BBC caught lying once again

[The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace]

And what exactly about this shocks you?

That there are people with so little time on their hands. Of course, NS exists too, so...

Time in one hand, Internet in the other.

[Frisivisia]

Anyway, now that I look at the source, it seems as if this is a hyper-Zionist website getting upset because the BBC reported something about Israel that wasn't 100% Black Angus Pro-Israel propaganda.

[The Serbian Empire]

All have some bias. The BBC just has a lot less bias than most.

[Conserative Morality]

No. Do not pass go, do not collect 200$.

[Farnhamia]

No. Do not pass go, do not collect 200$.

You put the dollar sign in the wrong place, heretical traitor. Prepare to be deported.

[Conserative Morality]

You put the dollar sign in the wrong place, heretical traitor. Prepare to be deported.

I blame it on the internet letting foreigners in! They've corrupted me!

[Farnhamia]

You put the dollar sign in the wrong place, heretical traitor. Prepare to be deported.

I blame it on the internet letting foreigners in! They've corrupted me!

No excuses. *summons Guards* Put him on a plane ... somewhere. And make sure it's an economy-class seat. Better yet, make it stand-by, see how he likes hanging around the airport.

[San Leggera]

Only if we get to call it the Bingo-Callers Confederacy, too.

Correction:

"Bingo Bango!" - Chandler

[Farnhamia]

Only if we get to call it the Bingo-Callers Confederacy, too.

Correction:

"Bingo Bango!" - Chandler

"She gave me a smile I could feel in my hip pocket." - Raymond Chandler

[Ostroeuropa]

I suppose by the same pedantry and warped logic they use in the link, we should rename this thread as ralkovia caught lying once again and quote the former title.

[Kirrig]

Firstly, Al Quds TV is not merely a “Palestinian broadcaster” – it is a television station owned and run by Hamas. Of course this is not the first time that the BBC has elected to conceal from its audiences the terror connections of Al Quds TV and its sister organization Al Aqsa TV.

Still a Palestinian broadcaster.

[Costa Alegria]

I think the more biased source is probably the BBCWatch site itself.

[Xathranaar]

http://bbcwatch.org/2013/01/16/bbc-tones-down-morsis-support-for-terrorism-against-all-israelis/

So at this point can we proclaim the BBC a biased news organization?

Gee, that site doesn't seem biased at all.

[Onora]

http://bbcwatch.org/2013/01/16/bbc-tones-down-morsis-support-for-terrorism-against-all-israelis/

So at this point can we proclaim the BBC a biased news organization?

Gee, that site doesn't seem biased at all.

The truth often hurts

[Free South Califas]

So at this point can we proclaim the BBC a biased news organization?

Well, yes, they've always been made of humans. Nothing new there.

Or did you mean to make a claim that could possibly be even slightly controversial? Perhaps you could spell it out.

[Kirrig]

Gee, that site doesn't seem biased at all.

The truth often hurts

That's ambiguous. Is it a painful truth for pro-BBC people or pro=BBCWatch people?

[Xathranaar]

The truth often hurts

That's ambiguous. Is it a painful truth for pro-BBC people or pro=BBCWatch people?

I think he's just after me because I put him on ignore when he telegrammed me saying that my parents basically just didn't care enough about us to try and save their relationship.

[Mike the Progressive]

Well no shit. It always was. It just became the douche-intellectual liberal thing to do. "Oh, I can't trust American news organizations, with their biases and corporate backing, I'm going with BBC or dirka dirka Mohammed Jihad one (al jazeera)." My point being all organizations have biases, corporate backing or ones by a government doesn't make you any more or less bias than the other guys.

[Christmahanikwanzikah]

This thread would probably be stronger if it referenced what the BBC did with respect to the whole Jimmy Savile saga.

[Neovilla]

First of all, can anyone clarify the issue here for me because I don;t really get it.

Second, what's wrong about replacing the word "Zionists" with "Jewish settlers". Doesn;t those two mean the same thing?

[Souseiseki]

BBC not sufficiently biased in Israels favour, shows blatant anti-semetic anti-Israel left-wing bias yet again.Thinking back I remember myself watching the BBC and watching them refuse to allow the address of Gaza aid appeals to be broadcast and now I am sad, because that time I am sure I must have missed an excellent NSG thread about it.

http://i.imgur.com/J2oYW.jpg

[Souseiseki]

Well no shit. It always was. It just became the douche-intellectual liberal thing to do. "Oh, I can't trust American news organizations, with their biases and corporate backing, I'm going with BBC or dirka dirka Mohammed Jihad one (al jazeera)." My point being all organizations have biases, corporate backing or ones by a government doesn't make you any more or less bias than the other guys.

ahahahahahahahahahahahaha look at this post

[Souseiseki]

oh hey, MEMRI

aren't those the guys that are kinda infamous for their inaccurate translations

now, i'm not saying that the guys that are infamous their possibly deliberately inaccurate translations are a bad source for when you're bitching that the BBC did not translate a speech in a way you liked, but maybe they are

just my 2 cents, or rather would that be 3 cents, because i have thus far made 3 posts?

[Liriena]

It's still the single most reliable news source in the world...and their documentaries are awesome!

[Liriena]

Well no shit. It always was. It just became the douche-intellectual liberal thing to do. "Oh, I can't trust American news organizations, with their biases and corporate backing, I'm going with BBC or dirka dirka Mohammed Jihad one (al jazeera)." My point being all organizations have biases, corporate backing or ones by a government doesn't make you any more or less bias than the other guys.

Forgive the following emoticon: