NATION

PASSWORD

Atheism is a faith

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Maledixit
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 186
Founded: Mar 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Maledixit » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:52 am

Enadail wrote:
Maledixit wrote:
ORLY?


Did you notice the use of the word "ABSOLUTE"? It changes the meaning, significantly. Faith is defined as the complete trust or confidence in something without proof. It is VERY different from slight acceptance or trust without proof.


Sorry but no. You said no one had said something, so I quoted two people that had. Disproven. Accept that.
Last edited by Maledixit on Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:53 am

Maledixit wrote:
Pradja wrote:
:) sorry thats my question really: Because I simply answered your question and did not try to defend it, it means I do not fit your description, so am I not an atheist?


Ok finally, you cooperate.

You think he wasn't cooperating? :palm:
password scrambled

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:53 am

Maledixit wrote:
Enadail wrote:
Did you notice the use of the word "ABSOLUTE"? It changes the meaning, significantly. Faith is defined as the complete trust or confidence in something without proof. It is VERY different from slight acceptance or trust without proof.


Sorry but no. You said no one had said something, so I quoted two people that had. Disproven. Accept that.

Did you just decide to not read what he said?
password scrambled

User avatar
Hallistar
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6144
Founded: Nov 21, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Hallistar » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:53 am

Maledixit wrote:
Pradja wrote:
:) sorry thats my question really: Because I simply answered your question and did not try to defend it, it means I do not fit your description, so am I not an atheist?


Ok finally, you cooperate.

But the answer is, I never made an implication that militant fundamentalism was inherent in all atheists. In fact, I already made it clear that others had misconceived the message. And that, rather, I was implying that being an atheist or theists does not make either exempt from that trap, and both can also escape it.

I do not care if you think of yourself as an 'atheist' or 'theist' or not to whatever description I have though. Because surely the notion of freethought is about not needing anyone else's approval. Not really sure what you're trying to attempt here, frankly. I'm just trying to humour you.


You kept on going about how the "atheist label" makes atheists think they're smarter and more socially aware than theists. And that they have faith in that label (??).

User avatar
Enadail
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5799
Founded: Jun 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Enadail » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:53 am

Maledixit wrote:
Enadail wrote:Wait... all THEISTS get thrown at them? Most of the world is theists, in many places atheism is outlawed, and even in the US, atheists are viewed as less trustworthy then rapists, and its the theists who have stuff thrown at them? No, sorry, not taking that. Its a bullshit victim mentality of theists and I won't have any part of it.

In the end, someone is theists because they choose to ignore the very basis for logic: evidence is required to support a claim. It has nothing to do with their intellectual capacity.


Here is a scary realization. Not every single location on the planet has the same social context.


I'd love citations of theists being on the attack for being theists. And I don't mean theists being attacked for believing in the wrong religion or god or whatever, for being theists.

Anywhere you go in the world, theists are the significant majority. I can't think of any social context where theists are the ones who don't have the control.

And yes, atheists are persecuted world wide.

User avatar
Pradja
Diplomat
 
Posts: 723
Founded: Mar 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Pradja » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:55 am

Maledixit wrote:
Pradja wrote:
:) sorry thats my question really: Because I simply answered your question and did not try to defend it, it means I do not fit your description, so am I not an atheist?


Ok finally, you cooperate.

But the answer is, I never made an implication that militant fundamentalism was inherent in all atheists. In fact, I already made it clear that others had misconceived the message. And that, rather, I was implying that being an atheist or theists does not make either exempt from that trap, and both can also escape it.

I do not care if you think of yourself as an 'atheist' or 'theist' or not to whatever description I have though. Because surely the notion of freethought is about not needing anyone else's approval. Not really sure what you're trying to attempt here, frankly. I'm just trying to humour you.

I was just asking for your opinion on that matter, nothing more.

But a point I would try to make is this; you seem to assume that the label atheist generates a feeling of superiority over others, correct? While there are without a doubt indivudals or groups that would absolutely fit that perception, its important to note that the same can be said about theist or anybody who has an opinion really, hence I find the reasoning behind your question somewhate strange.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57888
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:56 am

I don't know if he's dropped the persecuted thing because he's realized how wrong he is, or if he's just ignoring the posts.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Maledixit
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 186
Founded: Mar 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Maledixit » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:56 am

No, I'm reading it, I still think the true colours behind this thread and the posters in it, are simply victim complexes and group polarization.

And ok, I guess that does speak alot of volume and clarity.

I guess I won't ask any of you to introspect, because I know you won't. Existential crisis and all.
Last edited by Maledixit on Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:57 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57888
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:56 am

Maledixit wrote:So basically, the true colours behind this thread and the posters in it, is simply victim complexes and group polarization?

Well ok, I guess that does speak alot of volume and clarity.


