of the local "Christian" churches, because a Wiccan group actually bothers to go through all the hoops necessary to use some of Ft. Hood ground for their celebrations. The group meets all requirement, and Wicca is a recognized religion by the U.S. Army.

The fuckers would shit to know that Satanism is as well.

But everyone knows that the U.S. military exists only to spread Christendom and bring fiery Crusade justice to the heathens.... how could they consort with the pagans without shooting them??

Truly, I have no words to express my dismay at this atrocity.

by **Roan Cara** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:09 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:It's a pointless double standard. The boobies are everyone's friend. They bring nom to the nomless, they bring joy to the joyless, they bring bounce to the bounceless. Truly, one of nature's best inventions.

Exactly! But no, people don't like that. Men want to have all the pleasures of going shirtless to themselves!

I would go shirtless but man the expense of all that sunscreen! also I don't think the world is ready for this jelly yet.

by **The Emerald Dawn** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:09 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:It's a pointless double standard. The boobies are everyone's friend. They bring nom to the nomless, they bring joy to the joyless, they bring bounce to the bounceless. Truly, one of nature's best inventions.

Exactly! But no, people don't like that. Men want to have all the pleasures of going shirtless to themselves!

The last time I went out in public shirtless people literally lost their minds. I was wearing "Ranger Shorts" and nothing else. It was like watching a highway full of paradigms attempting to shift without a clutch.

by **Individuality-ness** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:09 pm

Roan Cara wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Exactly! But no, people don't like that. Men want to have all the pleasures of going shirtless to themselves!

I would go shirtless but man the expense of all that sunscreen! also I don't think the world is ready for this jelly yet.

Hey, we're already spending a shit load of money on sunscreen anyways.

by **Big Jim P** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:09 pm

Carpathia and Moldova wrote:All I can say is that I approve of this protest cuz of free boobs.

Indeed.

Actually, we really need to come p with more reason to get the girls to expose their boobs in protest.

Maybe that the sky is blue? :twisted:

by **G-Tech Corporation** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:10 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
Carpathia and Moldova wrote:All I can say is that I approve of this protest cuz of free boobs.

WHY DOES EVERYONE FOCUS ON THE FUCKING BOOBS?!

There was a point to be made... but everyone focuses on the boobies... *sigh*

I posit that man is a visual creature, and a sexual being as a species.

My ground-breaking paper will be presented at the Symposium of Man in a few weeks.

by **Individuality-ness** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:10 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Exactly! But no, people don't like that. Men want to have all the pleasures of going shirtless to themselves!

The last time I went out in public shirtless people literally lost their minds. I was wearing "Ranger Shorts" and nothing else. It was like watching a highway full of paradigms attempting to shift without a clutch.

I can't imagine going shirtless, society would just give me weird looks...

by **Souseiseki** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:11 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
Carpathia and Moldova wrote:All I can say is that I approve of this protest cuz of free boobs.

WHY DOES EVERYONE FOCUS ON THE FUCKING BOOBS?!

There was a point to be made... but everyone focuses on the boobies... *sigh*

because no one would have given the slightest fuck about this protest without them, so they made they presumably conscious decision to deliberately invoke this effect

by **The Emerald Dawn** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:11 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:The last time I went out in public shirtless people literally lost their minds. I was wearing "Ranger Shorts" and nothing else. It was like watching a highway full of paradigms attempting to shift without a clutch.

I can't imagine going shirtless, society would just give me weird looks...

You're female, they do that anyway.

by **Ethel mermania** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:11 pm

Frisbeeteria wrote:This isn't TET. Knock it off with the chat and threadjacking, please.

(... not that there was much topic here in the first place, but still ...)

femen's protests are a legitimate topic.

laffin i was going to post their home page but their server seems to be a bit overloaded

"Service Temporarily Unavailable

The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later.
Apache Server at www.femen.org Port 80"

proof that their protest and means of protest are successful.

by **G-Tech Corporation** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:12 pm

Souseiseki wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:WHY DOES EVERYONE FOCUS ON THE FUCKING BOOBS?!

There was a point to be made... but everyone focuses on the boobies... *sigh*

because no one would have given the slightest fuck about this protest without them

Well, the fact that they invaded a church might have gotten them local coverage, tbf. We would almost assuredly never have heard about it though.

by **The Emerald Dawn** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:12 pm

Ethel mermania wrote:
Frisbeeteria wrote:This isn't TET. Knock it off with the chat and threadjacking, please.

(... not that there was much topic here in the first place, but still ...)

femen's protests are a legitimate topic.

laffin i was going to post their home page but their server seems to be a bit overloaded

"Service Temporarily Unavailable

The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later.
Apache Server at http://www.femen.org Port 80"

proof that their protest and means of protest are successful.

The world just wanged the hell out of their bandwidth.

by **Individuality-ness** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:12 pm

Souseiseki wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:WHY DOES EVERYONE FOCUS ON THE FUCKING BOOBS?!

