This is politics, not a friendly fireside chat.
Advertisement
by Jormengand » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:33 pm
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.
by Ostroeuropa » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:33 pm
Souseiseki wrote:Dungeyland wrote:
This. Why is everybody so damn cynical?
because tories are pricks and cameron is a prick and people are shocked at the idea cameron might be doing something good for non-prickish reasons
extend this to all politicians as necessary
if anything, they have historical precedent and you're damn idealistic
by Jormengand » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:34 pm
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.
by Ostroeuropa » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:34 pm
by Samozaryadnyastan » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:34 pm
Oneracon wrote:Zanzor wrote:
In the UK it doesn't the church is a state religion, that's why when a law is past like this they have to be made exempt, like with sexual discrimination it's illegal by law so it should be with the Church of England but there is a clause that makes the exempt.
And yet, they still manage to keep God out of the government better than the Americans do.
For example, the Queen is the head of the Church of England and yet she will be signing off on this bill when it becomes law.
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.
by Souseiseki » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:35 pm
Jormengand wrote:DIVISION!
by Ostroeuropa » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:35 pm
by Great Nepal » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:35 pm
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:Oneracon wrote:And yet, they still manage to keep God out of the government better than the Americans do.
For example, the Queen is the head of the Church of England and yet she will be signing off on this bill when it becomes law.
Because the Queen is the head of the church, not the government.
by Jormengand » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:36 pm
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.
by Ceannairceach » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:36 pm
by Of the Free Socialist Territories » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:36 pm
Dungeyland wrote:Jormengand wrote:I'm not prejudiced against him. This is just a vote-buying stunt. The biggest vote-buying stunt I have ever seen, aye, but a vote-buying stunt.
It's not a vote buying stunt. Only 53% of the country favours it, and the other 47% would hate the party which supports it. Cameron genuinely believes in it.
by Ostroeuropa » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:36 pm
by Souseiseki » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:37 pm
by Jormengand » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:37 pm
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.
by Dungeyland » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:37 pm
Souseiseki wrote:Dungeyland wrote:
This. Why is everybody so damn cynical?
because tories are pricks and cameron is a prick and people are shocked at the idea cameron might be doing something good for non-prickish reasons
extend this to all politicians as necessary
if anything, they have historical precedent and you're damn idealistic
by Tsuntion » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:38 pm
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Jumpin' on the SOURCE-TRAIN!
CHOO CHOO MUFUKA! We be ridin' the rails, checkin' the trails, you get nothin' and your argument fails!
by Samozaryadnyastan » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:38 pm
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.
by Dungeyland » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:38 pm
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:Dungeyland wrote:
It's not a vote buying stunt. Only 53% of the country favours it, and the other 47% would hate the party which supports it. Cameron genuinely believes in it.
Could you source the numbers, please? I had a poll up earlier showing that it was something more along the lines of 62% for to 31% against.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Jetan, Likhinia, The Foxes Swamp, The Huskar Social Union, The Kharkivan Cossacks, Vorkat
Advertisement