That's Dr. Art to you.
Advertisement

by Neo Art » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:35 am

by The Black Forrest » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:35 am

by The Black Forrest » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:35 am

by Frisivisia » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:35 am
Sibirsky wrote:Frisivisia wrote:No, they can't. Poor people can't afford bodyguards or mercenary armies. This would provide a monopoly on force for the rich, which ends up being neo-feudalism. Oh, and your bitching is called freedom of speech, but it's still bitching.
1) There would be fewer poor. 2) Defense would probably be funded by insurers. 3) Premiums would generally be lower in general, for things we have insurance already for. 4) The very poor wouldn't have much to insure. 5) Life insurance is already fairly cheap. 6) And there are charities and other programs to help them.
by Sibirsky » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:35 am

by Oppressorion » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:36 am
Ifreann wrote:Oppressorion wrote:It is not 'given to you' - they are providing a service in exchange for you paying taxes, which you have allowed them to believe without bothering to correct them. This is because most people pay taxes -read: honest- so everyone assumes that you have unless told otherwise. This is known as presumption of innocence, and generally thought of as a good thing.
Tell me, which government services require you to demonstrate that you've paid taxes before you can avail of them? Do the emergency services run a check before they'll respond?

by Conserative Morality » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:36 am
Sibirsky wrote:I'm not wrong. I'm just not going to spend my time proving it. If you think it's wrong, prove it. If not, just drop it.

by Frisivisia » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:36 am

by The Black Forrest » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:37 am
Sibirsky wrote:Wisconsin9 wrote:This shit again? Look, if you don't like it, then vote for someone who'll lower taxes. If they don't win or if they stab you in the back, leave the country. Now please quit bitching and let the rest of us enjoy our protection from violent criminals and foreign invasions.
Those things can be privately funded. In any case, that is what we are doing. Oh and our, "bitching" is actually called "freedom of speech."

by Cromarty » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:37 am
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack

by Yaltabaoth » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:37 am
by Sibirsky » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:37 am

by Frisivisia » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:38 am

by The Joseon Dynasty » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:38 am
Ifreann wrote:The Joseon Dynasty wrote:
No, you're paying for them through taxes. Is that so hard to understand?
If you go into a restaurant, do you assume they're giving you free food because you haven't yet paid for it?
He's actually right. Availing of government services is not necessarily predicated on paying taxes. You see, folks, the government isn't a business.
by Sibirsky » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:38 am
by Sibirsky » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:39 am
by Sibirsky » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:40 am

by Wisconsin9 » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:40 am

by Tlaceceyaya » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:40 am
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

by Frisivisia » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:40 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Arcanda, Cratersti, Duvniask, Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Hdisar, Holy Marsh, Land of Corporations, Neu California, Pramana, The Archregimancy
Advertisement