Divair wrote:You respect the institution of marriage? Piss off. What a homophobe.
no. no. that was his gay constituent!!! a gay said it so he's not homophobic anymore.
Advertisement
by Souseiseki » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:34 am
Divair wrote:You respect the institution of marriage? Piss off. What a homophobe.
by Jamie Anumia » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:35 am
by Afalia » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:35 am
by Of the Free Socialist Territories » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:35 am
by Ostroeuropa » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:35 am
Divair wrote:Homosexual MP standing up now.
by The Jahistic Unified Republic » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:35 am
Divair wrote:Homosexual MP standing up now.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:"Considering Officer Krupke was patently idiotic to charge these young men in the first place, we're dropping the charges in the interest of not wasting any more of the Judiciary's time with farcical charges brought by officers who require more training on basic legal principles."
by Tagmatium » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:35 am
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...
by Sibirsky » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:35 am
by The Jahistic Unified Republic » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:36 am
Afalia wrote:Why do Christian MPs have to embarrass all other Christians by saying Christians do not support same sex marriage because of a definition in the bible. Most Christians I have spoken to about same-sex marriage are fully supportive.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:"Considering Officer Krupke was patently idiotic to charge these young men in the first place, we're dropping the charges in the interest of not wasting any more of the Judiciary's time with farcical charges brought by officers who require more training on basic legal principles."
by Souseiseki » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:36 am
by Tagmatium » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:36 am
Sibirsky wrote:There is no justification to these debates. The state should not have any authority in dictating who people choose to be with.
Which is basically what the Doug Stanhope quote I posted was trying to convey.
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...
by San Leggera » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:37 am
by Souseiseki » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:37 am
by Oneracon » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:37 am
Divair wrote:Homosexual MP standing up now.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |
by Zanzor » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:37 am
Sibirsky wrote:There is no justification to these debates. The state should not have any authority in dictating who people choose to be with.
Which is basically what the Doug Stanhope quote I posted was trying to convey.
by Ostroeuropa » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:38 am
by Wisconsin9 » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:38 am
by Tagmatium » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:38 am
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Atrito, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Camtropia, Risottia, Sky Reavers
Advertisement