I've already explained why Atheists are persecuted worldwide, except in maybe one or two countries.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:57 am

Maledixit wrote:So basically, the true colours behind this thread and the posters in it, is simply victim complexes and group polarization?

Well ok, I guess that does speak alot of volume and clarity.


When you can't actually argue, just claim all your opponents are biased and illogical and that it proves you're the only reasonable one.

This guy gets it.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:58 am

Maledixit wrote:No, I'm reading it, I still think the true colours behind this thread and the posters in it, is simply victim complexes and group polarization.

And ok, I guess that does speak alot of volume and clarity.

Victim complexes? No, it's a realization of the persecution of atheists worldwide, and the acknowledgement of severe distrust of us.

If anyone is delusional here, it's you.
password scrambled

User avatar
Maledixit
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 186
Founded: Mar 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Maledixit » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:58 am

I will say though, I kind of find it hilarious how you all need to gang up on a brand new member for having their own views, just to feel secure.

If that's how you get your kicks then. Haha ok. It doesn't bother me, I just think it's kind of funny.
Last edited by Maledixit on Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:58 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57888
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:59 am

Maledixit wrote:I will say though, I kind of find it hilarious how you all need to gang up on a brand new member, just to feel secure.

If that's how you get your kicks then. Haha ok. It doesn't bother me, I just think it's kind of funny.


We're not ganging up.
It's an open forum. It's split roughly 50/50 between theists and atheists.
The problem is, you've said things so profoundly stupid that none of them are coming to help you, and all of us are ticked off.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:59 am

Look, I think all the guy is saying that theists are being persecuted. It's true. Theists are being persecuted by other theists. Christians are being persecuted in places where they are minority and interestingly, the opposite is true.

What I don't and what I'll never, ever, ever accept is that atheists aren't being persecuted anywhere. Between the prejudice that atheists receive by society as a whole and the general hatred against them, it is an undeniable fact that they are hated everywhere, anywhere. Just because they're not being actively hunted doesn't mean there's no persecution against them.
Last edited by Norstal on Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Pradja
Diplomat
 
Posts: 723
Founded: Mar 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Pradja » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:59 am

Maledixit wrote:No, I'm reading it, I still think the true colours behind this thread and the posters in it, are simply victim complexes and group polarization.

And ok, I guess that does speak alot of volume and clarity.

I guess I won't ask any of you to introspect, because I know you won't. Existential crisis and all.

Excuse me?

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:00 pm

Norstal wrote:Look, I think all the guy is saying that theists are being persecuted. It's true. Theists are being persecuted by other theists. Christians are being persecuted in places where they are minority and interestingly, the opposite is true.

What I don't and what I'll never, ever, ever accept is that atheists aren't being persecuted anywhere. Between the prejudice that atheists receive by society as a whole and the general hatred against them, it is an undeniable fact that they are hated everywhere, anywhere.

Everywhere?
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Duvniask
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6337
Founded: Aug 30, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Duvniask » Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:00 pm

Maledixit wrote:I will say though, I kind of find it hilarious how you all need to gang up on a brand new member for having their own views, just to feel secure.

If that's how you get your kicks then. Haha ok. It doesn't bother me, I just think it's kind of funny.


If someone is ignorant and uses worthless arguments, then yes, they are deserving of criticism.
Last edited by Duvniask on Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
One of these days, I'm going to burst a blood vessel in my brain.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:01 pm

Maledixit wrote:I will say though, I kind of find it hilarious how you all need to gang up on a brand new member for having their own views, just to feel secure.

If that's how you get your kicks then. Haha ok. It doesn't bother me, I just think it's kind of funny.


See? Masterful.

Seriously though, if having reasoned debate and actually making coherent points is "ganging up on a new board member", yes, we're guilty as hell.

But honestly, if you get this upset when people don't bow down and agree with you every time you voice an opinion, you won't like it here.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Hallistar
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6144
Founded: Nov 21, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Hallistar » Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:01 pm

Maledixit wrote:No, I'm reading it, I still think the true colours behind this thread and the posters in it, is simply victim complexes and group polarization.


Maledixit wrote:I will say though, I kind of find it hilarious how you all need to gang up on a brand new member for having their own views, just to feel secure.

And ok, I guess that does speak alot of volume and clarity.


--Keeps mentioning about how the "atheist label" makes atheists think they're smarter and better than theists

--Says that Atheism is a faith

--Calls atheists 'defensive' when they post clarifying that atheism at its core is the lack of theism

--Thinks that atheists are taking this as personal attacks

--Thinks that the atheists on here suffer victim complexes because they mentioned how theists aren't the ones being persecuted, by discussing the persecution that atheists in countries face, as well as their social statuses.

