NATION

PASSWORD

Where is your morality coming from?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Post a reply
User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:51 pm

Unterzagersdorf wrote:
Maurepas wrote:
UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
North Suran wrote:I do see some concerns over how a lifeless corpse can give informed consent, unless they signed some sort of "My body is ripe for plundering" waiver before they died.


I see no way in which you can rape a corpse anymore than you could rape one of those mildly creepy real dolls.

The corpse used to be a person, Id say unless that person left a will stating they could be fucked in death, then you are, in effect, raping them...

You see, unlike the creepy doll, the person used to be alive...


He does raise a good point though. Once life has gone, it is essentially just another inanimate object...

Yes, but, they were still people, dead =/= inanimate objects, or else, why have wills at all? Why stop people from fucking coma patients?


Its a consent issue...
Top
User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:51 pm

Maurepas wrote:The corpse used to be a person, Id say unless that person left a will stating they could be fucked in death, then you are, in effect, raping them...

You see, unlike the creepy doll, the person used to be alive...


The doll used to be part of various living things, all of them not human. Is that bestiality? No. Nor is having sex with that which used to be human rape. Neither is eating a vegetable equivalent to eating shit, even though the vegetable grew in and is mostly made from reorganized shit particles.
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?
Top
User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:51 pm

It is disgusting. However, if the person, when alive gave consent, I really cannot see a legal argument against it.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place
Top
User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:52 pm

Maurepas wrote:Yes, but, they were still people, dead =/= inanimate objects, or else, why have wills at all? Why stop people from fucking coma patients?


Its a consent issue...


Is a coma patient a corpse?
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?
Top
User avatar
Tunizcha
Senator
 
Posts: 4174
Founded: Mar 23, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Tunizcha » Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:52 pm

Maurepas wrote:Yes, but, they were still people, dead =/= inanimate objects, or else, why have wills at all? Why stop people from fucking coma patients?


Its a consent issue...


Comatose =/= dead
Barzan wrote: I'll stick with rape, thank you.

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:It's Rape night on NSG.
*／l、
ﾞ（ﾟ､ ｡ ７
l、ﾞ ~ヽ
じしf_, )ノ
This is Koji. Copy and paste Koji to your sig so he can acheive world domination.
Top
User avatar
L3 Communications
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5150
Founded: Jun 21, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby L3 Communications » Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:52 pm

Rhodmhire wrote:
Hiddenrun wrote:What would your reaction be to this practice?


There are far worse paraphilias out there.

That's my reaction.


This.
The Corporate Conglomerate of L3 Communications
L3 Corporate Factbook - L3 Embassy/Consulate Programme - L3 Broadcasting Corporation - L3 Communications - Global Armaments

- Member of The Conglomerate
- Member of CAPINTERN
- Member of the IFA
Economic Tyranny/Libertarian: 7.38
Social Libertarian/Tyranny: -4.46
New Nicksyllvania wrote:WA is jew infested tyranny that does not understand freedom and 0% taxation

Lyras wrote:Thirdly, the inclusion of multiple penetration aids (such as flares, chaff, false-target balloons and lubricant)...
Top
User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:53 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
Maurepas wrote:The corpse used to be a person, Id say unless that person left a will stating they could be fucked in death, then you are, in effect, raping them...

You see, unlike the creepy doll, the person used to be alive...


The doll used to be part of various living things, all of them not human. Is that bestiality? No. Nor is having sex with that which used to be human rape. Neither is eating a vegetable equivalent to eating shit, even though the vegetable grew in and is mostly made from reorganized shit particles.

Not necessarily, Id wager the majority are synthetic, ;)

But, it doesnt take a whole lot to realize the difference between Fossils or Plants, etc., and Human Beings...furthermore, Id not want them doing my dog that way either...
Top
User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:54 pm

Tunizcha wrote:
Maurepas wrote:Yes, but, they were still people, dead =/= inanimate objects, or else, why have wills at all? Why stop people from fucking coma patients?


Its a consent issue...


Comatose =/= dead

I never said it was, merely showing a comparison, ;)
Top
User avatar
Bobs Taco Shack
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 198
Founded: Oct 28, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Bobs Taco Shack » Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:54 pm

Is having morality just of having an opinion about necrophilia? I dont care either way, do it or dont. As for the question asked, mine comes from others people. I will do what ever I want to whom ever I want when ever I want unless I see a problem I dont want to deal with in the future. When I explained it to others, one used the phrase 'amoralistic'. I like it. :)
Enjoying 13 years of awesome tacos.
"Woah... you are a warrior zombie survivor." -Dimoniquid
I may jump to conclusions, but I do so using both feet, yelling "BwaaaAaaaAaaaAaaa!" the entire time.
If you use weapons in this game, chances are my region made them.
Top
User avatar
Mad hatters in jeans
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19119
Founded: Nov 14, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Mad hatters in jeans » Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:55 pm

Jordaxia wrote:Nobody is being harmed - why would I object?

cos it's weird and really creepy that's why.
Top
User avatar
Tunizcha
Senator
 
Posts: 4174
Founded: Mar 23, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Tunizcha » Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:55 pm

Maurepas wrote:
Tunizcha wrote:
Maurepas wrote:Yes, but, they were still people, dead =/= inanimate objects, or else, why have wills at all? Why stop people from fucking coma patients?


Its a consent issue...


Comatose =/= dead

I never said it was, merely showing a comparison, ;)

:p
But I don't really see how your argument, er, hypothetical would apply.
Barzan wrote: I'll stick with rape, thank you.

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:It's Rape night on NSG.
*／l、
ﾞ（ﾟ､ ｡ ７
l、ﾞ ~ヽ
じしf_, )ノ
This is Koji. Copy and paste Koji to your sig so he can acheive world domination.
Top
User avatar
Mad hatters in jeans
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19119
Founded: Nov 14, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Mad hatters in jeans » Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:55 pm

Sibirsky wrote:It is disgusting. However, if the person, when alive gave consent, I really cannot see a legal argument against it.

well if it's legal to do something then there's no problems eh?
Top
User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:56 pm

Mad hatters in jeans wrote:
Jordaxia wrote:Nobody is being harmed - why would I object?

cos it's weird and really creepy that's why.

One could argue that noone's being harmed in a Coma rape either...the person would never know...

That doesnt mean a person didnt give consent...
Top
User avatar
Unterzagersdorf
Diplomat
 
Posts: 541
Founded: Jul 02, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Unterzagersdorf » Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:58 pm

Deleted
Last edited by Unterzagersdorf on Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: -1.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.05
Top
User avatar
Mad hatters in jeans
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19119
Founded: Nov 14, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Mad hatters in jeans » Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:58 pm

Maurepas wrote:
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:
Jordaxia wrote:Nobody is being harmed - why would I object?

cos it's weird and really creepy that's why.

One could argue that noone's being harmed in a Coma rape either...the person would never know...

That doesnt mean a person didnt give consent...

you what now?
Top
User avatar
Nercer -
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 500
Founded: Mar 18, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Nercer - » Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:59 pm

Uh . . . Eww . . . :o
Guess how much I don't care?
Top
User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:00 pm

Maurepas wrote:Not necessarily, Id wager the majority are synthetic, ;)

But, it doesnt take a whole lot to realize the difference between Fossils or Plants, etc., and Human Beings...furthermore, Id not want them doing my dog that way either...


There's no moral difference between a human corpse and petroleum.
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?
Top
User avatar
Macindia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 121
Founded: May 26, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Macindia » Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:00 pm

I don't see anything with the scenario you described. If it was legal, I'd consider donating my body to necrophiliacs
Economic Left/Right: -10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.87
Top
User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:00 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
Maurepas wrote:Not necessarily, Id wager the majority are synthetic, ;)

But, it doesnt take a whole lot to realize the difference between Fossils or Plants, etc., and Human Beings...furthermore, Id not want them doing my dog that way either...


There's no moral difference between a human corpse and petroleum.

Yes, there is, Petroleum never needed consent to have sex...
Top
User avatar
Rhodmhire
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17421
Founded: Jun 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodmhire » Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:01 pm

L3 Communications wrote:
Rhodmhire wrote:
Hiddenrun wrote:What would your reaction be to this practice?


There are far worse paraphilias out there.

That's my reaction.


This.


:lol:

We should know, of all the people on this site. :rofl:
Part of me grew up here. But part of growing up is leaving parts of ourselves behind.
Top
User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:01 pm

Mad hatters in jeans wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:It is disgusting. However, if the person, when alive gave consent, I really cannot see a legal argument against it.

well if it's legal to do something then there's no problems eh?


Legally? No. Doesn't mean it is right or moral. But, who the hell are politicians to tell us what we can, and cannot do? They are buffoons. The lowest class of the human species.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place
Top
User avatar
Cameroi
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15788
Founded: Dec 24, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Cameroi » Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:02 pm

i seem to be seeing the usual ns disconnect.
precisely what does necrophilia have to do with WHERE anyone gets their morality from?
truth isn't what i say. isn't what you say. isn't what anybody says. truth is what is there, when no one is saying anything.

"economic freedom" is "the cake"
=^^=
.../\...
Top
User avatar
Mad hatters in jeans
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19119
Founded: Nov 14, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Mad hatters in jeans » Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:03 pm

Sibirsky wrote:
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:It is disgusting. However, if the person, when alive gave consent, I really cannot see a legal argument against it.

well if it's legal to do something then there's no problems eh?


Legally? No. Doesn't mean it is right or moral. But, who the hell are politicians to tell us what we can, and cannot do? They are buffoons. The lowest class of the human species.

a country is only as strong as it's weakest citizen.
Top
User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:03 pm

Maurepas wrote:Yes, there is, Petroleum never needed consent to have sex...


So, if we invent time travel, can I go back 65 million years and fuck a dinosaur?
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?
Top
User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:04 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
Maurepas wrote:Yes, there is, Petroleum never needed consent to have sex...


So, if we invent time travel, can I go back 65 million years and fuck a dinosaur?

If you can get one to give you consent...Good luck with that though, :?
Top
PreviousNext
Post a reply

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Benuty, Bovad, Renovated Germany, Shazbotdom, The Pirateariat

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Advertisement

Remove ads