FoxTropica wrote:Socially, it sounds semi-nice to me. (Promised gay marriage sooner, We have free university and such.)
Economically, I'm not sure, so i assume the worst.
So overall I'm meh to the thing.
Sooner than this year?
Advertisement

by Olivaero » Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:36 am
FoxTropica wrote:Socially, it sounds semi-nice to me. (Promised gay marriage sooner, We have free university and such.)
Economically, I'm not sure, so i assume the worst.
So overall I'm meh to the thing.
by Souseiseki » Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:37 am

by Carsonalia » Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:59 am

by Polar Islandstates » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:01 am
Carsonalia wrote:No for the purely selfish reason that I can see it stirring up more problems in NI
http://bellacaledonia.org.uk/2013/01/10 ... ish-unity/
If we rid ourselves of the political imperialist baggage of the UK state, new possibilities emerge. For example, it would become feasible for Ireland, as an established sovereign nation, to see itself as part of a shared geographical and cultural entity. This, in turn, brings potential opportunities for the continued development of the peace process in Northern Ireland. The idea of the political independence of England and Scotland leading to conflict, hatred and distrust is the mindset of opportunistic status-quo fearmongers and gloomy nationalist fantasists stuck in a Bannockburn-Culloden timewarp, and deeply insulting to the people of both countries. Swedes, Norwegians and Danes remain on amicable terms; they trade, co-operate and visit each other socially any time they like. They don’t need a pompous, blustering state called Scandinavia, informing them from Stockholm how wonderful they all are, but (kind of) only really meaning Sweden.

by Carsonalia » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:03 am
Polar Islandstates wrote:Carsonalia wrote:No for the purely selfish reason that I can see it stirring up more problems in NI
Irvine Welsh wrote a decent opinion piece on Scottish Independence, actually, putting forwards an argument that with an independent Scotland making three separate nations in the archipelago, Ireland might feel less like a growth tacked onto the side of the UK, and more like a constituent part of a shared archipelago of nations, hence reducing tensions in NI.

by Polar Islandstates » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:04 am

by Olivaero » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:07 am

by Tunasai » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:08 am

by Polar Islandstates » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:09 am
Carsonalia wrote:
EDIT : He gives fuck all reasoning as to why it would foster the peace process. He just states it'll happen with no follow up. Give me a fucking break. The Shinners will be all over it like the smug twats they are further picking away at any Britishness left in the province.
by Souseiseki » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:09 am
Tunasai wrote:Maybe after I watch Braveheart but right now I'm not feeling it

by Polar Islandstates » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:10 am
Tunasai wrote:Maybe after I watch Braveheart but right now I'm not feeling it

by Cameroi » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:10 am
by Souseiseki » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:12 am
Cameroi wrote:i think people expect too much from the idea of sovereignty. i don't see a problem with it. i don't see anything wrong with it. but i don't see it as being worth the risk of violence over it either.
i just don't see who gets to name a place, as having very much to do with the freedom or quality of life of the people living there.

by Rio Cana » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:25 am
Glasgia wrote:
Unfortunately, Scotland would lose a lot of influence on the world stage as it gains decision-making power locally. It is also very hard to predict how well an indepedent Scottish economy would do.

by Romneyerica » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:36 am

by Lantianguo » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:49 am

by Salven » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:52 am
Lantianguo wrote:Free Scotland. A test of anarchism has yet to be tried in a developed nation in the modern world, and being a nation that size out of the influence or tyranny of authoritarian entities like the EU and UK, and the inevitability of economic collapse rendering its leadership illegitimate, makes for a brilliant sample. When the dependency nets implode or become insolvent, I can't see Edinburgh being able to tame revolutionaries in Glasgow. So long as England stays out of it, Scotland will birth the new paradigm shift in libertarian thought, both left and right.

by Mefpan » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:56 am

by Polar Islandstates » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:57 am
Salven wrote:Lantianguo wrote:Free Scotland. A test of anarchism has yet to be tried in a developed nation in the modern world, and being a nation that size out of the influence or tyranny of authoritarian entities like the EU and UK, and the inevitability of economic collapse rendering its leadership illegitimate, makes for a brilliant sample. When the dependency nets implode or become insolvent, I can't see Edinburgh being able to tame revolutionaries in Glasgow. So long as England stays out of it, Scotland will birth the new paradigm shift in libertarian thought, both left and right.
Alas, Scotland is not inhabited by anarchists. Nor is the UK authoritarian.
And I'd (hope?) think Scotland would stay under the Crown, as well, and at the very least in the Commonwealth.

by North Stradia » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:58 am

by Lantianguo » Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:00 am
Salven wrote:Lantianguo wrote:Free Scotland. A test of anarchism has yet to be tried in a developed nation in the modern world, and being a nation that size out of the influence or tyranny of authoritarian entities like the EU and UK, and the inevitability of economic collapse rendering its leadership illegitimate, makes for a brilliant sample. When the dependency nets implode or become insolvent, I can't see Edinburgh being able to tame revolutionaries in Glasgow. So long as England stays out of it, Scotland will birth the new paradigm shift in libertarian thought, both left and right.
Alas, Scotland is not inhabited by anarchists.
Nor is the UK authoritarian.

by South Asia Minor » Sun Jan 27, 2013 12:25 pm

by Salamanderston » Sun Jan 27, 2013 12:29 pm

by Varijnland » Sun Jan 27, 2013 12:32 pm
Wind in the Willows wrote:Alex Salmond is an idiot.

by Varijnland » Sun Jan 27, 2013 12:35 pm
Salamanderston wrote:On one hand, a free Scotland would be both comical and badass.
On the other hand, it's a political blunder.
Then again, no one really likes the British, so why the hell not.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Diarcesia, Ethel mermania, Necroghastia, Old Temecula, Pizza Friday Forever91, Roighelm, Socialism uwu, The Crimson Isles, The Jamesian Republic, Washington Resistance Army, Western Theram
Advertisement