NATION

PASSWORD

Taxes are theft

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:17 am

Republica Newland wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:Because you are obligated to pay taxes if you are a resident US citizen. It's like a country club revoking your membership for not paying the fees.

If you don't want to pay taxes, renounce your citizenship and kindly leave.


"If you don't want to pay taxes, renounce your citizenship and kindly leave."

The policies and systems proposed by me are politically impossible to instate in the US,you do realize this is all just hypothetical talk right? Like what would be the right way for a state to work.

And that statement was hypothetical.

You do realize this, right?

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:17 am

Sibirsky wrote:
Kengburg wrote:Theft: Taking one's money for another's gain
Taxation: Taking one's money for valuable services that are given to the person you took it from (Public Education, Federal Hospitals, Police Department, Fire Department, Military) In sense, if we removed taxation, the US would turn into an anarchy. So just because you get mad at the Obamacare tax does not mean all taxes are theft.

My nephew is dying of cancer. I rob you, you pay for his treatment.

Not theft. It went to a valuable service (healthcare) and saved his life.

Thy analogy fails.
He defines taxation as "taking one's money for valuable services that are given to the person you took it from."
The services are given to the person who lost the cash.
Last edited by Conscentia on Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:19 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:18 am

Chinese Regions wrote:
Republica Newland wrote:
So you do admit it's an outdated system reminiscent to Feudalism?

People don't rent houses in the USA?

No. More like, our education system apparently doesn't teach basic fucking logic or economics.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Kengburg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1506
Founded: Dec 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Kengburg » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:18 am

Dremono wrote:I might have normally agreed.. but the money being "stolen" is going towards a better life for the people, and our country. If a boy took your ball, that would be theft. Though, if a boy took your ball, sold it for more, and got a better ball , would you be happy? Of course. This is quite a strange opinion. :eyebrow:

Horrible Example, it is more like this:
Everyone in the class has $10, there is an idea for a pizza party, but to buy everything everyone has to give $2, everyone gives two dollars, then the class has the pizza party. If someone were to say "NO! I AM NOT GIVIN MY $2", then it wouldn't be fair for them to be attending the party, and they probably would have to go to another class, but you can't just send someone elsewhere in real life taxation, so if you do not pay your taxes, you shouldn't be entitled to the Public School, Police, etc. that everyone else pays for. So that's why we have the IRS
My Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: 1.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.21
Proud Allied State of the Union of Human Supremacists, Ave Humanitas!

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:18 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:My nephew is dying of cancer. I rob you, you pay for his treatment.

Not theft. It went to a valuable service (healthcare) and saved his life.

Maybe you should give up on analogies. I mean you clearly stated that you robbed him. That pretty much destroys any point you were attempting to make.

:palm:
No, it doesn't. The exchange of funds, was not voluntary.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:19 am

Norstal wrote:
Chinese Regions wrote:People don't rent houses in the USA?

No. More like, our education system apparently doesn't teach basic fucking logic or economics.

The economics and logic of fucking? Sounds like an interesting class.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:19 am

Republica Newland wrote:No it does not.Robbing = To steal from, especially using force or violence or threat thereof.


Technically merely stealing is larceny. Robbery requires a threat or use of force. Regardless, the definition, as pointed out again, quite simply, is that you are a private citizen and the government is the government.

The government can do a whole LOT of things normal people can't do. Seriously, enough of this fucking bullshit of "if I take your money it's theft, how come it's ok when the GOVERNMENT does it, HUH?"

If you grab a guy, put him in cuffs, then lock him in a cage against his will, under a threat of the use of lethal force, that's a whole slew of crimes, including assault, battery, kidnapping, and false imprisonment. Yet when the government does it it's called "arrest". If you walk into someone's factory, and try to make them show you their equipment, that's called trespassing. Yet when the government does it it's called "inspection". If you flood someone's body with lethal chemicals it's called murder. Yet when the govenrment does it it's called "lethal injection".

The government does a whole lot of things private people can't do. That's fine, they're the government.

Why aren't you there screaming "that's kidnapping!" everytime the government arrests somebody?

You being sent to the slammer for not paying taxes is a pretty obvious threat in my book.


