NATION

PASSWORD

Cause of Homosexuality and Bisexuality

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What is(are) the cause(s) of Homosexuality and Bisexuality?

Genetics (meaning the make up of the person excluding outside factors)
193
32%
Hormone changes in the womb
65
11%
Temperature changes in the womb
3
1%
Sexual Abuse (You know it had to be on here)
16
3%
Disease (You know it had to be on here)
29
5%
Other (please specify)
91
15%
Combination (please specify)
130
22%
I'm looking for a cop out and this is it
70
12%
 
Total votes : 597

User avatar
Eirenia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 511
Founded: Sep 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Eirenia » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:27 pm

Abatael wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Which doesn't mean you're a homosexual. You don't become a homosexual through random environmental factors after you're born.


I'm not saying it means you're homosexual; I'm sure there are many people, who have done things like that before and are heterosexual.

Then how do you become homosexual, assuming you start of not as a homosexual?


Your assumption is invalid to begin with.
look i have views and opinions
radical queer, feminist, liberal, agnostic non-practicing jew, american
she/her/hers pronouns
Economic Left/Right: -6.88, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.15
cosmopolitan social democrat
yes to: pro-choice, right to die, comprehensive sex education, social security/welfare, affirmative action, animal welfare, evolution, sex positivity, body positivity, queer rights in any form
no to: assimilationism, death penalty, pro-lifers, religious fundamentalism, abstinence-only, drone warfare, war on terror, corporate greed, censorship, TSA, anyone who calls herself/himself an "ally"
fence-sitting: israel/palestine, electoral college, gun control, capitalism, probably other things

User avatar
Eirenia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 511
Founded: Sep 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Eirenia » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:29 pm

Abatael wrote:
Eirenia wrote:
There is NO SUCH THING as a consenting nine year old. Ever. None. Prepubescent children do not consent to sex.


Well, if they're both under the age of consent, then I don't see how it's child molestation.


You must be joking. Right? A prepubescent child being made to do sexual things is child molestation. Always. Children can sexually assault other children.
look i have views and opinions
radical queer, feminist, liberal, agnostic non-practicing jew, american
she/her/hers pronouns
Economic Left/Right: -6.88, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.15
cosmopolitan social democrat
yes to: pro-choice, right to die, comprehensive sex education, social security/welfare, affirmative action, animal welfare, evolution, sex positivity, body positivity, queer rights in any form
no to: assimilationism, death penalty, pro-lifers, religious fundamentalism, abstinence-only, drone warfare, war on terror, corporate greed, censorship, TSA, anyone who calls herself/himself an "ally"
fence-sitting: israel/palestine, electoral college, gun control, capitalism, probably other things

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:29 pm

Abatael wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Such an assumption is idiotic in the first place, so this question is rather asinine.


How is that idiotic? I don't know how humans start off as, and I doubt you do.

Exactly. So making an assumption such as that is stupid. Glad you agree.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Eirenia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 511
Founded: Sep 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Eirenia » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:30 pm

Abatael wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Such an assumption is idiotic in the first place, so this question is rather asinine.


How is that idiotic? I don't know how humans start off as, and I doubt you do.


There is a significant incidence of homosexuality between male identical twins (and fraternal twins to a lesser extent). Homosexuals have different physiological reactions to stimuli than heterosexuals. Homosexuals have neurological differences from heterosexual counterparts.

Explain how this makes sense if there's no biological predisposition towards homosexuality.
look i have views and opinions
radical queer, feminist, liberal, agnostic non-practicing jew, american
she/her/hers pronouns
Economic Left/Right: -6.88, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.15
cosmopolitan social democrat
yes to: pro-choice, right to die, comprehensive sex education, social security/welfare, affirmative action, animal welfare, evolution, sex positivity, body positivity, queer rights in any form
no to: assimilationism, death penalty, pro-lifers, religious fundamentalism, abstinence-only, drone warfare, war on terror, corporate greed, censorship, TSA, anyone who calls herself/himself an "ally"
fence-sitting: israel/palestine, electoral college, gun control, capitalism, probably other things

User avatar
Transhuman Proteus
Senator
 
Posts: 3788
Founded: Mar 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Transhuman Proteus » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:30 pm

Abatael wrote:
CVT Temp wrote:
Do you have evidence or is this just speculation?


