NATION

PASSWORD

Anal Kings or Lowly Buttrats?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Glorious Freedonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1866
Founded: Jun 09, 2006
Ex-Nation

Anal Kings or Lowly Buttrats?

Postby Glorious Freedonia » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:09 am

This thread is a spin off from the "Does porn degrade anybody?" thread.

My sexual orientation is that I am a straight male who only really likes anal sex. Ever since I was a prebuscent it was all I really wanted to do sexually. Growing up I knew I was different. I also never felt that my sexual orientation was respected in society.

There will never be an article in Maxim or Ladies Home Journal about guys like me. We are tabboo.

It was not until I met girls who were also oriented exclusively south of their vaginas that I started to feel like I was a real person and not some kind of freak.

It seems that even the homosexual man is more accepted today than guys like me. There are no Biblical prohibitions against my kind of sex. Yet, we are looked down upon. I do not think I will ever see the day of a straight anal sexual orientation pride parade in any city.

Even in porn, we are not celeberated at all. Female anal sex enthusiasts are respectfully referred to as "Anal Queens". Yet, there are no "Anal Kings". We are the lowly "buttrats". We are freaks.

I hope that I am not the only Buttratt on NSG. C'mon gentleman, cast aside your shame and disgrace. Step up proudly and acknowledge that you have human worth and that our sexual orientation is a good and noble one. Sure, we may never see an article in Ladies Home Journal about anal intimacy, but maybe we can at least have a refuge here.

Ladies of the anal persuasion, you are the flower and we are your bees. Our symbiosis is beautiful and should be celeberated.

Maybe instead of referring to ourselves as nasty buttrats, maybe we should refer to ourselves as anal bees. Our female equivalents, "anal flowers". Our sweet lovemaking, "anal honey"?

So let today be the humble beginning of the movement for social equality for the buttfuckers. Buttfuckers of the world, unite. All that we have to lose is our shame!
Last edited by Glorious Freedonia on Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:14 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Glorious Freedonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1866
Founded: Jun 09, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Freedonia » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:30 am

Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men and single (by choice) moms. What was that show that had the single mom? Oh heck even House has a powerful intelligent nice and feminine character who is a single mom.

We are lower than single moms. We are lower than homosexual men. We are probably higher than necrophiliacs, those who have relations with beasts, furries, and pedos. What is so bad about us?
Last edited by Glorious Freedonia on Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Albaron
Diplomat
 
Posts: 754
Founded: Jul 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Albaron » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:31 am

Glorious Freedonia wrote:This thread is a spin off from the "Does porn degrade anybody?" thread.

My sexual orientation is that I am a straight male who only really likes anal sex. Ever since I was a prebuscent it was all I really wanted to do sexually. Growing up I knew I was different. I also never felt that my sexual orientation was respected in society.

There will never be an article in Maxim or Ladies Home Journal about guys like me. We are tabboo.

It was not until I met girls who were also oriented exclusively south of their vaginas that I started to feel like I was a real person and not some kind of freak.

It seems that even the homosexual man is more accepted today than guys like me. There are no Biblical prohibitions against my kind of sex. Yet, we are looked down upon. I do not think I will ever see the day of a straight anal sexual orientation pride parade in any city.

Even in porn, we are not celeberated at all. Female anal sex enthusiasts are respectfully referred to as "Anal Queens". Yet, there are no "Anal Kings". We are the lowly "buttrats". We are freaks.

I hope that I am not the only Buttratt on NSG. C'mon gentleman, cast aside your shame and disgrace. Step up proudly and acknowledge that you have human worth and that our sexual orientation is a good and noble one. Sure, we may never see an article in Ladies Home Journal about anal intimacy, but maybe we can at least have a refuge here.

Ladies of the anal persuasion, you are the flower and we are your bees. Our symbiosis is beautiful and should be celeberated.

Maybe instead of referring to ourselves as nasty buttrats, maybe we should refer to ourselves as anal bees. Our female equivalents, "anal flowers". Our sweet lovemaking, "anal honey"?

So let today be the humble beginning of the movement for social equality for the buttfuckers. Buttfuckers of the world, unite. All that we have to lose is our shame!

Actually, there are biblical condemnations against it. Sorry. Not preaching, you just said that it wasn't condemned in the Bible. It is.
The Holy Empire of Albaron
AUGUSTAVUS XIII - "Pax Imperialis"
Member of the STEEL PACT

User avatar
Lunatic Goofballs
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 23629
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Lunatic Goofballs » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:32 am

Glorious Freedonia wrote:Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men.


