Ohne Zeit wrote:Ja.
Pathetic.
Advertisement

by Eirenia » Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:34 am

by Eirenia » Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:35 am

by Zweite Alaje » Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:36 am
Ohne Zeit wrote:Ja.

by Nazi Flower Power » Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:36 am

by Zweite Alaje » Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:37 am

by Eirenia » Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:38 am

by Xathranaar » Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:41 am
Judy Beth wrote:Identical twins have different fingerprints.
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/rea ... ngerprints
Or this one.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/artic ... -identical
If you wanted to say that both individuals have the same foundational genetics, that would be correct. But the moment they enter the world, they begin to adapt and change. There may be striking similaries such as appearance. But even their genes will differentiate in some fairly major ways, given enough time.
As for homosexuality.. What science has proven is that is it not nurtured. You cannot raise a child to be gay. But science has not determined whether it is genetics or environment, or a combination of the two. As a gay man, I can state that I never "decided" to be gay. I never responded to women sexually, I always responded to men (well, those that bathed on a regular basis and have a car and a 401k) sexually.
There have been some interesting studies.
Brain Mapping and the Gay Brain http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 151845.htm
Hearing Differences for Lesbians http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/19 ... 064433.htm
More Brothers means More Homosexuals http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic ... y-gay.html
Evolutionary Psychology shows Biological Benefits to Homosexity http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/1 ... 90501.html
Which basically means ... "We don't know... but they didn't choose it"
The best argument against this research is: Do these biological difference cause homosexuality, or did the homosexuality create these changes as a response? Again, no one really knows.Tlaceceyaya wrote:Science just exploded.
First, identical twins are DEFINED as having the exact same genes.
Second, the only difference between an identical twin and a clone, aside from how they were made, is their age relative to the comparison. An identical twin will vary by a few minutes - so not at all, for nearly all intents and purposes, whereas a clone will be younger than the original by however long the original had been alive before it was cloned.

by Zweite Alaje » Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:42 am

by Eirenia » Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:45 am
• Homosexual male probands with monozygotic cotwins, dizygotic cotwins, or adoptive brothers were recruited using homophile publications. Sexual orientation of relatives was assessed either by asking relatives directly, or when this was impossible, asking the probands. Of the relatives whose sexual orientation could be rated, 52% (29/56) of monozygotic cotwins, 22% (12/54) of dizygotic cotwins, and 11% (6/57) of adoptive brothers were homosexual. Heritabilities were substantial under a wide range of assumptions about the population base rate of homosexuality and ascertainment bias. However, the rate of homosexuality among nontwin biological siblings, as reported by probands, 9.2% (13/142), was significantly lower than would be predicted by a simple genetic hypothesis and other published reports. A proband's self-reported history of childhood gender nonconformity did not predict homosexuality in relatives in any of the three subsamples. Thus, childhood gender nonconformity does not appear to be an indicator of genetic loading for homosexuality. Cotwins from concordant monozygotic pairs were very similar for childhood gender nonconformity.

by Kilobugya » Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:47 am

by Nazi Flower Power » Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:20 am

by Corporate Investors » Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:27 am
Euronion wrote:Hello NS. I am here because I recently found an article (lost it now) that suggested that there was a correlation between the temperature and hormones in the womb or something like that and homosexuality. This got me thinking as to the cause(s) of Homosexuality. My theory is it is all genetics.I have met people who say that "it just is" and frankly I do not accept that line of argument as it has no backing in facts or evidence. From what I remember from Biology, a simple dumbed down version that is, is that one gender releases pheromones which the other gender detects and is attracted to. There is a difference in pheromone detection and production from male to female and inside the genders as well (explaining why you'd be attracted to one girl and not another). That is at least the way it was explained to me. Now basing off what my Bio teacher told me, I conclude that for someone to be Homosexual, they must detect the same sets of pheromones as opposed to just the opposite set. This would explain bisexuality as well, a person in that case detects both sets of pheromones. Well the next logical question is why. Why do homosexuals and bisexuals have this different detection system. Well the way I look at it is the brain. The brain is the center of everything and therefore it would be logical to assume that this attraction is different because the brains between a homosexual, bisexual, and heterosexual person are different. What would explain their brains being different in the sense of attraction? their construction, and their construction was in their mother's womb according to the genetic blueprint. This would also explain homosexual behavior in other species as well. Therefore I conclude that the cause of homosexuality must be genetics or something else that connects to and can disrupt the construction of the brain. An answer for the question of "why is it so widespread then" could be simply stated that homosexuals concealed their desires for those of their own gender and had children causing their genes and the mutation to pass on to the children, in which case the gene could go unnoticed and or repressed for generations.
That is my view on the cause of homosexuality and bisexuality, I am curious as to what the opinions of those on NS are.

