NATION

PASSWORD

should abortion be legal?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

should abortion be legal?

Yes
328
72%
No
125
28%
 
Total votes : 453

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:59 am

Novairia wrote:
Ryaanistan wrote:Yes. No one owns the rights to a woman's body. Just like no one owns the rights to a man's body. End of discussion. Good night!


:o ... Does that mean I have a say?

Sure... Right up until the point at which your body is no longer involved in the process.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Guardland
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 6
Founded: Nov 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Guardland » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:06 am

The Catechism of the Catholic Church

2270 Human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception. From the first moment of his existence, a human being must be recognized as having the rights of a person - among which is the inviolable right of every innocent being to life.

Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you.
My frame was not hidden from you, when I was being made in secret, intricately wrought in the depths of the earth.


2271 Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable. Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or a means, is gravely contrary to the moral law:

You shall not kill the embryo by abortion and shall not cause the newborn to perish.
God, the Lord of life, has entrusted to men the noble mission of safeguarding life, and men must carry it out in a manner worthy of themselves. Life must be protected with the utmost care from the moment of conception: abortion and infanticide are abominable crimes.


2272 Formal cooperation in an abortion constitutes a grave offense. The Church attaches the canonical penalty of excommunication to this crime against human life. "A person who procures a completed abortion incurs excommunication latae sententiae," "by the very commission of the offense," and subject to the conditions provided by Canon Law. The Church does not thereby intend to restrict the scope of mercy. Rather, she makes clear the gravity of the crime committed, the irreparable harm done to the innocent who is put to death, as well as to the parents and the whole of society.

2273 The inalienable right to life of every innocent human individual is a constitutive element of a civil society and its legislation:

"The inalienable rights of the person must be recognized and respected by civil society and the political authority. These human rights depend neither on single individuals nor on parents; nor do they represent a concession made by society and the state; they belong to human nature and are inherent in the person by virtue of the creative act from which the person took his origin. Among such fundamental rights one should mention in this regard every human being's right to life and physical integrity from the moment of conception until death."
"The moment a positive law deprives a category of human beings of the protection which civil legislation ought to accord them, the state is denying the equality of all before the law. When the state does not place its power at the service of the rights of each citizen, and in particular of the more vulnerable, the very foundations of a state based on law are undermined. . . . As a consequence of the respect and protection which must be ensured for the unborn child from the moment of conception, the law must provide appropriate penal sanctions for every deliberate violation of the child's rights."

2274 Since it must be treated from conception as a person, the embryo must be defended in its integrity, cared for, and healed, as far as possible, like any other human being.

Prenatal diagnosis is morally licit, "if it respects the life and integrity of the embryo and the human fetus and is directed toward its safe guarding or healing as an individual. . . . It is gravely opposed to the moral law when this is done with the thought of possibly inducing an abortion, depending upon the results: a diagnosis must not be the equivalent of a death sentence."

2275 "One must hold as licit procedures carried out on the human embryo which respect the life and integrity of the embryo and do not involve disproportionate risks for it, but are directed toward its healing the improvement of its condition of health, or its individual survival."

"It is immoral to produce human embryos intended for exploitation as disposable biological material."

"Certain attempts to influence chromosomic or genetic inheritance are not therapeutic but are aimed at producing human beings selected according to sex or other predetermined qualities. Such manipulations are contrary to the personal dignity of the human being and his integrity and identity" which are unique and unrepeatable.




Obviously, abortion shouldn't be legal.
Last edited by Guardland on Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:07 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:10 am

Guardland wrote:<snip>

Unless you live in the Vatican, the opinion of the Roman Catholic Church doesn't matter.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:11 am

Guardland wrote:The Catechism of the Catholic Church

2270 Human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception. From the first moment of his existence, a human being must be recognized as having the rights of a person - among which is the inviolable right of every innocent being to life.

Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you.
My frame was not hidden from you, when I was being made in secret, intricately wrought in the depths of the earth.


2271 Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable. Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or a means, is gravely contrary to the moral law:

You shall not kill the embryo by abortion and shall not cause the newborn to perish.
God, the Lord of life, has entrusted to men the noble mission of safeguarding life, and men must carry it out in a manner worthy of themselves. Life must be protected with the utmost care from the moment of conception: abortion and infanticide are abominable crimes.