Do you really want to be the butt of sitcom jokes?(pun intended)
Life's Short. Munch Tacos.

“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!”
Hunter S. Thompson

User avatar
RoI3
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 456
Founded: Sep 09, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby RoI3 » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:33 am

Glorious Freedonia wrote:Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men.

Quit bitching. It's not like you've been prosecuted for years.
CI
"I actually believe that in some
Economic Left/Right: -5.00
parts of America people have
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.97
started mating with vegetables"
Add 3465 to post count from Jolt
- Jeremy Clarkson, future PM

User avatar
Czardas
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6922
Founded: Feb 25, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Czardas » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:34 am

Lunatic Goofballs wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men.


Do you really want to be the butt of sitcom jokes?(pun intended)

I hate to be anal about this kind of thing, but making far-too-easy "butt" puns just makes one come across as a bit of an ass.
30 | she/her | USA | ✡︎ | ☭ | ♫

I have devised a truly marvelous signature, which this textblock is too small to contain

User avatar
Little Jim P
Envoy
 
Posts: 234
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Little Jim P » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:34 am

What an asinine thread.
Hail Satan!

Fist Colony of The Satanic Empire of Big Jim P.

The only thing more useless than a priest is a lawyer.

User avatar
Czardas
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6922
Founded: Feb 25, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Czardas » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:35 am

Little Jim P wrote:What an asinine thread.

I disagree, it penetrates to the very bowels of the discrimination these people face in society.

Well, maybe not that far.
30 | she/her | USA | ✡︎ | ☭ | ♫

I have devised a truly marvelous signature, which this textblock is too small to contain

User avatar
LOL ANARCHY NUBZ
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1181
Founded: Dec 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby LOL ANARCHY NUBZ » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:35 am

Czardas wrote:
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men.


Do you really want to be the butt of sitcom jokes?(pun intended)

I hate to be anal about this kind of thing, but making far-too-easy "butt" puns just makes one come across as a bit of an ass.


I really like your style sometimes.

User avatar
Glorious Freedonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1866
Founded: Jun 09, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Freedonia » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:36 am

Albaron wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:This thread is a spin off from the "Does porn degrade anybody?" thread.

My sexual orientation is that I am a straight male who only really likes anal sex. Ever since I was a prebuscent it was all I really wanted to do sexually. Growing up I knew I was different. I also never felt that my sexual orientation was respected in society.

There will never be an article in Maxim or Ladies Home Journal about guys like me. We are tabboo.

It was not until I met girls who were also oriented exclusively south of their vaginas that I started to feel like I was a real person and not some kind of freak.

It seems that even the homosexual man is more accepted today than guys like me. There are no Biblical prohibitions against my kind of sex. Yet, we are looked down upon. I do not think I will ever see the day of a straight anal sexual orientation pride parade in any city.

Even in porn, we are not celeberated at all. Female anal sex enthusiasts are respectfully referred to as "Anal Queens". Yet, there are no "Anal Kings". We are the lowly "buttrats". We are freaks.

I hope that I am not the only Buttratt on NSG. C'mon gentleman, cast aside your shame and disgrace. Step up proudly and acknowledge that you have human worth and that our sexual orientation is a good and noble one. Sure, we may never see an article in Ladies Home Journal about anal intimacy, but maybe we can at least have a refuge here.

Ladies of the anal persuasion, you are the flower and we are your bees. Our symbiosis is beautiful and should be celeberated.

Maybe instead of referring to ourselves as nasty buttrats, maybe we should refer to ourselves as anal bees. Our female equivalents, "anal flowers". Our sweet lovemaking, "anal honey"?

So let today be the humble beginning of the movement for social equality for the buttfuckers. Buttfuckers of the world, unite. All that we have to lose is our shame!

Actually, there are biblical condemnations against it. Sorry. Not preaching, you just said that it wasn't condemned in the Bible. It is.


Is it in the New Testament or the Old? I am not an expert on the New Testament. Are you sure that this is not a condemnation of man on man anal?

User avatar
Brogavia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5271
Founded: Sep 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Brogavia » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:36 am

Czardas wrote:
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men.


Do you really want to be the butt of sitcom jokes?(pun intended)

I hate to be anal about this kind of thing, but making far-too-easy "butt" puns just makes one come across as a bit of an ass.


Damn you. Took the words right out of my mouth. And I can't think of any more good anal puns.
Playing NS since Jan of 2006

1010102, Unjustly Deleted

Agent of the Timegate, if you expose me I'll kill you

User avatar
Glorious Freedonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1866
Founded: Jun 09, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Freedonia » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:38 am

I am reeling from the barrage of puns that were just posted to this thread where I cried my heart out upon. Actually, I like puns a lot. Good job, NSG.

User avatar
Flameswroth
Senator
 
Posts: 4773
Founded: Sep 05, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Flameswroth » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:38 am

You know in behindsight, I suppose this is sort of true. It seems to be quite common in porn, buttocks more off-limits in normal conversations. Seems like you're getting screwed. This situation ought to be rectumified right away!

Myself, I could never really get into that sort of thing. I mean, if you prefer that even to the point of excluding all else, you might as well be doing a dude. There's just too many other fun parts of females to play with to focus on that piece we have in common. But that's just my opinion.
Czardas wrote:Why should we bail out climate change with billions of dollars, when lesbians are starving in the streets because they can't afford an abortion?

Reagan Clone wrote:What you are proposing is glorifying God by loving, respecting, or at least tolerating, his other creations.

That is the gayest fucking shit I've ever heard, and I had Barry Manilow perform at the White House in '82.



User avatar
Lunatic Goofballs
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 23629
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Lunatic Goofballs » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:38 am

Czardas wrote:
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men.


Do you really want to be the butt of sitcom jokes?(pun intended)

I hate to be anal about this kind of thing, but making far-too-easy "butt" puns just makes one come across as a bit of an ass.


You're right. I might be bottoming out on the puns. Still, there's no need to be so cheeky about it. I'm just trying to keep this thread from entering an uncomfortable place.
Life's Short. Munch Tacos.

“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!”
Hunter S. Thompson

User avatar
Czardas
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6922
Founded: Feb 25, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Czardas » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:38 am

Brogavia wrote:
Czardas wrote:
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men.


Do you really want to be the butt of sitcom jokes?(pun intended)

I hate to be anal about this kind of thing, but making far-too-easy "butt" puns just makes one come across as a bit of an ass.


Damn you. Took the words right out of my mouth. And I can't think of any more good anal puns.

Oh, there are more, but they skirt the rim of acceptability. We try to keep things PG-13 around here.
30 | she/her | USA | ✡︎ | ☭ | ♫

I have devised a truly marvelous signature, which this textblock is too small to contain

User avatar
Albaron
Diplomat
 
Posts: 754
Founded: Jul 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Albaron » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:39 am

Glorious Freedonia wrote:
Albaron wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:This thread is a spin off from the "Does porn degrade anybody?" thread.

My sexual orientation is that I am a straight male who only really likes anal sex. Ever since I was a prebuscent it was all I really wanted to do sexually. Growing up I knew I was different. I also never felt that my sexual orientation was respected in society.

There will never be an article in Maxim or Ladies Home Journal about guys like me. We are tabboo.

It was not until I met girls who were also oriented exclusively south of their vaginas that I started to feel like I was a real person and not some kind of freak.

It seems that even the homosexual man is more accepted today than guys like me. There are no Biblical prohibitions against my kind of sex. Yet, we are looked down upon. I do not think I will ever see the day of a straight anal sexual orientation pride parade in any city.

Even in porn, we are not celeberated at all. Female anal sex enthusiasts are respectfully referred to as "Anal Queens". Yet, there are no "Anal Kings". We are the lowly "buttrats". We are freaks.

I hope that I am not the only Buttratt on NSG. C'mon gentleman, cast aside your shame and disgrace. Step up proudly and acknowledge that you have human worth and that our sexual orientation is a good and noble one. Sure, we may never see an article in Ladies Home Journal about anal intimacy, but maybe we can at least have a refuge here.

Ladies of the anal persuasion, you are the flower and we are your bees. Our symbiosis is beautiful and should be celeberated.

Maybe instead of referring to ourselves as nasty buttrats, maybe we should refer to ourselves as anal bees. Our female equivalents, "anal flowers". Our sweet lovemaking, "anal honey"?

So let today be the humble beginning of the movement for social equality for the buttfuckers. Buttfuckers of the world, unite. All that we have to lose is our shame!

Actually, there are biblical condemnations against it. Sorry. Not preaching, you just said that it wasn't condemned in the Bible. It is.


Is it in the New Testament or the Old? I am not an expert on the New Testament. Are you sure that this is not a condemnation of man on man anal?

