
by Glorious Freedonia » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:09 am

by Glorious Freedonia » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:30 am

by Albaron » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:31 am
Glorious Freedonia wrote:This thread is a spin off from the "Does porn degrade anybody?" thread.
My sexual orientation is that I am a straight male who only really likes anal sex. Ever since I was a prebuscent it was all I really wanted to do sexually. Growing up I knew I was different. I also never felt that my sexual orientation was respected in society.
There will never be an article in Maxim or Ladies Home Journal about guys like me. We are tabboo.
It was not until I met girls who were also oriented exclusively south of their vaginas that I started to feel like I was a real person and not some kind of freak.
It seems that even the homosexual man is more accepted today than guys like me. There are no Biblical prohibitions against my kind of sex. Yet, we are looked down upon. I do not think I will ever see the day of a straight anal sexual orientation pride parade in any city.
Even in porn, we are not celeberated at all. Female anal sex enthusiasts are respectfully referred to as "Anal Queens". Yet, there are no "Anal Kings". We are the lowly "buttrats". We are freaks.
I hope that I am not the only Buttratt on NSG. C'mon gentleman, cast aside your shame and disgrace. Step up proudly and acknowledge that you have human worth and that our sexual orientation is a good and noble one. Sure, we may never see an article in Ladies Home Journal about anal intimacy, but maybe we can at least have a refuge here.
Ladies of the anal persuasion, you are the flower and we are your bees. Our symbiosis is beautiful and should be celeberated.
Maybe instead of referring to ourselves as nasty buttrats, maybe we should refer to ourselves as anal bees. Our female equivalents, "anal flowers". Our sweet lovemaking, "anal honey"?
So let today be the humble beginning of the movement for social equality for the buttfuckers. Buttfuckers of the world, unite. All that we have to lose is our shame!

by Lunatic Goofballs » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:32 am
Glorious Freedonia wrote:Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men.

by RoI3 » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:33 am
Glorious Freedonia wrote:Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men.

by Czardas » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:34 am
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Glorious Freedonia wrote:Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men.
Do you really want to be the butt of sitcom jokes?(pun intended)

by Little Jim P » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:34 am

by Czardas » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:35 am
Little Jim P wrote:What an asinine thread.

by LOL ANARCHY NUBZ » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:35 am
Czardas wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Glorious Freedonia wrote:Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men.
Do you really want to be the butt of sitcom jokes?(pun intended)
I hate to be anal about this kind of thing, but making far-too-easy "butt" puns just makes one come across as a bit of an ass.

by Glorious Freedonia » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:36 am
Albaron wrote:Glorious Freedonia wrote:This thread is a spin off from the "Does porn degrade anybody?" thread.
My sexual orientation is that I am a straight male who only really likes anal sex. Ever since I was a prebuscent it was all I really wanted to do sexually. Growing up I knew I was different. I also never felt that my sexual orientation was respected in society.
There will never be an article in Maxim or Ladies Home Journal about guys like me. We are tabboo.
It was not until I met girls who were also oriented exclusively south of their vaginas that I started to feel like I was a real person and not some kind of freak.
It seems that even the homosexual man is more accepted today than guys like me. There are no Biblical prohibitions against my kind of sex. Yet, we are looked down upon. I do not think I will ever see the day of a straight anal sexual orientation pride parade in any city.
Even in porn, we are not celeberated at all. Female anal sex enthusiasts are respectfully referred to as "Anal Queens". Yet, there are no "Anal Kings". We are the lowly "buttrats". We are freaks.
I hope that I am not the only Buttratt on NSG. C'mon gentleman, cast aside your shame and disgrace. Step up proudly and acknowledge that you have human worth and that our sexual orientation is a good and noble one. Sure, we may never see an article in Ladies Home Journal about anal intimacy, but maybe we can at least have a refuge here.
Ladies of the anal persuasion, you are the flower and we are your bees. Our symbiosis is beautiful and should be celeberated.
Maybe instead of referring to ourselves as nasty buttrats, maybe we should refer to ourselves as anal bees. Our female equivalents, "anal flowers". Our sweet lovemaking, "anal honey"?
So let today be the humble beginning of the movement for social equality for the buttfuckers. Buttfuckers of the world, unite. All that we have to lose is our shame!
Actually, there are biblical condemnations against it. Sorry. Not preaching, you just said that it wasn't condemned in the Bible. It is.

by Brogavia » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:36 am
Czardas wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Glorious Freedonia wrote:Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men.
Do you really want to be the butt of sitcom jokes?(pun intended)
I hate to be anal about this kind of thing, but making far-too-easy "butt" puns just makes one come across as a bit of an ass.

by Glorious Freedonia » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:38 am

by Flameswroth » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:38 am
Czardas wrote:Why should we bail out climate change with billions of dollars, when lesbians are starving in the streets because they can't afford an abortion?
Reagan Clone wrote:What you are proposing is glorifying God by loving, respecting, or at least tolerating, his other creations.
That is the gayest fucking shit I've ever heard, and I had Barry Manilow perform at the White House in '82.

by Lunatic Goofballs » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:38 am
Czardas wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Glorious Freedonia wrote:Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men.
Do you really want to be the butt of sitcom jokes?(pun intended)
I hate to be anal about this kind of thing, but making far-too-easy "butt" puns just makes one come across as a bit of an ass.

by Czardas » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:38 am
Brogavia wrote:Czardas wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Glorious Freedonia wrote:Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men.
Do you really want to be the butt of sitcom jokes?(pun intended)
I hate to be anal about this kind of thing, but making far-too-easy "butt" puns just makes one come across as a bit of an ass.
Damn you. Took the words right out of my mouth. And I can't think of any more good anal puns.

by Albaron » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:39 am
Glorious Freedonia wrote:Albaron wrote:Glorious Freedonia wrote:This thread is a spin off from the "Does porn degrade anybody?" thread.
My sexual orientation is that I am a straight male who only really likes anal sex. Ever since I was a prebuscent it was all I really wanted to do sexually. Growing up I knew I was different. I also never felt that my sexual orientation was respected in society.
There will never be an article in Maxim or Ladies Home Journal about guys like me. We are tabboo.
It was not until I met girls who were also oriented exclusively south of their vaginas that I started to feel like I was a real person and not some kind of freak.
It seems that even the homosexual man is more accepted today than guys like me. There are no Biblical prohibitions against my kind of sex. Yet, we are looked down upon. I do not think I will ever see the day of a straight anal sexual orientation pride parade in any city.
Even in porn, we are not celeberated at all. Female anal sex enthusiasts are respectfully referred to as "Anal Queens". Yet, there are no "Anal Kings". We are the lowly "buttrats". We are freaks.
I hope that I am not the only Buttratt on NSG. C'mon gentleman, cast aside your shame and disgrace. Step up proudly and acknowledge that you have human worth and that our sexual orientation is a good and noble one. Sure, we may never see an article in Ladies Home Journal about anal intimacy, but maybe we can at least have a refuge here.
Ladies of the anal persuasion, you are the flower and we are your bees. Our symbiosis is beautiful and should be celeberated.
Maybe instead of referring to ourselves as nasty buttrats, maybe we should refer to ourselves as anal bees. Our female equivalents, "anal flowers". Our sweet lovemaking, "anal honey"?
So let today be the humble beginning of the movement for social equality for the buttfuckers. Buttfuckers of the world, unite. All that we have to lose is our shame!
Actually, there are biblical condemnations against it. Sorry. Not preaching, you just said that it wasn't condemned in the Bible. It is.
Is it in the New Testament or the Old? I am not an expert on the New Testament. Are you sure that this is not a condemnation of man on man anal?

by Little Jim P » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:39 am

by Glorious Freedonia » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:40 am
Flameswroth wrote:You know in behindsight, I suppose this is sort of true. It seems to be quite common in porn, buttocks more off-limits in normal conversations. Seems like you're getting screwed. This situation ought to be rectumified right away!
Myself, I could never really get into that sort of thing. I mean, if you prefer that even to the point of excluding all else, you might as well be doing a dude. There's just too many other fun parts of females to play with to focus on that piece we have in common. But that's just my opinion.

by Little Jim P » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:41 am
Glorious Freedonia wrote:I am reeling from the barrage of puns that were just posted to this thread where I cried my heart out upon. Actually, I like puns a lot. Good job, NSG.


by New Olwe » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:42 am
Glorious Freedonia wrote:Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men and single (by choice) moms. What was that show that had the single mom? Oh heck even House has a powerful intelligent nice and feminine character who is a single mom.

by Neesika » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:42 am

by Glorious Freedonia » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:42 am
Albaron wrote:Glorious Freedonia wrote:Albaron wrote:Glorious Freedonia wrote:This thread is a spin off from the "Does porn degrade anybody?" thread.
My sexual orientation is that I am a straight male who only really likes anal sex. Ever since I was a prebuscent it was all I really wanted to do sexually. Growing up I knew I was different. I also never felt that my sexual orientation was respected in society.
There will never be an article in Maxim or Ladies Home Journal about guys like me. We are tabboo.
It was not until I met girls who were also oriented exclusively south of their vaginas that I started to feel like I was a real person and not some kind of freak.
It seems that even the homosexual man is more accepted today than guys like me. There are no Biblical prohibitions against my kind of sex. Yet, we are looked down upon. I do not think I will ever see the day of a straight anal sexual orientation pride parade in any city.
Even in porn, we are not celeberated at all. Female anal sex enthusiasts are respectfully referred to as "Anal Queens". Yet, there are no "Anal Kings". We are the lowly "buttrats". We are freaks.
I hope that I am not the only Buttratt on NSG. C'mon gentleman, cast aside your shame and disgrace. Step up proudly and acknowledge that you have human worth and that our sexual orientation is a good and noble one. Sure, we may never see an article in Ladies Home Journal about anal intimacy, but maybe we can at least have a refuge here.
Ladies of the anal persuasion, you are the flower and we are your bees. Our symbiosis is beautiful and should be celeberated.
Maybe instead of referring to ourselves as nasty buttrats, maybe we should refer to ourselves as anal bees. Our female equivalents, "anal flowers". Our sweet lovemaking, "anal honey"?
So let today be the humble beginning of the movement for social equality for the buttfuckers. Buttfuckers of the world, unite. All that we have to lose is our shame!
Actually, there are biblical condemnations against it. Sorry. Not preaching, you just said that it wasn't condemned in the Bible. It is.
Is it in the New Testament or the Old? I am not an expert on the New Testament. Are you sure that this is not a condemnation of man on man anal?
I think that its in the Old. And it's against any type of that thing (man-man, man-woman, or woman-woman if that's possible).

by Czardas » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:42 am
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Czardas wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Glorious Freedonia wrote:Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men.
Do you really want to be the butt of sitcom jokes?(pun intended)
I hate to be anal about this kind of thing, but making far-too-easy "butt" puns just makes one come across as a bit of an ass.
You're right. I might be bottoming out on the puns. Still, there's no need to be so cheeky about it. I'm just trying to keep this thread from entering an uncomfortable place.

by Little Jim P » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:44 am
Czardas wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Czardas wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Glorious Freedonia wrote:Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men.
Do you really want to be the butt of sitcom jokes?(pun intended)
I hate to be anal about this kind of thing, but making far-too-easy "butt" puns just makes one come across as a bit of an ass.
You're right. I might be bottoming out on the puns. Still, there's no need to be so cheeky about it. I'm just trying to keep this thread from entering an uncomfortable place.
Puns of this nature are a crack in the spotless façade of NSG, a hole enterprise that exposes the seamy underside of the forums. They are, moreover, a temptation in any thread like this, and as we all know, "Get thee behind me, Satan!"
Whew. Hopefully I've gotten that out of my system now.

by LOL ANARCHY NUBZ » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:44 am
Glorious Freedonia wrote:Flameswroth wrote:You know in behindsight, I suppose this is sort of true. It seems to be quite common in porn, buttocks more off-limits in normal conversations. Seems like you're getting screwed. This situation ought to be rectumified right away!
Myself, I could never really get into that sort of thing. I mean, if you prefer that even to the point of excluding all else, you might as well be doing a dude. There's just too many other fun parts of females to play with to focus on that piece we have in common. But that's just my opinion.
Nice puns, but seriously, your serious post is illustrative of what we have to deal with. We are seen as wierdos for not being into the vagina (ok I know that is a pun but it is still true). The whole concept of "you might as well be doing a dude" is part of the problem too. We are not into dudes. We are straight and we are buttfuckers. We are not after butts in general. We specialize in the female ass.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Al-Momenta, Ifreann, James_xenoland, Lisander, Point Blob, The Astral Mandate, The Rio Grande River Basin
Advertisement