Parthenon wrote:Neo Art wrote:Parthenon wrote:Ryadn wrote:Parthenon wrote:This thread is terrible. I can say without a shadow of a doubt a good 75+% of you have never listened to a complete savage nation show and are just going off of wikipedia/youtube to make your comments. Dr. Savage is an accomplished author, commentator, businessman, and scientist holding an earned PHD from Berkley and two masters degrees.
And I should care... why? Hateful violence-mongers can't be well educated?
Michael has never advocated violence, your comment is libelous at best. I suggest you watch your posting.
Or....what? Michael Savage will report her?
Guess you don't listen to his show. He has publicly stated in recent weeks that he will file charges against any and all such claims as he has done in combating the British Home Office. Hell, he already has the legal defense fund started. http://www.michaelsavage.wnd.com/?pageId=134
He'll have a hard time winning.
Special rules apply in the case of statements made in the press concerning public figures, which can be used as a defense. A series of court rulings led by New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) established that for a public official (or other legitimate public figure) to win a libel case, the statement must have been published knowing it to be false or with reckless disregard to its truth, (also known as actual malice).[15]




