NATION

PASSWORD

Not allow Atheists to graduate from HS? GOP says yes!

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Bleckonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1528
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Bleckonia » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:26 pm

The Merchant Republics wrote:It's abhorrent.

Loyalty oaths, especially ones that demand religious loyalty, should not be imposed on anyone by law.

High school is not voluntary, even if graduation is, I wouldn't stand for it. And so hope the bill is sunk.


I'm an Arizonan, and I'm pretty sure it will be. There are enough moderate Republicans to vote against it.
Economic Left: -9.13; Social Libertarian: -6.26
Atheist. Marxist-Leninist. Anti-consumerist.
Revolutionary Socialist Party of Fernão, Workers of the world, unite!

User avatar
The United Soviet Socialist Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17944
Founded: Aug 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:26 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:No. It can however make it illegal to not believe in God according to the Constitution.

Then that's establishing a religion. That's illegal.

No religion is not establishing a religion.
Gay and Proudand also a brony
Political Compass:Left: 7.76, Authoritarian: 5.6
I am: Fascist/Corporatist on economy,
Conservative on social issues(Support same sex marriage),
Anti secularist on religion,
Anti-Republican on government,
Interventionist/Imperialist on international issues

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:26 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Religion not lack thereof.

Free excersise of religion.

You do know that religion=/=theism, right?

Again, show me where it states that you have the right to believe in God. If you cannot do so, you do not have rights.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Wisconsin9
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35753
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wisconsin9 » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:27 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Which according to you would include atheists, since you claim that we as a group were not directly given rights, forget the fact that the Fourteenth Amendment means that we're all US citizens and are granted the right to due process.

Does not mean Atheists have rights in the Constitution.

CITIZENS have rights. Not specifically THEISTS, not specifically ATHEISTS, CITIZENS. If you're going to advocate stripping my legal status as a human being, then at the very least do so with a halfway legitimate argument.
~~~~~~~~
We are currently 33% through the Trump administration.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:27 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Again, where?

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Do you see anything protecting Atheists in there?

First ammendment wrote:Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

Therefore, everyone must always keep talking.
Everyone must always be reporting a news.
Everyone must always assemble.
Everyone must always petition government.
Everyone must have grievance of every government.

*nods*
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Oneracon
Senator
 
Posts: 4735
Founded: Jul 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Oneracon » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:27 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Which according to you would include atheists, since you claim that we as a group were not directly given rights, forget the fact that the Fourteenth Amendment means that we're all US citizens and are granted the right to due process.

Does not mean Atheists have rights in the Constitution.


See James J. Kaufman, v. Gary R. McCaughtry, et al., United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit No. 04-1914
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Oneracon IC Links
Factbook
Embassies

"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power"
Pro:LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa
Anti: Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza

Your resident Canadian neutral good socdem graduate student.

*Here, queer, and not a prop for your right-wing nonsense.*

User avatar
The United Soviet Socialist Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17944
Founded: Aug 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:27 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Religion not lack thereof.

Free excersise of religion.

You do know that religion=/=theism, right?

Again, show me where it states that you have the right to believe in God. If you cannot do so, you do not have rights.

Religion is Theism.

It protects the right to exercise religion, thus to believe in God. Whilst it mentions nothing of lack thereof so you have no rights according to the Constitution.
Gay and Proudand also a brony
Political Compass:Left: 7.76, Authoritarian: 5.6
I am: Fascist/Corporatist on economy,
Conservative on social issues(Support same sex marriage),
Anti secularist on religion,
Anti-Republican on government,
Interventionist/Imperialist on international issues

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65251
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:29 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Religion is Theism.

Try again.
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
New Chalcedon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12226
Founded: Sep 20, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Chalcedon » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:29 pm

Bleckonia wrote:
The Merchant Republics wrote:It's abhorrent.

Loyalty oaths, especially ones that demand religious loyalty, should not be imposed on anyone by law.

High school is not voluntary, even if graduation is, I wouldn't stand for it. And so hope the bill is sunk.


I'm an Arizonan, and I'm pretty sure it will be. There are enough moderate Republicans to vote against it.


You just used three words that should never be in the same sentence: "Arizona", "moderate" and "Republican".

There are moderate people from Arizona.
There are moderate Republicans.
There are Arizona Republicans.

There are not - at least not in office - moderate Arizona Republicans, afaik.
Fuck it all. Let the world burn - there's no way roaches could do a worse job of being decent than we have.

User avatar
The United Soviet Socialist Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17944
Founded: Aug 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:30 pm

Immoren wrote:
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Religion is Theism.

Try again.

The majority are still Theist. And it still does not give rights to Atheists.
Gay and Proudand also a brony
Political Compass:Left: 7.76, Authoritarian: 5.6
I am: Fascist/Corporatist on economy,
Conservative on social issues(Support same sex marriage),
Anti secularist on religion,
Anti-Republican on government,
Interventionist/Imperialist on international issues

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:30 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Religion is Theism..

No.

Theism, in the broadest sense, is the belief that at least one deity exists


Religion is an organized collection of belief systems, cultural systems, and world views that relate humanity to spirituality and, sometimes, to moral values.


Unless you want to argue that Buddhism, Hinduism, and Jainism aren't religions, you're wrong.

So again, show me where it states that you have the right to believe in God.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Wisconsin9
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35753
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wisconsin9 » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:30 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:

The majority are still Theist. And it still does not give rights to Atheists.

Please at least try to come up with a response to my point about citizenship and rights.
~~~~~~~~
We are currently 33% through the Trump administration.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................