It's just a speculation, as I said "I feel," and "I believe." I know how one could test this, but I do not want to risk corrupting the subjects.


You don't need to test it, you need to ask gay people "did you have a SS encounter as a child?" I think you'd be surprised how many said "no".

And remembering - throughout human history, human culture, all kinds of backgrounds, both genders etc. Do you imagine there is a lot of SS hanky panky from kids in Uganda or Iran?

Abatael wrote:
Eirenia wrote:
Burden of proof is on you.

I believe that heterosexuality comes from eating bad food as a child. Prove that this is not the case or else I am right.


I told you what I feel; he's saying this bullshit, so he can prove that epigenetics and womb hormone conditions cause it.


What you feel.

What you feel happens to be fairly fair down the ladder to what is a seriously considered hypothesis about contributing factors to homosexuality (and therefore heterosexuality as well). No one has a definitive answer yet, there are many ideas. So you should show us that your feelings (environmental as in two boys touching one another at a young age) on the subject have anywhere near the same level of serious consideration as things like womb temperature etc, things that have some proof showing biological factors (unalterable biological factors) are involved.
Last edited by Transhuman Proteus on Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Xathranaar
Minister
 
Posts: 3384
Founded: Jul 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Xathranaar » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:31 pm

Abatael wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Such an assumption is idiotic in the first place, so this question is rather asinine.


How is that idiotic? I don't know how humans start off as, and I doubt you do.

Err... yes, we do.

All humans are start off female, so...
My views summarized.
The Gospel According to Queen.
It is possible that some of my posts may not be completely serious.

User avatar
NERVUN
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 29451
Founded: Mar 24, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby NERVUN » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:34 pm

Krownsinburg wrote:I stopped reading his theory after he mentioned phermones being linked to certain genders.

It's a choice, it's not genetic.

Just accept it you Bio-freaks, no one is born Gay.

Knock it off. We don't need baiting or name calling.
To those who feel, life is a tragedy. To those who think, it's a comedy.
"Men, today you'll be issued small trees. Do what you can for the emperor's glory." -Daistallia 2104 on bonsai charges in WWII
Science may provide the means while religion provides the motivation but humanity and humanity alone provides the vehicle -DaWoad

One-Stop Rules Shop, read it, love it, live by it. Getting Help Mod email: nervun@nationstates.net NSG Glossary
Add 10,145 to post count from Jolt: I have it from an unimpeachable source, that Dark Side cookies look like the Death Star. The other ones look like butterflies, or bunnies, or something.-Grave_n_Idle

Proud Member of FMGADHPAC. Join today!

User avatar
Abatael
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6608
Founded: Mar 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Abatael » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:46 pm

Eirenia wrote:
Abatael wrote:
Well, if they're both under the age of consent, then I don't see how it's child molestation.


You must be joking. Right? A prepubescent child being made to do sexual things is child molestation. Always. Children can sexually assault other children.


I did say there was no force or intimidation.

Mavorpen wrote:
Abatael wrote:
How is that idiotic? I don't know how humans start off as, and I doubt you do.

Exactly. So making an assumption such as that is stupid. Glad you agree.


What do you think causes it?

Transhuman Proteus wrote:
Abatael wrote:
I told you what I feel; he's saying this bullshit, so he can prove that epigenetics and womb hormone conditions cause it.


What you feel.

