Samozaryadnyastan wrote:Genivaria wrote:May I ask a slightly controversial question?
Why exactly is it that we treat the Bill of Rights as if they were gospel?
Why is it that we always use the Bill of Rights and the Founding Fathers as its own argument?
The Founding Fathers lived 200 years ago in a vastly different world of differing values and circumstances, why should what they say matter?
They were men, not gods, men.
On this issue I'm going to say right now that the 2nd Amendment is wrong.
Then the entirety of America, as an entity is wrong.
The Bill of Rights and the Constitution defines every aspect of your country.
To declare it forfeit and start again is wut and impossible.
He didn't say the entire Constitution, he said "the 2nd Amendment". Despite what the NRA may have lead you to believe, there is more to the Constitution than the 2nd Amendment, much more. For example, this bit:
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html wrote:Article. V.
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.