I think the only thing we're seeing so far, is that you're just wasting our time.
Last edited by Hallistar on Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
West Macedonia
Envoy
 
Posts: 305
Founded: Mar 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby West Macedonia » Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:01 pm

atheism is not a faith :shock:
In the name of the blood and the sun, the dagger and the gun, Christ protect this soldier, a full blooded Macedonian.

Западна Македонија
West Macedonia
West Mazedonien
পশ্চিমী ম্যাসেডোনিয়া
مقدونيا الغربية
מערב מקדוניה
마케도니아 서부

User avatar
Mexicanada
Diplomat
 
Posts: 527
Founded: Dec 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mexicanada » Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:01 pm

Everyone's persecuted at some point in their life.
For those people who are going to ask for a source:here's your source

/argument
Political Compass: (OOC)
Left/Right 5.52
Libertarian/Authoritarian 1.23
IC:
All hail the mighty Chespin.
Short military description.

Religious: I consider myself an Agnostic Christian, if that makes any sense. I've been asked too many times to explain, so if you ask, I won't explain.
Economy: I am a firm supporter of capitalism and economic libertarianism.
General: I enjoy a good, intelligent debate, but I can get pretty heated on some subjects.
I've been away for a few months, and I'm trying to get back into the community so bear with me hahaha

User avatar
Maledixit
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 186
Founded: Mar 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Maledixit » Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:02 pm

Norstal wrote:Look, I think all the guy is saying that theists are being persecuted. It's true. Theists are being persecuted by other theists. Christians are being persecuted in places where they are minority and interestingly, the opposite is true.

What I don't and what I'll never, ever, ever accept is that atheists aren't being persecuted anywhere. Between the prejudice that atheists receive by society as a whole and the general hatred against them, it is an undeniable fact that they are hated everywhere, anywhere.


I think every demographic is persecuted somewhat. And also, all demographics can be seen as not as persecuted as they think they may be somewhat.

But I do think that it's become very apparent that many people here have identified with atheism so strongly, to the point of militant defending, because they needed a victim complex to hide behind so they can justify why life sucks for them.

And I'm glad that it's become clearer, because I was wondering. But really, it's a good thing, because now this thread makes a whole lot more sense.
Last edited by Maledixit on Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mexicanada
Diplomat
 
Posts: 527
Founded: Dec 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mexicanada » Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:03 pm

Maledixit wrote:I will say though, I kind of find it hilarious how you all need to gang up on a brand new member for having their own views, just to feel secure.

If that's how you get your kicks then. Haha ok. It doesn't bother me, I just think it's kind of funny.

It's okay. These guys did the exact same thing to me, too. You get used to it after a while... :hug:
Political Compass: (OOC)
Left/Right 5.52
Libertarian/Authoritarian 1.23
IC:
All hail the mighty Chespin.
Short military description.

Religious: I consider myself an Agnostic Christian, if that makes any sense. I've been asked too many times to explain, so if you ask, I won't explain.
Economy: I am a firm supporter of capitalism and economic libertarianism.
General: I enjoy a good, intelligent debate, but I can get pretty heated on some subjects.
I've been away for a few months, and I'm trying to get back into the community so bear with me hahaha

User avatar
Pradja
Diplomat
 
Posts: 723
Founded: Mar 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Pradja » Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:03 pm

Maledixit wrote:
Norstal wrote:Look, I think all the guy is saying that theists are being persecuted. It's true. Theists are being persecuted by other theists. Christians are being persecuted in places where they are minority and interestingly, the opposite is true.

What I don't and what I'll never, ever, ever accept is that atheists aren't being persecuted anywhere. Between the prejudice that atheists receive by society as a whole and the general hatred against them, it is an undeniable fact that they are hated everywhere, anywhere.


I think every demographic is persecuted somewhat. And also, all demographics can be seen as not as persecuted as they think they may be somewhat.

But I do think that it's become very apparent that many people here have identified with atheism so strongly, to the point of militant defending, because they needed a victim complex to hide behind so they can justify why life sucks for them.

And I'm glad that it's become clearer, because I was wondering. But really, it's a good thing, because now this thread makes a whole lot more sense.

It might also have to do with you dropping the "existential crisis"-bomb on us.

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:03 pm

Mexicanada wrote:Everyone's persecuted at some point in their life.
For those people who are going to ask for a source: here's your source


Your source states that it has to be systematic mistreatment.

Your source also does not state that persecution is universal.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Adawarastan, Azov steel 2022, Cannot think of a name, Democracylandistan, Democratic Poopland, El Lazaro, Elves Liberation Movement, Emotional Support Crocodile, Eternal Algerstonia, Fartsniffage, Gerkau, Imperiul romanum, Lurinsk, Norse Inuit Union, Sheizou, The Black Forrest, The Empire Of The Sutherlands

Advertisement

Remove ads