What you feel happens to be fairly fair down the ladder to what is a seriously considered hypothesis about contributing factors to homosexuality (and therefore heterosexuality as well). No one has a definitive answer yet, there are many ideas. So you should show us that your feelings (environmental as in two boys touching one another at a young age) on the subject have anywhere near the same level of serious consideration as things like womb temperature etc, things that have some proof showing biological factors (unalterable biological factors) are involved.


How am I to show it?

It is only a theory, and I have never done any testing on, as I am not interested in discovering the cause of homosexuality. I answered the question. No one knows what it is or has given any evidence proving me wrong, besides saying, "That's so dumb," or "So child molestation cause homosexuality?"

And I don't think about this that much really, so, of course, there would be some issues with it. People are treating this like I'm saying, "No, this is the one and only cause for homosexuality."

Xathranaar wrote:
Abatael wrote:
How is that idiotic? I don't know how humans start off as, and I doubt you do.

Err... yes, we do.

All humans are start off female, so...


What does that have to do with the starting sexuality?
IMPERIVM·NOVVM·VENOLIÆ.
PAX·PER·BELLVM.
ROMVLVS·AVRELIVS·SECVNDVS.
DEVS·VENOLIAM·BENEDICAT.

Second Best Factbook (UNDERGOING MAJOR REVISIONS)| Factbook Rankings | Embassy Program

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:47 pm

Abatael wrote:What do you think causes it?

Some genetic and some external that changes how these genes are expressed.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Abatael
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6608
Founded: Mar 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Abatael » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:49 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Abatael wrote:What do you think causes it?

Some genetic and some external that changes how these genes are expressed.


What would be an external factor?
IMPERIVM·NOVVM·VENOLIÆ.
PAX·PER·BELLVM.
ROMVLVS·AVRELIVS·SECVNDVS.
DEVS·VENOLIAM·BENEDICAT.

Second Best Factbook (UNDERGOING MAJOR REVISIONS)| Factbook Rankings | Embassy Program

User avatar
Xathranaar
Minister
 
Posts: 3384
Founded: Jul 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Xathranaar » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:49 pm

Abatael wrote:
Xathranaar wrote:Err... yes, we do.

All humans are start off female, so...


What does that have to do with the starting sexuality?

It implies that that the default setting is either female hetero, or bisexuality, but not male heterosexuality.
My views summarized.
The Gospel According to Queen.
It is possible that some of my posts may not be completely serious.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:50 pm

Abatael wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Some genetic and some external that changes how these genes are expressed.


What would be an external factor?


Hormonal conditions in the womb would be the most obvious.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Eirenia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 511
Founded: Sep 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Eirenia » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:51 pm

Abatael wrote:
Eirenia wrote:
You must be joking. Right? A prepubescent child being made to do sexual things is child molestation. Always. Children can sexually assault other children.


I did say there was no force or intimidation.


A nine year old cannot consent under any circumstances. it is ALWAYS sexual assault to have sexual content with a nine-year-old. Do you really think a prepubescent child can consent? If you do, you're far more damaged than I am as a gay person.
look i have views and opinions
radical queer, feminist, liberal, agnostic non-practicing jew, american
she/her/hers pronouns
Economic Left/Right: -6.88, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.15
cosmopolitan social democrat
yes to: pro-choice, right to die, comprehensive sex education, social security/welfare, affirmative action, animal welfare, evolution, sex positivity, body positivity, queer rights in any form
no to: assimilationism, death penalty, pro-lifers, religious fundamentalism, abstinence-only, drone warfare, war on terror, corporate greed, censorship, TSA, anyone who calls herself/himself an "ally"
fence-sitting: israel/palestine, electoral college, gun control, capitalism, probably other things

User avatar
Olthar
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59474
Founded: Jun 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Olthar » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:52 pm

Abatael wrote:
Eirenia wrote:
You must be joking. Right? A prepubescent child being made to do sexual things is child molestation. Always. Children can sexually assault other children.


I did say there was no force or intimidation.

