NATION

PASSWORD

Barack Obama: 4 Years In Review

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Obama?

The Messiah
19
3%
A great president
74
11%
He's ok
162
24%
Bad president
78
12%
COMMUNIST!!!
41
6%
A socialist
47
7%
Average liberal
81
12%
A right-winger
40
6%
Typical statist
55
8%
I prefer Bonobos.
77
11%
 
Total votes : 674

User avatar
EnragedMaldivians
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8450
Founded: Feb 01, 2010
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby EnragedMaldivians » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:39 pm

North Stradia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Again, it isn't theft if you consent to it.

I don't consent.

Do you consent to sex by being married?


There needs to be a whole legal and policing infrastructure in place so that your property and money are protected in the first place. That infrastructure costs money to maintain.

You want the benefits of that infrastructure without paying for it. Which kind of sounds like theft.
Taking a break.

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:39 pm

Nadkor wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Ignored? I was under the impression that Congress stopped him from shutting down Guantanamo Bay by collectively refusing to house the prisoners there anywhere else.


Yeah, but then a significant number of the charges of failure that are levelled at Obama can be directly attributed to the GOP's obstructionism.

Not that one. This one happened during the time the Democrats controlled both houses.

User avatar
EnragedMaldivians
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8450
Founded: Feb 01, 2010
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby EnragedMaldivians » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:41 pm

Laerod wrote:
Nadkor wrote:
Yeah, but then a significant number of the charges of failure that are levelled at Obama can be directly attributed to the GOP's obstructionism.

Not that one. This one happened during the time the Democrats controlled both houses.


But they didn't control the senate with a supermajority, which allowed the Republicans to obstruct by making use of the filibuster. Which they did. To an unprecedented degree.
Taking a break.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:48 pm

Laerod wrote:
Nadkor wrote:
Yeah, but then a significant number of the charges of failure that are levelled at Obama can be directly attributed to the GOP's obstructionism.

Not that one. This one happened during the time the Democrats controlled both houses.


The nonexistent time?

President Obama DID NOT control Congress for Two Years!

The Big Lies of Mitt Romney V: Obama Had A Super-Majority In Congress For Two Years
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
The Republic of Lanos
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17727
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Republic of Lanos » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:49 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Laerod wrote:Not that one. This one happened during the time the Democrats controlled both houses.


The nonexistent time?

President Obama DID NOT control Congress for Two Years!

The Big Lies of Mitt Romney V: Obama Had A Super-Majority In Congress For Two Years

So those Democratic majorities didn't exist? :eyebrow:

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:50 pm

The Republic of Lanos wrote:

So those Democratic majorities didn't exist? :eyebrow:

For roughly four mouths.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:53 pm

North Stradia wrote:
Condunum wrote:Technically, it was a negative claim, but the burden of proof is on him, considering it is the original claim.

And he is wrong.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

Providing for the general welfare is a duty of Congress.

The interpretation of "general welfare" is up for debate.

Also, "shall have Power to" does not imply a duty; it implies a right.

No, it implies a power, not a right. Yes, I used the wrong word, but that's not the issue here.

And how is it up for debate? The have the power to provide for the general welfare. That's basically saying that they have the power to provide for the people what necessities they ask for that aren't blocked by another part of the constitution.

North Stradia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Again, it isn't theft if you consent to it.

I don't consent.

Do you consent to sex by being married?

As mav said, shitty analogy is shit.

The only way you could possibly construe this to make sense is that you get to have sex with her, but she doesn't get to do the same with you. Somehow.
password scrambled

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:12 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Laerod wrote:Not that one. This one happened during the time the Democrats controlled both houses.


The nonexistent time?

President Obama DID NOT control Congress for Two Years!

The Big Lies of Mitt Romney V: Obama Had A Super-Majority In Congress For Two Years

Did I say Obama, or did I say Democrats? Did the GOP shoot down closing Guantanamo, or did the Democrats?

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:22 pm

North Stradia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Again, it isn't theft if you consent to it.

I don't consent.

Do you consent to sex by being married?

What a crap analogy.