2272 Formal cooperation in an abortion constitutes a grave offense. The Church attaches the canonical penalty of excommunication to this crime against human life. "A person who procures a completed abortion incurs excommunication latae sententiae," "by the very commission of the offense," and subject to the conditions provided by Canon Law. The Church does not thereby intend to restrict the scope of mercy. Rather, she makes clear the gravity of the crime committed, the irreparable harm done to the innocent who is put to death, as well as to the parents and the whole of society.

2273 The inalienable right to life of every innocent human individual is a constitutive element of a civil society and its legislation:

"The inalienable rights of the person must be recognized and respected by civil society and the political authority. These human rights depend neither on single individuals nor on parents; nor do they represent a concession made by society and the state; they belong to human nature and are inherent in the person by virtue of the creative act from which the person took his origin. Among such fundamental rights one should mention in this regard every human being's right to life and physical integrity from the moment of conception until death."
"The moment a positive law deprives a category of human beings of the protection which civil legislation ought to accord them, the state is denying the equality of all before the law. When the state does not place its power at the service of the rights of each citizen, and in particular of the more vulnerable, the very foundations of a state based on law are undermined. . . . As a consequence of the respect and protection which must be ensured for the unborn child from the moment of conception, the law must provide appropriate penal sanctions for every deliberate violation of the child's rights."

2274 Since it must be treated from conception as a person, the embryo must be defended in its integrity, cared for, and healed, as far as possible, like any other human being.

Prenatal diagnosis is morally licit, "if it respects the life and integrity of the embryo and the human fetus and is directed toward its safe guarding or healing as an individual. . . . It is gravely opposed to the moral law when this is done with the thought of possibly inducing an abortion, depending upon the results: a diagnosis must not be the equivalent of a death sentence."

2275 "One must hold as licit procedures carried out on the human embryo which respect the life and integrity of the embryo and do not involve disproportionate risks for it, but are directed toward its healing the improvement of its condition of health, or its individual survival."

"It is immoral to produce human embryos intended for exploitation as disposable biological material."

"Certain attempts to influence chromosomic or genetic inheritance are not therapeutic but are aimed at producing human beings selected according to sex or other predetermined qualities. Such manipulations are contrary to the personal dignity of the human being and his integrity and identity" which are unique and unrepeatable.




Obviously, abortion shouldn't be legal.

On what grounds? The Catholic Church has no legal bearings on a modern secular democracy. P
password scrambled

User avatar
Sophian
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 407
Founded: Dec 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Sophian » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:13 am

Risottia wrote:
Sophian wrote:
Because I think forcing another living thing to cease having a heartbeat is immoral.


Are you vegetarian?

Anyway, let's keep on the thread. The thread is about abortion being legal or illegal, not about being moral or immoral. Morality =/= law.


Of course. The meat industry is outlawed in The Sophian Federation. We replaced meat with tasty meat tasting substitutes made from soy, similar to Morning Star Chik'n.
Last edited by Sophian on Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
"We've never made the case or argued the case that somehow Osama Bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming." - Dick Cheney (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nX-KQbYXnk) on the The Tony Snow Show March 29, 2006

Bill Maher: "You have to admit that there are people who do want to kill Americans."
Mos Def: "Yeah, some of them are called the police."

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:17 am

Yes, it reduces crime, is a form of population control, and keeps an unwanted child from being born and living a miserable life.

Biologically it is murder though so I understand why people are against it. The good outweighs the bad though.
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Tubbsalot
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9196
Founded: Oct 17, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Tubbsalot » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:18 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:Biologically it is murder though

It's killing, yeah. Murder doesn't just mean "killing."
"Twats love flags." - Yootopia

User avatar
Guardland
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 6
Founded: Nov 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Guardland » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:21 am

Dyakovo wrote:Unless you live in the Vatican, the opinion of the Roman Catholic Church doesn't matter.


Nonsence. The doctrines of the Catholic Church apply to every person all around the world.


Condunum wrote:On what grounds? The Catholic Church has no legal bearings on a modern secular democracy. P


Equally nonsence. The Catholic Church has more legal bearings on modern secular democracy than any other person or organization, because it's authority comes from the highest source, God.

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:21 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:Yes, it reduces crime, is a form of population control, and keeps an unwanted child from being born and living a miserable life.

Biologically it is murder though so I understand why people are against it. The good outweighs the bad though.

There is no biological definition of murder.
password scrambled

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:23 am

Guardland wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Unless you live in the Vatican, the opinion of the Roman Catholic Church doesn't matter.