Children do not perform sexual activities unless taught that behavior by an adult. It just doesn't happen. Children do not experience sexual desire until puberty hits.
The Second Cataclysm: My New RP

Roll Them Bones: A Guide to Dice RPs

My mommy says I'm special.
Add 37 to my post count for my previous nation.

Copy and paste this into your signature if you're a unique and special individual who won't conform to another person's demands.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:52 pm

Abatael wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Some genetic and some external that changes how these genes are expressed.


What would be an external factor?

Salandria beat me to it.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Xathranaar
Minister
 
Posts: 3384
Founded: Jul 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Xathranaar » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:53 pm

Olthar wrote:
Abatael wrote:
I did say there was no force or intimidation.

Children do not perform sexual activities unless taught that behavior by an adult. It just doesn't happen. Children do not experience sexual desire until puberty hits.

That's not entirely accurate.
My views summarized.
The Gospel According to Queen.
It is possible that some of my posts may not be completely serious.

User avatar
Abatael
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6608
Founded: Mar 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Abatael » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:55 pm

Eirenia wrote:
Abatael wrote:
I did say there was no force or intimidation.


A nine year old cannot consent under any circumstances. it is ALWAYS sexual assault to have sexual content with a nine-year-old. Do you really think a prepubescent child can consent? If you do, you're far more damaged than I am as a gay person.


Do you have a source that they cannot consent? And obviously you aren't speaking about legally consent, because certain nations have age of consent legally.
IMPERIVM·NOVVM·VENOLIÆ.
PAX·PER·BELLVM.
ROMVLVS·AVRELIVS·SECVNDVS.
DEVS·VENOLIAM·BENEDICAT.

Second Best Factbook (UNDERGOING MAJOR REVISIONS)| Factbook Rankings | Embassy Program

User avatar
Olthar
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59474
Founded: Jun 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Olthar » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:55 pm

Xathranaar wrote:
Olthar wrote:Children do not perform sexual activities unless taught that behavior by an adult. It just doesn't happen. Children do not experience sexual desire until puberty hits.

That's not entirely accurate.

Are you saying prepubescent children naturally engage in sexual activities? :eyebrow:
The Second Cataclysm: My New RP

Roll Them Bones: A Guide to Dice RPs

My mommy says I'm special.
Add 37 to my post count for my previous nation.

Copy and paste this into your signature if you're a unique and special individual who won't conform to another person's demands.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:56 pm

Abatael wrote:
Eirenia wrote:
A nine year old cannot consent under any circumstances. it is ALWAYS sexual assault to have sexual content with a nine-year-old. Do you really think a prepubescent child can consent? If you do, you're far more damaged than I am as a gay person.


Do you have a source that they cannot consent? And obviously you aren't speaking about legally consent, because certain nations have age of consent legally.

AFAIK, no nation allows 9 year olds to consent. The lowest age of consent is 12 maybe. I'd have to check.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
San-Silvacian
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12111
Founded: Aug 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby San-Silvacian » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:57 pm

'Gays came out of the womb being fabulous because the womb was a bit to warm'

seems legit.
░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄
░░░█░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░▀▀▀▄░░░░▐█░░░░░░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░░▀█▄
░░█░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░░▀░░░▐█░░░░░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░█▀
░▐▌░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░░░░░░▐█▄▄░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░▐▌
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▄░░░▄█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░▐▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀███▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐▌
░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░░░░░░░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░█

User avatar
Olthar
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59474
Founded: Jun 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Olthar » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:57 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Abatael wrote:
Do you have a source that they cannot consent? And obviously you aren't speaking about legally consent, because certain nations have age of consent legally.

AFAIK, no nation allows 9 year olds to consent. The lowest age of consent is 12 maybe. I'd have to check.

Saudi Arabia is 9 if the child is married.
The Second Cataclysm: My New RP

Roll Them Bones: A Guide to Dice RPs

My mommy says I'm special.
Add 37 to my post count for my previous nation.