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:26 pm

North Stradia wrote:Obama was just sworn into his second term as President.

I think this is a good time to review what he has done over his past four years.

I think he broke a lot of his promises. He campaigned on ending the wars, yet we are still very much a nation at war. He has also ignored his promises to shut down Guantanamo. I'm happy he finally came out and supported gay marriage though.

What do you think?


Where did he say he would end wars? He was one of the few who boldly (and correctly) opposed the invasion of Iraq as having nothing at all to do with combating terrorism. Fine. But as far as I know he always supported action in Afghanistan because it did in fact directly impinge upon the capacity of a state to support international terrorism.

I'm with him on both counts.

He has also brought the NLRB back to its original purposes, which means it no longer devotes its energies to persecuting injured workers.

He has made most aspects of government much more open. We have access to information that we never had before. This includes what the NRA hates, info about those trying to buy assault weapons.
Last edited by Pope Joan on Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:31 pm

Pope Joan wrote:
North Stradia wrote:Obama was just sworn into his second term as President.

I think this is a good time to review what he has done over his past four years.

I think he broke a lot of his promises. He campaigned on ending the wars, yet we are still very much a nation at war. He has also ignored his promises to shut down Guantanamo. I'm happy he finally came out and supported gay marriage though.

What do you think?


Where did he say he would end wars? He was one of the few who boldly (and correctly) opposed the invasion of Iraq as having nothing at all to do with combating terrorism. Fine. But as far as I know he always supported action in Afghanistan because it did in fact directly impinge upon the capacity of a state to support international terrorism.

I'm with him on both counts.

He has also brought the NLRB back to its original purposes, which means it no longer devotes its energies to persecuting injured workers.

He has made most aspects of government much more open. We have access to information that we never had before. This includes what the NRA hates, info about those trying to buy assault weapons.

He made a promise to end the Iraq war in a way that the military felt would be appropriate. Funnily enough, that's a promise he kept.

User avatar
Howdoyoudoland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 788
Founded: Jan 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Howdoyoudoland » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:41 pm

He's done horrible, 0/10, incredibly awful President.
You know what? I quit, this place blows.

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:42 pm

Stock market up 700%, unemployment cut by a third, poverty down, foreclosures basically vanished from the scene, medical coverage expanded, real incomes up, more manufacturing growth in one term than we've had in the past decade and a half or so. Yeah, I'd say he did pretty well.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
Howdoyoudoland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 788
Founded: Jan 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Howdoyoudoland » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:43 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
North Stradia wrote:The interpretation of "general welfare" is up for debate.

Regardless, it allows for redistribution of wealth.

...No it doesn't.
You know what? I quit, this place blows.

User avatar
Khodoristan
Minister
 
Posts: 2325
Founded: Jul 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Khodoristan » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:43 pm

Howdoyoudoland wrote:He's done horrible, 0/10, incredibly awful President.


Proof.
Economic Left/Right: -3.88, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.69 (centrist)
DERECON: 1 2 3 4 5

REST IN PEACE UNDERØATH 11/30/97-1/26/13
Pro: NATO, SEATO, ANZUS, EU, ROC, ROK, Japan, Israel, Russia, Turkey, India, gay rights, fiscal and social liberalism, Christianity, Judaism
Against: Iran, Pakistan, China, DPRK, Venezuela, racism, sexism, abortion, Islam, conservatism, military aggression

I'm a nihilistic Catholic. Yes, we do exist.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:44 pm

Howdoyoudoland wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Regardless, it allows for redistribution of wealth.

...No it doesn't.

Source?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:45 pm

New England and The Maritimes wrote:Stock market up 700%, unemployment cut by a third, poverty down, foreclosures basically vanished from the scene, medical coverage expanded, real incomes up, more manufacturing growth in one term than we've had in the past decade and a half or so. Yeah, I'd say he did pretty well.

Shame he isn't pushing for same sex marriage in his 2nd term. The legacy he'd leave behind with that..

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:48 pm

Laerod wrote:
Pope Joan wrote:
Where did he say he would end wars? He was one of the few who boldly (and correctly) opposed the invasion of Iraq as having nothing at all to do with combating terrorism. Fine. But as far as I know he always supported action in Afghanistan because it did in fact directly impinge upon the capacity of a state to support international terrorism.

I'm with him on both counts.

He has also brought the NLRB back to its original purposes, which means it no longer devotes its energies to persecuting injured workers.

He has made most aspects of government much more open. We have access to information that we never had before. This includes what the NRA hates, info about those trying to buy assault weapons.

He made a promise to end the Iraq war in a way that the military felt would be appropriate. Funnily enough, that's a promise he kept.

Strange that people forget that.

User avatar
Howdoyoudoland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 788
Founded: Jan 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Howdoyoudoland » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:48 pm

Khodoristan wrote:
Howdoyoudoland wrote:He's done horrible, 0/10, incredibly awful President.


Proof.


We've got more debt, we're still at war, the economy is barely dragging itself along at this point, government is more divided than it's been in 2 decades (at least), the nation is more divided than it's been in 2 decades, etc.

I could go on, you know.
You know what? I quit, this place blows.

User avatar
Howdoyoudoland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 788
Founded: Jan 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Howdoyoudoland » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:49 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Howdoyoudoland wrote:...No it doesn't.

Source?


In what way can you possibly stretch the concept of "General Welfare" to mean "Wealth Redistribution"?

It's asinine.
You know what? I quit, this place blows.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:50 pm

Howdoyoudoland wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Source?


In what way can you possibly stretch the concept of "General Welfare" to mean "Wealth Redistribution"?

It's asinine.

So then it allows for wealth distribution.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:51 pm

Howdoyoudoland wrote:
Khodoristan wrote:
Proof.


We've got more debt, we're still at war, the economy is barely dragging itself along at this point, government is more divided than it's been in 2 decades (at least), the nation is more divided than it's been in 2 decades, etc.

I could go on, you know.


True, but it's improving as quickly as is sensible; beyond his ability to stop; it's doing great; nothing to do with him; and nothing to do with him, respectively.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:51 pm

Howdoyoudoland wrote:We've got more debt,

Not important as long as we keep growing.

Howdoyoudoland wrote:we're still at war,

Yes, the plan was to leave in 2014. Always has been.

Howdoyoudoland wrote:the economy is barely dragging itself along at this point,

2.6% growth and hundreds of thousands of jobs per month is not "barely dragging".

Howdoyoudoland wrote:government is more divided than it's been in 2 decades (at least), the nation is more divided than it's been in 2 decades, etc.

This isn't his fault. Blame the GOP.
Last edited by Divair on Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Western cuba
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6472
Founded: Jul 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Western cuba » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:54 pm

I've been a bit disappointed, but most of that is due to congress being too arrogant to actually do there job. It made me sick when congress decided to leave the fiscal cliff debate still standing and leave capital hill for vacation near the deadline.

The only thing I ever really was opposed to during Obama's term was his intervention in Libya, but that's probably because I'm a dove.

If I was Obama I would press for an amendment pushing for same-sex marriage. (I know this is hotly debated, so before I go further I want everyone to know I'm not homosexual).
Now known as the Technological State of Adros, the successor state of Western Cuba

User avatar
Howdoyoudoland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 788
Founded: Jan 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Howdoyoudoland » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:55 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Howdoyoudoland wrote:
In what way can you possibly stretch the concept of "General Welfare" to mean "Wealth Redistribution"?

It's asinine.

So then it allows for wealth distribution.


If there were a clause that specifically said, "And allows for Congress to confiscate and redistribute wealth without justification as they see fit"? Sure, then it probably would.

It doesn't.
You know what? I quit, this place blows.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alvecia, Bienenhalde, Blargoblarg, Celritannia, Dimetrodon Empire, Duvniask, Enaia, Eyreland, Fractalnavel, Galactic Powers, Mearisse, North Samean Red Rhotfola, Ostroeuropa, Saint Monkey, Saitam and Aperac, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Uminaku, Warvick

Advertisement

Remove ads