Nonsence. The doctrines of the Catholic Church apply to every person all around the world.


Condunum wrote:On what grounds? The Catholic Church has no legal bearings on a modern secular democracy. P


Equally nonsence. The Catholic Church has more legal bearings on modern secular democracy than any other person or organization, because it's authority comes from the highest source, God.

Maybe you don't know what secular means. Religion does not govern a secular nation. Your god has no place in my government.
password scrambled

User avatar
Tubbsalot
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9196
Founded: Oct 17, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Tubbsalot » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:24 am

Guardland wrote:The Catholic Church has more legal bearings on modern secular democracy than any other person or organization, because it's authority comes from the highest source, God.

I'm not sure you understand how laws work.
"Twats love flags." - Yootopia

User avatar
Novairia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 625
Founded: Feb 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Novairia » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:26 am

Threlizdun wrote:
Novairia wrote:I think it should be legal, BUT regulated. Just like drugs, just like alcohol, just like guns, legal but regulated is my stance.

A simple draft..

1. Abortion will be legal up to the point of 2.5 weeks before estimated due date. With exceptions and amendments to:
a) If the fetus becomes toxic and a threat to the mothers life, then the abortion is legal at that moment, no matter the time of pregnancy.
b) If the father (excluding rapists, divorced, etc, or ones deemed unfatherly by the court) objects to the abortion, the abortion procedure will not be carried out until a concensus is formed between the couple to proceed.
c) Family units (be it related by blood or organization) of the Mother/Father, have no say in the fetus's fate or abortion procedure. Tampering with would result in heavy monetary fines. The sole holders of the fetus decision is the Mother/Father unit.



That or have the dam kid, raise it till it is weened, then put it in the orphanarium so it can be adopted by people that want kids but can't have their own for multiple reasons.

So the father owns the woman's body, not the woman herself. It's great to know you seek centuries of regression in regards to gender equality

The fetus is not part of the womans body, it is an endosymbiont, a type of parasite that feeds off of the host until it can survive on its own / or until the host expels it.
A parasite that could not form without both the inputs of the male and female, just because the parasite resides within her womb does not mean she owns it. Parking a jointly bought car at your uncles garage does not make it his.
And for it to be "centuries" of regression (of which there is none with what I have said above you Femnazi, above is what we call equality), modern womans rights would have had to start a lot farther back.
Region: Vapor
Government: Democratic Technocracy Councils
Head of State: Lord Chairman Elad Nossral
Current RP Time: 1885-1900's
Tech Type: STEAM & STEEL

Primary service rifle: KR-86V4 revolver rifle (MTs-255 ~8.6mmLapua)
More added as I go on

4=Uneasy Peace

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:27 am

Guardland wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Unless you live in the Vatican, the opinion of the Roman Catholic Church doesn't matter.


Nonsence. The doctrines of the Catholic Church apply to every person all around the world.


Condunum wrote:On what grounds? The Catholic Church has no legal bearings on a modern secular democracy. P


Equally nonsence. The Catholic Church has more legal bearings on modern secular democracy than any other person or organization, because it's authority comes from the highest source, God.


Got any proof?
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Guardland
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 6
Founded: Nov 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Guardland » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:27 am

Condunum wrote:Maybe you don't know what secular means. Religion does not govern a secular nation. Your god has no place in my government.


Religion does not govern any nation. It's political role is to lay down the moral law to which the nation must abide to. Therefore, God does have a place in your government.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:27 am

Guardland wrote:
Condunum wrote:Maybe you don't know what secular means. Religion does not govern a secular nation. Your god has no place in my government.


Religion does not govern any nation. It's political role is to lay down the moral law to which the nation must abide to. Therefore, God does have a place in your government.


You got any proof or not.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:28 am

Tubbsalot wrote:
Guardland wrote:The Catholic Church has more legal bearings on modern secular democracy than any other person or organization, because it's authority comes from the highest source, God.

I'm not sure you understand how laws work.

Ah ah, secular law. Splitting hairs, though.
password scrambled

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:29 am

Condunum wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:Yes, it reduces crime, is a form of population control, and keeps an unwanted child from being born and living a miserable life.

Biologically it is murder though so I understand why people are against it. The good outweighs the bad though.

There is no biological definition of murder.