There was a point to be made... but everyone focuses on the boobies... *sigh*

because no one would have given the slightest fuck about this protest without them, so they made they presumably conscious decision to deliberately invoke this effect

I know that, it's just that the message seems to have been lost because BOOB. And people are quick to condemn them because BOOB.

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:I can't imagine going shirtless, society would just give me weird looks...

You're female, they do that anyway.

True.

by **Lost Memories** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:13 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
Carpathia and Moldova wrote:All I can say is that I approve of this protest cuz of free boobs.

WHY DOES EVERYONE FOCUS ON THE FUCKING BOOBS?!

There was a point to be made... but everyone focuses on the boobies... *sigh*

Why are/were you expecting the opposite to happen?
I mean people totally ignoring the boobs on their faces to instead look/contemplate the message the ""protesters"" exposed.

by **Carpathia and Moldova** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:13 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:WHY DOES EVERYONE FOCUS ON THE FUCKING BOOBS?!

Because everyone loves free boobs.

by **Individuality-ness** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:15 pm

Lost Memories wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:WHY DOES EVERYONE FOCUS ON THE FUCKING BOOBS?!

There was a point to be made... but everyone focuses on the boobies... *sigh*

Why are/were you expecting the opposite to happen?
I mean people totally ignoring the boobs on their faces to look/contemplate at the message they exposed.

I wish. I mean, it was a perfect way to discuss double standards in society, but BOOB.

Carpathia and Moldova wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:WHY DOES EVERYONE FOCUS ON THE FUCKING BOOBS?!

Because everyone loves free boobs.

... yes, yes they do.

by **The Emerald Dawn** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:15 pm

Is it just me, or does anyone else misread their organization as "Fremen"?

by **G-Tech Corporation** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:17 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:Is it just me, or does anyone else misread their organization as "Fremen"?

If only.... the Fremen would doubtless just cut FEMEN though.

by **Roan Cara** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:17 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
Lost Memories wrote:Why are/were you expecting the opposite to happen?
I mean people totally ignoring the boobs on their faces to look/contemplate at the message they exposed.

I wish. I mean, it was a perfect way to discuss double standards in society, but BOOB.

Carpathia and Moldova wrote:Because everyone loves free boobs.

... yes, yes they do.

meh seen the pics in this case I can say that we are truly making mountains out of molehills

by **Vitaphone Racing** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:17 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:It's a pointless double standard. The boobies are everyone's friend. They bring nom to the nomless, they bring joy to the joyless, they bring bounce to the bounceless. Truly, one of nature's best inventions.

Exactly! But no, people don't like that. Men want to have all the pleasures of going shirtless to themselves!

Actually I think I speak for all men when I say women deserve the right to be topless in public, and in the home. And basically everywhere.

In fact shirts and bras are oppressive and we should ban them immediately.

by **Lost Memories** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:17 pm

Ethel mermania wrote:
Frisbeeteria wrote:This isn't TET. Knock it off with the chat and threadjacking, please.

(... not that there was much topic here in the first place, but still ...)

femen's protests are a legitimate topic.

laffin i was going to post their home page but their server seems to be a bit overloaded

"Service Temporarily Unavailable

The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later.
Apache Server at http://www.femen.org Port 80"

proof that their protest and means of protest are successful.

Or that they've a shitty low-cost server.

by **Carpathia and Moldova** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:17 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:And people are quick to condemn them because BOOB.

I'm not condemning them. If all female protestors here would protest topless, oh man, what a sight that would be. And I see nothing wrong with women going topless. I mean, I don't know any guys who would disapprove of that.

by **G-Tech Corporation** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:17 pm

Roan Cara wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:I wish. I mean, it was a perfect way to discuss double standards in society, but BOOB.

... yes, yes they do.

meh seen the pics in this case I can say that we are truly making mountains out of molehills

I've seen nicer knockers on doors, honestly.

by **EnragedMaldivians** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:18 pm

G-Tech Corporation wrote:
EnragedMaldivians wrote:
Yeah, the Maldives isn't a part of the West but child molestation occurs where I'm from as well, with remarkable frequency. It's a problem everywhere. And all institutions and organisations that facilitate child molestation by ensuring that the perpetrators are never brought to justice should be held accountable. The Catholic Church just happens to be one of them.

Threadjack -> Topic

Fascinating. Have women ever protested topless in your church because of the child molestation?

Now my post was slightly off tangent I'll admit but thread actually isn't just about women going around topless my dear pumpkin, since the protestors were showing their disdain for the Catholic Church. There's arguably a broader theme of victims of discrimination by religious institutions standing up and expressing their contempt for said religious institution at work here.

As to your question, Churches aren't allowed where I'm from. There was however a case where a group of local feminists sent some women's underwear in the mail to a rather well known misogynistic sheikh, ironically enough, wishing him a happy Valentine's day.

Boobs invade Notre-Dame de Paris

Who is online