That's....nice?
Last edited by Neo Art on Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:20 am, edited 2 times in total.
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:20 am

Neo Art wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:My


You are not the democratically elected and legally empowered legitimate government of a sovereign nation. The rest of what you had to say was irrelevant due to this fact.

An analogy only works when like is compared with like. This is clearly not the case here.

Ah, so it's ok to vote large groups to have the power of theft, but not individuals or smaller groups.

Got it.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:20 am

Sibirsky wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Maybe you should give up on analogies. I mean you clearly stated that you robbed him. That pretty much destroys any point you were attempting to make.

:palm:
No, it doesn't. The exchange of funds, was not voluntary.

Of course it is, because you ADMITTED you were robbing him. You already showed that it was theft. You didn't even attempt to show how taxes are theft because that would be circular logic.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Yorkopolis
Minister
 
Posts: 2024
Founded: Jul 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Yorkopolis » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:21 am

Sibirsky wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Maybe you should give up on analogies. I mean you clearly stated that you robbed him. That pretty much destroys any point you were attempting to make.

:palm:
No, it doesn't. The exchange of funds, was not voluntary.

Silver medal debating right there!
I ask you, how many times does it take you, or any other lolbertarian to realize that taxes are legal, theft is not?

This sums up the title: Legal is illegal. Except in this case, legal is taxes and illegal is theft. To understand and acknowledge this as a truth one would have to apply the principles of doublethink.
Libertarian socialist, confederalist, and Dutch republican.
Economic Left/Right: -9.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.69
Political Spectrum:
Left: 7.67
Libertarian: 2.63
Foreign Non-Interventionist: -6.76
Cultural Liberal: -6.63



I like: Guild socialism, Republicanism, Environmentalism, Trade unions, Egalitarianism, LGBT Rights, Direct democracy, Decentralization.
I dislike: Libertarianism, capitalism, racism, Hitlerism, Stalinism, monarchism, neoliberalism, white nationalism, laissez-faire, Fascism, totalitarianism.

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:21 am

Ceannairceach wrote:
Republica Newland wrote:
No it does not.Robbing = To steal from, especially using force or violence or threat thereof.You being sent to the slammer for not paying taxes is a pretty obvious threat in my book.

Because you are obligated to pay taxes if you are a resident US citizen. It's like a country club revoking your membership for not paying the fees.

If you don't want to pay taxes, renounce your citizenship and kindly leave.

People are not born with country club memberships. People do not have to change their entire life to quit a country club. People do not have to pay, to quit the country club.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:21 am

Sibirsky wrote:
Neo Art wrote:
You are not the democratically elected and legally empowered legitimate government of a sovereign nation. The rest of what you had to say was irrelevant due to this fact.

An analogy only works when like is compared with like. This is clearly not the case here.

Ah, so it's ok to vote large groups to have the power of theft, but not individuals or smaller groups.

Got it.

Are you going to argue without using circular logic?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:21 am

Sibirsky wrote:
Neo Art wrote:
You are not the democratically elected and legally empowered legitimate government of a sovereign nation. The rest of what you had to say was irrelevant due to this fact.

An analogy only works when like is compared with like. This is clearly not the case here.

Ah, so it's ok to vote large groups to have the power of theft, but not individuals or smaller groups.

Got it.

If it's legal, then it isn't theft. I know that is a hard legal concept to understand, but seriously, it might be worth the time to consider.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Kengburg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1506
Founded: Dec 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Kengburg » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:22 am

Sibirsky wrote:
Neo Art wrote:
You are not the democratically elected and legally empowered legitimate government of a sovereign nation. The rest of what you had to say was irrelevant due to this fact.

An analogy only works when like is compared with like. This is clearly not the case here.

Ah, so it's ok to vote large groups to have the power of theft, but not individuals or smaller groups.

Got it.

Have you ignored all the posts? THE POINT IS THAT TAXATION IS NOT THEFT!!!!!!!!!!!!
Last edited by Kengburg on Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
My Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: 1.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.21
Proud Allied State of the Union of Human Supremacists, Ave Humanitas!

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:22 am

Kengburg wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:My nephew is dying of cancer. I rob you, you pay for his treatment.

Not theft. It went to a valuable service (healthcare) and saved his life.

