Gun Bans

[Czechanada]

Yes, but craving violence is not a sign of being a crazed psychotic.

Law abiding gun owners dont crave violence, so your still wrong.

Really? So why do people laugh when someone gets hurt in a comedy or cartoon, and why is getting into a fight one of the attractions of going to a bar?

[Salandriagado]

Now go and try reading the fucking discussion before jumping into the middle of it. We are talking about the currently perfectly legal background-check-less private sales that don't involve such a thing.

Your still wrong either way.

So you don't have anything resembling an argument?

[Salandriagado]

It's quoted in the very top post on this page.

So your admitting that your wrong? Got it.

No, I am pointing you happily to a 100% reliable source demonstrating that you are in fact running around waving a strawman around whilst shouting inanely. Put it down, and maybe we can try to have a fucking discussion.

[Chernoslavia]

Law abiding gun owners dont crave violence, so your still wrong.

Really? So why do people laugh when someone gets hurt in a comedy or cartoon, and why is getting into a fight one of the attractions of going to a bar?

Okay, show me a reliable source that better supports your claim.

[Penguin Union Nation]

Gun bans don't work! Except in Japan, England, Australia, and Canada.

[Chernoslavia]

So your admitting that your wrong? Got it.

No, I am pointing you happily to a 100% reliable source demonstrating that you are in fact running around waving a strawman around whilst shouting inanely. Put it down, and maybe we can try to have a fucking discussion.

Then source it or gtfo.

[Salandriagado]

No, I am pointing you happily to a 100% reliable source demonstrating that you are in fact running around waving a strawman around whilst shouting inanely. Put it down, and maybe we can try to have a fucking discussion.

Then source it or gtfo.

Since you are apparently completely incapable of scrolling up and clicking a link, here's another one.

[New England and The Maritimes]

So... RPGs are illegal in the US. Why is it we don't see a rash of crimes committed with them, again?

[Nua Corda]

Gun bans don't work! Except in Japan, England, Australia, and Canada.

That's not the bans at work there, it's the heavy regulation that comes with them. I could easily commit a mass shooting with a weapon legal under British law, and Canada actually allows the same weapon that was used at Newtown. They just regulate the fuck out of them, and so they don't end up in the wrong hands. Don't know enough about Australia or Japan, but if they allow bolt-action rifles with magazines (even internal ones) I'd still be able to carry out a massacre. Not that I ever would, just that if I wanted to, those bans would not stop me.

[Chernoslavia]

Then source it or gtfo.

Since you are apparently completely incapable of scrolling up and clicking a link, here's another one.

You still have not shown me where Bafuria has said that the militia might kill administrative staff. Thanks for embarrassing yourself. My favorite part is when you used your own source to do it.

[Chernoslavia]

So... RPGs are illegal in the US. Why is it we don't see a rash of crimes committed with them, again?

Please read the current laws before opening your mouth.

[Salandriagado]

Since you are apparently completely incapable of scrolling up and clicking a link, here's another one.

You still have not shown me where Bafuria has said that the militia might kill administrative staff. Thanks for embarrassing yourself. My favorite part is when you used your own source to do it.

Exactly in that post. Here, since clicking a link is apparently too hard for you, I'll quote it in full:

And how, exactly, are small arms going to help? That is: what are they going to do to stop a dictatorship without say, bomber wings, aircraft carriers and cruise missiles?

Missiles can bomb the ground, but only infantry can hold it.

The US armed forces currently have about 70.000 Infantrymen, the rest are people who handle logistics and maintenance.
These are the people that transport missiles from the factory to the military airfield, load the missile on the jet fighter, refuel it, clear it for takeoff, collect the timesheets of the people at the base etc.

These people are not an effective fighting force and would quickly be overrun by an armed militia, crippling the military.

[Nua Corda]

So... RPGs are illegal in the US. Why is it we don't see a rash of crimes committed with them, again?

Please read the current laws before opening your mouth.

Chill, bro, you're straining the AC

[Chernoslavia]

You still have not shown me where Bafuria has said that the militia might kill administrative staff. Thanks for embarrassing yourself. My favorite part is when you used your own source to do it.

Exactly in that post. Here, since clicking a link is apparently too hard for you, I'll quote it in full:

Missiles can bomb the ground, but only infantry can hold it.

The US armed forces currently have about 70.000 Infantrymen, the rest are people who handle logistics and maintenance.
These are the people that transport missiles from the factory to the military airfield, load the missile on the jet fighter, refuel it, clear it for takeoff, collect the timesheets of the people at the base etc.

These people are not an effective fighting force and would quickly be overrun by an armed militia, crippling the military.

Notice he said ''overrun'' not kill. But please dont stop, I need the laughter.

[Chernoslavia]

Please read the current laws before opening your mouth.

Chill, bro, you're straining the AC

Straining the what...?

[Salandriagado]

Exactly in that post. Here, since clicking a link is apparently too hard for you, I'll quote it in full:

Notice he said ''overrun'' not kill. But please dont stop, I need the laughter.

And what, exactly, do you think being overrun by an armed militia entails? Tea and biscuits?

[Nua Corda]

Exactly in that post. Here, since clicking a link is apparently too hard for you, I'll quote it in full:

Notice he said ''overrun'' not kill. But please dont stop, I need the laughter.

Overrrun implies kill or imprision in militaryspeak. You should know that.

[Nua Corda]

Chill, bro, you're straining the AC

Straining the what...?

Air Conditioning. As in, it's getting hot all up in here, ham-dog

[Chernoslavia]

Notice he said ''overrun'' not kill. But please dont stop, I need the laughter.

Overrrun implies kill, or imprision in militaryspeak. You should know that.

Yeah, it means to spread over to conquer or occupy a territory by force. Force meaning against the enemies will.

[Nua Corda]

Overrrun implies kill, or imprision in militaryspeak. You should know that.

Yeah, it means to spread over to conquer or occupy a territory by force. Force meaning against someone's will.

Not necessarily. It can also mean to take a position, capture a town, or wipe out enemy forces. All of which usually involve killing the enemy.

[Chernoslavia]

Notice he said ''overrun'' not kill. But please dont stop, I need the laughter.

And what, exactly, do you think being overrun by an armed militia entails? Tea and biscuits?

By force, but force doesnt have to include lethal actions.

[Hornesia]

So... RPGs are illegal in the US. Why is it we don't see a rash of crimes committed with them, again?

Because no one can afford them?

[Chernoslavia]

Yeah, it means to spread over to conquer or occupy a territory by force. Force meaning against someone's will.

Not necessarily. It can also mean to take a position, capture a town, or wipe out enemy forces. All of which usually involve killing the enemy.

Well, yes of course it usually does involve trying to kill the enemy, but if said enemy retreates or surrenders without suffering any fatalities you could still say they have overran them.

[Nua Corda]

And what, exactly, do you think being overrun by an armed militia entails? Tea and biscuits?

By force, but force doesnt have to include lethal actions.

When the force is by rebels, partisans, guerrillas or civie militia? It universally does.

[Nua Corda]

So... RPGs are illegal in the US. Why is it we don't see a rash of crimes committed with them, again?

Because no one can afford them?

More because the regulations on them stop people who would use them for evil from owning them. People can own them, but only if they pass a massive BATFE licensing regime.