by Xathranaar » Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:31 am
Corporate Investors wrote:Euronion wrote:Hello NS. I am here because I recently found an article (lost it now) that suggested that there was a correlation between the temperature and hormones in the womb or something like that and homosexuality. This got me thinking as to the cause(s) of Homosexuality. My theory is it is all genetics.I have met people who say that "it just is" and frankly I do not accept that line of argument as it has no backing in facts or evidence. From what I remember from Biology, a simple dumbed down version that is, is that one gender releases pheromones which the other gender detects and is attracted to. There is a difference in pheromone detection and production from male to female and inside the genders as well (explaining why you'd be attracted to one girl and not another). That is at least the way it was explained to me. Now basing off what my Bio teacher told me, I conclude that for someone to be Homosexual, they must detect the same sets of pheromones as opposed to just the opposite set. This would explain bisexuality as well, a person in that case detects both sets of pheromones. Well the next logical question is why. Why do homosexuals and bisexuals have this different detection system. Well the way I look at it is the brain. The brain is the center of everything and therefore it would be logical to assume that this attraction is different because the brains between a homosexual, bisexual, and heterosexual person are different. What would explain their brains being different in the sense of attraction? their construction, and their construction was in their mother's womb according to the genetic blueprint. This would also explain homosexual behavior in other species as well. Therefore I conclude that the cause of homosexuality must be genetics or something else that connects to and can disrupt the construction of the brain. An answer for the question of "why is it so widespread then" could be simply stated that homosexuals concealed their desires for those of their own gender and had children causing their genes and the mutation to pass on to the children, in which case the gene could go unnoticed and or repressed for generations.
That is my view on the cause of homosexuality and bisexuality, I am curious as to what the opinions of those on NS are.
Other: Environment

by Nazi Flower Power » Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:34 am

by Eirenia » Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:35 am
Corporate Investors wrote:Euronion wrote:Hello NS. I am here because I recently found an article (lost it now) that suggested that there was a correlation between the temperature and hormones in the womb or something like that and homosexuality. This got me thinking as to the cause(s) of Homosexuality. My theory is it is all genetics.I have met people who say that "it just is" and frankly I do not accept that line of argument as it has no backing in facts or evidence. From what I remember from Biology, a simple dumbed down version that is, is that one gender releases pheromones which the other gender detects and is attracted to. There is a difference in pheromone detection and production from male to female and inside the genders as well (explaining why you'd be attracted to one girl and not another). That is at least the way it was explained to me. Now basing off what my Bio teacher told me, I conclude that for someone to be Homosexual, they must detect the same sets of pheromones as opposed to just the opposite set. This would explain bisexuality as well, a person in that case detects both sets of pheromones. Well the next logical question is why. Why do homosexuals and bisexuals have this different detection system. Well the way I look at it is the brain. The brain is the center of everything and therefore it would be logical to assume that this attraction is different because the brains between a homosexual, bisexual, and heterosexual person are different. What would explain their brains being different in the sense of attraction? their construction, and their construction was in their mother's womb according to the genetic blueprint. This would also explain homosexual behavior in other species as well. Therefore I conclude that the cause of homosexuality must be genetics or something else that connects to and can disrupt the construction of the brain. An answer for the question of "why is it so widespread then" could be simply stated that homosexuals concealed their desires for those of their own gender and had children causing their genes and the mutation to pass on to the children, in which case the gene could go unnoticed and or repressed for generations.
That is my view on the cause of homosexuality and bisexuality, I am curious as to what the opinions of those on NS are.
Other: Environment

by Eirenia » Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:36 am

by Zweite Alaje » Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:48 am


by The Truth and Light » Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:50 am

by Neu Acadie » Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:50 am

by Zweite Alaje » Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:53 am

by The Truth and Light » Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:54 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bhang Bhang Duc, Candesia, Ifreann, Majestic-12 [Bot], Point Blob, Senkaku, Senscaria, Socialistic Britain
Advertisement