Yet people have access to healthcare when they pay their taxes, they always get something back when they give. If you don't pay your taxes, then you aren't entitled to any services the government gives.

Lol what?

I don't think you have any idea of how taxes and spending actually work.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:23 am

Sibirsky wrote:Ah, so it's ok to vote large groups to have the power of theft, but not individuals or smaller groups.


Yes, exactly right. Just why it's ok to vote large groups to have the power to arrest. To have the power to inpsect. To have the power to do a thousand other things that would be illegal if a private person tried to do it.

There is no intellectual honest reason, none what so ever, to argue that "taxes are theft" but not argue "arrests are kidnapping".

And since nobody, not even you, are prepared to argue that the government should not have the clear, legitimate authority to maintain law and order through the power to arrest, you must admit that it's OK for the government to do some things that private people aren't allowed to do.

And once you admit that, there's no intellectually honest ability to maintain that it's "bad" for the government to be able to do things the private person can't do vis-a-vis taxes/larceny but it's "good" for the government to be able to do things the private person can't do vis-a-vis arrests/kidnapping

You don't have to LIKE it, and I'm not saying you should. But to somehow be so terribly shocked that "it's ok to vote large groups" to do things that normal people can't do is frightfully intellectually dishonest.

Yes, the government can do things the private person can not. That's because they're the government.
Last edited by Neo Art on Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
L Ron Cupboard
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9054
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby L Ron Cupboard » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:23 am

"Government of the people, by the people, for the people" - can you steal from yourself?
A leopard in every home, you know it makes sense.

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:23 am

Yorkopolis wrote:
Republica Newland wrote:
No it does not.Robbing = To steal from, especially using force or violence or threat thereof.You being sent to the slammer for not paying taxes is a pretty obvious threat in my book.

How many times does it take before you understand that taxes are legal and theft isn't?

Semantics.

The entity with the power to tax, defines legal terms. Hmmm...
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:24 am

Sibirsky wrote:
Yorkopolis wrote:How many times does it take before you understand that taxes are legal and theft isn't?

Semantics.

The entity with the power to tax, defines legal terms. Hmmm...

Pretty much.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Republica Newland
Minister
 
Posts: 2623
Founded: Oct 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Republica Newland » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:24 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:Ah, so it's ok to vote large groups to have the power of theft, but not individuals or smaller groups.

Got it.

Are you going to argue without using circular logic?


There is no circular logic here,it's just denial on your part.
F Scale: 2.9(3)
Economic Left/Right: 0.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10
Aloha.
I play RL-concious. That's just how I roll. Deal with it.
GOODIES IN STOCK!!! - Republica Arms™ - SEARCH FOR TFLRN IN GLOBAL ECONOMICS&TRADE!

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:24 am

Sibirsky wrote:Semantics.

The entity with the power to tax kidnap, defines legal terms. Hmmm...


Why don't you think rapists and murderers shouldn't be arrested?
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:24 am

Conscentia wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:My nephew is dying of cancer. I rob you, you pay for his treatment.

Not theft. It went to a valuable service (healthcare) and saved his life.

Thy analogy fails.
He defines taxation as "taking one's money for valuable services that are given to the person you took it from."
The services are given to the person who lost the cash.

Except that is bullshit. Taxes pay for services whether you pay taxes or not.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:25 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Sibirsky wrote: :palm:
No, it doesn't. The exchange of funds, was not voluntary.

Of course it is, because you ADMITTED you were robbing him. You already showed that it was theft. You didn't even attempt to show how taxes are theft because that would be circular logic.

:palm:
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:26 am

Republica Newland wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Are you going to argue without using circular logic?


There is no circular logic here,it's just denial on your part.

Really? "Taxes are theft because it's robbing citizens because they steal," ad naseum isn't circular logic? I think you're in dire need of a dictionary.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:27 am

Sibirsky wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Of course it is, because you ADMITTED you were robbing him. You already showed that it was theft. You didn't even attempt to show how taxes are theft because that would be circular logic.

:palm:

Thank you for your concession.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Corporate Collective Salvation, Ethel mermania, Grandbania, Heavenly Assault, Hurdergaryp, Ifreann, In-dia, Likhinia, Port Caverton, Soviet Haaregrad, The Jamesian Republic, The Two Jerseys, Uiiop, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads