How many pages has it been since you posted anything about the topic?
Advertisement

by AiliailiA » Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:25 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.

by Chernoslavia » Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:27 pm

by Frisivisia » Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:28 pm

by Chernoslavia » Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:30 pm

by Frisivisia » Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:34 pm
Chernoslavia wrote:Frisivisia wrote:Here's what I get every time you post on a gun thread:
Person 1: Blah blah, gun control.
Person 2: Blah blah, no gun control.
You: Person1, you don't even know anything about guns, just go away. *Picture of Diane Feinstein not knowing about guns*
...This is only the 2nd time I made that mistake.

by Dyakovo » Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:35 pm

by Chernoslavia » Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:37 pm

by Grinning Dragon » Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:41 pm
Copenhagen Metropolis wrote:Grinning Dragon wrote:
It is a valid argument in that being that all laws must fall within the guidelines of the Constitution.
It is a good argument for it being right, and there are provisions to change the Constitution by Amendments or by a Constitutional Convention.
It's not a good argument for it being right, no. That something is a law is a good argument for it being obeyed and upheld - that something is a law is not a good argument for it being a good law. Bad laws can be changed, and should be, if the only ''argument'' against it is that 'the constitution says so'.

by Chernoslavia » Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:45 pm
Grinning Dragon wrote:Copenhagen Metropolis wrote:It's not a good argument for it being right, no. That something is a law is a good argument for it being obeyed and upheld - that something is a law is not a good argument for it being a good law. Bad laws can be changed, and should be, if the only ''argument'' against it is that 'the constitution says so'.
Bad laws can be changed, and if it is met with resistance then the only recourse is to challenge it on Constitutional grounds.
Just because a law is good doesn't mean it is Constitutional, this country isn't a democracy, it is a Constitutional Republic.
What good what it do, to have a Constitutional framework if it is going to be ignored just to pass a law? If that is the case, maybe Congress can pass a bill and the prez, can sign it into law, that you are now being forced to house soldiers, or you cannot be critical of your president or your elected officials, and doing so is now considered treasonous.

by The Black Forrest » Sun Feb 03, 2013 7:46 pm

by Distruzio » Sun Feb 03, 2013 7:49 pm

by Chernoslavia » Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:02 pm

by Grinning Dragon » Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:05 pm
Dilange wrote:Utah Sheriffs warn Obama that they don't understand laws.

by Truziodis » Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:16 pm

by Inyourfaceistan » Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:17 pm
Distruzio wrote:Good for them.... although I'm not sure where you are going with the invocation of States Rights.


by The Republic Of Ardenhelm » Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:20 pm
Galiantus II wrote:The Utah Sheriffs' Association has issued fightin' words to President Obama. In a stern letter, the organization hints they would go to war against the federal government in the event their citizens are denied their right to bear arms against criminals and "tyrannical subjugation." The organization urges the government to "make no mistake … we will enforce the rights to our citizens guaranteed by the Constitution." In conclusion, the letter states: "We, like you, swore a solemn oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, and we are prepared to trade our lives for the preservation of its traditional interpretation." And there we were thinking New Hampshire was the "Live Free or Die" state.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/utah-sher ... le/2519176
And the letter: http://www.utahsheriffs.org/USA-Home_fi ... Letter.pdf
I am completely in agreement with the sheriffs of my state. Obama, remember: it was the states that came first, not the Union.

by Dyakovo » Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:24 pm

by Grinning Dragon » Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:25 pm

by Dyakovo » Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:28 pm

by Norstal » Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:30 pm
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Dyakovo » Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:32 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alris, Arval Va, Bienenhalde, Dakran, Dazchan, El Lazaro, Enclave World Government, Eternal Algerstonia, EuroStralia, Galloism, Ifreann, Ilova, Islamic Holy Sites, Juansonia, Nantoraka, Port Caverton, Rary, Saiwana, Sarcassia, Soviet Haaregrad, The Most Grand Feline Empire, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement