So you belive that Martin Luther's and (un)St. Thomas Aquinas's philosophies of Christianity are wrong?
Advertisement

by Bavin » Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:25 pm

by Femeria » Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:31 pm

by Bavin » Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:45 pm
Femeria wrote:Personally i'm an atheist for reasons more than just the classic "forsaken flock". But I would have to say if all these churches wont accept you why go to them? Do you need someone with a white collar or big hat to tell you that god loves you? do you need a giant useless church to kneel down in and pray? Believe what you believe and stand alone whether with or without god. Groups are easy corrupted and and confused to believe in whatever their told. Search for yourself and you might just find a better answer.

by Tunizcha » Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:47 pm
Bavin wrote:Femeria wrote:Personally i'm an atheist for reasons more than just the classic "forsaken flock". But I would have to say if all these churches wont accept you why go to them? Do you need someone with a white collar or big hat to tell you that god loves you? do you need a giant useless church to kneel down in and pray? Believe what you believe and stand alone whether with or without god. Groups are easy corrupted and and confused to believe in whatever their told. Search for yourself and you might just find a better answer.
So you believe in a Creator? If you do, you aren't an atheist.

by Bavin » Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:48 pm
Tunizcha wrote:Bavin wrote:Femeria wrote:Personally i'm an atheist for reasons more than just the classic "forsaken flock". But I would have to say if all these churches wont accept you why go to them? Do you need someone with a white collar or big hat to tell you that god loves you? do you need a giant useless church to kneel down in and pray? Believe what you believe and stand alone whether with or without god. Groups are easy corrupted and and confused to believe in whatever their told. Search for yourself and you might just find a better answer.
So you believe in a Creator? If you do, you aren't an atheist.
That would be non-denominational Theist or Deist, depending on how much of a personal god this is.

by Femeria » Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:04 pm
Bavin wrote:Tunizcha wrote:Bavin wrote:Femeria wrote:Personally i'm an atheist for reasons more than just the classic "forsaken flock". But I would have to say if all these churches wont accept you why go to them? Do you need someone with a white collar or big hat to tell you that god loves you? do you need a giant useless church to kneel down in and pray? Believe what you believe and stand alone whether with or without god. Groups are easy corrupted and and confused to believe in whatever their told. Search for yourself and you might just find a better answer.
So you believe in a Creator? If you do, you aren't an atheist.
That would be non-denominational Theist or Deist, depending on how much of a personal god this is.
I believe that is right...

by Buxtahatche » Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:54 am
Bavin wrote:Buxtahatche wrote: Of all you mentioned, only 'bisexual' sets off alarms in my head. A Christian can't accept being 'bisexual'; homosexuality is inherently sinful.
If its sinful why does it exist? Either Yahweh can't control it, or he condones it. And if he can't control it, what use is it for us to control it?
I say Yahweh because as an atheist, referring to your god by his title is rather annoying. You don't call Obama President.


by Saint Jade IV » Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:06 am

by RightLeaningChristians » Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:08 am
Saint Jade IV wrote:Why would you, a "mixed-race, gender-variant, bisexual, disabled girl", even bother joining a church like the three you mentioned when they openly admit that transexuals and bisexuals are not welcome in their ranks? Except to cause problems and whine when you get kicked out?

by Saint Jade IV » Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:11 am
RightLeaningChristians wrote:Saint Jade IV wrote:Why would you, a "mixed-race, gender-variant, bisexual, disabled girl", even bother joining a church like the three you mentioned when they openly admit that transexuals and bisexuals are not welcome in their ranks? Except to cause problems and whine when you get kicked out?
Maybe so they can help her leave her sinful ways?

by Getbrett » Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:15 am
Saint Jade IV wrote:RightLeaningChristians wrote:Saint Jade IV wrote:Why would you, a "mixed-race, gender-variant, bisexual, disabled girl", even bother joining a church like the three you mentioned when they openly admit that transexuals and bisexuals are not welcome in their ranks? Except to cause problems and whine when you get kicked out?
Maybe so they can help her leave her sinful ways?
Considering the rant the OP went on, I don't think she wants to leave her "sinful" ways. I think she wants to be a member of the club without following the rules.

by Bottle » Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:41 am
South East Europe wrote:I have been excommunicated from the Church of Latter Day Saints, I have been disfellowshipped from the Jehovah World Order aka Jehovah World Organization, and I have been excommunicated from the Church of Christian Science. What was the reason? Believing god to be a loving creator and having a different opinion as to what scripture meant. True Christians, as you claim to be, are not so intolerant and ignorant. So, I have several questions to all of you Religious Fundamentalists out there. Why am I, a mixed-race, gender-variant, bisexual, disabled girl, a worse sinner then all of you who condemn and ridicule innocent people? Why do you believe that you know exactly what God is thinking? And, the final question, Why do you believe that Jesus will let you into his kingdom for being such intolerant and ignorant individuals?

by Ismon » Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:49 am
South East Europe wrote:I have been excommunicated from the Church of Latter Day Saints, I have been disfellowshipped from the Jehovah World Order aka Jehovah World Organization, and I have been excommunicated from the Church of Christian Science. What was the reason? Believing god to be a loving creator and having a different opinion as to what scripture meant. True Christians, as you claim to be, are not so intolerant and ignorant. So, I have several questions to all of you Religious Fundamentalists out there. Why am I, a mixed-race, gender-variant, bisexual, disabled girl, a worse sinner then all of you who condemn and ridicule innocent people? Why do you believe that you know exactly what God is thinking? And, the final question, Why do you believe that Jesus will let you into his kingdom for being such intolerant and ignorant individuals?

by LOL ANARCHY NUBZ » Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:00 am
Ismon wrote:South East Europe wrote:I have been excommunicated from the Church of Latter Day Saints, I have been disfellowshipped from the Jehovah World Order aka Jehovah World Organization, and I have been excommunicated from the Church of Christian Science. What was the reason? Believing god to be a loving creator and having a different opinion as to what scripture meant. True Christians, as you claim to be, are not so intolerant and ignorant. So, I have several questions to all of you Religious Fundamentalists out there. Why am I, a mixed-race, gender-variant, bisexual, disabled girl, a worse sinner then all of you who condemn and ridicule innocent people? Why do you believe that you know exactly what God is thinking? And, the final question, Why do you believe that Jesus will let you into his kingdom for being such intolerant and ignorant individuals?
Maybe join a religion you agree with, or rather logically determine what or where the spiritual truth is and then act accordingly. What is the point of joing a religion, violating it's tenets and then demanding that in the interests of equality and tolerance the world owes you special treatment because you are 'different'.

by Flameswroth » Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:08 am
Czardas wrote:Why should we bail out climate change with billions of dollars, when lesbians are starving in the streets because they can't afford an abortion?
Reagan Clone wrote:What you are proposing is glorifying God by loving, respecting, or at least tolerating, his other creations.
That is the gayest fucking shit I've ever heard, and I had Barry Manilow perform at the White House in '82.

by Domminus » Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:11 am
Flameswroth wrote:A quick browsing of the topic has revealed that, unless I missed it somewhere, the OP really hasn't posted since his first post. And considering that it takes more than 'differing beliefs' to get excommunicated from most religions, I'm gonna say this must be some troll stuffs in response to the other thread on here at the moment.
If not OP, prove me wrong by stating the exact reasoning behind each excommunication, not using vagueness in saying, "I differed in how I interpreted scripture".

by The Isle of Biscay » Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:24 am
Buxtahatche wrote:...Of all you mentioned, only 'bisexual' sets off alarms in my head. A Christian can't accept being 'bisexual'; homosexuality is inherently sinful.

by Kashindahar » Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:25 am
The Isle of Biscay wrote:The idea that homosexuality is wrong is only opinion.
Voracious Vendetta wrote:There is always some prick that comes along and ruins a thread before it goes anywhere

by The Isle of Biscay » Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:27 am

by Kashindahar » Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:35 am
Voracious Vendetta wrote:There is always some prick that comes along and ruins a thread before it goes anywhere

by The Isle of Biscay » Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:39 am
Kashindahar wrote:
It can be other than opinion by being the word of god. It's your opinion that it isn't, it is not objective fact that it isn't.
My opinion is irrelevant to this discussion.

by Domminus » Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:41 am
The Isle of Biscay wrote:You are claiming "the word of God" to be objective? LOL. Firstly, it was written down subject to the person writing it, and translated subjectively, thereafter. And the idea of the Bible being objective is also an opinion.

by Treznor » Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:44 am
Kashindahar wrote:
It can be other than opinion by being the word of god. It's your opinion that it isn't, it is not objective fact that it isn't.
My opinion is irrelevant to this discussion.

by Kashindahar » Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:45 am
The Isle of Biscay wrote:Firstly, it was written down subject to the person writing it, and translated subjectively, thereafter.
The Isle of Biscay wrote:And the idea of the Bible being objective is also an opinion.
Voracious Vendetta wrote:There is always some prick that comes along and ruins a thread before it goes anywhere
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Mestovakia, Soviet Haaregrad
Advertisement