I think that its in the Old. And it's against any type of that thing (man-man, man-woman, or woman-woman if that's possible).
The Holy Empire of Albaron
AUGUSTAVUS XIII - "Pax Imperialis"
Member of the STEEL PACT

User avatar
Little Jim P
Envoy
 
Posts: 234
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Little Jim P » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:39 am

Czardas wrote:
Little Jim P wrote:What an asinine thread.

I disagree, it penetrates to the very bowels of the discrimination these people face in society.

Well, maybe not that far.


But this leads to the fundamental question: does anyone in the mainstream give a rats ass?
Hail Satan!

Fist Colony of The Satanic Empire of Big Jim P.

The only thing more useless than a priest is a lawyer.

User avatar
Glorious Freedonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1866
Founded: Jun 09, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Freedonia » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:40 am

Flameswroth wrote:You know in behindsight, I suppose this is sort of true. It seems to be quite common in porn, buttocks more off-limits in normal conversations. Seems like you're getting screwed. This situation ought to be rectumified right away!

Myself, I could never really get into that sort of thing. I mean, if you prefer that even to the point of excluding all else, you might as well be doing a dude. There's just too many other fun parts of females to play with to focus on that piece we have in common. But that's just my opinion.


Nice puns, but seriously, your serious post is illustrative of what we have to deal with. We are seen as wierdos for not being into the vagina (ok I know that is a pun but it is still true). The whole concept of "you might as well be doing a dude" is part of the problem too. We are not into dudes. We are straight and we are buttfuckers. We are not after butts in general. We specialize in the female ass.

User avatar
Little Jim P
Envoy
 
Posts: 234
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Little Jim P » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:41 am

Glorious Freedonia wrote:I am reeling from the barrage of puns that were just posted to this thread where I cried my heart out upon. Actually, I like puns a lot. Good job, NSG.


NSG: Where the Punlords come to play. ;)

Edit: Bunlords as well apparently.
Last edited by Little Jim P on Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Hail Satan!

Fist Colony of The Satanic Empire of Big Jim P.

The only thing more useless than a priest is a lawyer.

User avatar
New Olwe
Minister
 
Posts: 2445
Founded: Aug 16, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby New Olwe » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:42 am

Glorious Freedonia wrote:Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men and single (by choice) moms. What was that show that had the single mom? Oh heck even House has a powerful intelligent nice and feminine character who is a single mom.


Being looked down on isn't the reason why people of your sexual lifestyle aren't represented in TV. It's censorship, plain and simple. There are only so many ways you can reference anal sex without the FCC cracking down on you.

Now I don't know what HBO's excuse is... we should maybe hopefully see someone of your persuasion represented in one of their shows eventually, since I'd like to see where they go with that sort of thing storyline-wise.

As for the actual topic of the thread... meh, anal's not my thing really. I like the way the female ass looks, but I can't stop thinking about what comes out of it while I'm penetrating it... it's too close to scat for me.
Magic-using nation here! I don't RP in MT.
I seem to have forgotten to post the part where my ambassador informs New Olwe's representative that we will help. I'll do that later, I hope. - Fortareata
Start an Embassy in New Olwe!

User avatar
Neesika
Minister
 
Posts: 2569
Founded: Aug 26, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Neesika » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:42 am

As someone who loves anal, and who loves to watch anal, I have to say that I LIKE the fact that anal is still somewhat taboo. I'm not sure I'd be so into it if it weren't. If it weren't a 'kink' it probably wouldn't turn my crank as much. Up with taboo!
"Look, Ann Coulter explained it one time. Jesus came to perfect the Jews so they could become Christians and be saved. If they stay Jews, they are rejecting God and the opportunity to eat bacon dipped in mayo and served on the tits of a woman who doesn't complain at restaruants." - RepentNowOrPayLater

User avatar
Glorious Freedonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1866
Founded: Jun 09, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Freedonia » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:42 am

Albaron wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:
Albaron wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:This thread is a spin off from the "Does porn degrade anybody?" thread.

My sexual orientation is that I am a straight male who only really likes anal sex. Ever since I was a prebuscent it was all I really wanted to do sexually. Growing up I knew I was different. I also never felt that my sexual orientation was respected in society.

There will never be an article in Maxim or Ladies Home Journal about guys like me. We are tabboo.

It was not until I met girls who were also oriented exclusively south of their vaginas that I started to feel like I was a real person and not some kind of freak.

It seems that even the homosexual man is more accepted today than guys like me. There are no Biblical prohibitions against my kind of sex. Yet, we are looked down upon. I do not think I will ever see the day of a straight anal sexual orientation pride parade in any city.

Even in porn, we are not celeberated at all. Female anal sex enthusiasts are respectfully referred to as "Anal Queens". Yet, there are no "Anal Kings". We are the lowly "buttrats". We are freaks.

I hope that I am not the only Buttratt on NSG. C'mon gentleman, cast aside your shame and disgrace. Step up proudly and acknowledge that you have human worth and that our sexual orientation is a good and noble one. Sure, we may never see an article in Ladies Home Journal about anal intimacy, but maybe we can at least have a refuge here.

Ladies of the anal persuasion, you are the flower and we are your bees. Our symbiosis is beautiful and should be celeberated.

Maybe instead of referring to ourselves as nasty buttrats, maybe we should refer to ourselves as anal bees. Our female equivalents, "anal flowers". Our sweet lovemaking, "anal honey"?

So let today be the humble beginning of the movement for social equality for the buttfuckers. Buttfuckers of the world, unite. All that we have to lose is our shame!

Actually, there are biblical condemnations against it. Sorry. Not preaching, you just said that it wasn't condemned in the Bible. It is.


Is it in the New Testament or the Old? I am not an expert on the New Testament. Are you sure that this is not a condemnation of man on man anal?

I think that its in the Old. And it's against any type of that thing (man-man, man-woman, or woman-woman if that's possible).

Please find it for me because I really do not think that it is in there and I try to observe all sexual laws. If I found out that not only society scorns me but G-d as well, then my head will probably explode.

User avatar
Czardas
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6922
Founded: Feb 25, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Czardas » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:42 am

Lunatic Goofballs wrote:
Czardas wrote:
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men.


Do you really want to be the butt of sitcom jokes?(pun intended)

I hate to be anal about this kind of thing, but making far-too-easy "butt" puns just makes one come across as a bit of an ass.


You're right. I might be bottoming out on the puns. Still, there's no need to be so cheeky about it. I'm just trying to keep this thread from entering an uncomfortable place.

Puns of this nature are a crack in the spotless façade of NSG, a hole enterprise that exposes the seamy underside of the forums. They are, moreover, a temptation in any thread like this, and as we all know, "Get thee behind me, Satan!"


Whew. Hopefully I've gotten that out of my system now.
30 | she/her | USA | ✡︎ | ☭ | ♫

I have devised a truly marvelous signature, which this textblock is too small to contain

User avatar
Little Jim P
Envoy
 
Posts: 234
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Little Jim P » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:44 am

Czardas wrote:
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:
Czardas wrote:
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:Does anybody else think it is a shame that there is a popular show "Will and Grace" that has openly gay characters, but no TV shows have openly straight anal sex oriented men as characters? We are apparently seen by society as something less acceptable than homosexual men.


Do you really want to be the butt of sitcom jokes?(pun intended)

I hate to be anal about this kind of thing, but making far-too-easy "butt" puns just makes one come across as a bit of an ass.


You're right. I might be bottoming out on the puns. Still, there's no need to be so cheeky about it. I'm just trying to keep this thread from entering an uncomfortable place.

Puns of this nature are a crack in the spotless façade of NSG, a hole enterprise that exposes the seamy underside of the forums. They are, moreover, a temptation in any thread like this, and as we all know, "Get thee behind me, Satan!"


Whew. Hopefully I've gotten that out of my system now.


Not exactly a wise thing to say considering the topic under discussion.
Hail Satan!

Fist Colony of The Satanic Empire of Big Jim P.

The only thing more useless than a priest is a lawyer.

User avatar
LOL ANARCHY NUBZ
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1181
Founded: Dec 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby LOL ANARCHY NUBZ » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:44 am

Glorious Freedonia wrote:
Flameswroth wrote:You know in behindsight, I suppose this is sort of true. It seems to be quite common in porn, buttocks more off-limits in normal conversations. Seems like you're getting screwed. This situation ought to be rectumified right away!

Myself, I could never really get into that sort of thing. I mean, if you prefer that even to the point of excluding all else, you might as well be doing a dude. There's just too many other fun parts of females to play with to focus on that piece we have in common. But that's just my opinion.


Nice puns, but seriously, your serious post is illustrative of what we have to deal with. We are seen as wierdos for not being into the vagina (ok I know that is a pun but it is still true). The whole concept of "you might as well be doing a dude" is part of the problem too. We are not into dudes. We are straight and we are buttfuckers. We are not after butts in general. We specialize in the female ass.


So fucking what?

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Al-Momenta, Ifreann, James_xenoland, Lisander, Point Blob, The Astral Mandate, The Rio Grande River Basin

Advertisement

Remove ads