OK, it is killing. I will say it is also murder because it is pre-planned by the woman. Killing something on purpose even with just one cell is murder. The college biology teacher said this is why he views abortion as wrong. We all start as a single cell.

Abortion is sad, I wish we made it easier for people to get steralized. Encouraging this with propoganda campaigns would be a good step in the right direction. Uneducated and poor people should be encouraged to get steralized.
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:30 am

Guardland wrote:
Condunum wrote:Maybe you don't know what secular means. Religion does not govern a secular nation. Your god has no place in my government.


Religion does not govern any nation. It's political role is to lay down the moral law to which the nation must abide to. Therefore, God does have a place in your government.

"Religion does not govern any nation. It just governs any nation."

Kay.
password scrambled

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:30 am

Sophian wrote:
Risottia wrote:
Are you vegetarian?

Anyway, let's keep on the thread. The thread is about abortion being legal or illegal, not about being moral or immoral. Morality =/= law.


Of course. The meat industry is outlawed in The Sophian Federation. We replaced meat with tasty meat tasting substitutes made from soy, similar to Morning Star Chik'n.

No such place.


Freiheit Reich wrote:Yes, it reduces crime, is a form of population control, and keeps an unwanted child from being born and living a miserable life.

Biologically it is murder though so I understand why people are against it. The good outweighs the bad though.

Murder is not a biological concept.


Guardland wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Unless you live in the Vatican, the opinion of the Roman Catholic Church doesn't matter.


Nonsence. The doctrines of the Catholic Church apply to every person all around the world.

No, they don't. The Pope can choke on s cardinal's cock for all I care.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:30 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Condunum wrote:There is no biological definition of murder.


OK, it is killing. I will say it is also murder because it is pre-planned by the woman. Killing something on purpose even with just one cell is murder. The college biology teacher said this is why he views abortion as wrong. We all start as a single cell.

Abortion is sad, I wish we made it easier for people to get steralized. Encouraging this with propoganda campaigns would be a good step in the right direction. Uneducated and poor people should be encouraged to get steralized.


Notsureifserious.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Guardland
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 6
Founded: Nov 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Guardland » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:31 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:Got any proof?


I'm sure you'll find the Church's teachings on its role within society in the Catechism.

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:31 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Condunum wrote:There is no biological definition of murder.


OK, it is killing. I will say it is also murder because it is pre-planned by the woman. Killing something on purpose even with just one cell is murder. The college biology teacher said this is why he views abortion as wrong. We all start as a single cell.

Abortion is sad, I wish we made it easier for people to get steralized. Encouraging this with propoganda campaigns would be a good step in the right direction. Uneducated and poor people should be encouraged to get steralized.

Abortion is a moral neutral, as far as I'm concerned.

But no, you cannot call it murder. It must be defined as such to be called murder.
password scrambled

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:32 am

Guardland wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:Got any proof?


I'm sure you'll find the Church's teachings on its role within society in the Catechism.


So thats a no then.
I hereby claim that Individuality-ness is the second coming.
They say abortion is fine. Since it comes from god, obviously our laws need to be based on his opinion.
Do you see the problem yet?
Either come up with an actual argument or you may as well just be making farm animal noises. Your religion has no place here.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:33 am

Condunum wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
OK, it is killing. I will say it is also murder because it is pre-planned by the woman. Killing something on purpose even with just one cell is murder. The college biology teacher said this is why he views abortion as wrong. We all start as a single cell.

Abortion is sad, I wish we made it easier for people to get steralized. Encouraging this with propoganda campaigns would be a good step in the right direction. Uneducated and poor people should be encouraged to get steralized.

Abortion is a moral neutral, as far as I'm concerned.

But no, you cannot call it murder. It must be defined as such to be called murder.


Legalized murder. If I step on a cockroach on purpose I murdered the cockroach.
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:34 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Condunum wrote:Abortion is a moral neutral, as far as I'm concerned.

But no, you cannot call it murder. It must be defined as such to be called murder.


Legalized murder. If I step on a cockroach on purpose I murdered the cockroach.


There is no such thing as legalized murder.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder
Unlawful is a part of the definition.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Albaaa, Emotional Support Crocodile, Forsher, Imperial British State, Kirby0508, Perikuresu, Rary, Siimyardo, Sublime Ottoman State 1800 RP, The Huskar Social Union, The Rio Grande River Basin, Tummylandia and Susistan

Advertisement

Remove ads