User avatar
United States of Raptors
Minister
 
Posts: 2011
Founded: Dec 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Raptors » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:30 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Which according to you would include atheists, since you claim that we as a group were not directly given rights, forget the fact that the Fourteenth Amendment means that we're all US citizens and are granted the right to due process.

Does not mean Atheists have rights in the Constitution.

Mavorpen wrote:Wrong. The text states that you cannot prohibit the free exercise of religion, not that you cannot prohibit belief in God.


I can play this game too. Show me where it states that you have the right to believe in a God.

Religion not lack thereof.

Free excersise of religion.


The first ammendment allows the lack of religion.

Need me to quote the first ammendment word for word here?

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I believe that not believing in a religion falls under freedom of speech.
The Archregimancy wrote:I only have one:

That most people in NSG actually know that much about history/archaeology in the first place.

User avatar
Meryuma
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14922
Founded: Jul 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Meryuma » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:30 pm

Wisconsin9 wrote:As an atheist, I'm actually more worried about the idea of forcing people to take the Oath of Enlistment before they can graduate.


Exactly.

People are glossing over the scary part and instead scaring themselves silly with a pretty harmless/meaningless part.
ᛋᛃᚢ - Social Justice Úlfheðinn
Potarius wrote:
Neo Arcad wrote:Gravity is a natural phenomenon by which physical bodies attract with a force proportional to their mass.


In layman's terms, orgy time.


Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.


Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."


Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.



Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.

Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...

*puts on sunglasses*

blow out of proportions."

YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

...so here's your future

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:31 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:You do know that religion=/=theism, right?

Again, show me where it states that you have the right to believe in God. If you cannot do so, you do not have rights.

Religion is Theism.

It protects the right to exercise religion, thus to believe in God. Whilst it mentions nothing of lack thereof so you have no rights according to the Constitution.


religion is a set of rituals that its perfectly possible to exercise without believing in a god.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:31 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Which according to you would include atheists, since you claim that we as a group were not directly given rights, forget the fact that the Fourteenth Amendment means that we're all US citizens and are granted the right to due process.

Does not mean Atheists have rights in the Constitution.

Yes. We. Fucking. Do. Have. Rights. In. The. Constitution.

NOWHERE in the Fourteenth Amendment does it say anything about religious qualifications for citizenship - and nowhere in naturalization law does it say that immigrants have to pass a religious test to become a citizen.

And debunk your idea that the US is a Christian nation once and for all, we have the Treaty of Tripoli, which states "As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion,—as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen,—and as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
The United Soviet Socialist Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17944
Founded: Aug 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:31 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Religion is Theism..

No.

Theism, in the broadest sense, is the belief that at least one deity exists


Religion is an organized collection of belief systems, cultural systems, and world views that relate humanity to spirituality and, sometimes, to moral values.


Unless you want to argue that Buddhism, Hinduism, and Jainism aren't religions, you're wrong.

So again, show me where it states that you have the right to believe in God.

Hinduism believes in many Gods. Buddhism is a lifestyle not a religion. And I don't even know what Jainism is.

By the right to exercise religion. Most religions are Theist so thus it gives that right.
Gay and Proudand also a brony
Political Compass:Left: 7.76, Authoritarian: 5.6
I am: Fascist/Corporatist on economy,
Conservative on social issues(Support same sex marriage),
Anti secularist on religion,
Anti-Republican on government,
Interventionist/Imperialist on international issues

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:33 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Hinduism believes in many Gods.