Copy and paste this into your signature if you're a unique and special individual who won't conform to another person's demands.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:58 pm

Olthar wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:AFAIK, no nation allows 9 year olds to consent. The lowest age of consent is 12 maybe. I'd have to check.

Saudi Arabia is 9 if the child is married.

Damn loopholes.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Transhuman Proteus
Senator
 
Posts: 3788
Founded: Mar 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Transhuman Proteus » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:58 pm

Abatael wrote:
Transhuman Proteus wrote:
What you feel.

What you feel happens to be fairly fair down the ladder to what is a seriously considered hypothesis about contributing factors to homosexuality (and therefore heterosexuality as well). No one has a definitive answer yet, there are many ideas. So you should show us that your feelings (environmental as in two boys touching one another at a young age) on the subject have anywhere near the same level of serious consideration as things like womb temperature etc, things that have some proof showing biological factors (unalterable biological factors) are involved.


How am I to show it?

It is only a theory, and I have never done any testing on, as I am not interested in discovering the cause of homosexuality. I answered the question. No one knows what it is or has given any evidence proving me wrong, besides saying, "That's so dumb," or "So child molestation cause homosexuality?"

And I don't think about this that much really, so, of course, there would be some issues with it. People are treating this like I'm saying, "No, this is the one and only cause for homosexuality."


First you ask yourself why exactly you think/feel that, and if you have any good reason to think/feel that. And then realize there are a lot of other theories on the subject that point away from what your thinking. Instead of going "Mr Darwin, I hear you are just starting to come up with a theory on the origin of species that isn't biblical - I have no good reason to believe this but my theory is *presents idea with no good reason why it is plausible and goes against everything science is showing as more likely*. Now prove I'm wrong Mr Darwin!"

Then you could consider actual homosexual people, and how many of them say "why yes, as a child I had a homosexual encounter with another child". If you have no reason to think any great number had these imaginary experiences then your theory is in trouble. If you consider it might well be likely more of them had a "heterosexual encounter" - the old playing doctor scenario yet still ended up homosexual? Or walked in on their parents or saw a pornographic magazine etc. Or the passive saturation of heterosexual relationships in society - every child will have seen a lot more straight romances, kisses, fade to blacks on tv, in movies, books, games etc than homosexual ones.

As to no one giving you any evidence to prove you wrong - because it is your claim, and there is no evidence to prove a negative in this case because no science is showing it as plausible - psychology, biology etc are all starting to point in a similar direction, and it isn't to your theory.
Last edited by Transhuman Proteus on Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Xathranaar
Minister
 
Posts: 3384
Founded: Jul 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Xathranaar » Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:00 pm

Olthar wrote:
Xathranaar wrote:That's not entirely accurate.

Are you saying prepubescent children naturally engage in sexual activities? :eyebrow:

Yes. It is a mistake to view children as asexual. They are just not fully sexual.

This does not mean that what Abatael proposes is not abuse.
My views summarized.
The Gospel According to Queen.
It is possible that some of my posts may not be completely serious.

User avatar
Olthar
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59474
Founded: Jun 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Olthar » Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:01 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Olthar wrote:Saudi Arabia is 9 if the child is married.

Damn loopholes.

I think it's a religious thing since Muhammad had a nine year-old wife, and since Muhammad can do no wrong, it must be morally acceptable to marry nine year-olds. :roll:
The Second Cataclysm: My New RP

Roll Them Bones: A Guide to Dice RPs

My mommy says I'm special.
Add 37 to my post count for my previous nation.

Copy and paste this into your signature if you're a unique and special individual who won't conform to another person's demands.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Bienenhalde, Cannot think of a name, Cappedore, Hispida, Ifreann, Incelastan, Kingdom of Englands, Necroghastia, Norse Inuit Union, Rusozak, Ryemarch, Sheizou, Shidei, Stellar Colonies, Techocracy101010, The Crimson Isles, The North Polish Union, Trump Almighty, Umeria, Valyxias

Advertisement

Remove ads