No.
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Buddhism is a lifestyle not a religion.

No.
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:By the right to exercise religion. Most religions are Theist so thus it gives that right.

So it doesn't give you the right to believe in God?
Last edited by Mavorpen on Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:33 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:No.





Unless you want to argue that Buddhism, Hinduism, and Jainism aren't religions, you're wrong.

So again, show me where it states that you have the right to believe in God.

Hinduism believes in many Gods. Buddhism is a lifestyle not a religion. And I don't even know what Jainism is.

By the right to exercise religion. Most religions are Theist so thus it gives that right.


no, no, no. you can practice religions, you can't believe in them.

its fun when people twist what words mean isn't it?
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
House Korlov
Attaché
 
Posts: 86
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby House Korlov » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:33 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5mmFPyDK_8
Yes we'll rally round the flag, boys, we'll rally once again,
Shouting the battle cry of freedom,
We will rally from the hillside, we'll gather from the plain,
Shouting the battle cry of freedom!

(Chorus)
The Union forever! Hurrah, boys, hurrah!
Down with the traitor, up with the star;
While we rally round the flag, boys, rally once again,
Shouting the battle cry of freedom!

We are springing to the call of our brothers gone before,
Shouting the battle cry of freedom!
And we'll fill our vacant ranks with a million freemen more,
Shouting the battle cry of freedom!

Chorus

We will welcome to our numbers the loyal, true and brave,
Shouting the battle cry of freedom!
And although they may be poor, not a man shall be a slave,
Shouting the battle cry of freedom!


This is basically my response. Why do I slowly but surely have a gradually creeping idea that we may have to sort out the issue of "union" again, with blood and steel? And will we have to die to make men free again?
A brief history of House Korlov
“We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists.” – Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:33 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Then that's establishing a religion. That's illegal.

No religion is not establishing a religion.

We're a SECULAR nation. If you're making it illegal to NOT believe in your magical sky faerie, that's impeding on my right to NOT believe in said sky faerie, hence striping me of my rights, hence illegal.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
New Chalcedon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12226
Founded: Sep 20, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Chalcedon » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:33 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Which according to you would include atheists, since you claim that we as a group were not directly given rights, forget the fact that the Fourteenth Amendment means that we're all US citizens and are granted the right to due process.

Does not mean Atheists have rights in the Constitution.


Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States wrote:Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.


I see the word "all" in there, and no exclusion of atheists.

All atheists who are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States are just as covered by this as anyone else.
Last edited by New Chalcedon on Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fuck it all. Let the world burn - there's no way roaches could do a worse job of being decent than we have.

User avatar
United States of Raptors
Minister
 
Posts: 2011
Founded: Dec 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Raptors » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:34 pm

Being Atheist falls under freedom of religion and freedom of speech, do the math here guys.
The Archregimancy wrote:I only have one:

That most people in NSG actually know that much about history/archaeology in the first place.

User avatar
Kamchastkia
Senator
 
Posts: 3943
Founded: Jan 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kamchastkia » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:35 pm

Wisconsin9 wrote:
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Does not mean Atheists have rights in the Constitution.

CITIZENS have rights. Not specifically THEISTS, not specifically ATHEISTS, CITIZENS. If you're going to advocate stripping my legal status as a human being, then at the very least do so with a halfway legitimate argument.


I'm going to have to disagree with you, people have rights, whether you're a citizen or not you're protected by the Bill of Rights. :)

User avatar
The United Soviet Socialist Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17944
Founded: Aug 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:35 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Hinduism believes in many Gods.

No.
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Buddhism is a lifestyle not a religion.

No.
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:By the right to exercise religion. Most religions are Theist so thus it gives that right.

So it doesn't give you the right to believe in God?

There are Hindu Atheists. That does not mean the religion does not believe in God.

If it does not have a God it is not a religion.

Yes it does. Does not give you the right to not believe in God.
Gay and Proudand also a brony
Political Compass:Left: 7.76, Authoritarian: 5.6
I am: Fascist/Corporatist on economy,
Conservative on social issues(Support same sex marriage),
Anti secularist on religion,
Anti-Republican on government,
Interventionist/Imperialist on international issues

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Des-Bal, Elejamie, Fartsniffage, Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Grinning Dragon, Haganham, Ifreann, New Proviles, Pangurstan, Port Caverton, The Notorious Mad Jack, Valyxias

Advertisement

Remove ads